The role of the capability approach in the just development of mobility
A systematic review of the literature
Abstract
The present paper fits into an emerging stream of literature that seeks to strengthen the social justice theory foundations of transport-related mobility development. Using a systematic literature review, we examine the potential contribution of Amartya Sen’s capability approach to the just development of mobility. The capability approach offers a framework that links well-being and justice. An important element of the capability approach is emphasizing the distinction between the means and ends of development, taking into account the diversity of individual characteristics and the context of mobility, and thus the better understanding of the exclusion of vulnerable social groups from mobility. Previous research has not fully exploited the potential of the capability approach: Sen’s arguments on justice have only been partially reflected in the analysed works. At the end of the paper, we make recommendations for the better utilisation of the opportunities offered by the capability approach.
References
ABREU, M.–COMIM, F.–JONES, C. [2024]: A capability-approach perspective on regional development. Regional Studies, 58. évf. 11. sz. 2208–2220. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2276332.
AKHAVAN, M.–VECCHIO, G. [2018]: Mobility and accessibility of the ageing society. Defining profiles of the elderly population and neighbourhood. TeMA – Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 11. évf. 2. sz. 9–22. o. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5757.
ARNOLD, E.–PAUNOV, C.–PLANES-SATORRA, S.–SCHWAAG SERGER, S.–MACKLE, L. [2023]: Navigating green and digital transitions: Five imperatives for effective STI policy. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 162. OECD Publishing, Párizs. https://doi.org/10.1787/dffb0747-en.
AZMOODEH, M.–HAGHIGHI, F.–MOTIEYAN, H. [2022]: Capability Index: Applying a fuzzy-based decision-making method to evaluate social inclusion in urban areas using the capability approach. Social Indicators Research, 165. köt. 1. sz. 77–105. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-03005-5.
AZMOODEH, M.–HAGHIGHI, F.–MOTIEYAN, H. [2023]: The capability approach and social equity in transport: Understanding factors affecting capabilities of urban residents, using structural equation modeling. Transport Policy, 142. köt. 137–151. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.08.010.
BAJMÓCY ZOLTÁN [2012]: A képesség-szemlélet alkalmazásának lehetőségei a regionális tudományban. Megjelent: Rechnitzer János–Rácz Szilárd (szerk.): Dialógus a regionális tudományról. SZE Regionális és Gazdaságtudományi Doktori Iskola – MRTT, Győr, 18–30. o.
BAJMÓCY ZOLTÁN–GÉBERT JUDIT [2014]: Arguments for deliberative participation in local economic development. Acta Oeconomica, 64. évf. 3. sz. 313–334. o.
BAJMÓCY ZOLTÁN–MIHÓK BARBARA–GÉBERT JUDIT [2022]: Furthering social justice for disabled people. A framework based on Amartya Sen’s capability approach. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Sociologia, 67. évf. 1. sz. 69–84. o.
BAJMÓCY ZOLTÁN–GÉBERT JUDIT–MÁLOVICS GYÖRGY (szerk.) [2017]: Helyi gazdaságfejlesztés a képességszemlélet alapján. JATEPress, Szeged.
BANISTER, D. [2019]: Transport for all. Transport Reviews, 39. évf. 3. sz. 289–292. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1582905.
BANTIS, T.–HAWORTH, J. [2020]: Assessing transport related social exclusion using a capabilities approach to accessibility framework: A dynamic Bayesian network approach. Journal of Transport Geography, 84. évf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102673.
BARCIK, R.–BYLINKO, L. [2018]: Transportation demand management as a tool of transport policy. Transport Problems, 13. évf. 2. sz. 121–131. o. https://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-da9d90cf-e65a-4b98-b3f7-4fb16e6a88a3.
CALDERÓN, F.–MILLER, E. J. [2022]: A conceptual framework for modeling the supply side of mobility services within large-scale agent-based travel demand models. Transportation Letters, 14. évf. 6. sz. 600–609. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2021.1913303.
CAO, M.–HICKMAN, R. [2019]: Understanding travel and differential capabilities and functionings in Beijing. Transport Policy, 83. köt. 46–56. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.08.006.
CEDER, A. [2020]: Urban mobility and public transport: future perspectives and review. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 25. évf. 2. sz. 1–25. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2020.1799846.
COOK, N.–BUTZ, D. [2020]: Mobilities, mobility justice and social justice. Routledge, Abingdon on Thames–CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
COOKE, S.–RYSECK, B.–SIAME, G.–NKURUNZIZA, A.–MOLEFE, L.–ZUIDGEEST, M. [2022]: Proximity is not access: A capabilities approach to understanding non-motorized transport vulnerability in African cities. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4. köt. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.811049.
DAMART, S.–ROY, B. [2009]: The uses of cost–benefit analysis in public transportation decision-making in France. Transport Policy, 16. évf. 4. sz. 200–212. o.
DEÁK ÁGNES–RICZ JUDIT [2022]: A többdimenziós szegénység mérése – latin-amerikai tapasztalatok. Közgazdasági Szemle, 69. évf. 3. sz. 389–412. o. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2022.3.389.
DEKA, D. [2022]: Trip deprivation among older adults in the context of the capability approach. Journal of Transport Geography, 100. köt. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103325.
DUBOIS, J.-L.–TRANI, J.-F. [2009]: Extending the capability paradigm to address the complexity of disability. ALTER: European Journal of Disability Research, 3. évf. 3. sz. 192–218. o.
