Why and how should you write a technical article using AI? AI has the answer

Abstract

Objective: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) is currently surrounded by both enthusiasm and skepticism: some see it as a revolutionary breakthrough, while others regard it as an overrated tool. Practical experience is equally ambivalent — AI can be impressive in some cases, yet surprisingly superficial in others. This paper aims to explore this ambivalence and to address the question posed in the title by involving AI systems themselves in the inquiry.

Accomplishment: The study analyzes a “dialogue” between two leading AI systems, ChatGPT and Google Gemini. The question was first posed to ChatGPT, and its response was subsequently evaluated using Google Gemini. The same question was then presented to Google Gemini, and its response was assessed by ChatGPT. This process created a form of mutual “peer review,” in which AI systems acted not only as respondents but also as critical evaluators.

Conclusions: Both AI systems were able to provide structured and practically useful summaries of the advantages and risks of AI use, while also offering meaningful refinement to each other’s responses. The findings suggest that AI can be engaged not only as a tool but also as a reflective partner in scientific work. The combined use of multiple AI systems may enhance not only the depth of analysis but also the practice of critical thinking.