Spatial and seasonal changes of shoreline habitats of juvenile fish in the Danube at the Göd island (rkm 1671-1669)

  • Tibor Gaebele Hungarian Danube Research Station, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  • Gábor Guti Hungarian Danube Research Station, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Keywords: point abundance sampling, aquatic-terrestrial transition zone, large river, floodplain, seasonal dynamic

Abstract

A juvenile fish survey was implemented at the Göd island in the Danube section upstream of Budapest from March to September in 2008, and spatial and temporal changes of shoreline habitats were analysed intensely. Point abundance sampling strategy was used and 10 habitat variables were measured for characterization of investigated sites. The preliminary results indicated increasing influence of woody debris and terrestrial vegetation during the inundations, along the natural shorelines. Habitat variables of rip-rap shoreline were stable and partly independent from the water level fluctuation.

References

Copp, G.H. (1989a): The habitat diversity and fish reproductive function of floodplain ecosystem. – Env. Biol. Fish. 26: 1–26.

Copp, G.H. (1989b): Electrofishing for fish larvae and 0+ juveniles: equipment modifications for increased efficiency with short fishes. – Aqua. Fish. Mgmt. 210: 117–186.

Copp, G.H. (1992): Comparative microhabitat use of cyprinid larvae and juvenile fish in a lotic floodplain channel. – Env. Biol. Fish. 33: 181–193.

Copp, G., Guti, G., B. Rovny & Cerny, J.(1994): Hierarchal analysis of habitat use by 0+ juvenile fish in the Hungarian/Slovak floodplain of the River Danube. – Env. Biol. Fish. 40: 329–348.

Guti, G. (1996): Species composition of juvenile (0+) fish assemblages in the Szigetköz floodplain of the Danube. – Tiscia 30: 49–54.

Guti, G. (1997): Halivadékállományok dinamikája a szigetközi hullámtéren a bősi vízlépcső üzembehelyezését követően. – Hidrológiai Közl. 77/1-2: 55–56.

Guti, G. (1998): Changes in juvenile fish assemblages in two backwaters of the Szigetköz floodplain after river diversion by Gabčikovo Dam. – It. J. Zool. Suppl. 65: 337–339.

Hammer, Ř., Harper, D.A.T., and P. D. Ryan, 2001. PAST (2001): Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1): 9pp

Hendricks, M. L., Hocutt Ch. H. & Stauffer J. R. (1980): Monitoring of fish in lotic habitats. – In: Hocutt, Ch. H. & Stauffer, J. R. (eds.) Biological monitoring of fish. Lexington Books, Massachussetts and Toronto, pp. 205–231.

Kurmayer, R., Keckeis, H., Schrutka, S. & Zweimüller, I. (1996): Macro- and microhabitat used by 0+ fish in a side-arm of the River Danube. – Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 113: 425–432.

Persat, H. & Oliver, J. M. (1991): The point abundance sampling, a fishing strategy for large rivers: Short presentation of the concept, its appliance and some results. – In: M. Penáz (ed.) Biological Monitoring of Large Rivers. Brno pp. 104-113.

Schiemer, F. (2000): Fish has indicator for the assessment of the ecological integrity of large rivers. – Hidrobiol. 422/423: 271–278.

Schiemer, F. & Spindler, T. (1989): Endangered fish species of the Danube River in Austria. – Regulated Rivers Res. Manage. 4: 397–407.

Schiemer, F., Flore, L. & Keckeis, H. (2001): Preface: 0+ fis has indicators for the ecological status of large rivers. – Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 135/2-4: 115–116.

Wintersberger, H.(1996): Species assemblages and habitat selection of larval and juvenile fishes int he River Danube. – Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 113: 497–505.

Published
2009-12-31