The long-term social impacts of COVID-19: The case of home office

  • Anna Sára Ligeti ELTE Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont, Egészségbiztonság Nemzeti Laboratórium
  • Ádám Stefkovics ELTE Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont, Egészségbiztonság Nemzeti Laboratórium
  • Szilvia Rudas ELTE Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont, Egészségbiztonság Nemzeti Laboratórium
  • Júlia Koltai ELTE Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont, Egészségbiztonság Nemzeti Laboratórium, ELTE Társadalomtudományi Kar
Keywords: home office, COVID-19, labour market inequalities

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed social and economic structures in Hungary to an unprecedented extent, with a radical shift of work from the conventional workplace to the home environment of workers. The present research examines the dynamics of the expansion of home office, its long-term persistence and social inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic and in 2025 by analysing representative samples from Hungary. The results show that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant and lasting impact on the prevalence and nature of home-based work. Although the proportion of people working from home declined after the pandemic and did not reach previous levels, the form of work has changed and shifted increasingly towards hybrid arrangements. The present study has confirmed that the availability and prevalence of home office reflects certain social inequalities, notably in terms of occupation, level of education, gender and age.

References

Horváth, J. K., Komlós, K. E., Krisztalovics, K., Röst, G., & Oroszi, B. A. (2022): A COVID-19 világjárvány első két éve Magyarországon. Népegészségügy, 99(1), 6-19.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (2016.04.14): Employment. Elérhető: https://www.ilo.org/resource/employment-1
Karsai, M. Koltai, J. Vásárhelyi, O. Röst, G. (2020): Hungary in mask/maszk in Hungary. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, (2).
Leeper, T. J. (2024). margins: Marginal Effects for Model Objects. R package version 0.3.28.
R Core Team (2013): R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
Aczel, B. – Kovacs, M. – van der Lippe, T. – Szaszi, B. (2021): Researchers Working from Home: Benefits and Challenges. PloS ONE, 16(3): e0249127, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249127
Allen, T. D. – Golden, T. D. – Shockley, K. M. (2015): How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 16(2): 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
Allen, T. D. – Merlo, K. – Lawrence, R. C. – Slutsky, J. – Gray, C. E. (2021): Boundary Management and Work‐Nonwork Balance While Working from Home. Applied Psychology 70(1): 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12300
Ammons, S. K. – Markham, W. T. (2004): Working at Home: Experiences of Skilled White-Collar Workers. Sociological Spectrum 24(2): 191–238.
Astroza, S. – Tirachini, A. – Hurtubia, R. – Carrasco, J. A. – Guevara, A. – Munizaga, M. – Figueroa, M. – Torres, V. (2020): Mobility Changes, Teleworking, and Remote Communication during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Chile. Findings. https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.13489
Bailey, D. E. – Kurland, N. B. (2002): A Review of Telework Research: Findings, New Directions, and Lessons for the Study of Modern Work. Journal of Organizational Behavior 23(4): 383–400.
Bhumika (2020): Challenges for Work-Life Balance during COVID-19 Induced Nationwide Lockdown: Exploring Gender Difference in Emotional Exhaustion in the Indian Setting. Gender in Management 35(7–8): 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-06-2020-0163
Cannito, M. – Scavarda, A. (2020): Childcare and Remote Work during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Ideal Worker Model, Parenthood, and Gender Inequalities in Italy. Italian Sociological Review 10(3S): 801–820. https://doi.org/10.13136/isr.v10i3s
Çoban, S. (2021): Gender and Telework: Work and Family Experiences of Teleworking Professional, Middle‐Class, Married Women with Children during the COVID‐19 Pandemic in Turkey. Gender, Work & Organization 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12684
Cooper, C. L. – Kurland, N. B. (2002): Telecommuting, Professional Isolation, and Employee Development in Public and Private Organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior 23(4): 511–532.
Dávid, B., Herke, B., Huszti, É., Tóth, G., Túry-Angyal, E., & Albert, F. (2021): A pandémia hatása a személyes kapcsolathálózati struktúrára. Scientia et Securitas, 2(3), 350-357.
de Abreu e Silva, J. – Melo, P. C. (2018): Home telework, travel behavior, and land-use patterns: A path analysis of British single-worker households. Journal of Transport and Land Use 11(1): 419–441.
