Nest entry shape change may cause nest abandonment in urban cavity-nesting species: a case study of the Tree Sparrow Passer montanus

  • Ju-Hyun Lee Department of Biological Sciences, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 61186, Republic of Korea
  • Se-Yeong Kim School of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 61186, Republic of Korea http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3197-3203
  • Dae-Han Cho School of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 61186, Republic of Korea http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8961-7159
  • Ha-Cheol Sung Department of Biological Sciences, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 61186, Republic of Korea http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7494-7446
Keywords: Nest abandonment, Nest entry shape, Passer montanus, Secondary cavity nester, Tree Sparrow

Abstract

The threat of predation is the main cause of bird nest abandonment, with such behaviour imposing considerable energetic costs on breeding birds. However, for several species, nest abandonment can be a less costly alternative to complete brood failure. In this study, we examined nest abandonment among Eurasian Tree Sparrows (Passer montanus) by surveying 71 Tree Sparrow nests with various types of entry holes and conducted artificially manipulating some of the entrance shapes. We found that nest abandonment was caused by changes to the nest entry shape in seven cases and by human interference in two cases. Nest abandonments occurred throughout the breeding season, and breeding pairs attempted to breed again immediately after nest abandonment. The results of the artificial nest entry shape manipulation experiment showed that nine of twelve nests (75.0%) were abandoned where the nest entrance holes were widened, and six of eleven nests (54.5%) were abandoned where the nest entrance holes were narrowed. However, none of the nests were abandoned where the entry shape was unchanged. Thus, nest abandonment by Tree Sparrows is correlated with nest entry shape manipulation and is more likely to occur when the energy cost of breeding again is less than that of abandoning the nest.

References

Beckmann, C. & Martin, K. (2016): Testing hypotheses about the function of repeated nest abandonment as a life history strategy in a passerine bird. – Ibis 158: 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12361

Berger‐Tal, R., Berger‐Tal, O. & Munro, K. (2010): Nest desertion by Grey Fantails during nest building in response to perceived predation risk. – Journal of Field Ornithology 81: 151–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523–1739.2004.00417.x

Bordjan, D. & Tome, D. (2014): Rain may have more influence than temperature on nest abandonment in the Great Tit Parus major. – Ardea 102: 79–86. https://doi.org/10.5253/078.102.0107

Brunton, D. H. (1997): Impacts of predators: center nests are less successful than edge nests in a large nesting colony of Least Terns. – The Condor 99: 370–380. https://doi.org/10.2307/1369943

Chae, H. (2019): Are you curious about the sparrow? – EcoNature foundation, Seoul [in Korean]

Collias, N. E. & Collias, E. C. (1971): Some observations on behavioral energetics in the Village Weaverbird. I. Comparison of colonies from two subspecies in nature. – The Auk 88: 124–133. https://doi.org/10.2307/4083967

Collias, N. E., Victoria, J. K., Coutlee, E. L. & Graham, M. (1971): Some observations on behavioral energetics in the village weaverbird. II. All-day watches in an aviary. – The Auk 88: 134–143. https://doi.org/10.2307/4083968

Cordero, P. (1991): Predation in house sparrow and Tree Sparrow (Passer spp.) nests. Pp. 111–120. In: Kavanagh, B. P. & Gorski, W. (eds): Nestling mortality of granivorous birds due to microorganisms and toxic substances. – Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw.

Eggers, S., Griesser, M., Nystrand, M. & Ekman, J. (2006): Predation risk induces changes in nest-site selection and clutch size in the Siberian jay. – Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273: 701–706. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3373

Flegeltaub, M., Biro, P. & Beckmann, C. (2017): Avian nest abandonment prior to laying – a strategy to minimize predation risk? – Journal of Ornithology 158: 1091–1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336–017–1470–7

García-Navas, V. & Sanz, J. J. (2012): Yearly and seasonal variation of breeding parameters in a declining multi-brooded passerine, the Tree Sparrow. – Ardea 100: 79–88. https://doi.org/10.5253/078.100.0112

Gauthier, M. & Thomas, D. W. (1993): Nest site selection and cost of nest building by Cliff Swallows (Hirundo pyrrhonota). – Canadian Journal of Zoology 71: 1120–1123. https://doi.org/10.1139/z93–152

Isaksson, D., Wallander, J. & Larsson, M. (2007): Managing predation on ground-nesting birds: The effectiveness of nest exclosures. – Biological Conservation 136: 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.015

Lee, J., Nam, W. & Sung, H. (2020): Breeding ecology of the Eurasian Tree Sparrow Passer montanus living in urban area in South Korea. – Korean Journal of Ornithology 27: 81–89. https://doi.org/10.30980/kjo.2020.12.27.2.81

