Prevention or treatment? – The dilemma of local government health strategies
Prevention-based, cost-effective, and community-based solutions in local implementation
Abstract
Background: In this public health-oriented opinion paper, the author formulates recommendations for the implementation of local government health strategies, drawing on key principles emphasized in contemporary international literature.
Opinion: The five proposed interventions are the strategic separation and allocation of funding between prevention and healthcare services, the establishment of a Community Health Development Office, the operation of community coalitions, the initiation of healthy school programs, and the development of an integrated, community-based local human services model. They form a coherent and deliberately focused package of actions. Compared to multiple parallel, fragmented measures, this concentrated approach is more likely to produce measurable outcomes by enabling clear priorities, a consistent direction of action, and accountable implementation.
Conclusions: Together, the proposed interventions offer a coherent, evidence-informed implementation framework that simultaneously promotes population health and well-being, strengthens local communities, and supports the achievement of municipal strategic goals. A participatory and partnership-based approach is expected to increase public satisfaction and local trust, both of which are key public policy values for municipalities. Furthermore, the active involvement of community and economic stakeholders may mobilize additional human and financial resources: collaboration with local businesses, institutions, and civil organizations can broaden the reach of programs while enhancing the cost-effectiveness and social return on municipal investments.
References
Bovaird, T. (2007), Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review, 67: 846-860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
Cyril, S., Smith, B. J., Possamai-Inesedy, A., & Renzaho, A. M. (2015). Exploring the role of community engagement in improving the health of disadvantaged populations: a systematic review. Global health action, 8, 29842. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.29842
Hartmann, D. (2001). Notes on Midnight Basketball and the Cultural Politics of Recreation, Race, and At-Risk Urban Youth. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 25(4), 339-371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723501254002
Heckman J. J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science (New York, N.Y.), 312(5782), 1900–1902. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128898
Kristjansson, A. L., Mann, M. J., Sigfusson, J., Thorisdottir, I. E., Allegrante, J. P., & Sigfusdottir, I. D. (2020). Implementing the Icelandic Model for Preventing Adolescent Substance Use. Health promotion practice, 21(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839919849033
Massey, W. V., & Whitley, M. A. (2016). The role of sport for youth amidst trauma and chaos. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 8(5), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2016.1204351
Masters, R., Anwar, E., Collins, B., Cookson, R., & Capewell, S. (2017). Return on investment of public health interventions: a systematic review. Journal of epidemiology and community health, 71(8), 827–834. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-208141
O’Mara-Eves, A., Brunton, G., McDaid, D., Oliver, S., Kavanagh, J., Jamal, F., Matosevic, T., Harden, A., & Thomas, J. (2013). Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis. NIHR Journals Library. https://doi.org/10.3310/phr01040
Owen, L., Pennington, B., Fischer, A., & Jeong, K. (2018). The cost-effectiveness of public health interventions examined by NICE from 2011 to 2016. Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 40(3), 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx119
Rifkin S. B. (2014). Examining the links between community participation and health outcomes: a review of the literature. Health policy and planning, 29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2), ii98–ii106. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu076
Schools for Health in Europe (2021) EIE Iskolai Kézikönyv 2.0. Módszertani útmutató az egészségfejlesztő iskolává váláshoz. ISBN 978-87-94161-08-4. https://www.schoolsforhealth.org/sites/default/files/editor/health-promoting-school/hungarian-she-school-manual2-0.pdf
Society for Public Health Education (2016) Coalition Guide Resource. https://www.sophe.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Full-Resource-Guide.pdf
The Kings Fund (2024) Realising the potential of integrated care systems Developing system-wide solutions to workforce challenges. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/reports/integrated-care-systems-workforce
World Health Organization (2017). Shanghai declaration on promoting health in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Health promotion international, 32(1), 7–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daw103
World Health Organization (2020) Commu-nity engagement: a health promotion guide for universal health coverage in the hands of the people. ISBN: 9789240010529. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240010529
