Artificial Intelligence and Sustainability: A Conceptual Framework for System-Level Impact Assessment
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly emerging as a general-purpose technology with far-reaching implications for sustainable development. While AI applications are increasingly deployed across sectors such as healthcare, energy systems, urban management, and education, their overall sustainability impacts remain uncertain and often contradictory. Existing research typically examines isolated effects of AI within individual sustainability pillars, which limits the ability to understand systemic interactions, feedback loops, and long-term consequences. This study introduces a conceptual analytical framework designed to assess the sustainability impacts of artificial intelligence across environmental, economic, and social dimensions, extended by an additional individual-level pillar. The framework defines a set of AI Impact Groups (AIG) that translate technological capabilities into system-level functions, including perception, learning, strategic foresight, coordination, and risk detection. In addition, the model introduces key input parameters – AI intensity, adoption level, autonomy, quality of use, and system quality – that influence how AI capabilities translate into sustainability outcomes. By linking AI capabilities, system-level functions, and sustainability pillars, the proposed framework enables a more integrated assessment of both opportunities and risks associated with AI deployment. The model highlights how AI impacts propagate across domains and may generate both short-term benefits and long-term systemic risks, such as rebound effects, technological dependence, or skill erosion. The framework provides a foundation for future scenario analysis, sector-specific impact assessment, and interdisciplinary collaboration aimed at understanding and governing AI-driven sustainability transitions.
References
Antwi, B. O., Agyapong, D., & Owusu, D. (2026). Beyond adoption: Analysing the sufficient and necessary factors for ai-driven sustainable performance in an emerging economy. Sustainable Futures, 11, 101750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2026.101750
Browning, J., & LeCun, Y. (2023). Language, common sense, and the Winograd schema challenge. Artificial Intelligence, 325, 104031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.104031
Brundtland Commission (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. United Nations. URL: http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf
Doğan, A. R., & Doğan, A. İ. (2026). From the Turing Test to AI detectors: an epistemological mismatch in scholarly publishing. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology, 76(2), 844740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2026.844740
EIMT (2026). Who is the Father of AI and Machine Learning? European Institute of Management & Technology. URL: https://www.eimt.edu.eu/who-is-the-father-of-ai-and-machine-learning
EurLex (n. d.). Glossary of Summaries. Sustainable development. Official website of the European Union. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/glossary/sustainable-development.html
Gohr, C., Rodríguez, G., Belomestnykh, S. et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence in sustainable development research. Nature Sustainability. 8, 970–978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01598-6
Katper, N., Hamid, A. B. B. A., Kaur, K., & Mohy-ud-Din, K. (2026). Dual pathways toward sustainability performance through AI technologies: Moderated mediation role of green HRM by fintech. Journal of Cleaner Production, 554, 148038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.148038
Manning, P. C. (2020). Artificial Intelligence Definitions. Stanford University Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. URL: https://hai-production.s3.amazonaws.com/files/2020-09/AI-Definitions-HAI.pdf
Matsuo, Y., LeCun, Y., Sahani, M., Precup, D., Silver, D., Sugiyama, M., ... & Morimoto, J. (2022). Deep learning, reinforcement learning, and world models. Neural Networks, 152, 267-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2022.03.037
OECD (2025). Introducing the OECD AI Capability Indicators. OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/be745f04-en
Phan, L., Gatti, A., Han, Z. et al. (2025a). Humanity’s Last Exam. arXiv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.14249
Phan, L., Gatti, A., Han, Z. et al. (2025b). Humanity's Last Exam Benchmark Leaderboard: Score vs. Release Date. Center for AI Safety. URL: https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/humanitys-last-exam
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689
Singla, A., Sukharevsky, A., Yee, L., Chui, M., Hall, B. (2025). The state of AI in early 2024. Quantum Black, McKinsey. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai-2024
SU HAI (2025). The 2025 AI Index Report. Stanford University, Human-Centered Artificial Intelligences (SU HAI). URL: https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2025-ai-index-report
Toderas, M. (2025). Artificial Intelligence for Sustainability: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of AI Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions. Sustainability. 17(17), 8049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17178049
Velupillai, K. V., & Kao, Y. F. (2014). Computable and computational complexity theoretic bases for Herbert Simon’s cognitive behavioral economics. Cognitive Systems Research, 29, 40-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.07.005
UN – United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. URL: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Xia, B. Lu, Q., Zhu, L., Xing, Z. (2024). An AI System Evaluation Framework for Advancing AI Safety: Terminology, Taxonomy, Lifecycle Mapping. AIware 2024: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on AI-Powered Software. 74–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3664646.3664766

















