Watch for the Ripples, Not Just the Splash
How the EU Position on Investment Arbitration Has Affected the Enforcement of Awards
Abstract
The European Commission’s attempts to end intra-European Union (EU) investment arbitration, and the decisively helping hand lent by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) have produced massive splashes, rightfully attracting much attention. However, the ripples after the several splashes have had limited effects. This paper briefly outlines the splashes and goes on to analyze the ripples: investment tribunals retaining jurisdiction and issues around recognition and enforcement within and outside the EU. Although the judgments of the CJEU have had limited effects outside the EU, they have made it more difficult to enforce intra-EU awards within the EU and sometimes also outside of it. The study also examines some of the tools used by the EU to effectively shut the door on intra-EU investment arbitration, which mostly burden its Member States, such as infringement proceedings and decisions on unlawful state aid.
References
Andrews, N. (2012) The Three Paths of Justice: Court Proceedings, Arbitration and Mediation in England. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2294-1.
Bermann, G. A. (2020) 'Understanding ICSID Article 54', ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal, 35(1-2), pp. 311-344; https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siaa020.
Bohmer, L. (2021) 'Uniper seeks to halt anti-arbitration proceedings before German courts by requesting provisional measures from newly-constituted ICSID Tribunal', IAReporter, 6 December 2021.
Brenninkmeijer, M., Gélinas, F. (2021) 'The problem of execution immunities and the ICSID Convention', Journal of World Investment & Trade 22, pp. 429-458; https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340214.
Charlotin, D. (2021) 'ICSID Tribunal regrets clash between fundamental norms of EU law and ECT arbitration, but dismisses Spain's request to reopen intra-EU issue in vire of Komstroy decision', IAReporter, 7 December 2021.
Charlotin, D. (2021) 'ICSID Tribunal hearing claims by state-owned German banks against Spain declines to reconsider intra-EU decision in light of the CJEU's Komstroy decision', IAReporter, 13 December 2021.
Dózsa, D. (2021) 'The protection of Intra-EU investment after PL Holdings. C'est la vie?', Available at: https://eulawlive.com/op-ed-the-protection-of-intra-eu-investmentafter-pl-holdings-cest-la-vie-by-daniel-dozsa/ (Accessed 16 January 2022)
Gáspár-Szilágyi, Sz. (2018) 'It Is not Just About Investor-State Arbitration: A Look at Case C-284/16, Achmea BV.', European Papers, Vol. 3, pp. 357-373; https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3527600.
Gáspár-Szilágyi, Sz., Usynin, M. (2019) 'The Uneasy Relationship between Intra-EU Investment Tribunals and the Court of Justice's Achmea Judgment', European Investment Law and Arbitration Review Online, 4(1), pp. 29-65; https://doi.org/10.1163/24689017_00401003.
Gáspár-Szilágyi, Sz. (2021) 'Between Fiction and Reality: The External Autonomy of EU Law as a "Shapeshifter" after Opinion 1/17' European Papers, 6(1), pp. 675-692; https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3527563.
Hess, B. (2018) 'The Fate of Investment Dispute Resolution after the Achmea Decision of the European Court of Justice', MPILux Research Paper (3), Available at: https://ssrn. com/abstract=3152972 (Accessed 16 January 2022); https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3152972
Hindelang, S. (2018) 'The Limited Immediate Effects of CJEU's Achmea Judgement', Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/the-limited-immediate-effects-of-cjeusachmea-judgement/ https://doi.org/10.17176/20180309-092343. (Accessed 16 January 2022).
History of the ICSID Convention. Vol. II-2. Available at: https://icsid.worldbank. org/sites/default/files/publications/History%20of%20the%20ICSID%20Convention/ History%20of%20ICSID%20Convention%20-%20VOLUME%20II-2.pdf (Accessed 16 January 2022)
Káposznyák, A. (2020) 'Intra-EU Arbitral Awards After Achmea: Recognition and Enforcement Within the European Union Under the New York Convention' in Meškić, Z., Kunda, I., Popović, D. V., Omerović, E. (eds.) Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law 2019. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/16247_2019_5
Korom, V. (2020) 'The Impact of the Achmea Ruling on Intra-EU BIT Investment Arbitration - A Hungarian Perspective' Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, (8)1, 53-74; https://doi.org/10.5553/HYIEL/266627012020008001004
Martin Jarrett: Investment-Treaty Arbitration after Achmea. Available at: https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxr579pgMTw (Accessed 16 January 2022)
Micula Brothers Manage To Seize 67 M Shares Owned By The State At Nuclearelectrica - Romania Journal, 4 December 2019. Available at: https://www.romaniajournal. ro/business/micula-brothers-manage-to-seize-67-m-shares-owned-by-the-state-atnuclearelectrica/ (Accessed 16.01.2022.)
Nagy, Cs. I. (2018) 'Intra-EU bilateral investment treaties and EU law after Achmea: "Know well what leads you forward and what holds you back", German Law Journal, 19(4), pp. 981-1016; https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200022938
Nagy, Cs. I. (2019) 'Intra-EU BITs after Achmea: A cross-cutting issue' in Nagy, Cs. I. (ed.) Investment Arbitration in Central and Eastern Europe: Law and Practice. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019; https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3495393.
