The Conditions and Practice of the Enforcement of Life Imprisonment Without Parole
Abstract
This study examines the conditions and practice of enforcing life imprisonment without the possibility of parole (LWOP), with a particular focus on the structural, psychological and security- related challenges faced by the penal system. The defining feature of LWOP is the permanent exclusion of release, which fundamentally alters the traditional purpose of imprisonment and renders the reintegration function largely inapplicable. This shift necessitates a re-evaluation of detention strategies, as a purely custodial approach carries serious risks both for the psychological well-being of prisoners and for institutional security. The paper outlines the preparatory professional work preceding the introduction of LWOP in Hungary and the early risk assessments identifying persistent hopelessness, depressive states, increased suicide risk and the potential for heightened aggression among this prisoner population. In response to these concerns, the first Long-Term High Security Regime unit (HSR) was established at Szeged Prison. The HSR was designed to combine maximum security with psychological stabilisation, functioning not solely as an isolating measure but as an intermediate and preparatory regime aimed at fostering cooperation and institutional adaptability. Domestic experience demonstrates that prisoners serving LWOP do not constitute a homogeneous group. With appropriate treatment, therapeutic interventions and access to educational and occupational activities, some prisoners may, after a certain period, be integrated into standard prison units. The psychological condition of prisoners serving extremely long sentences evolves dynamically, with phases of resistance, hope and acceptance alternating throughout the prison life course. In this context, isolation cannot be regarded as a permanent solution but rather as a time-limited and professionally justified element within a differentiated regime structure. By situating the Hungarian practice within the framework of international research, the study highlights that LWOP is frequently experienced by prisoners as a form of the death penalty. The permanent absence of parole, the gradual erosion of personal relationships, prolonged isolation and elevated suicide risk are recurring features of this punishment. The study concludes that the enforcement of LWOP can only be considered compatible with the requirements of a rule-of-law system if security considerations are consistently balanced with safeguards ensuring psychological stability, respect for human dignity and individualized treatment throughout the period of detention.
References
behind Bars. Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 55 (2016), pp. 312–327. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12172
2. APPLETON, Catherine: Life without Parole. In: Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford, Oxford
University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935383.013.25
3. BANISTER, P. – SMITH, F. – HESKIN, K. – BOLTON, N.: Psychological Correlates of Long-
Term Imprisonment I–II. British Journal of Criminology, 13 (1973), pp. 312–323; 323–330. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a046481
4. BOLGER, Maggie: Offenders. In: OLIVIERE, David – MONROE, Barbara (szerk.): Death, Dying
and Social Differences. New York, Oxford University Press, 2004. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599295.001.0001
5. CASELLA, Jean – RIDGEWAY, James – SHOURD, Sarah (szerk.): Hell Is a Very Small Place:
Voices from Solitary Confinement. New York, New Press, 2016.
6. COHEN, Stanley – TAYLOR, Laurie: Psychological Survival: The Experience of Long-Term
Imprisonment. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1972. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1177/089124167300200111
7. CSÓTI András: A magyar börtönügy új kihívása: a tényleges életfogytig tartó szabadságvesztés.
Börtönügyi Szemle, 2005/2.
8. CULLEN, Eric – NEWELL, Tim: Murderers and Life Imprisonment: Containment, Treatment,
Safety and Risk. Winchester, Waterside Press, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.435
9. CUNNINGHAM, Mark – SORENSEN, Jon: Nothing to Lose? A Comparative Examination of
Prison Misconduct Rates among Life-without-Parole and Other Long-Term High-Security Inmates.
Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33 (2006), pp. 683–705. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854806288273
10. DOLE, Joseph: The Meaning of Life. In: HARTMAN, Kenneth (szerk.): Too Cruel, Not Unusual
Enough: An Anthology Published by the Other Death Penalty Project. Lancaster, The Other Death
Penalty Project, 2013.
11. ÉLES Éva: A fogvatartottakkal kapcsolatos pszichológiai feladatok bemutatása, kiemelt
témakörként ismertetve a tényleges életfogytiglanos fogvatartottakkal kapcsolatos kihívást.
Börtönügyi Szemle, 2019/2, pp. 5–11.
12. ÉLES Éva – MATOVICS Csaba – TIKÁSZ Sándor: A Szegedi Fegyház és Börtön hosszúidős
fogvatartási tapasztalatai. Börtönügyi Szemle, 2018/2.
13. FLANAGAN, Timothy (szerk.): Long-Term Imprisonment: Policy, Science, and Correctional
Practice. London, Sage Publications, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483327228.n1
14. GARAMI Lajos: Élő halottak? A tényleges életfogytiglani szabadságvesztés végrehajtásának
problémái. Börtönügyi Szemle, 1999/2, pp. 56–63.
15. GEORGE, Erin: A Woman Doing Life: Notes from a Prison for Women. New York, Oxford
University Press, 2010.
