Theories on Sovereignty

  • Zoltán J. Tóth Dean of the Faculty of Law, Full professor at and Head of the Department of Jurisprudence, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church, Hungary https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8836-7231
Keywords: sovereignty, political philosophy, ideological history, parliamentarism, government, social contract, volonté générale

Abstract

The notion of sovereignty has been invented in the 16th century. This concept is traditionally linked to Jean Bodin, who first used the term to describe modern statehood in his work ‘Six Books of the Commonwealth,’ written in 1576. The concept itself was originally conceived to define the characteristics of the absolute monarchy, but was later used to describe the rule of other sovereigns as well; thus, it was created as one of the most prolific concepts in political theory. Although sovereignty was an object of intense interest to political philosophers mainly until the middle of the 20th century, it is still not an out-of-date concept. While it is true that modern international law, recent political practice, and the chiselled concepts of law and state have diminished the importance of this notion until now, it has not disappeared. In fact, even the recent international policy and the modern constitutional practice are not able to do without the paradigm of state sovereignty. Like all concepts, it has been inflated, yet, its core political theoretical content remained almost the same. In the present paper I am going to attempt to introduce the types of sovereignty, mainly on the basis of who the sovereign can be.

References

Bodin, J. (1955) Six Books on the Commonwealth. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Dicey, A. V. (1885) Introductory to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. 1st edn. London: MacMillan and Co.

Favoreu, L. (2003) ‘Az alkotmánybíróságok’ in Paczolay, P. (ed.) Alkotmánybíráskodás – alkotmányértelmezés. Budapest: Rejtjel Kiadó, pp. 52–113.

Hobbes, Th. (1997) Leviathan or the Matter, Forme, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil. Touchstone.

Karácsony, A. (2019) ‘Carl Schmitt a szuverénről’, Kommentár, 2019/1, pp. 69–73.

Paczolay, P. (1996) ‘Machiavelli államfogalma’, Acta Universitatis Szegediensis: Acta Juridica et Politica, (49)1–48; pp. 447–463.

Paczolay, P. (1998) Államelmélet I. Machiavelli és az államfogalom születése. Budapest: Korona Kiadó.

Paczolay, P. (2003) ‘Alkotmánybíráskodás a politika és jog határán’ in Paczolay, P. (ed.) Alkotmánybíráskodás – alkotmányértelmezés. Budapest: Rejtjel Kiadó, pp. 9–32.

Rousseau, J-J. (1998) The Social Contract. Wordsworth Classics of World Literature.

Szilágyi, P. (2011) Jogi alaptan. Budapest: ELTE Eötvös Kiadó.

Takács, P. (2011) Államtan: Négy fejezet az állam általános elmélete köréből. Az állam általános sajátosságai. Budapest: Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem Közigazgatástudományi Kar Jogtudományi Tanszék.

Takács, P. (2012) ‘A modern állam kialakulása és változásai’ in Takács, P., Szilágyi, I. H., Fekete, B. (eds.) Államelmélet. Fejezetek és előadások az állam általános elmélete köréből. Budapest: Szent István Társulat, pp. 108–130.

Tóth J., Z. (2019a) ‘A demokrácia és a jogállamiság kapcsolata’, Jogtudományi Közlöny, (74)7–8, pp. 302–317.

Tóth J., Z. (2019b) ‘A jogállamiság tartalma’, Jogtudományi Közlöny, (74)5, pp. 197–212.

Tóth J., Z. (2019c) ‘Az utópizmus jellemzői’, Glossa Iuridica, Új folyam, 6(1–2), pp. 67–83.

Published
2023-06-14
How to Cite
TóthZ. J. (2023). Theories on Sovereignty. Central European Journal of Comparative Law, 4(1), 175-195. https://doi.org/10.47078/2023.1.175-195
Section
Articles