Iatrogenic electric burns and lessons learned from our cases
Abstract
In most cases, high-frequency electrosurgical instruments are used in modern surgery, which utilize their electrothermal effects to achieve targeted tissue destruction. However, there are three main potential causes that may result in electrical burn injuries during surgery: fire caused by the ignition of flammable antiseptic solutions, burns from unintended contact between the device and the skin, and the most common cause is the improper use of the monopolar device, often due to faulty placement of the neutral electrode. Although iatrogenic electrical burns are rare (sporadically reported in the literature), their significance cannot be overlooked. These injuries often present as deep, third-degree burns affecting all layers of the skin. Beyond the usual concerns with burns, electrical injuries require special attention to potential damage beneath the skin’s surface. The psychological effects of these injuries are also considerable. Furthermore, legal consequences are often involved, potentially affecting both the operating surgeon and the treating hospital. This article discusses three cases of intraoperative electrical burns. Our aim is to present three alternative treatment options (negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with split-thickness skin grafting, flap closure, necrectomy and primary closure), and to share our results in post-operative scar management, drawing the surgical team’s attention to these avoidable injuries, while emphasizing the importance of education and further training.
References
Arnoldo BD, Purdue GF. The diagnosis and management of electrical injuries. Hand Clin. 2009. 25(4): 469-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2009.06.001
Bae HS, Lee MY, Park JU. Intraoperative burn from a grounding pad of electrosurgical device during breast surgery. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. 97(1): e8370. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008370
Gupta K, Kumar GVP, Bansal A, Mehta Y. Burn injury by displacement of electrocautery plate. Indian J Anaesth. 2011. 55(6): 634-635. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.90636
Kaya B, Celik B, Cerkez C, Aslan E. Iatrogenic burns. Turkish Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2016. 24(1): 35-38.
Marwah S, Singla SL. Spirit-induced cautery burns: An unusual iatrogenic injury. The Internet Journal of Surgery. 2009 22. (2). 1-3.
Mundinger GS, Rozen SM, Carson B, Greenberg RS, Redett RJ. full-thickness forehead burn over indwelling titanium hardware resulting from an aberrant intraoperative electrocautery circuit. Eplasty. 2008. 8: e1.
Pesthy P, Dákay A, Varga T, Sebestyén J, Révész Zs. Nagyfrekvenciás sebészeti vágókészülék (diathermiás készülék) használata során keletkezett égési sérülések. Tanulságok néhány eset kapcsán. A Magyar Égési Egyesület Tudományos Konferenciáján elhangzott előadás. Debrecen, 2023. június 10.
Saaiq M, Zaib S, Ahmad S. Electrocautery burns: experience with three cases and review of literature. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2012. 25(4): 203-206.
Schissler K, Pruden C. Pediatric electrical injuries in the emergency department: an evidence-based review. Pediatr Emerg Med Pract. 2021 18(12): 1-24.
Sheridan RL, Wilson NC, O’Connell MF, Fabri JA. Noncontact electrosurgical grounding is useful in burn surgery. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2003. 24(6): 400-401. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BCR.0000095514.65067.15
Sudhindra TV, Joseph A, Hacking CJ, Haray PN. Are surgeons aware of the dangers of diathermy? Ann R Coll Surg Eng. 2000. 82(1): 31-32.
Waldmann V, Narayanan K, Combes N, Jost D, Jouven X, Marijon E. Electrical cardiac injuries: current concepts and management. Eur Heart J. 2018. 39(16): 1459-1465. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx142