From Pixels to Policy to the Court: The Current Legal and Jurisdictional Landscape of the Use of Remote Sensing Data for Environmental Protection in the EU

  • Camilla ACQUARONE Doctor in Space Law at the University of Paris Cité, France; Contract Manager – Launch Services, AVIO S.p.A https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0664-1050
  • Pranav SATYANATH Policy associate at SkyServe
  • Virginia MARAGLINO EUSPA – Security Authority Department – Administrative Support
  • Marie-Claire DE BRUIJN University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • Avisha PAWAR Sales Associate – AAC Clyde Space
  • László MEZEY PhD Candidate in Space Law at the University of Miskolc, Hungary; Intern at Central European Academy https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3830-1259
  • Rana ALSHAERI Regulatory and Legal Jr. Associate at Neo Space Group
  • Laurène MUSELET Master’s in Geographical Information Science at Lund University, Sweden
Keywords: Remote Sensing Data, Environmental Law, Sustainable Development, Space Policy, Earth Observation, Data Admissibility

Abstract

The paper analyses the legal framework for the collection and distribution of remote sensing data, particularly in the field of sustainable development and environmental protection at the European level. The research firstly focuses on the historical evolution of space law at the international, European, and national levels, starting from the 1970s. In parallel, environmental law has rapidly developed since the Stockholm Conference of 1972, with thousands of sources regulating aspects related to nature, the environment, and sustainable development. However, the effectiveness of environmental law remains a challenge due to technical difficulties, high costs, and a lack of awareness at all levels. To overcome these obstacles, remote sensing offers valuable information for environmental policies, from conception to implementation. Therefore, satellite observation is considered to analyse whether the data obtained through remote sensing can have a real impact on environmental protection, supporting this sometimes-flawed legislation. A legal framework was established with UN Resolution 41/65 in 1986, defining principles of cooperation and access to satellite data, particularly for natural disasters. Europe, through its institutions and policies, plays a key role in the development of environmental law and the promotion of new technologies to facilitate the application of these rules and the deployment of ambitious policies. A preliminary question is whether European institutions are the most suitable legislative and judicial level to ensure environmental compliance or if controls and decision-making at the local level are more effective, although this effectiveness is difficult to assess. Regarding the use of remote sensing, despite the growing availability of satellite data and a move towards an ‘Open Data’ system promoting sharing, use, and archiving of these data through a favourable European framework, legal and technical constraints hinder free use in all areas. Limitations may exist due to risks to privacy or intellectual property. Additionally, certain applications of satellite data remain underutilised due to prohibitions related to national security or diplomatic reasons. One of the main obstacles at the member state level of the European Union is the reluctance of legal bodies and the courts to accept satellite data as evidence, often due to a lack of understanding of the technology and concerns about data accuracy and confidentiality. Furthermore, cost and technical complexity issues limit the widespread adoption of these technologies. From a legal and academic perspective, it is interesting to compare the approaches of member states, in light of the different rules of civil, criminal, and administrative procedure, and to identify anomalies or barriers to the admissibility of evidence from remote sensing. In conclusion, data derived from remote sensing offers powerful tools for environmental protection, but their effective use requires international cooperation, robust legal frameworks, and increased stakeholder awareness. To maximise the impact of these technologies, it is essential to overcome legal and technical obstacles and encourage broader and more informed adoption of these innovative tools, harmonising the practices of member states.

References

Baumann I (2015) Liability for GNSS signals and services, Inside GNSS 10(6).

Bhalla P (2014) Regulating Satellite Remote Sensing, CLAWS Journal, pp. 98–115.

Billiet CM (2012) Satellite images as evidence for environmental crime in Europe: A judge’s perspective, in: Purdy R & Leung D (eds.) Evidence from earth observation satellites: emerging legal issues, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, pp. 322–328, https://tinyurl.com/yh322fk8 [11.11.2024].

Bu-Pasha S & Kuusniemi H (2020) Data protection and space: What challenges will the General Data Protection Regulation face when dealing with space-based data?, Journal of Data Protection & Privacy 4(1), pp. 52–58.

Bu-Pasha S, Allen-Savikko A, Makinen J, Guinness R & Korpisaari P (2016) EU law perspectives on location data privacy in smartphones and informed consent for transparency, European Data Protection Law Review 2, p. 312.

