Expert Opinions on Foreign Law in Court: Applied Comparative Law in the Munich Institute for East European Law

Herbert Küpper

doi:10.47078/2020.1.111-130

Herbert Küpper Managing director, Institut für Ostrecht München, Germany

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47078/2020.1.111-130

Keywords: basic comparative research, applied comparative research, expert opinions on foreign law, country expert system vs. field of law expert system, Ostrecht, Munich Institute for East European law, Max Planck Institutes on foreign and comparative law

Abstract

Comparative law has many facets. It often consists of basic research for academic purposes, but it may have a practical side as well. A genuine combination of basic and applied comparative legal research are expert opinions on foreign law for a domestic court. The expert researcher has to fully comprehend the foreign law on the books as well as in action, and has to be able to translate this foreign law into the legal background of the domestic court and into the procedural setting of the law-suit at hand. Taking the ‘Munich Institute for East European Law’ as an example, this essay describes the continuous basic research as a prerequisite for expertise on foreign law, as well as the practice of writing expert opinions for courts of law and authorities with regard to the law of the formerly socialist countries in Europe.

References

Bányai, I. (2020) 'Az igazságügyi szakértő helye, szerepe a döntéshozatalban', Magyar Jog, 67(2), pp. 120-122.

Bartal, G (2018) 'Magánszakértői vélemény az új Pp.-ben', Magyar Jog, 65(6), pp. 321-326.

Baumbach, A., Lauterbach, W., Albers, J. and Hartmann, P. (eds.) (2016) Zivilprozessordnung. 74th edn., Munich: C.H.Beck.

Brunner, G. (1975) 'Die Methode des Ostrechs im Widerstreit von Recht und Politik', Osteuropa Recht, 1975, pp. 89-102.

Cséffai, A. Cs. (2019) 'Alkotmányos igazságügyi szakértés', Közjogi Szemle, 12(1), pp. 80-87.

Kischel, U. (2015) Rechtsvergleichung. Munich: C.H.Beck.

Küpper, H. (2004) 'Rechtsgutachten durch das Institut für Ostrecht München (IOR)', Deutsche Richterzeitung, 2004.

Küpper, H. (2005) 'Einführung in die Rechtsgeschichte Osteuropas' in Studien des Instituts für Ostrecht München, Vol. 54, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Publishing, pp. 686-705.

Küpper, H. (2016) 'A magyar jogi kultúra egyes jellegzetességei összehasonlító perspektívából' in Jakab András, Gajduschek György (eds.) A magyar jogrendszer állapota, MTA TK JTI: Budapest, 2016, pp. 131-141.

Küpper, H. and Vincze, A. (eds.) (2018) 'Verfassungsgerichte und Obergerichte in Mitteleuropa' in Studien des Instituts für Ostrecht München, Vol. 83, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3726/b15135

Luchterhandt, O. (1996) 'Künftige Aufgaben der Ostrechtsforschung', MfOR-WGO, 1996, pp. 159-175.

Maurach, R. (1967) 'Aus der Frühzeit der deutschen Ostrechsforschung' in Jahrbuch für Ostrecht 1967/II, pp. 7-24.

Nogel, M. (2018) 'A hazai szakértői minőségbiztosítás rendszerének vázlata és annak jelentősége a büntetőeljárásban', Magyar Jog, 65(3), pp. 162-168.

Schroeder, F.-C. (1983) '25 Jahre Institut für Ostrecht München', in Jahrbuch für Ostrecht 1983/I, pp. 9-13.