Del Boca, D. – Oggero, N. – Profeta, P. – Rossi, M. (2020): Women’s and Men’s Work, Housework and Childcare, Before and During COVID-19. Review of Economics of the Household 18(4): 1001–1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-020-09502-1
Dilmaghani, M. (2020): There is a Time and a Place for Work: Comparative Evaluation of Flexible Work Arrangements in Canada. International Journal of Manpower 42(1): 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-12-2019-0555
Elbaz, S. – Richards, J. B. – Provost Savard, Y. (2023): Teleworking and work–life balance during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne 64(4): 227–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000330
Elldér, E. (2019): Who Is Eligible for Telework? Exploring the Fast-Growing Acceptance of and Ability to Telework in Sweden, 2005–2006 to 2011–2014. Social Sciences 8(7): 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8070200
Fang, D. – Kang, S. K. – Kaplan, S. (2022): We need to make sure telecommuting does not exacerbate gender disparity. The Lancet 400(10355): 795–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01211-9
Fodor, É. – Gregor, A. – Koltai, J. – Kováts, E. (2021): The impact of COVID-19 on the gender division of childcare work in Hungary. European Societies 23(sup1): S95–S110. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1817522
Fonner, K. L. – Roloff, M. E. (2010): Why Teleworkers are More Satisfied with Their Jobs than are Office-Based Workers: When Less Contact is Beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research 38(4): 336–361.
Gajendran, R. S. – Harrison, D. A. (2007): The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology 92(6): 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
Galanti, T. – Guidetti, G. – Mazzei, E. – Zappalà, S. – Toscano, F. (2021): Work from Home during the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Impact on Employees’ Remote Work Productivity, Engagement, and Stress. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 63(7): e426–e432. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002236
Gallacher, G. – Hossain, I. (2020): Remote Work and Employment Dynamics under COVID-19: Evidence from Canada. Canadian Public Policy 46(S1): S44–S54. https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2020-026
Gálvez, A. – Tirado, F. – Martínez, M. J. (2020): Work–Life Balance, Organizations and Social Sustainability: Analyzing Female Telework in Spain. Sustainability 12(9): 3567, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093567
Giovanis, E. (2018): The relationship between teleworking, traffic and air pollution. Atmospheric Pollution Research 9(1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2017.06.004
Golden, T. D. – Veiga, J. F. (2008): The Impact of Superior-Subordinate Relationships on the Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Performance of Virtual Workers. The Leadership Quarterly 19(1): 77–88.
Graham, M. – Weale, V. – Lambert, K. A. – Kinsman, N. – Stuckey, R. – Oakman, J. (2021): Working at Home: The Effects of COVID-19 on Health, Family-Work-Life Conflict, Gender, and Parental Responsibilities. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 63(11): 938–943. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000002337
Greenhaus, J. H. – Powell, G. N. (2003): When work and family collide: Deciding between competing role demands. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 90(2): 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00519-8
Gurstein, P. (2001): Wired to the World: Chained to the Home: Telework in Daily Life. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Hamouche, S. – Parent-Lamarche, A. (2022): Teleworkers’ job performance: a study examining the role of age as an important diversity component of companies’ workforce. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance 10(2): 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-03-2022-0057
Handy, S. L. – Mokhtarian, P. L. (1996): The Future of Telecommuting. Futures 28(3): 227–240.
Harpaz, I. (2002): Advantages and Disadvantages of Telecommuting for the Individual, Organization and Society. Work Study 51(2): 74–80.
Huszár, Á. – Székely, G. – Zsom, B. – Kincses, Á. (2015): A társadalom rétegződése. Budapest: Központi Statisztikai Hivatal.
Johnson, L. C. – Audrey, J. – Shaw, S. M. (2007): Mr Dithers Comes to Dinner: Telework and the Merging of Women’s Work and Home Domains in Canada. Gender, Place, and Culture 14(2): 141–161.