College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (2002) LJN AD9994, AWB 01/550 – Partnership A and B to C v. Minister of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries in The Hague, 01.03.2002.

College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (2009) ECLI:NL:CBB:2009:BI4304 LJN BI4304, AWB 07/442, http://jure.nl/bi4304 [28.09.2024].

Colwell RN (1984) From photographic interpretation to remote sensing, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 50(9), pp. 1305–1307.

Copernicus (no date) Accès aux données – DIAS, https://www.copernicus.eu/fr/ acces-aux-donnees/dias [16.04.2025].

Court of Cassation (2021) Sentence n° 39087/2021 – Caliandro Case, https:// tinyurl.com/mr2vpmaj [30.09.2024].

De Leeuw J, Georgiadou Y, Kerle N, De Gier A, Inoue Y, Ferwerda J et al. (2010) The function of remote sensing in support of environmental policy, Remote Sensing 2(7), pp. 1731–1750.

Decreto del Presidente della Repubblica (1988) n. 447 Approvazione del codice di procedura penale, art. 234, https://tinyurl.com/3c4pc6hp [14.11.2024].

Deekshatulu BL & Kamat DS (1983) Data processing in remote sensing, Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences Section C: Engineering Sciences 6(2), pp. 135–144, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02842930.

Dighe K, Mikolop T, Mushal RW, & O’Connell D (2012) The use of satellite imagery in environmental crimes prosecutions in the United States: A developing area, in Purdy R, & Leung D (ed.) Evidence from Earth Observation Satellites: Emerging Legal Issues (Vol. 7), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, pp. 65–70.

Epstein JM (1995) Global Positioning System (GPS): Defining the legal issues of its expanding civil use, Journal of Air Law and Commerce 61, p. 243.

ESA (no date) The Sentinel Missions, https://www.esa.int/Applications/ Observing_the_Earth/Copernicus/The_Sentinel_missions [16.04.2025].

EU Agency for the Space Programme (2023) EU Space for Green Transformation: A New Tool for Companies to Monitor Their Sustainability Targets, https://tinyurl. com/tz7s8kvs [16.04.2025].

EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (2007) Title VI: Justice, Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial, Official Journal of the European Union, C 303/17, https://fra.europa.eu/en/eu-charter/article/47-right-effective-remedy- and-fair-trial [16.04.2025].

European Parliament & Council of the European Union (1996) Directive 96/9/EC on the legal protection of databases, Official Journal of the European Communities L 77/20, http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1996/9/oj [16.04.2025].

European Parliament & Council of the European Union (2008) Directive 2008/99/EC on the protection of the environment through criminal law, Official Journal of the European Union L 328/28, http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/99/oj [16.04.2025].

European Space Agency (no date) Remote Sensing Data, https://www.esa.int/ About_Us/Law_at_ESA/Intellectual_Property_Rights/Remote_sensing_data [16.04.2025].

European Union (1997) Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts, European Commission.

European Union Agency for the Space Programme (2024) EO and GNSS Market Report, Issue 2, Publications Office of the European Union, https://data.europa. eu/doi/10.2878/73092 [28.10.2024].

Federal Constitutional Court (2006) 1 BvR 507/01 – NJW 2006, 2836, 2837, https://tinyurl.com/57eadxpy [16.04.2025].

Gabrynowicz J (2012) The U.N. Principles Relating to Remote Sensing of the Earth from Outer Space and Soft Law, in: Marboe I (ed.) Soft Law in Outer Space: The Function of Non-Binding Norms in International Space Law, Böhlau Verlag, Vienna.

Gabrynowicz J (2015) Commentary on the Principles Relating to Remote Sensing of the Earth from Outer Space, in: Hobe S, Schmidt-Tedd B & Schrogl D-U (eds.) Cologne Commentary on Space Law, Vol. III, pp. 88–188.

Geneva Environment Network (2024) Human Rights and the Environment, https://tinyurl.com/47xcb3m4 [08.11.2024].

Goward SN, Williams DL, Arvidson T, Rocchio LE, Irons JR, Russell CA et al. (2022) Landsat’s Enduring Legacy: Pioneering global land observations from space, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 88(6).

Gummadi G & Gupta B (2022) Remote sensing data and international IP laws, Journal of Legal Subjects 20(2), pp. 13–28.

