The European Parliament Against the Background of the Rule of Law and the Standards of a Parliamentary System: Selected Issues

Grzegorz Pastuszko

doi:10.47078/2023.2.215-232

Grzegorz Pastuszko Associate Professor, Dr. Habil., Rzeszów University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1494-6409

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47078/2023.2.215-232

Keywords: European Parliament, rule of law, parliamentarism, parliamentary system

Abstract

The aim of this study is to show the legal status and mechanism of action of the European Parliament against the background of classical standards of the rule of law in a democratic system. This study shows the extent of the deviation of the European Parliament from these standards and highlights its special features by using historical-, theoretical-, and dogmatic-legal methods. This helps to understand what parliamentarism is built into the present concept of the rule of law, and what distinguishes it from the classically understood assumptions of a parliamentary system. Specifically, this study comprises three key issues: the nature of the subject that equips the Parliament with democratic legitimacy, the way it is situated in the mechanism of power or, finally, the extent to which it is bound by existing legal norms. This research perspective is, of course, limited in nature and deals with selected issues. The crux of the study makes the reader aware that at the level of the European Union a new type of parliament and, consequently, a new type of parliamentarism has developed, and the rule of law applicable here is clearly different from the analogous principle found in traditional states.

References

Barnard, C. (2008) ‘The ‘Opt-Out’ for the UK and Poland from the Charter of Fundamental Rights: Triumph of Rhetoric over Reality?’ in Griller, S., Ziller, J. (eds.) The Lisbon Treaty: EU, Constitutionalism without a Constitutional Treaty? New York: Springer, pp. 257–283; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-09429-7_11.

Dubowski, T. (2010) Równowaga instytucjonalna w Unii Europejskiej – wybrane zagadnienia w świetle postanwień Traktatu z Lizbony. Warsaw: Temida 2.

Dziadzio, A. (2005) ‘Koncepcja państwa prawa w XIX wieku – idea i rzeczywistość’, Czasopismo Historyczno-Prawne, 17(1), pp. 177–201.

Garben, S. (2019) ‘Competence Creep Revisited’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(2), pp. 205–222; https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12643.

Grosse, T.G. (2008) ‘Deficyt demokratyczny w Unii Europejskiej i metody jego przezwyciężania’ in Kurczewska, U. (ed.) Deficyt demokracji w Unii Europejskiej a europejskie grupy interesu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, pp. 75–96.

Grosse, T.G. (2017) ‘Is Europe Moving Towards a Democratic Federation’, Yearbook of Polish European Studies, 2017/20, pp. 11–30.

Habermas, J.H. (1992) ‘Citizenship and National Identity: Some Reflections on the Future of Europe’, Praxis International, 12(1), pp. 1–19.

Jacobs, F., Corbett, R., Shackleton, M. (1996) Parlament Europejski. Rzeszów: Wydaw. Wyższej Szkoły Pedagogicznej.

Kowalik-Bańczyk, K. (2020) ‘Instytucje Unii Europejskiej’ in Biernat, S. (ed.) System Prawa Unii Europejskiej. Podstawy i źródła prawa Unii Europejskiej. Vol. I. Warsaw: Beck, p. 418.

Lord, Ch. (2003) ‘The European Parliament, Not a Very European Parliament?’, Politique Européenne, 1(9), pp. 30–48; https://doi.org/10.3917/poeu.009.0030.

Magen, A., Pech, L. (2018) ‘The rule of law and the European Union’ in May Ch., Winchester, A. (eds.) Handbook on the Rule of Law. Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 235–256; https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786432445.00022.

Majone, G. (1998) ‘Europe’s „Democratic Deficit”: The Question of Standards’, European Law Journal, 4(1), pp 5–28; https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00040.

McCormick, J. (2020) European Union Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Menon, A., Peet, J. (2010) Beyond the European Parliament: Rethinking the EU’s democratic legitimacy, Center for European Essays [Online]. Available at: https://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/publications/attachments/pdf/2011/essay_parliament_peet_menon_dec10-179.pdf (Accessed: 25 July 2023).

Mizera, K. (2014) ‘Deficyt demokratyczny w Unii Europejskiej’, Folia Iuridica Wratislaviensis, 3/1, pp. 87–138.

Moravcsik, A. (2002) ‘In Defence of the Democratic Deficit’: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), pp. 603–624; https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00390.

Mrozowska, S. (2007) ‘Konstytucja europejska wobec deficytu demokratycznego’, Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne, 2007/2, pp. 155–164; https://doi.org/10.14746/ssp.2007.2.11.

Pastuszko, G. (2019) Zasada autonomii regulaminowej Sejmu, Senatu i Zgromadzenia Narodowego w polskim prawie parlamentarnym. Rozważania na tle Konstytucji RP z 2 kwietnia 1997 roku. Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego.

Pelc, R. (2000) ‘Obywatelstwo Unii Europejskiej a obywatelstwo państw członkowskich i państw trzecich’ in Biernat, S. (ed.) Studia z prawa europejskiego w piątą rocznicę utworzenia Katedry Prawa Europejskiego UJ. Cracow: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, p. 77.

Poboży, M. (2015) ‘Ustrój instytucjonalny Unii Europejskiej w czasach kryzysu - horyzontalny podział władzy i funkcji’, Przegląd Europejski, 2015/4, pp. 54–66.

Potorski, R. (2011) ‘Zjawisko deficytu demokratyczności w Unii Europejskiej a reformy Traktatu z Lizbony’, Historia i Polityka, 5(12), pp. 140–155; https://doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2011.010.

Prechal, S. (2010) ‘Competence Creep and General Principles of Law’, Review of European and Administrative Law, 3(1), pp. 5–22; https://doi.org/10.7590/REAL_2010_01_02.

Schiatti, E. (2016) The democratic legitimacy of the European Parliament Citizens’ representation within an ever closer Union, Strasbourg: Global Campus Europe [Online]. Available at: https://repository.gchumanrights.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/e891400a-9526-4885-b6b9-9888cdbeb321/content. (Accessed: 25 July 2023).

Schweitzer, M., Hummer, W. (1996) Europarecht. Neuwied: C. F. Muller.

Siedentop, L. (2000) Democracy in Europe. London: Penguin.

Tuleja, P. (2003) Stosowanie Konstytucji RP w świetle zasady jej nadrzędności (wybrane problemy). Cracow: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Weatherill, S. (2004) ‘Competence Creep and Competence Control’, Yearbook of European Law, 23(1), pp. 1–55; https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/23.1.1.

Zielonka, J. (2000) ‘Enlargement and the Finality of European Integration, Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper (Symposium)’, Contribution to the Jean Monnet Working Paper. Symposium: Responses to Joschka Fischer, 2000/7 [Online]. Available at: https://jeanmonnetprogram.org/archive/papers/00/00f0801.html (Accessed: 25 July 2023).