Romanian Gov't To Pay EUR 278 M In The Micula Brothers Case After Romatsa's Accounts Frozen - Romania Journal, 13 December 2019. Available at: https://www. romaniajournal.ro/society-people/romanian-govt-to-pay-eur-278-m-in-the-miculabrothers-case-after-romatsas-accounts-frozen/ (Accessed 16.01.2022.)
Schreuer, C., Malintoppi, L., Reinisch, A., Sinclair, A. (2009) The ICSID Convention - A Commentary. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596896
Yanos, A. A., Ramos-Mrosovsky, C. (2021) 'Intra-EU Investment Treaty Disputes in US Courts: Achmea, Micula and Beyond'. Available at: https://globalarbitrationreview.com/review/the-arbitration-review-of-the-americas/2022/article/intra-euinvestment-treaty-disputes-in-us-courts-achmea-micula-and-beyond (Accessed 16 January 2022)
Achmea B.V. v. The Slovak Republic, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. 2008-13 (formerly Eureko B.V. v. The Slovak Republic).
Agreement for the termination of Bilateral Investment Treaties between the Member States of the European Union - SN/4656/2019/INIT.
Award on Jurisdiction, Arbitrability and Suspension, PCA Case No. 2008-13, Achmea BV v The Slovak Republic.
Belenergia S.A. v. Italian Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/40.
Case C-741/19, Republic of Moldova v Komstroy LLC.
COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2015/1470 of 30 March 2015 on State aid SA.38517 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) implemented by Romania - Arbitral award Micula v Romania of 11 December 2013.
Commission asks Member States to terminate their intra-EU bilateral investment treaties, European Commission Press Release, Brussels, 18 June 2015.
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Protection of intra-EU investment - COM/2018/547 final.
Decision on Termination Request and Intra-EU Objection in Eskosol S.p.A. in liquidazione v. Italian Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/50.
Decision on the Intra-EU Jurisdictional Objection, in Rockhopper Italia S.p.A., Rockhopper Mediterranean Ltd, and Rockhopper Exploration Plc v. Italian Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/17/14.
Decision on the Achmea Issue in Vattenfall AB and others v. Federal Republic of Germany, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/12.
Decision on Termination Request and Intra-EU Objection in Eskosol S.p.A. in liquidazione v. Italian Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/50.
December 2021 infringements package: key decisions - Press release from the European Commission https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ inf_21_6201 (Accessed 16 January 2022)
Declaration of the Member States of 15 January 2019 on the legal consequences of the Achmea judgment and on investment protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/ publications/190117-bilateral-investment-treaties_en (Accessed 16 January 2022)
ESPF BETEILIGUNGS GMBH, ESPF NR. 2 AUSTRIA BETEILIGUNGS GMBH, AND INFRACLASS ENERGIE 5 GMBH & CO. KG v. Italian Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/5.
European Food and Others v Commission, Judgment ECLI:EU:T:2019:423 - https:// curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=215106&doclang=EN (Accessed 16 January 2022)
Infrastructure Services Luxembourg S.à.r.l. and Energia Termosolar B.V. (formerly Antin Infrastructure Services Luxembourg S.à.r.l. and Antin Energia Termosolar B.V.) v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/31.
Infrared Environmental Infrastructure GP Limited and others v Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. ARB/14/12), United States District Court for the District of Columbia in Civil Action No. 20-817.
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 March 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof - Germany) - Slowakische Republik v Achmea BV, Case C-284/16.
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 September 2021. Republic of Moldova v Komstroy LLC - C-741/19.
Judgment in Case C-109/20, Republiken Polen v PL Holdings Sàrl.
Judgment in Micula and others (Respondents/Cross-Appellants) v Romania (Appellant/Cross-Respondent), 19 February 2020. https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/ docs/uksc-2018-0177-judgment.pdf (Accessed 16 January 2022)
Landesbank Baden-Württemberg and others v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/45.
Mathias Kruck and others v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/23.
Memorandum Opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, in Case No. 17-cv-02332 (APM), Ioan Micula, et al. v Government of Romania.
Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 1 July 2021 (Case C-638/19 P Commission v European Food and Others).
Partial Award in Eastern Sugar B.V. v The Czech Republic, SCC Case No. 088/2004.
Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula, S.C. European Food S.A, S.C. Starmill S.R.L. and S.C. Multipack S.R.L. v. Romania [I], ICSID Case No. ARB/05/20.
Raiffeisen Bank International AG and Raiffeisen Bank Austria d.d. v. Republic of Croatia (II).
RWE AG and RWE Eemshaven Holding II BV v. Kingdom of the Netherlands, ICSID Case No. ARB/21/4.
State Aid - Spain - State aid SA.54155 (2021/NN) - Arbitration award to Antin - Spain - Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union Text with EEA relevance - C/2021/5405. Official Journal of the European Union, 05.11.2021. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.C_.2021.450.01.0005.01.ENG&toc=OJ%3AC%3A2021%3A450%3ATOC (Accessed 16 January 2022)
Uniper SE, Uniper Benelux Holding B.V. and Uniper Benelux N.V. v. Kingdom of the Netherlands, ICSID Case No. ARB/21/22.
