Legal issues in the property, use, preservation, and management of agricultural lands in Bulgaria

Absztrakt

This article reviews the subject of ‘agricultural lands’ in Bulgaria  from a  legal aspect, for the period 1878-2023. It analyses the normative acts, legal consequences and the most important legal changes that the land reforms in the country derive from. There is a review of the processes of restitution, land-settlement, and limitations of property; the initiation of cadastral maps and other events and initiatives related to them; legal actions of the administrative and judicial organs; and decisions related to the judicial and constitutional control, related to the owners and users of agricultural lands. There is some detailing of how the latter perform their legal rights to the land in certain cases. The study is provisionally divided into three sub-periods: the first presents legislation in Bulgaria related to agricultural lands in the period after the establishment of the Third Bulgarian State. It gives explanation to some important moments, deriving from the historical participation of the country in the political events related to the Balkan Peninsula and the First World War, as well as to the policies of land-settlement, organisation and cooperation of the agricultural subjects; establishment of the first administrative bodies; and the administration of the processes related to the property and in particular to the agricultural land. The second period reflects on the legislation defined by the collectivisation and expropriation of the private property, the limitation of the economic relations in regard to the agricultural lands, and the following redefining of the legal institutes related to the property of agricultural land. In a sense the first two parts of the article give answers to the reasons and the need for the last land reform performed after 1989. A milestone in the article is the process of restitution as well as the problems of the legal doctrine of the last period from 1989 until 2023. Apart from identifying the most important problems of the management of the legal aspect of the restitution processes, the article provides a  short review of the new course and the ‘curve’ of the legislation regarding agricultural land. The newest changes in the trajectory of the public relations and the legal challenges deriving from the legal order in the European Union are presented, including: legal contradictions of the Bulgarian legislation with the law of the EU; reflection of the structural funds over the legal processes related to the agricultural lands; and the ‘green’ payments and consolidation of the property in agricultural lands. At the end there are some suggestions for the improvement of the legal framework regarding the agricultural lands in the country. The article uses several legal methods, including legal-historical, positive legal analysis, and a normative approach in explaining the offers suitable for the change of the legal framework regarding agricultural lands.

Hivatkozások

Beyers Ch (2005) Land Restitution in District Six, Cape Town, Community, citizenship and social exclusion, Dphil dissertation, Sussex University.

Bobatinov M & Vlahov, Kr (2007). Property Law. Practical problems, Sibi.

Boliari N (2013) Does Land Fragmentation Affect Land Productivity? Empirical Evidence from Bulgaria, Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies 94 (3), pp. 273–302, doi: 10.4074/S1966960713003019.

Boyanov G (2000) Land easements related to water bodies, Ownership and right, 5, pp. 13-19.

Burawoy M & Verdery K (1999) Introduction. In Uncertain Transition: ethnographies of change in the post-socialist world (eds) Burawoy, M. and K. Verdery, Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.

CEDR (Hrsg.) (2019) Agriculture and Competition: XXIX European Congress and Colloquium of Rural Law, Lille, 20-23 September 2017 (82), Schriften zum Agrar-, Umwelt- und Verbraucherschutzrecht UR - https://doi. org/10.5771/9783845299655.

Djerov A (1994) Restitution – legal issues. Comment. Asconi - ed. p. 168

Doichinova Yu (1996) Organizational restructuring of Bulgarian agriculture prerequisites results, Economy and management of agriculture, 2, pp. 9-14.

