Comparing the nest predation edge effect in different habitat edges

  • Anita Heim Independent researcher
  • András Báldi Animal Ecology Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and the Hungarian Natural History Museum
Keywords: artificial nest, concealment, edge effect, fragmentation, Vértes Mountains

Abstract

Edge effect influences songbirds in that nest predation rates are higher near the edges than in the interior areas. In the last decades high number of studies investigating the problem of nest predation and edge effect were conducted, however, their results are surprisingly divers. In most studies only one type of edge (e.g. forest−arable field) was investigated, however, edge effect may vary in different edge types. In our research we aimed to examine the pattern of nest predation, when various habitat edges are examined in one mosaic landscape under same conditions simultaneously, and to investigate which environmental factors affect the nest predation rate. We conducted our survey in May 2007 in the East side of Vértes mountains in five edge types (oak forest−arable field, arable field−grassland, oak forest−grassland, oak forest−coniferous forest, coniferous forest−grassland). In each edge types we placed artificial ground nests with one quail and one plasticine egg 0−5−10−20−50 meters from the edges. In our analysis we compared the predation patterns of each edge types. We investigated the effects of concealment, distance of edge, habitat type, edge type and vegetation structure on nest predation. Predation rate at different distances varied strongly between edge types, however we detected a general pattern of higher predation at edges. With increase of the distance from the edge and increase of the concealment of nests the predation rate of the artificial nests decreased. We conclude that the concealment of artificial nests in given habitat and distance from the edge is the ultimate factor determining predation rate.

References

Andrén, H. & Angelstam, P. (1988): Elevated predation rates as an edge effect in habitat islands: experimental evidence. − Ecology 69: 544−547.

Askins, R. A., Lynch, J. F. & Greenberg, R. (1990): Population declines in migratory birds is eastern North America. − Current Ornithol. 7: 1−57.

Batáry, P. & Báldi, A. (2004): Evidence of an edge effect on avian nest success. − Conserv. Biol. 18: 389−400.

Batáry, P., Winkler, H. & Báldi, A. (2004): Experiments with artificial nests on predation in reed habitats. − J. Ornithol. 145: 59−63.

Brittingham, M. C. & Temple, S. A. (1983): Have cowbirds caused forest songbirds to decline? − BioScience 33: 31−35.

Burhans, D. E. & Thompson III, F. R. (1998): Effects of time and nest-site characteristics on concealment of songbird nests. − The Condor 100: 663−672.

Carlson, A. & Hartman, G. (2001): Tropical forest fragmentation and nest predation – an experimental study in an Eastern Arc montane forest, Tanzania. − Biodiv. Conserv. 10: 1077−1085.

Chapa-Vargas, L. & Robinson, S. K. (2006): nesting success of a songbird in a complex floodplain forest landscape in llinois, USA: Local fragmentation vs. vegetation structure. − Landscape Ecol. 21: 525−537.

Collias, N. E. & Collias, E. C. (1984): Nest building and bird behavior. − Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Fazekas, A. & Báldi, A. (2004): A szegélyhatás és az énekesmadarak fészekaljpredációjának kísérletes vizsgálata a Tököli Parkerdőben. − Ornis Hung. 10: 41−48.

Fenske-Crawford, T. J. & Niemi, G. J. (1997): Predation of artificial ground nests at two types of edges in a forest-dominated landscape − The Condor 99: 14−24.

Gates, J. E. & Gysel, L. W. (1978): Avian nest dispersion and fledging success in field-forest ecotones. − Ecology 59: 871−883.

Hartley, M. J. & Hunter, M. L. (1998): A meta-analysis of forest cover, edge effects, and artificial nest predation rates. − Conserv. Biol. 12: 465−469.

Howlett, J. S. & Stutchbury, B. J. (1996): Nest concealment and predation in hooded warblers: Experimental removal of nest cover. − Auk 113: 1−9.

Johnston, V. R. (1947): Breeding birds of the forest edge in Illinois − The Condor 49: 45−53.

Lay, D. W. (1938): How valuable are woodland clearings to birdlife. − Wilson Bull. 50: 254−256.

Malt, J. & Lank, D. (2007): Temporal dynamics of edge effects on nest predation risk for the marbled murrelet. − Biol. Conserv. 140: 160−173.

Martin, T. (1992): Breeding productivity considerations: What are the appropriate habitat features for management? In: Hagan, J. M. & Johnston, D. W. (eds) Conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. − Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 455−473.

Martin, T. E. (1993): Nest predation and nest sites. − Bioscience 43: 523−532.

Misenhelter, M. D. & Rotenberry, J. T. (2000): Choices and consequences of habitat occupancy and nest site selection in Sage Sparrows. − Ecology 81: 2892−2901.

Moorman, C. E., Guynn, D. C. & Kilgo, J. C. (2002): Hooded warbler nesting success adjacent to group-selection and clearcut edges in a southeastern bottomland forest. − Condor 104: 366−377.

Murcia, C. (1995): Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. − Trends Ecol. Evolut. 10: 58−62.

Newton, I. (2004): The recent declines of farmland bird populations in Britain: an appraisal of causal factors and conservation actions. − Ibis 146: 579–600.

Paton, P. W. C. (1994): The effect of edge on avian nest success: How strong is the evidence? − Conserv. Biol. 8: 17−26.

Rangen, S. A., Clark, R. G. & Hobson, K. A. (2000): Visual and olffactory attributes og artificial nests. − Auk 117: 136−146.

Sauer, J. R., Hines, J. E. & Fallon, J. (2001): The North American breeding bird survey, results and analysis 1966–2000. − USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland, USA.

Storch, I., Woitke, E. & Krieger, S. (2005): Landscape-scale edge effect in predation risk in forest−farmland mosaics of Central Europe. − Landscape Ecol. 20: 927−940.

Temple, S. A. & Flasphler, D. (1998): The edge of the cut: implications for wildlife populations. − J. Forestry 96: 22−26.

Wilcove, D. S. (1985): Nest predation in forest tracts and the decline of migratory songbirds. − Ecology 66: 1211−1214.

Wilson, A. M., Vickery, J. A. & Browne, S. J. (2001): Numbers and distribution of Northern Lapwings Vanellus vanellus breeding in England and Wales in 1998. − Bird Study 48: 2−17.

Yahner, R. H. & Scott, D. P. (1988): Effects of forest fragmentation on depredation of artificial nests. − J. Wildl. Manage. 52: 158−161.

Zanette, L. & Jenkins, B. (2000): Nesting success and nest predators in forest fragments: A study using real and artificial nests. − Auk 117: 445−454.

Published
2009-12-31