Guo H, Goodchild MF, & Annoni A (2020) Manual of digital Earth, Springer Nature, Berlin, p. 852.

Hitchens T (2023) NOAA eases licensing restrictions on commercial remote sensing, Breaking Defense, https://tinyurl.com/4zhsdb86 [10.11.2024].

Hyperion Project EU (2019) Demonstration Case C in the City of Venice (Italy), https://www.hyperion-project.eu/demonstration-case-c-in-the-city-of- venice-italy/ [30.09.2024].

Illert A (2009) Infrastructure for spatial information in Europe (INSPIRE) – Status report on the development of implementing rules for geographical names data, United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names, pp. 1–7, https://tinyurl.com/cppfu67w [16.04.2025].

Institut Français d’Histoire de l’Espace (2018) Earth Observation from Space: Optical and Radar Imagery, a European Success, Foreword.

Ito A (2011) Legal Aspects of Satellite Remote Sensing, Vol. 5, Brill, Leiden.

Jacobsen K (1998) Geometric calibration of space remote sensing cameras for efficient processing, International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 32, pp. 33–43.

Keijser N (2018) Civil legal expert examination in Netherlands: Situation and development, European Expertise & Expert Institute, https://experts-institute. eu/en/expertise-law-and-jurisprudence/civil-legal-expert-examination-in- netherlands/ [16.04.2025].

Kwok A (2024) Eyes in the sky: Clarifying guidelines for space-based imagery in mass atrocity prosecutions, Opinio Juris, https://tinyurl.com/27j9fbav [08.11.2024].

Liang S (2017) Comprehensive Remote Sensing, Elsevier Science, Netherlands, pp. 181–185.

Lins HF (1979) Some legal considerations in remote sensing, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 45(6), pp. 1059–1063.

London Institute of Space Policy and Law (2012) Evidence from Space: Study for the ESA on Use of Space-Derived EO Information as Evidence in Judicial and Administrative Proceedings, Document ESA-ISPL/EO 76/final.

Meguro M (2020) State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation, American Journal of International Law 114(4), pp. 729–735.

Mohr JJ & Madsen SN (2001) Geometric calibration of ERS satellite SAR images, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39(4), pp. 842–850.

Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P & Hugentobler U (2021) Sentinel-6 Michael Freilich: Precise orbit determination using ambiguity-fixed GPS carrier phase observations, Remote Sensing 13(6), p. 1235.

Nagler T, Rott H, Hetzenecker M, Wuite J & Potin P (2015) The Sentinel-1 mission: New opportunities for ice sheet observations, Remote Sensing 7(7), pp. 9371–9389.

NASA (2024) Remote Sensing, Earth Science Data Systems, https://www. earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/backgrounders/remote-sensing [07.11.2024].

NASA (no date) Landsat History, https://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/satellites/ history/ [16.04.2025].

Natural Resources Canada (2013) Image classification and analysis, Government of Canada, https://tinyurl.com/2s4k2u56 [16.04.2025].

Netherlands Judicial System (no date) Judicial System Netherlands, http://www. rechtspraak.nl/English/Judicial-System/Pages/default.aspx [16.04.2025].

Neuruppin Regional Court (2010) Judgement of 03.07.2010 – 11 Ks 321 Js 2/09.

OECD (2022) Environmental Performance Reviews, https://www.oecd.org/ environment/country-reviews/2958654.pdf [16.04.2025].

OLG Düsseldorf (2021) Judgement of 05.02.2021 – 2 RBs 191/20, https://tinyurl. com/bddsax3x [16.04.2025].

Purdy R (2006) Satellites: A new era for environmental compliance?, Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 3(5), pp. 406–413.

Purdy R (2010) Using earth observation technologies for better regulatory compliance and enforcement of environmental laws, Journal of Environmental Law 22(1), pp. 59–87.

Purdy R & Leung D (eds.) (2012) Evidence from Earth Observation Satellites: Emerging Legal Issues (Vol. 7), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden.

Rechtbank Den Haag (2015) C/09/456689 / HA ZA 13-1396 – Urgenda Foundation v. State of the Netherlands, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:7196, https://tinyurl.com/ yck88nve [16.04.2025].

Scoles S (2018) How the government controls sensitive satellite data, The Wired 2.

