Application of a modular knee prosthesis system in difficult primary situations

Report of four cases

  • Peter Than Orthopedic Clinic of the University of Pécs, Hungary
  • Hunor Antal Orthopedic Clinic of the University of Pécs, Hungary
Keywords: Arthroplasty, replacement, knee – Methods; Joint deformities, acquired; Knee prosthesis; Osteoarthritis, knee – Surgery; Prosthesis design;

Abstract

In arthroplasty practice, often occur complex primary cases that present a significant technical challenge. This is perhaps more prevalent with surgery of the hip, but complex primary knee cases are also frequent. Complex primary arthroplasty is in fact, more similar to revision arthroplasty, and can only be performed safely if certain conditions are met. It is essential to have the appropriate training and experience of the surgeon and the surgical team, in addition to the availability of revision instruments and implants along with bone grafting/substituting options. Currently the reimbursement of such procedures is not separately covered by the diagnoses-related group (DRG) type of health financing system, such as ours. The authors describe four complex primary cases where revision implants were required for treatment. The methods to solve bone deficiency, instability and frontal plane deformity are discussed along with implant selection. 

References

Anderson JA, Baldini A, MacDonald JH, Tomek I, Pellicci PM, Sculco TP. Constrained condylar knee without stem extensions for difficult primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2007. 20(3): 195-198. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1248042

Bala A, Penrose CT, Seyler TM, Mather RC 3rd, Wellman SS, Bolognesi MP. Outcomes after total knee arthroplasty for post-traumatic arthritis. Knee. 2015. 22(6): 630-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2015.10.004

Baldini A, Castellani L, Traverso F, Balatri A, Balato G, Franceschini V: The difficult primary total knee arthroplasty: a review. Bone Joint J. 2015. 97-B(10 Suppl A): 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.36920

Bellyei Á, Than P, Halmai V. A térdízületi teljes felszínpótló protézis eredményei klinikánkon. Magyar Traumatológia Ortopédia Kézsebészet Plasztikai Sebészet, 1998. 41(4): 319-326.

Cholewinski P, Putman S, Vasseur L, Migaud H, Duhamel A, Behal H, Pasquier G. Long-term outcomes of primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015. 101(4): 449-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.01.020

Easley ME, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Bullek DD. Primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty for the arthritic valgus knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000. 380: 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200011000-00008

Giori NJ, Lewallen DG. Total knee arthroplasty in limbs affected by poliomyelitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002. 84(7): 1157-1161. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200207000-00010

Hartford JM, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ, Knoblick G. Complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty using the condylar constrained prosthesis: an average 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 1998. 13(4): 380-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90002-X

Jordan L, Kligman M, Sculco TP. Total knee arthroplasty in patients with poliomyelitis. J Arthroplasty. 2007. 22(4): 543-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.03.013

Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES. Results of a second-generation constrained condylar prosthesis in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011. 26(8): 1228-1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.05.010

Malkani AL, Hitt KD, Badarudeen S, Lewis C, Cherian J, Elmallah R, Mont MA. The difficult primary total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2016. 65: 243-265.

Marczak DM, Synder M, Sibinski M, Okon T, Kowalczewski J. One-stage total knee arthroplasty with pre-existing fracture deformity post-fracture total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014. 29(11): 2104-2108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.07.007

Maynard LM, Sauber TJ, Kostopoulos VK, Lavigne GS, Sewecke JJ, Sotereanos NG. Survival of primary condylar-constrained total knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 7 years. J Arthroplasty. 2014. 29(6): 1197-1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.11.018

Meding JB, Keating EM, Ritter MA, Faris PM, Berend ME. Total knee replacement in patients with genu recurvatum. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001. 393: 244-249. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200112000-00027

Mullaji A, Lingaraju AP, Shetty GM. Computer-assisted total knee replacement in patients with arthritis and a recurvatum deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012. 94(5): 642-647. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B5.27211

Mullaji AB, Padmanabhan V, Jindal G. Total knee arthroplasty for profound varus deformity: technique and radiological results in 173 knees with varus of more than 20 degrees. J Arthroplasty. 2005. 20(5): 550-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.009

Ritter MA, Faris GW, Faris PM, Davis KE. Total knee arthroplasty in patients with angular varus or valgus deformities of > or = 20 degrees. J Arthroplasty. 2004. 19(7): 862-866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.03.009

Sabatini L, Risitano S, Rissolio L, Bonani A, Atzori F, Massè A. Condylar constrained system in primary total knee replacement: our experience and literature review. Ann Transl Med. 2017. 5(6): 135-140. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.03.29

Shearer DW, Chow V, Bozic KJ, Liu J, Ries MD. The predictors of outcome in total knee arthroplasty for post-traumatic arthritis. Knee. 2013. 20(6): 432-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.12.010

Published
2023-12-19
Section
Case reports