Li, P. & Martin, T. E. (1991): Nest-site selection and nesting success of cavity-nesting birds in high elevation forest drainages. – The Auk 108: 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/108.2.405

Maddox, J. D. & Weatherhead, P. J. (2006): Nests without eggs: Abandonment or cryptic predation? – The Auk 123: 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/123.1.135

Martin , T. E. (1992): Breeding productivity considerations: what are the appropriate habitat features for management? Pp. 455–473 In: Hagan, III, J. M. & Johnston, D. W. (eds): Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrants. – Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

Martin , T. E. (1993): Nest predation and nest sites. – BioScience 43: 523–532.

Martin , T. E. & Li, P. (1992): Life history traits of open‐ vs. cavity‐nesting birds. – Ecology 73: 579–592. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940764

Metz, K. J. (1991): The enigma of multiple nest building by male Marsh Wrens. – The Auk 108: 170–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/108.1.170

Munro, K. (2007): Breeding behavior and ecology of the grey fantail (Rhipidura albiscapa). – Australian Journal of Zoology 55: 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO07025

Nelson, S. K. & Hamer, T. E. (1995): Nest success and the effects of predation on Marbled Murrelets. Pp. 89–98. In: Ralph, C. J., Hunt, G. L., Jr., Raphael, M., G. & Piatt, J. F. (eds): Ecology and conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-152. – Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, Albany, CA

Nilsson, S. G. (1984): The evolution of nest-site selection among hole-nesting birds: the importance of nest predation and competition. – Ornis Scandinavica 15(3): 167–175. https://doi.org/10.2307/3675958

Nolan, Jr. V. (1978): The ecology and behavior of the prairie warbler, Dendroica discolor. Ornithological monographs, no. 26. – The American Ornithologists’ Union, 593 pp. ­https://doi.org/10.2307/40166732

Pinowski, J. (1968): Fecundity, mortality, numbers and biomass dynamics of a population of the Tree Sparrow (Passer montanus L.). Ecologia Polska – Seria A 16: 1–58.

Remeš, V., Matysiokova, B. & Cockburn, A. (2012): Long‐term and large‐scale analyses of nest predation patterns in Australian songbirds and a global comparison of nest predation rates. – Journal of Avian Biology 43: 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600–048X.2012.05599.x

Sasvári, L. & Hegyi, Z. (1994): Colonial and solitary nesting choice as alternative breeding tactics in Tree Sparrow Passer montanus. – Journal of Animal Ecology 63(2): 265–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/5545

Slagsvold, T. (1984): Clutch size variation of birds in relation to nest predation: on the cost of reproduction. – The Journal of Animal Ecology 53: 945–953. https://doi.org/10.2307/4669

Sonerud, G. A. (1985): Nest hole shift in Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus as defence against nest predation involving long-term memory in the predator. – The Journal of Animal Ecology 54: 179–192. https://doi.org/10.2307/4629

Stanley, T. R. (2002): How many kilojoules does a Black-billed Magpienest cost? – Journal of Field Ornithology 73: 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1648/0273–8570–73.3.292

Summers-Smith, J. (1995): The Tree Sparrow. – Bath Press, Bath, 206 pp.

Vaske, J. J., Rimmer, D. W. & Deblinger, R. D. (1994): The impact of different predator exclosures on Piping Plover nest abandonment (El impacto de diferentes Barreras para Detener Depredadores en el Abandono de Nidos por individuos de Charadrius melodus). – Journal of Field Ornithology 65: 201–209.

Verboven, N. & Tinbergen, J. M. (2002): Nest desertion: a trade-off between current and future reproduction. – Animal Behavior 63: 951–958. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1971

Wesołowski, T. (2002): Anti‐predator adaptations in nesting Marsh Tits Parus palustris: the role of nest‐site security. – Ibis 144: 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1474–919X.2002.00087.x

Williams, G. C. (1966): Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack’s principle. – The American Naturalis 100: 687–690. https://doi.org/10.1086/282461

Yamaguchi, N. & Higuchi, H. (2005): Extremely low nesting success and characteristics of life history traits in an insular population of Parus varius namiyei. – The Wilson Bulletin 117: 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1676/04–081

Published
2023-02-28
How to Cite
LeeJ.-H., KimS.-Y., ChoD.-H., & SungH.-C. (2023). Nest entry shape change may cause nest abandonment in urban cavity-nesting species: a case study of the Tree Sparrow Passer montanus. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 69(1), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.17109/AZH.69.1.63.2023