Fay D & James D (2009) Originally published in Fay, Derrick and James, Deborah, (eds.) The rights and wrongs of land restitution: ‘restoring what was ours’. Routledge, London, UK, pp. 1-24. http://tinyurl.com/yzxnt5dr [28.01.2024]

Giovarelli R & Bledsoe D (2001) Land Reform in Eastern Europe Western CIS, Transcaucuses, Balkans, and EU Accession Countries. FAO. https://www.fao. org/3/ad878e/AD878E00.htm [28.01.2024]

Hall R (2007) The impact of land restitution and land reform on livelihoods, Research Report 32, http://tinyurl.com/4fturxvt [accessed 28.01.2024]

Hartvigsen M (2013) Land reform in Central and Eastern Europe after 1989 and its outcome in the form of farm structures and land fragmentation, Land Tenure Working Paper 24, FAO, p. 61. http://tinyurl.com/jbzhkwps [02.09.2024]

Holt-Jensen A & Raagmaa G (2010) Restitution of agricultural land in Estonia: Consequences for landscape development and production, Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 64(3), pp.129-141. DOI: 10.1080/00291951.2010.502443

James D (2007) Gaining Ground? ‘Rights’ and ‘Property’ in South African land reform, London: Glasshouse Press.

Kopeva D, Noev N & Evtimov V (2002) Land fragmentation and land consolidation in the agricultural sector – A case study from Bulgaria. FAO. https://tinyurl.com/y3jpbabp [28.01.2024]

Luchnikov Sv (1999). The restitution, Bar review, SIBI. pp. 5 – 11.

Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Forestry (MAFF 2017) Analysis of the normative regulation of public relations in land use regarding the ownership, use, protection and management of agricultural lands in Bulgaria, Working group under order No. RD 09-771 of October 3, 2017.

Myers F (1986) The Politics of Representation: Anthropological Discourse and Australian Aborigines. American Ethnologist 13(1), pp. 138-153.

Nikolov V (1992) Processes and issues of privatization and restitution in the rural economy, Restitution and privatization through the eyes of independent experts, Zager.

Norer R(Ed.) (2023) Food sovereignty, food security and the contribution of agricultural law: XXX European Congress and Colloquium of Rural Law, Poznań, 18–21 Sept., 2019 (92), Schriften zum Agrar-, Umwelt- und Verbraucherschutzrecht, https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748941439.

Ntsebeza L (2005) Democracy compromised: chiefs and the politics of the land in South Africa. Leiden: Brill, 2005.

Parallax (2000) Agricultural lands. Collection of normative acts. Court practice. A new star.

Petrov Ts (1975) Agrarian Reforms in Bulgaria, 1880-1944, Sofia, Publishing House of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 41.

Povinelli E (2004) At home in the violence of recognition. In Property in Question: value transformation in the global economy (eds) Katherine Verdery and Caroline Humphrey, Berg: Oxford.

Punev B (2013) Restitution of illegally seized property by the authorities in the communist state (review of the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Bulgaria), Property and law, 9 and 10.

Rosanis S (2001) Co-ownership and camaraderie in the process. Ownership and right, (6), pp. 41 – 46.

Sarafov P (2000) Ownership between private and public ownership. Ownership and right, (5) pp. 5-12.

Sivenov B (1992) Some economic and legal aspects of restitution and privatization, Restitution and privatization through the eyes of independent experts, Zager.

Stefanov G (1992) About the nature of lease agreements. Legal thought. (1), pp. 27-33.

Stoyanov V (2000) Right of use according to Art. 26 of the LOUAL. Ownership and right. 5, pp. 23-27.

Stoyanov V, Kurteva, St & Stoykova, Yu (2011) Legal regime of agricultural lands and forest territories, IC Labor and Law.

Szilágyi JE (2016) Acquisition of the ownership of agricultural lands in Hungary, taking the EU’s and other countries’ law into consideration, Zbornik Radova, 50, p. 1437.

Szilágyi JE (2022) Hungary: Strict Agricultural Land and Holding Regulations for Sustainable and Traditional Rural Communities, Central European Academic Publishing, pp. 145-197.

Venedikov P (1975) Co-ownership. Science and art.

Venedikov P (1991) System of Bulgarian property law. Schedule 7M. Sofia

Yotov St (2020) Rule of law, justice and legal certainty, Challenge the right!. https:// tinyurl.com/4hy5ap2u [04.12.2024]

Megjelent
2024-12-19
Rovat
Cikkek