Kahn, R. L. – Wolfe, D. M. – Quinn, R. P. – Snoek, J. D. – Rosenthal, R. H. (1964): Organizational Stress. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Katsabian, T. (2020, szeptember 1): The Telework Virus: How the COVID-19 Pandemic Has Affected Telework and Exposed Its Implications for Privacy and Equality. SSRN Scholarly Paper, Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3684702
Kaufman, G. – Taniguchi, H. (2021): Working from Home and Changes in Work Characteristics during COVID-19. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 7 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231211052784
Khalifa, M. – Davison, R. (2000): Exploring the Telecommuting Paradox. Communications of the ACM 43(3): 29–31.
Koltai, J. A., Prinz, D., & Röst, G. (2021). Munkaerőpiaci alkalmazkodás a koronavírus-járvány idején – egy reprezentatív felmérés eredményei. In G. Kézdi & P. Bördős (Eds.), Munkaerőpiaci tükör, 2020 (pp. 97–101). Közgazdaság- és Regionális Tudományi Kutatóközpont, ELKH.
Koren, M. – Pető, R. (2020) Mely iparágakban és régiókban van lehetőség hosszú távon is távmunkára? In Fazekas, K. – Kónya, I. – Krekó, J. (szerk.): Munkaerőpiaci Tükör 2020. Budapest: Közgazdasági és Régiónális Tudományi Kutatóközpont, ELKH, 158–168.
Köllő, J. (2021) Foglalkoztatás a koronavírus-járvány első hullámának idején. In Fazekas, K. – Elek, P. – Hajdu, T. (szerk.): Munkaerőpiaci Tükör 2019. Budapest: Közgazdasági és Regionális Tudományi Kutatóközpont, ELKH, 220–232.
KSH (2022): Munkaerőpiaci folyamatok, 2022. I. negyedév. Elérhető: https://www.ksh.hu/s/kiadvanyok/munkaeropiaci-folyamatok-2022-i-nev/index.html
KSH (2023): A távmunkában, home office-ban foglalkoztatottak aránya. Elérhető: https://ksh.hu/s/kiadvanyok/fenntarthato-fejlodes-indikatorai-2023/2-7-sdg-8#definitions
KSH (2025): Munkaerő-felmérés, Gazdasági aktivitási kérdőív 2025. Elérhető: https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/info/02osap/2025/kerdoiv/k251539_2.pdf
López-Igual, P. – Rodríguez-Modroño, P. (2020): Who is Teleworking and Where from? Exploring the Main Determinants of Telework in Europe. Sustainability 12(21): 8797. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218797
Miglioretti, M. – Gragnano, A. – Margheritti, S. – Picco, E. (2021): Not All Telework is Valuable. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 37(1): 11–19. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2021a6
Mihálka, M. (2017): A munka-család interferencia áttekintése a szakirodalom tükrében. Kapocs 16(73): 3–11.
Mininni, G. – Manuti, A. (2020): Pleasures and Pains about Remote Work Experience during the Covid-19 Global Pandemic: A Diatextual Approach. Linguística: Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto 221–244.
Morgan, R. E. (2004): Teleworking: An Assessment of the Benefits and Challenges. European Business Review 16(4): 344–357.
Ory, D. T. – Mokhtarian, P. L. (2006): Which Came First, the Telecommuting or the Residential Relocation? An Empirical Analysis of Causality. Urban Geography 27(7): 590–609. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.27.7.590
Pető, R. (2022) Az otthoni munkavégzés lehetőségei Magyarországon. In Horn, D. – Bartal, A. M. (szerk.): Fehér könyv a Covid-19-járvány társadalmi-gazdasági hatásairól. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd Kutatási Hálózat, Közgazdaság- és Regionális Tudományi Kutatóközpont, Közgazdaságtudományi Intézet, 204–212.
Pratt, J. H. (1999): Selected Communications Variables and Telecommuting Participation Decisions: Data from Telecommuting Workers. The Journal of Business Communication 36(3): 247–254.
