Review of the Member States' decision based on the exercise of their fiscal authority in the light of the CJEU's case law

Repayment of support or unlawful taxes in case of final decisions

  • Róbert Szuchy Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary, Faculty of Law, Department of Commercial Law and Financial Law
  • Ágoston Korom Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary, Faculty of Law, Department of Civil Law and Roman Law
Keywords: Reimbursement of taxes violating EU law and aids which are not compatible with the internal market, exceptions to the final judgment, in which cases can the final judgements be reviewed, special rules to the reimbursement of aids which are not compatible with the internal market

Abstract

The Member States collect taxes during exercising their fiscal competencies and grant aids to the economic operators. The Member States’ margin of appreciation is not unlimited in this field, it often occurs that an aid provided for an economic operator, or a collected tax does not meet the requirements of the EU law. In these cases, in general, especially, if the aid is not compatible with the internal market, the taxes and aids should be reimbursed. An exception to this general rule, if the decision has become final, in these cases the EU law does not require reviewing the decisions. However, this exception cannot be applied in every case, moreover, the aids which are not compatible with the internal market require specific rules. In this paper, we examine in which cases can we forget the Member State’s final judgement. Reimbursement of significant state aids or taxes which were being paid for years can seriously affect the economic operators’ and the member States’ budgets.

Author Biographies

Róbert Szuchy, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary, Faculty of Law, Department of Commercial Law and Financial Law

Associate Professor

Ágoston Korom, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary, Faculty of Law, Department of Civil Law and Roman Law

Assistant professor, Researcher

References

Turmo, A., 2017. L’autorité de la chose jugée en droit de l’Union européenne, Bruxelles: Bruylant, Coll. Droit de l'Union européenne, ss-coll. Thèses.

Coutron, L., 2014. L’obligation de renvoi préjudiciel á la Cour de justice: une obligation sanctionnée? Bruxelle: Bruylant.

Rondu, J., 2020. L’individu, sujet du droit de L’Union européenne. Bruxelles: Bruylant.

Clément-Wilz, L. 2019., Le role politique de la Cour de justice de L’Union européenne. Bruxelles: Bruylant.

Blumann, C. & Dubouis, L., 2019. Droit matériel de L’Union Européenne. LGDJ.

Protectionnisme et Droit de L’Union européenne, sous la direction de Ségolene Barbou des Places. Paris: Pedone, 2014

Gyenei L., 2020. Európai uniós polgárság. In: Jakab A.; Könczöl M.; Menyhárdt A. & Sulyok G. (szerk) Internetes Jogtudományi Enciklopédia (EU jog rovat, rovatszerkesztő: Várnay, E.; Varju, M.; Horváthy, B.) http://ijoten.hu6szocikk/europai-unis-polgsg (A letöltés dátuma: 2021.05.02.)

Barbato, J. C. & Mouton, J. D., 2010. Vers la reconnaisance de droits fondamentaux aux États membres de l’union européenne? Rélfexions á partir des notions d’identité et solidarité. Bruxelles Bruylant.

Published
2022-08-31
How to Cite
SzuchyR., & Korom Ágoston. (2022). Review of the Member States’ decision based on the exercise of their fiscal authority in the light of the CJEU’s case law: Repayment of support or unlawful taxes in case of final decisions. Multidisciplinary Challenges, Diverse Responses - Journal of Management and Business Administration, (1), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.33565/MKSV.2022.01.06
Section
Review