The significance and legal assessment of Zoophilia and Zoophilic Acts, with special reference to Hungary
Abstract
The recognition of the inherent intrinsic value of living beings clearly characterizes the legislation of Europe in the last few decades, a process that can be seen in the refinement of the legal status of animals, in the increasingly detailed regulations of animal welfare rules, in the tightening of regulations against animal cruelty, in some constitutional changes, and in the prohibitions related to zoophilic acts. Zoophilia is as old as humanity, and although the attitude towards it was not uniform in different historical eras, it was rather negatively judged and prohibited. It is important to distinguish between zoophilia as a psychiatric paraphilia and zoophilic acts as legally relevant acts. In the past few years, sexual abuse committed against vulnerable groups has been in the spotlight in Europe, society's sensitivity is growing and we can witness the tightening of regulations. Although animals cannot be considered victims in the narrow legal sense due to their lack of legal capacity, these processes will also affect the legal assessment of zoophilic acts. In the case of zoophilia, there seems to be a high latency, few cases come to light, but they cause strong public indignation. In the long term, it is likely that even those countries that currently do not sanction or do not sanction zoophilia at the criminal law level (such as Hungary) will take stronger action against it in the future.
References
Abbate CE (2020) Valuing Animals as They Are – Whether They Feel it or Not. Eur. J. Philos. 2020, 1.
Aggrawal A (2011) A new classification of zoophilia. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 18(2), pp. 73–78.
Andriette B (1996) March. Laying with beasts. The Guide.
Atlas R M (2012) One Health: Its Origins and Future, in: Mackenzie J, Jeggo M, Daszak P & Richt J. (eds) One Health: The Human-Animal-Environment Interfaces in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 365. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Bartow A (2016) Copyright Law and the Commoditization of Sex.
Beetz A (2015). Bestiality and zoophilia: a review of the literature. Anthrozoös 28(1), pp. 19–36.
Beetz A M (2008) Bestiality and Zoophilia: A Discussion of Sexual Contact With Animals, in: Ascione F (ed.) The International Handbook of Animal Abuse and Cruelty: Theory, Research, and Application, Purdue University Press, pp. 201–220.
Bérces V (2017) On the criminal relevance of the victim’s conduct: Consent, involvement, subsequent consent, Büntetőjogi Szemle, 6, pp. 47–55.
Bolliger G (2016) Legal protection of animal dignity in Switzerland: status quo and future perspectives, Animal Law 22, pp. 311–395.
Bolliger G & Goetsche A F (2005). Sexual relations with animals (zoophilia): An unrecognized problem in animal welfare legislation, Tier im Recht 18, pp. 23–45.
Bullough V L (1976) Sexual Variance in Society and History, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Chauvet D (2018) Should cultured meat be refused in the name of animal dignity?, Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 21, pp. 387–411.
Chomel B & Sun B (2011) Zoonoses in the bedroom. Emerg Infect Dis. 17(2), pp. 167–172.
Davis P (1954) Sex Perversion and the Law, Mental Health Press, New York, NY, USA.
Dekkers M (1994) Dearest Pet: On Bestiality, New York, Verso.
Deli G (2013) A jó erkölcsökről, Medium, Budapest.
DSM (2013) Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, MERICAL Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, VA, USA.
Edwards M J (2009) Arrest and Prosecution of Animal Sex Abuse (Bestiality) Offenders in the United States, 1975–2015, J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 47, pp. 335–346.
Evans E P (1987) The Criminal Prosecution and Capital Punishment of Animals, Faber and Faber, London, UK.
Fekete M & Grád A (2012) Pszichológia és pszichopatológia jogászoknak, HVG-ORAC, Budapest.
Hadley J (2017) From Welfare to Rights without Changing the Subject, Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 20, pp. 993–1004.
Harold G, Grasmick G & Bryjak J (1980) The Deterrent Effect of Perceived Severity of Punishment, Social Forces, 59(2), pp. 471–491.
Krueger R B, Reed G M, First, M B, Marais A, Kismodi E & Brike P (2017) Proposals for Paraphilic Disorders in the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
Lesandrić V, Orlović I, Peitl V, Karlović D (2017) Zoophilia as an Early Sign of Psychosis. Alcoholism and Psychiatry Research. Journal on Psychiatric Research and Addictions. 53, 27-32.
Levin R J & van Berlo W (2004) Sexual arousal and orgasm in subjects who experience forced or non-consensual sexual stimulation – a review. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, Volume 11, Issue 2, 82-88.
Love B (1992) Encyclopedia of Unusual Sex Practices, Barricade Books, Inc, Fort Lee, NJ.
Martin A (2019) On respecting animals, or can animals be wronged without being harmed?, Res. Publica 25, pp. 83–99.
Massen J (1994) Zoophilie: die sexuelle Liebe zu Tieren, Informationen zu einem sexuellen Tabu, Pinto-Press-
McManus M A, Hargreaves P, Rainbow L & Alison L J (2013) Paraphilias: Definition, Diagnosis and Treatment, F1000Prime Rep.
Miletski H (2002a) Bestiality and Zoophilia: Sexual Relations with Animals. Journal of Sex Research 39(4), pp. 273–283.
Miletski H (2002b) Understanding Bestiality and Zoophilia, East West Publishing LLC: Bethesda, MD, USA.
Miletski H (2009) A History of Bestiality. In Bestiality and Zoophilia; Sexual Relations with Animals, New York, NY, USA.
Nagel T (1974) What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review 83, 435–450.
Németh I (2015) The Victim’s Consent in Criminal Law, Universitas Győr Nonprofit Kft, Győr.
Nussbaum M (2007) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ortiz S A G (2004) Beyond Welfare: Animal Integrity, Animal Dignity, and Genetic Engineering. Ethics Environ 9, pp. 94–120.
Ranger R & Fedoroff P (2014) Commentary: Zoophilia and Law, J. of the American Academy and the Law Online, 42(4), pp. 421–426.
Rosenberger J R (1968) Bestiality, Los Angeles, CA: Medco Books.
Salisbury J E (1994) The Beast Within – Animals in the Middle Ages, Routledge, New York.
Shaffer L & Penn J (2006) A comprehensive paraphilia classification system, in: Hickey E W (ed.) Sex crimes and paraphilia, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Sherman L W (1993) Defiance, Deterrence, and Irrelevance: A Theory of the Criminal Sanction, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30(4), pp. 445–473.
Steinbock B (1999) Speciesism and the Idea of Equality, in: Arthur J (ed.) Morality and Moral Controversies; Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, pp. 141–147.
Vetter Sz, Boros A & Ózsvári L (2020) Penal Sanctioning of Zoophilia in Light of the Legal Status of Animals – A Comparative Analysis of Fifteen European Countries, Animals 10(6), p. 1024.
Vetter Sz & Ózsvári L (2020) Az állatfajok és állategyedek védelme az európai országok alkotmányában, különös tekintettel az állatok "méltóságára", Alkotmánybírósági Szemle (2), pp. 11–18.
Weidner E (1972) Sodomie und Sadismus als Tierschutzproblem, Dissertation, University of Giessen.
Zuolo F (2016) Dignity and Animals. Does it Make Sense to Apply the Concept of Dignity to all Sentient Beings?, Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 19, pp. 1117–1130.
