Review of terrestrial and freshwater animal reintroduction programmes from an international and Hungarian perspective

  • Bálint Bajomi Herman Ottó Institute Nonprofit Ltd.; Faculty of Ecology, University of Debrecen
  • Erzsébet Óhegyi CEEweb for Biodiversity
  • Tímea Olajos Faculty of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, Szent István University
  • András Takács-Sánta Faculty of Social Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University
Keywords: bibliometrics, costs, Hungary, international trends, IUCN, reintroduction, scientific literature, taxonomic bias

Abstract

We endeavoured to collect the international literature of terrestrial and freshwater animal reintroductions as fully as possible and we examined more closely the Hungarian programmes. We gathered into a database bibliographic data of 8 508 sources produced between 1891 and 2015. The amount of literature showed exponential growth and then fluctuation after saturation. We are aware of 27 implemented Hungarian reintroduction programmes. We showed that following the recommendations of the IUCN guidelines increases significantly the potential of a programme to be successful. In an international perspective, the annual costs of the projects span from a negligible amount to 2 million USD. We found a significant taxonomic bias: in the international literature and also amongst the Hungarian programmes invertebrates are present in a lower, birds and mammals in a higher weight compared to their proportion in biodiversity.

References

Bajomi, B. (2003): White-headed duck breeding and reintroduction programme in Hungary, 1982-1992. Threatened Waterfowl Specialist Group News (14): 73–76.

Bajomi, B. (2011): Az eurázsiai hód (Castor fiber) visszatelepítésének tapasztalatai Magyarországon. Duna-Dráva Nemzeti Park, Budapest, 54 p.

Bajomi, B., Pullin, A. S., Stewart, G. B., Takács-Sánta, A. (2010): Bias and dispersal in the animal reintroduction literature. Oryx 44: 358–365. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605310000281

de Solla Price, D. (1979): Kis tudomány - nagy tudomány. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 251 p.

Fehér, Z., Majoros, G., Ötvös, S., Bajomi, B., Sólymos, P. (2017): Successful reintroduction of the endangered black nerite, Theodoxus prevostianus (Pfeiffer, 1828) (Gastropoda: Neritidae) in Hungary. Journal of Molluscan Studies 83(2): 240–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyx007

Fischer, J., Lindenmayer, D. B. (2000): An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biological Conservation 96: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00048-3

Griffiths, R. A., Pavajeau, L. (2008): Captive breeding, reintroduction, and the conservation of amphibians. Conservation Biology 22: 852–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00967.x

IUCN/SSC (1998): Guidelines for re-introductions. IUCN / SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group, Gland és Cambridge, 10 p.

IUCN/SSC (2013): Guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocations. Version 1.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland, 57 p.

Kiszely, P. (1999): Astacus astacus (L.) in the Balaton region (Hungary) - a summary of surveys between 1992–1998 and future prospects. Freshwater Crayfish 12: 817–824.

Lee, R., Hughes, B. (2008): Review of waterbird re-establishment in the AEWA region. Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, 105 p.

Márkus, F. (2004): Gerinces állatfajok visszatelepítésének természetrajza Magyarországon, 1970-től napjainkig. Természetvédelmi Közlemények 11: 359–369.

Óhegyi, E. (2013): Az állatfaj-visszatelepítési programok finanszírozása. MSc. diplomadolgozat, Mezőgazdaság- és Környezettudományi Kar, Szent István Egyetem, Gödöllő, 86 p.

Olajos, T. (2012): A magyarországi állatfaj-visszatelepítések elemzése az IUCN útmutató alapján. BSc. diplomadolgozat, Környezet- és Tájgazdálkodási Intézet, Természetvédelmi és Tájökológiai Tanszék, Szent István Egyetem, Mezőgazdaság- és Környezettudományi Kar, Gödöllő, 59 p.

R Core Team (2020): R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Wien.

Seddon, P. J., Armstrong, D. P. (2016): Reintroduction and other conservation translocations: History and future developments. In: Jachowski, D. S., Millspaugh, J. J., Angermeier, P. L., Slotow, R., (eds.): Reintroduction of Fish and Wildlife Populations. University of California Press, Oakland. pp. 7–27.

Seddon, P. J., Armstrong, D. P., Maloney, R. F. (2007): Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conservation Biology 21: 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00627.x

Seddon, P. J., Armstrong, D. P. (2016): Reintroduction and other conservation translocations: History and future developments. In: Jachowski, D. S.; Millspaugh, J. J., Angermeier, P. L., Slotow, R. (eds.): Reintroduction of Fish and Wildlife Populations. University of California Press, pp. 7–27.

Swan, K. D., McPherson, J. M., Seddon, P. J., Moehrenschlager, A. (2016): Managing marine Biodiversity: the rising diversity and prevalence of marine conservation translocations. Conservation Letters 9(4): 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12217

Sutherland, W. J., Armstrong, D., Butchart, S. H. M., Earnhardt, J., Ewen, J., Jamieson, I., Jones, C. G., Lee, R., Newbery, P., Nichols, J. D., Parker, K. A., Sarrazin, F., Seddon, P., Shah, N., Tatayaha, V. (2010): Standards for documenting and monitoring bird reintroduction projects. Conservation Letters 3: 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00113.x

Thomson Reuters és Clarivate (2006– 2021): EndNote X-20.4.1. Thomson Reuters and Clarivate, Philadelphia, PA and Boston, MA, USA.

Published
2023-12-19