Necessity of combining traditional and scientific agroecological knowledge in higher education trainings

  • Apolka Ujj Szent István University, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences - Institute of Nature Conservation and Landscape Management, Department of Organic Farming and Agri-environmental Planning
  • István Fehér Szent István University, Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Institute of Management Studies
Keywords: agroecology, organic farming, educational training, knowledge transfer, health, ecology, fairness, care

Abstract

The agroecology education due to its holistic approach presents a remarkable challenge for higher educators. Identification of agroecological elements and their complicated connections require an entirely new educational strategy. SAGITER international project team focuses on the promotion of agroecological knowledge transfer, by combining science-based approach with informal knowledge resulting from everyday experiences. In order to help educators and trainers, SAGITER project team creates training modules that reflect the complexity of agroecology, and teaching tools that facilitate the knowledge transfer. In Hungary, selecting the best knowledge transfer method depends on the basic knowledge of the target group, therefore a thorough real user need assessment was carried out among BSc and MSc students. One of the priority issue of the survey was the ecological farming. Results of the survey proved that there are significant differences in knowledge level related to organic farming originate from their different level and year of study, their different orientation of study, and also the gender was a determining factor. In general it can be stated that students are familiar with the impact of organic farming on the environment, but they are not familiar with its social and economic aspects. The most significant factor that influences students’ knowledge is their previous experiences acquired by practice. This result highlights the importance of the practice in higher education. As a response to the survey, we developed a training ‘offer’ of modules which covers those knowledge gaps that were explored during our survey: economic and social aspects of agroecology besides environmental protection.

References

Altieri, M. A. (1987): Agroecology: the scientific basis of alternative agriculture. – Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 246 pp.

Ángyán, J. & Menyhért, Z. (1997): Alkalmazkodó növénytermesztés, ésszerű környezetgazdálkodás. – Mezőgazdasági Szaktudás Kiadó, Budapest.

Dezsény, Z. & Drexler, D. (2012): Organic agriculture in Hungary. Country report. – Ecology and Farming. 3 21–23. http://www.ecologyandfarming.com/old_website/EF_2012-3%20Organic%20agriculture%20%20in%20Hungary%20-%20Z%20Dezseny%20D%20Drexler.pdf

Dover, M. J. & Talbot, L. M. (1987): To feed the Earth: Agro-Ecology for Sustainable Development. – World Resources Institute, Washington, 88 pp.

Douglass, G. K. (1984): The meanings of agricultural sustainability. – In: Douglass, G. K. (ed): Agricultural Sustainability in a Changing World Order . Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 3–30.

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation) (2003): World agriculture: towards 2015/2030. An FAO perspective. FAO, (szerk.): Bruinsma, J., Earthscan Publications, London. http://www.fao.org/3/a-y4252e.pdf

Fehér, I. (2009): European policy context for sustainable agriculture (Chapter 4) – In: Apostolides, C. (szerk.): Thematic Guide Eight, Athen, pp. 38–44.

Francis, C., Jordan, N., Porter, P., Breland, T. A., Lieblein, G., Salomonsson, L., Sriskandarajah, N., Wiedenhoeft, M., DeHann, R. Braden, I. & Langer, V. (2011): Innovative Education in Agroecology: Experiential Learning for a Sustainable Agriculture. – Crit Rev Plant Sci. 30 (1-2): 226–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.554497

Francis, C., Breland, T. A. , Østergaard, E., Lieblein, G. & Morse, S. (2013): Phenomenon-Based Learning in Agroecology: A Prerequisite for Transdisciplinarity and Responsible Action. – Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 37:1, 60–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2012.717905

Glickman, D. (1996): Secretary’s Memorandum 9500-6: Sustainable Development – U.S. Baltimore, Department of Agriculture, Office of the Secretary

Günal, H., Korucu, T., Birkas, M., Özgöz, E. & Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir, R. (2015): Threats to Sustainability of Soil Functions in Central and Southeast Europe. – Sustainability. 7: 2161–2188. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su7022161

Harnos, Zs. (1993): Sustainability: A system analytic approach. – In: Győrffy, B. (ed) Strategies for sustainable agriculture. BACCE-ARI, London-Martonvásár, pp. 21–26.

IFOAM (1972): Principles of Organic Agriculture. Jelenlegi változat letölthető: http://www.ifoam.bio/sites/default/files/poa_english_web.pdf

OECD (2008): Environmental Outlook to 2030. – OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264040519-en

Østergaard, E., Lieblein, G., Breland, T.A. & Francis, C. (2010): Students learning Agroecology: Phenomenon-based education for responsible action. – J Agr Educ Ex. 16:123–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13892240903533053

Rovira, A.D. (1995): Sustainable farming system in the cereal-livestock areas of the mediterranean region of Australia. – In: Cook H. F. & .Lee, H. C (eds) Soil management in Sustainable Agriculture. pp.12-30.

SARE Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (2010): What is sustainable agriculture? http://www.sare.org/publications/whatis/whatis.pdf

Ujj, A. (2006): A talajállapot- és az elővetemény- hatás javítása köztes védőnövényekkel és kímélő műveléssel. Doktori értekezés. Gödöllő. 115 pp.

Published
2016-12-31
Section
Social Sciences in Conservation