Az elektromos rollerek integrációjának vizsgálata Magyarországon
Absztrakt
A szakirodalom széles körben tárgyalja a mobilitáshoz kapcsolódó globális fenntarthatósági stratégiákat, hangsúlyozva a szennyezőanyag-kibocsátás csökkentésének szükségességét, valamint azt is, hogy a technológia erre önmagában nem megoldás. Az elektromos mikromobilitási eszközök a városi közlekedés zöldebb alternatíváját képviselik. Cikkünkben a Magyarországon elektromos rollert használók körében vizsgáltuk, hogy a lakóhelyük befolyásolja-e az e-roller-használatuk gyakoriságát vagy azt, hogy milyen típusú közlekedési módot váltanak ki ezzel a járművel, illetve milyen tényezőket tartanak fontosnak ezen közlekedési eszköz integrációjának szempontjából. Kérdőívünkre 292 válasz érkezett, amelyek alapján született számításaink azt mutatják, hogy direkt módon nincsen szignifikáns kapcsolat a lakóhely típusa és az elektromos rollerek használatának gyakorisága, valamint az ennek a járműnek az integrálását támogató tényezők között. A lakóhely típusa és a kiváltott közlekedési mód között viszont a χ2-próbát elvégezve szignifikáns kapcsolatot találtunk. Az elemzéseink rámutatnak arra, hogy az elektromos mikromobilitási eszközöknek a városi közlekedési rendszerbe illesztéséhez nem elég egyes településformák sajátosságainak a figyelembevétele, a helyi lakosság érdekeit is szem előtt kell tartani, ami jelenleg a magyarországi szabályozási gyakorlatra nem jellemző.
Hivatkozások
ABA ATTILA–ESZTERGÁR-KISS DOMOKOS [2023]: Electric micromobility from a policy-making perspective through European use cases. Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 26. 7469–7490. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03016-3.
AGUILERA-GARCÍA, Á.–GOMEZ, J.–RANGEL, T.–BAEZA, M. D. L. Á.–VASSALLO, J. M. [2024]: Which factors influence the use of shared and privately-owned e-scooters in the city of Madrid? Implications for urban mobility. Cities, Vol. 147. 104785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104785.
BABBIE, R. [2013]: The Practice of Social Research. Cengage Learning. https://books.google.hu/books?id=LRCrMgEACAAJ.
BAI, S.–JIAO, J. [2020]: Dockless E-scooter usage patterns and urban built Environments. A comparison study of Austin, TX, and Minneapolis, MN. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 20. 264–272. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.04.005.
BUEHLER, R.–BROADDUS, A.–SWEENEY, T.–ZHANG, W.–WHITE, E.–MOLLENHAUER, M. [2021]: Changes in Travel Behavior, Attitudes, and Preferences among E-Scooter Riders and Nonriders. First Look at Results from Pre and Post E-Scooter System Launch Surveys at Virginia Tech. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2675. No. 9. 335–345. o. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211002213.
BURT, N.–AHMED, Z. [2023]: E-scooter attitudes and risk-taking behaviours: An international systematic literature review and survey responses in the West Midlands, United Kingdom. Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. 11. 1277378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1277378.
CHRISTOFOROU, Z.–DE BORTOLI, A.–GIOLDASIS, C.–SEIDOWSKY, R. [2021]: Who is using e-scooters and how? Evidence from Paris. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 92. 102708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102708.
CUBELLS, J.–MIRALLES-GUASCH, C.–MARQUET, O. [2023]: E-scooter and bike-share route choice and detours: Modelling the influence of built environment and sociodemographic factors. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 111. 103664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103664.
DIBAJ, S.–HOSSEINZADEH, A.–MLADENOVIĆ, M. N.–KLUGER, R. [2021]: Where Have Shared E-Scooters Taken Us So Far? A Review of Mobility Patterns, Usage Frequency, and Personas. Sustainability, Vol. 13. No. 21. 11792. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111792.
DOBOZI ISTVÁN [2018]: Simai Mihály: A harmadik évezred nyitánya. A zöld fejlődés esélyei és a globális kockázatok. Könyvismertetés. Közgazdasági Szemle, 65. évf. 9. sz. 975–978. o. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2018.9.975.
