The "Environmental Lawsuit" as an Instrument of Preventive Protection of the Constitutional Right to Healthy Environment in the Law of the Republic of Serbia

Keywords: environment, right to a healthy environment, environmental lawsuit, claim to eliminate the danger of damage

Abstract

A lot of attention has been paid to the environment and its protection in Serbian legislation. The right to healthy environment is guaranteed by the Constitution, and in the last two decades numerous laws have been passed regulating various aspects of the environment in order to ensure its protection. The subject of the paper is the claim to eliminate the danger of damage, stipulated by the Law on Obligations from 1978. From the enactment of the law, this legal institution has been considered as a means suitable for providing preventive environmental protection, which is why it is often called an “environmental lawsuit” in Serbian legal theory.

References

1. Brkić M (2019) Pojam znatnije štete u preventivnoj zaštiti životne sredine, Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, 3/2019, pp. 294–310.
2. Cigoj S in Blagojević B, Krulj V (1980) Komentar Zakona o obligacionim odnosima, Beograd.
3. Cvetić R (2014) Održivi razvoj i ekološka šteta, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, No. 68, pp. 291–302.
4. Cvetić R (2015) Značaj negatorne tužbe za zaštitu životne sredine, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 4(49), pp. 1583–1595.
5. Dudás A (2015) Környezetvédelmi polgári jogi felelősség a szerb jogban, in: Sápi E (ed.) Decem anni in Europaea Unione III, Miskolci Egyetemi Kiadó, Miskolc,
pp. 27–42.
6. Gajinov T (2015) Građanskopravna odgovornost za imisije, doctoral thesis, Novi Sad.
7. Josipović T (2017) Građanskopravna zaštita od štetnih imisija, in: Barbić J (ed.) Građanskopravna zaštita okoliša, Zagreb, pp. 53–84.
8. Lazić M (2012) Imisije i građanskopravna zaštita, Pravna riječ, 32(9),
pp. 113–129.
9. Karanikić Mirić M (2007) Odgovornost za zagađenje životne sredine, Pravni život, 9(59), pp. 455–479.
10. Knežević M (2013) Teret dokazivanja nedozvoljenosti imisija kao pretpostavke negatornog zahteva, Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 4(47), pp. 357–374.
11. Maganić A (2017) Procesnopravni aspekti građanskopravne zaštite okoliša, in: Barbić J (ed.) Građanskopravna zaštita okoliša, Zagreb, pp. 21–52.
12. Malenica A (2017) Rimsko pravo, Novi Sad
13. Orlović S (2014) Pravo na život u Ustavu, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 4(48), pp. 161–175.
14. Petrušić N (2009) Zaštita životne sredine u građanskom sudskom postupku, in: Nikolić D (ed.) Osnove prava životne sredine, pp. 217–244.
15. Popov D, Nikolić D, Salma M, Cvetić R & Knežević M (2017) “Der Umweltschutz und bürgerliches Recht – materiell- und prozessualrechtliche Aspekte”, Legal Aspects of Biomedicine and Environmental Protection, Novi Sad,
pp. 81–93.
16. Salma J & Nikolić D (2009) Građansko pravo i životna sredina, in: Nikolić D (ed.) Osnove prava životne sredine, 169–192.
17. Salma J (2009) Obligacionopravna zaštita životne sredine: tužba radi otklanjanja izvora opasnosti za nastanak ekološke štete i tužba radi naknade ekološke štete, Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 2(43), pp. 33–53.
18. Salma M (2014) Preventivna tužba za otklanjanje izvora opasnosti od štete u svetlu održivog razvoja, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 4(48), pp. 131–145.
19. Šago D (2013) Ekološka tužba kao instrument građanskopravne zaštite okoliša, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 4(50), pp. 895–915.
20. Vučković M (2018) Građanskopravni aspekt zaštite od prekomernih imisija, doctoral thesis, Niš.
Published
2021-12-08
Section
Cikkek