Sergieieva K (no date) Historical satellite images: Assessing the old data, EOS Data Analytics, https://eos.com/blog/historical-satellite-images/ [16.04.2025].

Showstack R (2022) Eyes in the sky serve as a valuable tool for stewardship, BioScience 72(3), pp. 226–232.

Slater PN, Biggar SF, Holm RG, Jackson RD, Mao Y, Moran MS et al. (1987) Reflectance- and radiance-based methods for the in-flight absolute calibration of multispectral sensors, Remote Sensing of Environment 22(1), pp. 11–37.

Thome K, Markham B, Barker J, Slater P & Biggar S (1997) Radiometric calibration of Landsat, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 63, pp. 853–858.

U.S. Department of Commerce (no date) About the licensing of private remote sensing space systems, NOAA, https://tinyurl.com/mstypf8b [16.04.2025].

UN News (2021) Global perspective human stories: The right to a healthy environment – 6 things you need to know, 15 October, https://news.un.org/en/ story/2021/10/1103082 [08.11.2024].

UN News (2022) UN General Assembly declares access to a clean and healthy environment a universal human right, 28 July, https://news.un.org/en/ story/2022/07/1123482 [08.11.2024].

UNEP (2018) The State of Knowledge of Crimes that have Serious Impacts on the Environment, https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/25713/ knowledge_crime_envImpacts.pdf [16.04.2025].

United Nations (1972) Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972.

United Nations (1992) Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992. Volume I: Resolutions Adopted by the Conference – Corrigendum, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/165795/ files/A_CONF.151_26_Rev.1%28Vol.I%29_Corr.1-EN.pdf [16.04.2025].

University of Melbourne Library (2024) International Environmental Law, https://unimelb.libguides.com/c.php?g=948139&p=6870678 [08.11.2024].

USGS (1986) Landsat Chernobyl, April, https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/ landsat-chernobyl [16.04.2025].

UVS Niederösterreich (2002) Judgement of 05.11.2002 – SENAT-MI-01-2048, https://tinyurl.com/4y9veyy4 [16.04.2025].

VG Gelsenkirchen (2018) Judgement of 15.11.2018 – 8 K 5068/15, https://tinyurl. com/24xn29fx [16.04.2025].

VG Minden (2005) Judgement of 16.11.2005 – 3 K 2986/03, [16.04.2025].

VG Regensburg (1996) Final decision of 25.04.1996 – RO 7 K 94.1846 (unpublished).

VG Schleswig (2. Kammer), Decision of 10.12.2020 – 2 B 50/20; KG Berlin, 12. Zivilsenat, Decision of 28/05/2009, 12 U 43/09; VG Hannover (12. Kammer), Beschluss vom 09.02.2023 – 12 B 4795/22; OLG Koblenz (1. Strafsenat), Urteil vom 24.02.2021 – 1 StE 3/21; Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Federal Administrative Court), Decision of 2 December 2008, BVerwG 4BN14.08; Verwaltungsgericht Ansbach, 9. Kammer, Judgment of 11/06/2008, AN 9 K 07.02197.

VG Sigmaringen (2020) Judgement of 27.03.2020 – 5 K 3036/19, https://tinyurl. com/3anxef49 [16.04.2025].

VGH München (2023) Decision of 07.02.2023 – 22 CS 22.1908, https://www. gesetze-bayern.de/Content/Document/Y-300-Z-BECKRS-B-2023-N-1998 [16.04.2025].

Viñuales JE (ed.) (2015) The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Von Der Dunk FG (2004) Liability for global navigation satellite services: A comparative analysis of GPS and Galileo, Journal of Space Law 30, p. 129.

VWGH, 2012/03/0082, 27.11.2014, L65003 Hunting Wild Lower Austria.

Wang Q, Shi W & Atkinson PM (2014) Sub-pixel mapping of remote sensing images based on radial basis function interpolation, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 92, pp. 1–15.

Williams DL, Goward S & Arvidson T (2006) Landsat, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 72(10), pp. 1171–1178.

Williamson RA (2000) The Landsat legacy: Remote sensing policy and the development of commercial remote sensing, Space Policy 16(4), pp. 233–244.

WIPO (1979) Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva.

Yang X & Lo CP (2000) Relative radiometric normalization performance for change detection from multi-date satellite images, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 66(8), pp. 967–980.

Published
2025-12-10
Section
Cikkek