A proposition to establish a conservation area network for protecting fish assemblages in Hungary

  • Anna Dolezsai Balaton Limnological Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research
  • Péter Sály Balaton Limnological Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research
  • Péter Takács Balaton Limnological Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research
  • Tibor Erős Balaton Limnological Institute, MTA Centre for Ecological Research
Keywords: freshwater conservation areas, systematic conservation planning, Marxan, rivers, catchment

Abstract

Biodiversity of freshwaters is declining at an alarming rate. For their protection a careful selection of conservation areas is urgently needed. Systematic conservation planning (SCP) approaches optimise the selection of planning units (the basic units of the conservation selection procedure, e.g subcatchments in freshwater systems) by minimising area and maximizing biodiversity representation. Recent applications of SCP to riverine systems give special attention to connectivity among river segments, subcatchments or catchments to select priority areas for conservation. We evaluated the importance of transboundary rivers to achieve conservation goals by systematically deleting some rivers from the prioritization procedure in Marxan and assessing the trade-offs between complexity of conservation recommendations and cost. To combine our solution for protecting freshwater ecosystems and the currently valid nature protection area network we found
that 13710 km2 is enough to protect terrestrial and riverine (fish) biodiversity in Hungary. Special attention is needed for the protection of some boundary rivers (Dráva, Ipoly) because these rivers contain many stricty riverine fishes of conservation concern.

References

Abell, R., Allan, J. D. & Lehner, B. (2007): Unlocking the potencial of protected areas for freshwaters. – Biol. Conserv. 134: 48–63.

Ball, I. R., Possingham, H. P. & Watts, M. (2009): Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritisation. Chapter 14 – In: Moilanen, A., Wilson, K. A. & Possingham, H. P. (Eds.): Spatial conservation prioritisation: Quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 185–195.

Bivand, R. S. & Lewin-Koh, N. (2014): Maptools: Tools for reading and handling spatial objects. R package version 0.8-29. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=maptools

Bivand, R. S. & Rundel, C. (2014): Rgeos: Interface to Geometry Engine – Open Source (GEOS). R package version 0.3-3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgeos

Dolezsai, A., Sály, P., Takács, P., Hermoso, V. & Erős, T. (2015): Restricted by borders: trade-offs in transboundary conservation planning for large river systems. – Biodiv. Cons. in press

Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A. H., Gessner, M. O., Kawabata, Z-I., Knowler, D. J., Léveque, C., Naiman, R. J., Prieur-Richard, A-H., Soto, D., Stiassny, M. L. J. & Sullivan, C. A. (2006): Freshwater Biodiversity: importance, threaths, status and conservation challenges. – Biol. Rev. 81: 163–182.

Elith, J., Graham, C. H., Anderson, R. P., Dudík, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., Hijmans, R. J., Huettmann, F., Leathwick, J. R., Lehmann, A., Li J., Lohmann, L. G., Loiselle, B. A., Manion, G., Moritz, C., Nakamura, M., Nakazawa, Y., Overton, J. M., Peterson, A. T., Phillips, S. J., Richardson, K., Scachetti-Pereira, R., Schapire, R. E., Soberon, J., Williams, S., Wisz, M. S. & Zimmermann, N. E. (2006): Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. – Ecography 29: 129–151.

Erős, T. (2007): Partitioning the diversity of riverine fish: the roles of habitat types and non-native species. – Freshwater Biol. 52: 1400–1415.

Filipe, A. F., Marques, T. A., Seabra, S., Tiago, P., Riberio, F., Moreira, da Cost, L., Cowx, I. G. & Collares-Pereira, M. J. (2004): Selection of priority areas for fish conservation in Guadiana river basin, Iberian Penninsula. – Conserv. Biol. 18(1): 189–200.

Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E. & Parra, J. L. (2014): WorldClim version 1.4. Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley. Available at: http://www.worldclim.org/ (last accessed 6 April 2014).

Hermoso, V., Linke, S., Prenda, J. & Possingham, H. P. (2011): Addressing longitudinal connectivity in the sytematic conservation planning for freshwaters. – Freshwater Biol. 56: 57–70.

Leathwick, J. R., Elith, J. & Hastiec, T. (2006): Comparative performance of generalized additive models and multivariate adaptive regression splines for statistical modelling of species distributions. – Ecol. Model. 199: 188–196.

Linke, S., Kennard, M. J., Hermoso, V., Olden, J. D., Stein, J. & Pusey, B. J. (2012): Merging connectivity rules and large-scale condition assessment improves conservation adequacy in river systems. – J. Appl. Ecol. 49: 1036–1045.

Margules, C. R. & Pressey, R. L. (2000): Systematic conservation planning, Insight review articles. – Nature 405: 243–253.

Martonné Erdős, K. (2004): Magyarország természeti földrajza I., Debreceni Egyetem Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadója, Debrecen, 245 p.

Milborrow, S., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. (2014): Earth: Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline Models. R package version 3.2-7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=earth

Moilanen, A., Leathwick, J. & Elith, J. (2008): A method for spatial freshwater conservation prioritization. – Freshwater Biol. 53: 577–592.

Pebesma, E. J. & Bivand, R. S. (2005): Classes and methods for spatial data in R. R News 5 (2), http://cran.r-project.org/doc/Rnews/.

Pressey, R. L. & Nicholls, A. O. (1989): Efficiency in Conservation Evaluation: Scoring versus Iterative Approaches. – Biol. Conserv. 50: 199–218.

QGIS Development Team (2012): QGIS User Guide. Online available: http://docs.qgis.org/1.8/pdf/QGIS-1.8-UserGuide-en.pdf.

R Core Team (2013): R: A language and environment for statistical computing. – R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL, http://www.R-project.org/.

Ricciardi, A. & Rasmussen, J. B. (1999): Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. – Conserv Biol. 13: 1220–1222.

Sanderson, E. W., Malanding, J., Levy, M. A., Redford, K. H., Wannebo, A. W. & Woolmer, W. (2002): The human footprint and the last of the wild. – BioScience 52: 891–904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0891:THFATL]2.0.CO;2

Sály, P., Takács, P., Kiss, I., Bíró, P. & Erős, T. (2011): The relative influence of spatial context and catchment- and site-scale environmental factors on stream fish assemblages in a human modified landscape. – Ecol. Freshw. Fish 20: 251–262.

Steenmans, C. & Büttner, G. (2006): Mapping land cover of Europe for 2006 under GMES. Proceedings of the 2nd workshop of the EARSeL SIG on land use and land cover, Bonn, Germany, 28-30 September, 2006: 202–207. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/clc-2006-vector-data-version-2

Strecker, A. L., Olden, J. D., Whittier, J. B. & Paukert, C. P. (2011): Defining conservation priorities for freshwater fishes according to taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity. – Ecol. Appl. 21(8): 3002–3013.

Published
2015-12-31