16. GOFFMAN, Erving: Asylums. London, Penguin, 1961.
17. GOLDSTEIN, Joseph: Merciless End for a Long Island Cop Killer. New York Times, 2016. október
28.
18. HANEY, Craig: Mental Health Issues in Long-Term Solitary and ‘Supermax’ Confinement. Crime
and Delinquency, 49 (2003), pp. 124–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128702239239
19. HANEY, Craig – LYNCH, Mona: Regulating Prisons of the Future: The Psychological
Consequences of Solitary and Supermax Confinement. New York University Review of Law and
Social Change, 23 (1997), pp. 477–570.
20. HANDTKE, Violet – BRETSCHNEIDER, Wiebke – ELGER, Bernice – WANGMO, Tenzin: The
Collision of Care and Punishment: Ageing Prisoners' View on Compassionate Release. Punishment
and Society, 19 (2017), pp. 5–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516644679
21. HARTMAN, Kenneth (szerk.): Too Cruel, Not Unusual Enough: An Anthology Published by the
Other Death Penalty Project. Lancaster, The Other Death Penalty Project, 2013.
22. HASSINE, Victor: Life without Parole: Living in Prison Today. Los Angeles, Roxbury Publishing
Company, 1999.
23. JOHNSON, Robert – DOBRZANSKA, Sandra: Mature Coping among Life-Sentenced Inmates.
24. JOHNSON, Robert – TABRIZ, Sonia (szerk.): Life without Parole: Living and Dying in Prison
Today. New York, Oxford University Press, 2011.
25. KABA, Fatos – LEWIS, Andrea – GLOWA-KOLLISCH, Sarah – HADLER, James – LEE, David
– ALPER, Howard – SELLING, Daniel – MACDONALD, Ross – SOLIMO, Angela – PARSONS,
Amanda – VENTERS, Homer: Solitary Confinement and Risk of Self-Harm among Jail Inmates.
American Journal of Public Health, 104 (2014), pp. 442–447. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2013.301742
26. KISZELY Pál – NAGY István: Az idő rabságában. Börtönügyi Szemle, 2012/3.
27. LEIGEY, Margaret: The Forgotten Men: Serving a Life without Parole Sentence. New Brunswick,
Rutgers University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/685708
28. LIEM, Marieke: After Life Imprisonment: Reentry in the Era of Mass Incarceration. New York,
New York University Press, 2016.
29. LIEM, Marieke C. A. – VAN KUIJCK, Y. A. J. M. – RAES, B. C. M.: Detentiebeleving van
(levens)langgestraften. Delikt en Delinkwent, 2 (2016), pp. 10–29.
30. LIEBLING, Alison: Prisons and Their Moral Performance: A Study of Values, Quality and Prison
Life. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199271221.001.0001
31. LIEBLING, Alison – MARUNA, Shadd (szerk.): The Effects of Imprisonment. Cullompton,
Willan, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843926030
32. MacKenzie v. Stanford, Index No. 2789/15 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2016).
33. MATOVICS Csaba: A Szegedi Fegyház és Börtön hosszúidős speciális rezsimű körletének
működési tapasztalatai. Börtönügyi Szemle, 2009/2, pp. 99–108.
34. PAPP László: Mindörökké rács mögött. Szükség van-e a tényleges életfogytig tartó
szabadságvesztésre? De Jure, 2007/2, pp. 22–25.
35. RASCH, Wilfried: The Effects of Indeterminate Detention: A Study of Men Sentenced to Life
Imprisonment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 4 (1981), pp. 417–431. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2527(81)90010-8
36. REIDY, Thomas – CUNNINGHAM, Mark – SORENSEN, Joe: From Death to Life: Prison
Behaviour of Former Death Row Inmates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28 (2001), pp. 67–82.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854801028001003
37. RHODES, Lorna: Total Confinement: Madness and Reason in the Maximum Security Prison.
Berkeley – Los Angeles, University of California Press, 2004.
38. SCHARFF-SMITH, Peter: The Effects of Solitary Confinement on Prison Inmates: A Brief History
and Review of the Literature. Crime and Justice, 34 (2006), pp. 441–528. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1086/500626
39. SHALEV, Sharon: Supermax: Controlling Risk through Solitary Confinement. Cullompton,
Willan, 2009.
40. SHAUER, Edward: Book Review: Life without Parole: Living and Dying in Prison Today.
Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 8 (2011), pp. 177–178.
41. STEWART, Jim – LIEBERMAN, Paul: What Is This New Sentence That Takes away Parole?
Student Lawyer, 11 (1982), pp. 14–17.
42. SYKES, Gresham: The Society of Captives. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1958.
43. van Zyl Smit, Dirk – Appleton, Catherine: Life Imprisonment: A Global Human Rights Analysis.
44. WILLIS, Anthony – ZAITZOW, Barbara: Doing “Life”: A Glimpse into the Long-Term
Incarceration Experience. Laws, 4 (2015), pp. 559–578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws4030559