Pulido-Martos, M. – Cortés-Denia, D. – Lopez-Zafra, E. (2021): Teleworking in Times of COVID-19: Effects on the Acquisition of Personal Resources. Frontiers in Psychology 12 685275, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685275
Pyöriä, P. (2011): Managing telework: risks, fears and rules. Management Research Review 34(4): 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171111117843
Rudolph, C. W. – Zacher, H. (2020): “The COVID-19 Generation”: A Cautionary Note. Work, Aging and Retirement 6(3): 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waaa009
Şentürk, E. – Sağaltıcı, E. – Geniş, B. – Günday Toker, Ö. (2021): Predictors of Depression, Anxiety and Stress among Remote Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Work 70(1): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210082
Shin, J.-Y. – Takenoshita, H. (2022): Who Can Become a Teleworker during the COVID-19 Pandemic? 理論と方法 37(1): 69–89. https://doi.org/10.11218/ojjams.37.69
Tahlyan, D. – Said, M. – Mahmassani, H. – Stathopoulos, A. – Walker, J. – Shaheen, S. (2022): For whom did telework not work during the Pandemic? understanding the factors impacting telework satisfaction in the US using a multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 155 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.025
Tejero, L. M. S. – Seva, R. R. – Fadrilan-Camacho, V. F. F. (2021): Factors Associated with Work-Life Balance and Productivity Before and During Work from Home. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 63(12): 1065–1072. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002377
Tremblay, D.-G. – Thomsin, L. (2012): Telework and Mobile Working: Analysis of its Benefits and Drawbacks. International Journal of Work Innovation 1(1): 100–113.
Xu, C. – Jing, F. – Lu, Y. – Ni, Y. – Tucker, J. – Wu, D. – Zhou, Y. – Ong, J. – Zhang, Q. – Tang, W. (2022): Summarizing methods for estimating population size for key populations: a global scoping review for human immunodeficiency virus research. AIDS Research and Therapy 19(1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-022-00434-7
Zhang, C. – Yu, M. C. – Marin, S. (2021): Exploring Public Sentiment on Enforced Remote Work during COVID-19. Journal of Applied Psychology 106(6): 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000933
Zhang, S. – Moeckel, R. – Moreno, A. T. – Shuai, B. – Gao, J. (2020): A work-life conflict perspective on telework. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 141 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.09.007
71/2020 (III. 27.) korm. rendelet. Elérhető: https://magyarkozlony.hu/dokumentumok/19f1d27b1584ffb22ff468a3635013b9f1813b5e/megtekintes
2020. évi CIX. törvény. Elérhető: https://magyarkozlony.hu/dokumentumok/e35363d964683da1d1a8b57aa9220fe36dfb5f7f/megtekintes
45/2020. (III. 14.) korm. rendelet. Elérhető: https://magyarkozlony.hu/dokumentumok/9421b74af54379d07ba8934a5fe3180c7f62d0be/megtekintes
40/2020. (III. 11.) Korm. rendelet. Elérhető: https://magyarkozlony.hu/dokumentumok/6ddbac40c788cb35b5bd5a5be4bb31294b59f9fc/megtekintes
487/2020. (XI. 11.) korm. rendelet. Elérhető: https://magyarkozlony.hu/dokumentumok/db82b51beb85867396aac154b743ee26563ba9ad/megtekintes
393/2021. (VII. 2.) korm. rendelet . Elérhető: https://magyarkozlony.hu/dokumentumok/c6fac4c879c0ed6f84d2191481357b415fbc95db/megtekintes
478/2020. (XI. 3.) Korm. rendelet. Elérhető: https://magyarkozlony.hu/dokumentumok/8cbd291e418e353982f0af40c3a77d83c5d62fd4/megtekintes
283/2020. (VI. 17.) Korm. rendelet. Elérhető: https://magyarkozlony.hu/dokumentumok/7f5ec4710bd89dc281ab3d08def94bbc8079351e/megtekintes
2021. évi CXXX. törvény. Elérhető: https://net.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=a2100130.tv
Published
2025-09-24
How to Cite
LigetiA. S., Stefkovics Ádám, RudasS., & KoltaiJ. (2025). The long-term social impacts of COVID-19: The case of home office. Hungarian Review of Sociology, 35(3), 4-27. https://doi.org/10.51624/SzocSzemle.18547
Section
Studies