Right to a Healthy Environment and Legal Regulation of Viticulture

  • Dušan Nikolić University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law
Keywords: human rights, healthy environment, agricultural policy, planting rights, winegrowers' oases

Abstract

The foundations for the introduction and development of the modern right to a healthy environment were laid almost half a century ago, by adoption of the Declaration on the Human Environment at the United Nations thematic Conference on the Human Environment, held in Stockholm in 1972. The gathering was preceded by extensive preparations in which members of the academic community and people from politics participated equally. Scientists have obviously prepared a good basis for considering key issues, and representatives of member states and UN bodies have given it an appropriate political dimension. Thanks to that, reasonable, necessary compromises were made, which made it possible to establish a (fragile) balance of interests in the then polarized world and to start a process of great importance for humanity with a lot of optimism. Unfortunately, relatively little has been done on global level since then. This is evidenced by the terminological inconsistency and conceptual uncertainty of the right to a healthy environment, unclear legal nature, dominant development and expansion through constitutionalization at the national level (not on the basis of international instruments), as well as indirect application through the so-called greening of other human rights. The United Nations Human Rights Council, which in October 2021 adopted a Resolution on a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment by which the right to a healthy environment was raised to the level of human rights, officially assessed that many questions about the relationship of human rights and the environment remain unanswered and require further examination.

This paper opens several interrelated topics whose consideration can contribute to the further development of the right to a healthy environment. The author believes that over time there will be an interaction between the right to a healthy environment and property rights; that this will pave the way for a more extensive interpretation that could result in an individual's autonomous right to independently shape a healthy environment in the space person uses as the owner or holder of another property right; that such interaction would enable the owner to more effectively counter unjustified restrictions on property rights established by state bodies or supranational institutions, such as those existing in the field of viticulture. The paper points out the need to rethink policies and rights related to agriculture and to pay more attention to the part of the population that contributes to the preservation of a healthy environment through their way of life and work. In the final part, winegrowers ’oases that represent specific spatial units are analyzed.

References

1. Albers J H (2018) Human Rights and Climate Change – Protecting the Right to Life of Individuals of Present and Future Generations, Security and Human Rights 28(1-4), pp. 113–144.
2. Berk P, Hočevar M, Stajnko D & Belšak A (2016) Development of alternative plant protection product application techniques in orchards, based on measurement sensing systems, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture Vol. 124, pp. 273–288.
3. Cindrić P, Korać N & Ivanišević D (2019) Ampelography and selection of vines, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Agriculture, Novi Sad.
4. Collins H (2012) On the (In)copatibility of Human Rights Discourse in Private Law, LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 2012/7, pp. 1–44.
5. Harvey P (2004) Aspirational Law, Buffalo Law Review 52(3), pp. 701–726.
6. Jensen PK & Olesen MH (2014) Spray mass balance in pesticide application:
A review, Crop Protection Vol. 61, pp. 23–31.
7. Knox J (2020) Constructing the Human Right to a Healthy Environment, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1/2020, pp. 79–95.
8. Korać N (2011) Organsko Vinogradarstvo, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad.
9. Krstić I & Čučković B (2015) Procedural aspects of article 8 of the EHCR in environmental cases – The greening of human rights law, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2015/3.
10. Nikolić D (2017) Climate Change and Property Rights Changes, in: van Straalen F, Hartmann T & Sheehan J (eds.) Property Rights and Climate Change, London, Routledge, pp. 52–70.
11. Nikolić D (2018a) O pravu sađenja vinove loze u Evropskoj uniji, Harmonizacija srpskog i mađarskog prava sa pravom Evropske unije, Vol. 6, pp. 167–177.
12. Nikolić D (2018b) Prostorno planiranje vinogradarskih područja – Pravni aspekti, Harmonizacija srpskog i mađarskog prava sa pravom Evropske unije = A szerb és a magyar jog harmonizációja az Európai Unió jogával = Harmonisation of Serbian and Hungarian law with the European Union law: thematic collection of papers Vol. 7.
13. Paull J (2011) Attending the First Organic Agriculture Course: Rudolf Steiner’s Agriculture Course at Koberwitz, European Journal of Social Sciences 21(1), pp. 64–70.
14. Pirie F (2010) Law before Government: Ideology and Aspiration, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30(2), pp. 207–228.
15. Sáry P (2020) The legal protection of environment in ancient Rome, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Law 15(29), pp. 199–216; https://doi.org/10.21029/JAEL.2020.29.199.
Published
2021-12-08
Section
Cikkek