Theoretical Foundations and Lessons Learned from the Systematic Scoping Review
Abstract
In our study, we present an example of a literature collection and systematization process that underpins scientific research, the VosViewer application and the PRISMA model, which is increasingly popular in business, as well. The PRISMA model was originally developed in the field of health and medical research, which has gradually been generalised. Perhaps, all that is thanks to the popular free application of VosViewer. Additionally, we have also investigated how the artificial intelligence-led chatbot application can support the literature review phase.
We have experienced, discovered, and learned how to use systematic and scoping review, which means that our article is not from the scientific field of library and information science, but rather a sort of user manual, however it analyses and evaluates scientifically. The question is given: what is the added value of this technique compared to traditional or conventional literature collection? The investigated method (i.e., systematic review) is traced through secondary data (aka articles with the same methodology), pointing out both its true value and its pitfalls.
Our results show that these new methods are not a complete substitute for traditional literature review or systematisation, at least not for the reading and processing of literature, but they are an excellent starting point for the systematisation of international literature in English and, in our experience, in Hungarian, too. Finally, this method provides a track in order to discover a new direction for a possible research niche.
References
Ágoston, N., 2022. Külföldi csődelőrejelző módszerek szisztematikus irodalomelemzése. Vezetéstudomány; Corvinus University of Budapest. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2022.01.06
Aranyossy, M., & Szabó, K., 2022. Nascent entrepreneurship : A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Vezetéstudomány; Corvinus University of Budapest. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2022.11.03
Babbie, E., 1989. A társadalomtudományi kutatás gyakorlata. Negyedik kiadás. Balassi Kiadó, Budapest
Batizi, D., 2023. A karrierút és a személyiségjegyek kapcsolata : Szisztematikus szakirodalmi áttekintés. Vezetéstudomány; Corvinus University of Budapest. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2023.04.02
Biswas, S., 2023. Role of Chat GPT in Education (February 25, 2023). [online] Elérhető: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4369981 (2023. 05. 23.)
BMJ, 2021. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Boncz, B. & Szabó, R.Z., 2022. A mesterséges intelligencia munkaerő-piaci hatásai Hogyan készüljünk fel? Vezetéstudomány; Corvinus University of Budapest. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2022.02.06
Cotton, D.R.E. Cotton, P.A. Shipway, J.R., 2023. Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Dwivedi, Y.K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E.L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A.K., Baabdullah, A.M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M.A., Al-Busaidi, A.S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D. & Wright, R., 2023. “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Gelencsér, M., Végvári, B. & Szabó-Szentgróti, G., 2022. A munkaerő-megtartás és a well-being kapcsolatának elemzése nemzetközi kutatásokban. Vezetéstudomány; Corvinus University of Budapest. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2022.06.04
Green, C.D., Feinerer, I., Burman, J.T., 2015. Searching for the structure of early American psychology: Networking Psychological Review , 1894–1908. History of Psychology, 18(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038406
Grozdics, A.T., 2022. A home office megítélésének és a pandémia hatásának vizsgálata a szisztematikus irodalomelemzés módszerével. Vezetéstudomány; Corvinus University of Budapest. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2022.10.02
Hosseini, M. Rasmussen, L.M. & Resnik, D.B., 2023. Using AI to write scholarly publications, Accountability in Research. [online] https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535
ILO, 2020. ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the world of work. Fourth edition. 27 May 2020.
ILO Monitor, 2020. Youth COVID-19: Impacts on jobs, education, rights and mental well-being. 2020. April. 7
Kamarási, V. & Mogyorósy, G., 2015. Systematic surveys of literature – importance and methodology. Support in diagnostics and therapy. Orvosi Hetilap, 156(38), 1523–1531.
Katona, D., 2022. Customer Involvement. A Systematic Literature Review of the Definition, Measurement, and Innovation Outcomes. Vezetéstudomány; Corvinus University of Budapest. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2022.05.05
Kuhn, S.T., 1984. A tudományos forradalmak szerkezete. Budapest, Gondolat Könyvkiadó
Li, X., Primecz, H., & Paget, A., 2023. Understanding the early career self-initiated expatriation. Vezetéstudomány; Corvinus University of Budapest. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2023.05.02
Lund, B., & Wang, T., 2023. Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News; Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/lhtn-01-2023-0009
Matthews, B. & Ross, L., 2010. Research methods. A practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education Limited, England
Munn, Z., Peters, M.D.J., Stern, C., Tufănaru, C., McArthur, A. & Aromataris, E., 2018. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology; Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
O’Connor, A.M., Tsafnat, G., Thomas, J., Glasziou, P., Gilbert, S.B. & Hutton, B., 2019. A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies? Systematic Reviews; Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1062-0
Okoli, Ch. & Schabram, K., 2010. A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1954824
Page M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J.M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M.M., Li, T., Loder, E.W., Mayo, Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L.A., Stewart, L.A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A.C., Welch, V.A., Whiting, P. & Moher, D., 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pistrui, B. & Harmat, V., 2022. A szolgáltató robotok definiálása és alkalmazási lehetőségei az üzleti szervezetekben. Szisztematikus irodalmi áttekintés. Vezetéstudomány; Corvinus University of Budapest. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2022.01.05
Rudolph CW. Zacher H., 2020. The COVID-19 Generation: A Cautionary Note. Work Aging Retire. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waaa009
Salvagno, M., Taccone, F.S., & Gerli, A.G. 2023. Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Critical Care; BioMed Central. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2
Snyder, H., 2019. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, Volume 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
Szabó, K., 2002. Kommunikáció felsőfokon. Kossuth Kiadó, Budapest.
Szokolszky, Á., 2004. Kutatómunka a pszichológiában. Osiris Tankönyvek, Budapest.
Tranfield, D., Denyerű, D. & Smart, P., 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice, 285-320. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:169752113
Van Eck, N.J. & Waltman, L., 2011. Text mining and visualization using VosViewer. ISSI Newsletter, 7(3), 50-54.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1109.2058
Webster, J. & Watson, R.T., 2002. Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1.1.104.6570.
