Species richness and abundance of bees in the edge of three different agricultural fields

  • Anna Pálfy Szent István University, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Institute for Biology
  • András Báldi Hungarian Natural History Museum and Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Animal Ecology Research Group
  • Anikó Kovács Szent István University, PhD School of Environmental Sciences
Keywords: Apidae, autumn wheat, edge-effect, grassland, pollination, set-aside, structure of landscape

Abstract

Pollination is a basic form of ecosystem services. Eighty-four percent of the pollination of cultivated plants, and one third of the agricultural production depends on pollination. Bees (Apidae) are the most important pollinators in Europe. The structural changes in landscape, such as fragmentation and edge effect are partly responsible for the current pollination crisis (i.e.: the reduction of the number of pollinators, primarily bees). Therefore, the aim of our research was to study how the distance from the edge affects the abundance and species richness of bees (Apidae), and what are the differences between the agricultural areas. Our research was done on the Heves plane ESA, in May of 2008. We placed yellow water pans on three types of agricultural cultures: six autumn-sown wheat fields, five set-asides and five grasslands. The traps were placed on increased distances from the edge (0, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100 meters), above the vegetation. The pans were emptied twice a week for three weeks. All together 1102 individuals of 52 species were found. Analyses of variance (ANOVnovA), Tukey-test, and general linear mixed models were used for statistic analysis. Analyses of variance showed significant differences in terms of species richness and abundance between the cultures. The Tukey-test showed significant differences in case of species richness between wheat fields and set-asides, and in case of abundance between grasslands and wheat fields. The edge-effect varied among the different cultures. Using general linear models, significant differences were found in the number of individuals in the different distance values of grasslands. Our results indicate that not only the quality of the different elements of landscape structures has great significance on bees, but the quality of the edges connecting them. Our study confirms the importance of the detailed landscape-level analysis in case of bees.

References

Bäckman J.-P.C. & Tiainen J. (2005): Habitat quality of field margins in a Finnish farmland area for bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Bombus and Psithyrus). – Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 89: 53−68.

Biesmeijer J. C., Roberts S. P. M, Reemer M., Ohlemuller R., Edwards M., Peeters T., Schaffers A. P., Potts S. G., Kleukers R., Thomas C. D., Settele J., Kunin W. E. (2006): Parallel Declines in Pollinators and Insect-Pollinated Plants in Britain and the Netherlands. – Science 313: 351−354.

Buchmann S. L., Nabhan G. P. (1996): The Forgotten Pollinators. – Island Press, Washington DC .

Carvell C., Meek W. R., Pywell R. F., Nowakowski M. (2004): Theresponse of foraging bumblebees to successional change in newly created arable field margins. – Biol. Conserv. 118: 327−339.

Carvell C., Pywell R. F., Smart S., Roy D. (2001): Restoration and management of bumblebee habitat on arable farmland: literature review. Report for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (BD1617). – Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Huntingdon.

Croxton P. J., Carvell C., Mountford J. O., Sparks T. H. (2002): A comparison of green lanes and field margins as bumblebee habitat in arable landscape. – Biol. Conserv. 107: 365−374.

Greenleaf S. S., Williams N. M., Winfree R., Kremen C. (2007): Bee foraging ranges and their relationdhip to body size, – Oecologia 153: 589−596, (doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9)

Kells A. R., Goulson D. (2003): Preferred nesting sites of bumblebee queens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in agroecosystems in the UK. – Biol. Conserv. 109: 165−174.

Kohler F., Verhulst J., Roel van Klink, Kleijn D. (2008): At what spatial scale do high-quality habitats enhance the diversity of forbs and pollinators in intensivelyfarmed landscapes? – J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 000−000, (doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01394.x)

Kremen C., Williams N. M., Thorp R. W. (2002): Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification, – PNAS 99: 26

Marshall E. J. P., Moonen A. C. (2002): Field margins in northern Europe: their functions and interactions with agriculture. – Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 89: 5−21.

Öckinger E. & Smith H. G. (2007): Semi-natural grasslands as population sources for pollinating insects in agricultural landscapes. – J. Appl. Ecol. 44: 50−59. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01250.x)

Pinheiro, J. Bates D., DebRoy S. & Deepayan S.( 2007): The nlme package: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. URL: http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/nlme.html

Pywell R. F., Bullock J. M., Roy D. B., Warman E. A., Rothery P. (2003): Plant traits as predictors of performance in ecological restoration schemes. – J. Appl. Ecol. 40: 65−77.

Pywell R. F., Warman E. A., Sparks T. H., Greatorex-Davis J. N., Walker K. J., Meek W. R., Carvell C., Petit S., Firbank L. G. (2004): Assessing habitat quality for butterflies on intensively managed arable farmland. – Biol. Conserv. 118: 313−325.

Pywell R. F., Warman, E. A., Carvell, C., Sparks, T. H., Dicks, L. V., Bennet, D., Wright A., Critchley C. N. R., Sherwood A. (2005a): Providing foraging resources for bumblebees in intensively farmed landscapes. – Biol. Conserv. 121: 479−494.

Pywell R. F., James L. K., Herbert I., Meek W. R., Carvell C., Bell D., Sparks T. H. (2005b): Determinants of overwintering habitat quality for beetles and spiders on arable farmland. – Biol. Conserv. 123: 79−90.

Pywell R. F., Warman, E. A., Hulmes L., Hulmes S., Nuttall P., Sparks T. H., Critchley C. N. R., Sherwood A. (2006): Effectiveness of new agri-environment schemes in providing foraging resources for bumblebees in intensively farmed landscapes. – Biol. Conserv. 129: 192−206.

R Development Core Team 2006. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL: http://www.R-project.org

Rand T. A., Tylianakis J. M., Tscharntke T. (2006): Spillover edge effects: the dispersal of agriculturally subsidized insect natural enemies into adjacent natural habitats. – Ecol. Letters 9: 603−614.

Sárospataki, M., Báldi, A., Batáry, P., Józan, Z., Erdős, S. Rédei, T. 2009. Factors affecting the structure of bee assemblages in extensively and press.

Steffan-Dewenter I., Tscharntke T. (1999): Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set, – Oecologia 121: 432−440

Svensson B., Lagerlo F. J., Svensson, Bo.G. (2000): Habitat preferences of nest-seeking bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in an agricultural landscape. – Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 77: 247−255.

Westrich P. (1996): The problems of partial habitats. – In: Matheson A., Buchmann S. L., O’Toole C., Westrich P., Williams I. H. (szerk.): The Conservation of Bees, Linnean Society Symposium Series, Academic Press

Williams P. H. (1982): The distribution and decline of British bumblebees (Bombus Latr). – J. Apicult. Res. 21: 236−245.

Published
2009-12-31