External Systemic and Comparative Arguments in the Interpretation of the Slovak Constitutional Court
Abstract
This contribution aims to analyze the interpretation methodology used by the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic in its decision from 4 July 2012 upon protection of property rights and a right to a fair trial. Focus is given to the external systemic interpretative method, especially to the use of caselaw of the European Court of Human Rights.
References
Alexy, R. (2010) A Theory of Legal Argumentation. Rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Toth, Z. J. (2016) ‘The Methods of Statutory Interpretation in the Practice of the High Courts of Hungary’, Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, Lublin – Polonia, 1, p. 173–201.
Legal sources
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, concluded on 4 November 1950, 213 U.N.T.S. 222.
Charter of the United Nations, adopted on 26 June 1945, 1 U.N.T.S. 16.
International Court of Justice, Jurisdictional Immunities of the State, Germany v Italy: Greece intervening, judgement of 3 February 2012.
European Court of Human Rights, Al-Adsani v the United Kingdom, application no. 35763/97, judgement, 21 November 2001.
European Court of Human Rights, Soering v the United Kingdom, application no. 14038/88, judgement, 7 July 1989.
European Court of Human Rights, The Prince Hans-Adam II. of Liechtenstein v. Germany, application no. 42527/98, judgement, 12 July 2001.
European Court of Human Rights, Kalageropoulou and Others v Greece and Germany, application no. 59021/00, decision on inadmissibility, 12 December 2002.
The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany decision of 23 April 1974, 1st Senate, 1 BvR 6/74 and 2270/73.
Constitution of the Slovak Republic 460/1992 Coll.
PL. ÚS 111/2011, finding from 4 July 2012.
III. ÚS 328/05, finding from 29 March 2006.
No. 92/1998, finding from 3 March 1998.
II. ÚS 91/1999, ruling from 16 December 1999.
III. ÚS 243/2010, 26 January 2011.
PL. ÚS 30/95, 2 April 1996.
PL. ÚS 28/00, 10 January 2002.
Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic, decision published under No. 157/1964 Zb.