ECCARIUS, T.–LU, C.-C. [2020]: Adoption intentions for micro-mobility – Insights from electric scooter sharing in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 84. 102327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102327.
EREN, E.–UZ, V. E. [2020]: A review on bike-sharing: the factors affecting bike-sharing demand. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 54. 101882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101882.
ESZTERGÁR-KISS DOMOKOS–TORDAI DÁNIEL–LOPEZ LIZARRAGA, J. C. [2022]: Assessment of travel behavior related to e-scooters using a stated preference experiment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 166. 389–405. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.11.010.
FAN, R.–BAO, X.–DU, K.–WANG, YU–WANG, Yi [2022]: The effect of government policies and consumer green preferences on the R&D diffusion of new energy vehicles: A perspective of complex network games. Energy, Vol. 254. 124316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124316.
FEARNLEY, N.–JOHNSSON, E.–BERGE, S. H. [2020]: Patterns of e-scooter use in combination with public transport. Transport Findings, július 24. https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.13707.
FITT, H.–CURL, A. [2020]: The early days of shared micromobility: A social practices approach. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 86. 102779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102779.
FLEISCHER TAMÁS [2019]: Városi mobilitás, közjavak, fenntarthatóság. Közgazdasági Szemle, 66. évf. 10. sz. 1056–1072. o. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.18414/KSZ.2019.10.1056.
GITELMAN, V.–PESAHOV, F.–CARMEL, R.–CHEN, S. [2017]: Exploring the characteristics of potential and current users of mobility scooters, among older people in Israel. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 46. 373–389. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.07.010.
GÖSSLING, S. [2020]: Integrating e-scooters in urban transportation: Problems, policies, and the prospect of system change. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 79. 102230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102230.
HENAO, A.–MARSHALL, W. E. [2019]: An analysis of the individual economics of ride-hailing drivers. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 130. 440–451. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.056.
HOLLINGSWORTH, J.–COPELAND, B.–JOHNSON, J. X. [2019]: The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14. No. 8. 084031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8.
HUO, J.–YANG, H.–LI, C.–ZHENG, R.–YANG, L.–WEN, Y. [2021]: Influence of the built environment on E-scooter sharing ridership: A tale of five cities. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 93. 103084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103084.
KAZEMZADEH, K.–SPREI, F. [2022]: Towards an electric scooter level of service: a review and framework. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 29. 149–164. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.06.005.
KHAVARIAN-GARMSIR, A. R.–SHARIFI, A.–MORADPOUR, N. [2021]: Are high-density districts more vulnerable to the COVID-19 pandemic? Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 70. 102911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102911.
KOPPLIN, C. S.–BRAND, B. M.–REICHENBERGER, Y. [2021]: Consumer acceptance of shared e-scooters for urban and short-distance mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 91. 102680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102680.
KRISWARDHANA, W.–ESZTERGÁR-KISS DOMOKOS [2023]: A systematic literature review of Mobility as a Service. Examining the socio-technical factors in MaaS adoption and bundling packages. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 31. 232–243. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.12.007.
LAA, B.–LETH, U. [2020]: Survey of E-scooter users in Vienna. Who they are and how they ride. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 89. 102874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102874.
LIAO, F.–CORREIA, G. [2022]: Electric carsharing and micromobility. A literature review on their usage pattern, demand, and potential impacts. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 16. No. 3. 269–286. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1861394.
MALHOTRA, N. K.–SIMON JUDIT [2017]: Marketingkutatás. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. https://doi.org/10.1556/9789630598675.
MITRA, R.–HESS, P. M. [2021]: Who are the potential users of shared e-scooters? An examination of socio-demographic, attitudinal and environmental factors. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 23. 100–107. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.12.004.
MITROPOULOS, L.–STAVROPOULOU, E.–TZOURAS, P.–KAROLEMEAS, C.–KEPAPTSOGLOU, K. [2023]: E-scooter micromobility systems. Review of attributes and impacts. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 21. 100888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100888.
MOURATIDIS, K. [2021]: COVID-19 impact on teleactivities: role of built environment and implications for mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 158. 251–270. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.03.007.
MOURATIDIS, K.–PETERS, S. [2022]: Urban planning and quality of life: A review of pathways linking the built environment to subjective well-being. Cities, Vol. 115. 103229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103229.
