Prevention by prescription? – Dilemmas of a medicalized approach to physical activity
Abstract
Introduction: Physical inactivity is one of the most significant risk factors for chronic, non-communicable diseases, but it is questionable whether medical "prescriptions" are an appropriate tool for promoting prevention at the population level. The Physical Activity on Prescription (PAP) program provides a health response to this need by integrating physical activity into primary care as a medical intervention.
Opinion: However, a critical analysis of the study points out that the impact of the program is hampered by structural and conceptual limitations. The overburdening of family doctors, regional inequalities in exercise therapy infrastructure and specialist availability, and funding uncertainty significantly limit its feasibility. An even more fundamental problem is that the doctor-centered, biomedical approach of the PAP is unable to address the complex determinants of lifestyle, particularly nutrition, substance use, and the role of the social and physical environment. Since family doctors typically see patients who are already ill, the program is primarily a secondary and tertiary prevention tool and is of limited use for primary prevention at the population level. The study argues that sustainable increases in physical activity are more effectively served by environmental and cultural interventions at the municipal and community levels, as well as integrated lifestyle programs.
Conclusions: Prescribing exercise alone is not enough: real public health impact can only be achieved through comprehensive, intersectoral health promotion strategies.
References
Anderson, E., & Durstine, J. L. (2019). Physical activity, exercise, and chronic diseases: A brief review. Sports medicine and health science, 1(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhs.2019.08.006
Budapest Főváros Önkormányzata. Budapest 2030 – Integrált településfej-lesztési stratégia. Budapest; 2023
Dibben, G. O., Dalal, H. M., Taylor, R. S., Doherty, P., Tang, L. H., & Hillsdon, M. (2018). Cardiac rehabilitation and physical activity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart (British Cardiac Society), 104(17), 1394–1402. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312832
Garrett, S., Elley, C. R., Rose, S. B., O'Dea, D., Lawton, B. A., & Dowell, A. C. (2011). Are physical activity interventions in primary care and the community cost-effective? A systematic review of the evidence. The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 61(584), e125–e133. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X561249
Giles-Corti, B., Vernez-Moudon, A., Reis, R., Turrell, G., Dannenberg, A. L., Badland, H., Foster, S., Lowe, M., Sallis, J. F., Stevenson, M., & Owen, N. (2016). City planning and population health: a global challenge. Lancet (London, England), 388(10062), 2912–2924. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30066-6
Green, L. W., & Kreuter, M. W. (2005). Health program planning: An educational and ecological approach (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Heath, G. W., Parra, D. C., Sarmiento, O. L., Andersen, L. B., Owen, N., Goenka, S., Montes, F., Brownson, R. C., & Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group (2012). Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. Lancet (London, England), 380(9838), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60816-2
Kallings, L. V. (2016). The Swedish model of physical activity on prescription. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(14), 826–827. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095901.
Kovács, V. A., Kósa, K., Németh, Á., Bakacs, M., Heisz, T., & Vitrai, J. (2021). A fizikai inaktivitás népegészségügyi jelentősége Magyarországon. Magyar Sporttudományi Szemle, 22(1), 4–15.
Központi Statisztikai Hivatal. Sportlétesítmények és sportszakemberek eloszlása, 2023. Budapest: Központi Statisztikai Hivatal; 2024
Lee, I. M., Shiroma, E. J., Lobelo, F., Puska, P., Blair, S. N., Katzmarzyk, P. T., & Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group (2012). Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet (London, England), 380(9838), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9
Oja, P., Titze, S., Bauman, A., de Geus, B., Krenn, P., Reger-Nash, B., & Kohlberger, T. (2011). Health benefits of cycling: a systematic review. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 21(4), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01299.x
Papp, M. C. (2021). The human resource crisis in Hungarian primary care: A longitudinal perspective (PhD thesis). Debreceni Egyetem, Debrecen.
Pedersen, B. K., & Saltin, B. (2015). Exercise as medicine - evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 25 Suppl 3, 1–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12581.
Persson, G., Brorsson, A., Ekvall Hansson, E., Hansson, P., & Strandberg, E. L. (2013). Physical activity on prescription (PAP) in primary health care: A 2-year follow-up of patients’ physical activity and quality of life. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 31(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2013.797177
Sallis, J. F., Bull, F., Guthold, R., Heath, G. W., Inoue, S., Kelly, P., Oyeyemi, A. L., Perez, L. G., Richards, J., Hallal, P. C., & Lancet Physical Activity Series 2 Executive Committee (2016). Progress in physical activity over the Olympic quadrennium. Lancet (London, England), 388(10051), 1325–1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30581-5
Warburton, D. E., Nicol, C. W., & Bredin, S. S. (2006). Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 174(6), 801–809. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051351
WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
World Health Organization. Healthy Cities – promoting health and equity through good urban governance. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2020.
World Health Organization. Global status report on physical activity 2022. Geneva: WHO; 2022.