NIKIFORIADIS, A.–PASCHALIDIS, E.–STAMATIADIS, N.–RAPTOPOULOU, A.–KOSTARELI, A.–BASBAS, S. [2021]: Analysis of attitudes and engagement of shared e-scooter users. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 94. 102790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102790.
RECK, D. J.–GUIDON, S.–AXHAUSEN, K. W. [2021]: Modelling shared e-scooters: a spatial regression approach. 9th Symposium of the European Association for Research in Transportation, február 3–4. https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-B-000467559.
REUTERS [2023]: Párizs szeptembertől betiltja az e-rollereket. Reuters, április 3. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/parisians-vote-ban-e-scooters-french-capital-2023-04-02/.
SANGALLI, L. M.–SECCHI, P.–VANTINI, S.–VITELLI, V. [2010]: k-mean alignment for curve clustering. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Vol. 54. No. 5. 1219–1233. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.12.008.
SHAHEEN, S. [2019]: Micromobility Policy Toolkit: Docked and dockless bike and scooter sharing. UC Berkeley Transportation Sustainability Research Center, https://doi.org/10.7922/G2TH8JW7.
SOLON, G.–HAIDER, S.–WOOLDRIDGE, J. [2013]: What Are We Weighting For? NBER Working Paper Series, No. 18859. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18859.
SZEMERE DOROTTYA–IVÁNYI TAMÁS–SURMAN VIVIEN [2024]: Exploring electric scooter regulations and user perspectives: A comprehensive study in Hungary. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 15. 101135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101135.
TIRACHINI, A.–CATS, O. [2020]: COVID-19 and Public Transportation. Current Assessment, Prospects, and Research Needs. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 22. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.22.1.1.
TOKEY, A. I.–ALAM, M. S. [2023]: The travel behavior, attitude, and sociodemographic characteristics of the teleworkers in post-pandemic era. World Development Sustainability, Vol. 2. 100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2023.100066.
TU, J.-C.–JIA, X.-H.–YANG, T.-J. [2022]: Discussion on the Purchase Factors and the User Demands of Electric Scooters from the Perspective of Consumers’ Life Style – A Case Study on Gogoro. Processes, Vol. 10. No. 2. 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10020395.
UTENG, T. P.–KNAPSKOG, M.–UTENG, A.–MARIDAL, J. S. [2021]: Addressing climate policy-making and gender in transport plans and strategies. Megjelent: Magnusdottir, G. L.–Kronsell, A. (szerk): Gender, Intersectionality and Climate Institutions in Industrialised States. Routledge, London, 183–206. o. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003052821-14.
VERECKEI-POÓR BENCE–TÖRŐCSIK MÁRIA [2023]: Az elektromos autózás fogyasztói megítélése, dilemmái. Marketing & Menedzsment, 56. évf. 4. sz. 57–66. o. https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2022.56.04.06.
WOOLDRIDGE, J. M. [1999]: Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 90. No. 1. 77–97. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00033-5.
AGUILERA-GARCÍA, Á.–GOMEZ, J.–RANGEL, T.–BAEZA, M. D. L. Á.–VASSALLO, J. M. [2024]: Which factors influence the use of shared and privately-owned e-scooters in the city of Madrid? Implications for urban mobility. Cities, Vol. 147. 104785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104785.
BABBIE, R. [2013]: The Practice of Social Research. Cengage Learning. https://books.google.hu/books?id=LRCrMgEACAAJ.
BAI, S.–JIAO, J. [2020]: Dockless E-scooter usage patterns and urban built Environments. A comparison study of Austin, TX, and Minneapolis, MN. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 20. 264–272. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.04.005.
BUEHLER, R.–BROADDUS, A.–SWEENEY, T.–ZHANG, W.–WHITE, E.–MOLLENHAUER, M. [2021]: Changes in Travel Behavior, Attitudes, and Preferences among E-Scooter Riders and Nonriders. First Look at Results from Pre and Post E-Scooter System Launch Surveys at Virginia Tech. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2675. No. 9. 335–345. o. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211002213.
BURT, N.–AHMED, Z. [2023]: E-scooter attitudes and risk-taking behaviours: An international systematic literature review and survey responses in the West Midlands, United Kingdom. Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. 11. 1277378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1277378.
CHRISTOFOROU, Z.–DE BORTOLI, A.–GIOLDASIS, C.–SEIDOWSKY, R. [2021]: Who is using e-scooters and how? Evidence from Paris. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 92. 102708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102708.
CUBELLS, J.–MIRALLES-GUASCH, C.–MARQUET, O. [2023]: E-scooter and bike-share route choice and detours: Modelling the influence of built environment and sociodemographic factors. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 111. 103664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103664.
DIBAJ, S.–HOSSEINZADEH, A.–MLADENOVIĆ, M. N.–KLUGER, R. [2021]: Where Have Shared E-Scooters Taken Us So Far? A Review of Mobility Patterns, Usage Frequency, and Personas. Sustainability, Vol. 13. No. 21. 11792. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111792.
DOBOZI ISTVÁN [2018]: Simai Mihály: A harmadik évezred nyitánya. A zöld fejlődés esélyei és a globális kockázatok. Könyvismertetés. Közgazdasági Szemle, 65. évf. 9. sz. 975–978. o. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2018.9.975.
ECCARIUS, T.–LU, C.-C. [2020]: Adoption intentions for micro-mobility – Insights from electric scooter sharing in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 84. 102327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102327.
EREN, E.–UZ, V. E. [2020]: A review on bike-sharing: the factors affecting bike-sharing demand. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 54. 101882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101882.
ESZTERGÁR-KISS DOMOKOS–TORDAI DÁNIEL–LOPEZ LIZARRAGA, J. C. [2022]: Assessment of travel behavior related to e-scooters using a stated preference experiment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 166. 389–405. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.11.010.
FAN, R.–BAO, X.–DU, K.–WANG, YU–WANG, Yi [2022]: The effect of government policies and consumer green preferences on the R&D diffusion of new energy vehicles: A perspective of complex network games. Energy, Vol. 254. 124316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124316.
FEARNLEY, N.–JOHNSSON, E.–BERGE, S. H. [2020]: Patterns of e-scooter use in combination with public transport. Transport Findings, július 24. https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.13707.
FITT, H.–CURL, A. [2020]: The early days of shared micromobility: A social practices approach. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 86. 102779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102779.
FLEISCHER TAMÁS [2019]: Városi mobilitás, közjavak, fenntarthatóság. Közgazdasági Szemle, 66. évf. 10. sz. 1056–1072. o. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.18414/KSZ.2019.10.1056.
GITELMAN, V.–PESAHOV, F.–CARMEL, R.–CHEN, S. [2017]: Exploring the characteristics of potential and current users of mobility scooters, among older people in Israel. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 46. 373–389. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.07.010.
GÖSSLING, S. [2020]: Integrating e-scooters in urban transportation: Problems, policies, and the prospect of system change. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 79. 102230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102230.
HENAO, A.–MARSHALL, W. E. [2019]: An analysis of the individual economics of ride-hailing drivers. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 130. 440–451. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.056.
HOLLINGSWORTH, J.–COPELAND, B.–JOHNSON, J. X. [2019]: The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14. No. 8. 084031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8.
HUO, J.–YANG, H.–LI, C.–ZHENG, R.–YANG, L.–WEN, Y. [2021]: Influence of the built environment on E-scooter sharing ridership: A tale of five cities. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 93. 103084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103084.
KAZEMZADEH, K.–SPREI, F. [2022]: Towards an electric scooter level of service: a review and framework. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 29. 149–164. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.06.005.
KHAVARIAN-GARMSIR, A. R.–SHARIFI, A.–MORADPOUR, N. [2021]: Are high-density districts more vulnerable to the COVID-19 pandemic? Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 70. 102911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102911.
KOPPLIN, C. S.–BRAND, B. M.–REICHENBERGER, Y. [2021]: Consumer acceptance of shared e-scooters for urban and short-distance mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 91. 102680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102680.
KRISWARDHANA, W.–ESZTERGÁR-KISS DOMOKOS [2023]: A systematic literature review of Mobility as a Service. Examining the socio-technical factors in MaaS adoption and bundling packages. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 31. 232–243. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.12.007.
LAA, B.–LETH, U. [2020]: Survey of E-scooter users in Vienna. Who they are and how they ride. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 89. 102874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102874.
LIAO, F.–CORREIA, G. [2022]: Electric carsharing and micromobility. A literature review on their usage pattern, demand, and potential impacts. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 16. No. 3. 269–286. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1861394.
MALHOTRA, N. K.–SIMON JUDIT [2017]: Marketingkutatás. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. https://doi.org/10.1556/9789630598675.
MITRA, R.–HESS, P. M. [2021]: Who are the potential users of shared e-scooters? An examination of socio-demographic, attitudinal and environmental factors. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 23. 100–107. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.12.004.
MITROPOULOS, L.–STAVROPOULOU, E.–TZOURAS, P.–KAROLEMEAS, C.–KEPAPTSOGLOU, K. [2023]: E-scooter micromobility systems. Review of attributes and impacts. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 21. 100888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100888.
MOURATIDIS, K. [2021]: COVID-19 impact on teleactivities: role of built environment and implications for mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 158. 251–270. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.03.007.
MOURATIDIS, K.–PETERS, S. [2022]: Urban planning and quality of life: A review of pathways linking the built environment to subjective well-being. Cities, Vol. 115. 103229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103229.
NIKIFORIADIS, A.–PASCHALIDIS, E.–STAMATIADIS, N.–RAPTOPOULOU, A.–KOSTARELI, A.–BASBAS, S. [2021]: Analysis of attitudes and engagement of shared e-scooter users. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 94. 102790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102790.
RECK, D. J.–GUIDON, S.–AXHAUSEN, K. W. [2021]: Modelling shared e-scooters: a spatial regression approach. 9th Symposium of the European Association for Research in Transportation, február 3–4. https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-B-000467559.
REUTERS [2023]: Párizs szeptembertől betiltja az e-rollereket. Reuters, április 3. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/parisians-vote-ban-e-scooters-french-capital-2023-04-02/.
SANGALLI, L. M.–SECCHI, P.–VANTINI, S.–VITELLI, V. [2010]: k-mean alignment for curve clustering. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Vol. 54. No. 5. 1219–1233. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.12.008.
SHAHEEN, S. [2019]: Micromobility Policy Toolkit: Docked and dockless bike and scooter sharing. UC Berkeley Transportation Sustainability Research Center, https://doi.org/10.7922/G2TH8JW7.
SOLON, G.–HAIDER, S.–WOOLDRIDGE, J. [2013]: What Are We Weighting For? NBER Working Paper Series, No. 18859. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18859.
SZEMERE DOROTTYA–IVÁNYI TAMÁS–SURMAN VIVIEN [2024]: Exploring electric scooter regulations and user perspectives: A comprehensive study in Hungary. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 15. 101135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101135.
TIRACHINI, A.–CATS, O. [2020]: COVID-19 and Public Transportation. Current Assessment, Prospects, and Research Needs. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 22. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.22.1.1.
TOKEY, A. I.–ALAM, M. S. [2023]: The travel behavior, attitude, and sociodemographic characteristics of the teleworkers in post-pandemic era. World Development Sustainability, Vol. 2. 100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2023.100066.
TU, J.-C.–JIA, X.-H.–YANG, T.-J. [2022]: Discussion on the Purchase Factors and the User Demands of Electric Scooters from the Perspective of Consumers’ Life Style – A Case Study on Gogoro. Processes, Vol. 10. No. 2. 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10020395.
UTENG, T. P.–KNAPSKOG, M.–UTENG, A.–MARIDAL, J. S. [2021]: Addressing climate policy-making and gender in transport plans and strategies. Megjelent: Magnusdottir, G. L.–Kronsell, A. (szerk): Gender, Intersectionality and Climate Institutions in Industrialised States. Routledge, London, 183–206. o. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003052821-14.
VERECKEI-POÓR BENCE–TÖRŐCSIK MÁRIA [2023]: Az elektromos autózás fogyasztói megítélése, dilemmái. Marketing & Menedzsment, 56. évf. 4. sz. 57–66. o. https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2022.56.04.06.
WOOLDRIDGE, J. M. [1999]: Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 90. No. 1. 77–97. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00033-5.
Megjelent
2025-03-17
Hogyan kell idézni
SzemereD., & SurmanV. (2025). Az elektromos rollerek integrációjának vizsgálata Magyarországon. Közgazdasági Szemle, 72(3), 312-327. Elérés forrás https://ojs.mtak.hu/index.php/kszemle/article/view/18744
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
Műhely