DURAND, A.–ZIJLSTRA, T. [2023]: Public transport as travel alternative for users of Special Transport Services in the Netherlands. Journal of Transport & Health, 29. köt. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2023.101568.
EISENBERG, A. M. [2019]: Just Transitions. Southern California Law Review, 92. évf. 2. sz.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION [2020]: The Just Transition Mechanism: Making sure no one is left behind. European Commission, Brussels.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION [2022]: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council – 2022 Strategic Foresight Report: Twinning the green and digital transitions in the new geopolitical context. COM(2022) 289 final. European Commission, Brussels.
FLEISCHER TAMÁS [2019]: Városi mobilitás, közjavak, fenntarthatóság. Közgazdasági Szemle, 66. évf. 10. sz. 1056–1072. o. http://dx.doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2019.10.1056.
GÉBERT JUDIT [2017]: A képességszemlélet alapjai. Megjelent: Bajmócy Zoltán–Gébert Judit–Málovics György (szerk.): Helyi gazdaságfejlesztés a képességszemlélet alapján. JATEPress, Szeged, 21–46. o.
GÉBERT JUDIT–BAJMÓCY ZOLTÁN–MÁLOVICS GYÖRGY–PATAKI GYÖRGY [2016]: Eszközöktől a jóllétig. A helyi gazdaságfejlesztés körvonalai a képességszemléletben. Tér és Társadalom, 30. évf. 2. sz. 23–44. o. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.30.2.2752.
GEURS, K. T.–VAN WEE, B. [2004]: Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12. évf. 2. sz. 127–140. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005.
GIULIANO, G. [1992]: Transportation demand management: Promise or panacea? Journal of the American Planning Association, 58. évf. 3. sz. 327–335. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369208975811.
GOODWIN, P. B. [1974]: Generalised time and the problem of equity in transport studies. Transportation, 3. évf. 1–23. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02351839.
GROVE, H. [2021]: Ageing as well as you can in place: Applying a geographical lens to the capability approach. Social Science & Medicine, 288. köt. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113525.
HABERMAS, J. [2001]: A kommunikatív etika. A demokratikus vitákban kiérlelődő konszenzus és társadalmi integráció politikai-filozófiai elmélete. Új Mandátum, Budapest.
HANANEL, R.–BERECHMAN, J. [2016]: Justice and transportation decision-making: The capabilities approach. Transport Policy, 49. évf. 78–85. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.005.
HENRY, E.–BAFFOE, G. [2024]: Accessibility challenges for older adults in South Manchester: A capability approach. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 16. évf. 1. sz. 245–261. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2024.2380053.
JOHANSSON, V. [2023]: Just transition as an evolving concept in international climate law. Journal of Environmental Law, 35. évf. 2. sz. 229–249. o. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqad017.
JUHÁSZ JUDIT [2018]: A méltó emberi élet lehetősége. Közgazdasági Szemle, 65. évf. 12. sz. 1299–1319. o. http://dx.doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2018.12.1299.
JUHÁSZ JUDIT–BAJMÓCY ZOLTÁN–GÉBERT JUDIT–MÁLOVICS GYÖRGY [2015]: Szegénység, képességek, lehetőségek: Szegénységkezelési szempontok Amartya Sen elméletének tükrében. Közgazdasági Szemle, 62. évf. 5. sz. 544–564. o.
KARTALI GABRIELLA [2023]: A szisztematikus irodalmi áttekintés módszertana. Biztonságtudományi Szemle, 5. évf. 4. sz. 1–11. o.
KENYON, S.–LYONS, G.–RAFFERTY, J. [2002]: Transport and social exclusion: Investigating the possibility of promoting inclusion through virtual mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 10. évf. 3. sz. 207–219. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00012-1.
KITA, H.–YOTSUTSUJI, H.–IKEMIYA, M.–SUGA, Y. [2017]: How to measure the level of activity opportunities secured by rural public transport service: The capability approach. Transportation Research Procedia, 25. köt. 3865–3874. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.296.
KITA, H.–KOMODA, S.–OZAKI, R. [2024]: A quantified planning method of local public transport services for expanding residents’ activity opportunities. Transport Policy, 159. köt. 284–296. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.06.022.
LIESZKOVSZKY JÓZSEF PÁL [2018]: Introduction to the theoretical analysis of social exclusion of public transport in rural areas. Deturope – Central European Journal of Rural Development and Tourism, 10. évf. 3. sz. 214–227. o. https://doi.org/10.32725/det.2018.032.
LUCAS, K. [2012]: Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20. köt. 105–113. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013.
LUZ, G.–PORTUGAL, L. [2021]: Understanding transport-related social exclusion through the lens of capabilities approach. Transport Reviews, 42. évf. 4. sz. 503–525. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.2005183.
MARTENS, K. [2021]: Equity considerations in transport planning. Megjelent: International Encyclopedia of Transportation. Elsevier, Amszterdam, 154–160. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10634-7.
MARTINEZ, L.–MACHARIS, C.–KESERÜ, I. [2024]: Inclusive mobility hubs: An in-depth exploration of the requirements of disadvantaged groups. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 136. köt. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104447.
MCCAULEY, D.–HEFFRON, R. [2018]: Just transition: Integrating climate, energy and environmental justice. Energy Policy, 119. köt. 1–7. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.014.
MITRA, S. [2006]: The capability approach and disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16. évf. 4. sz. 236–247. o.
MOLNÁR GYÖRGY [2021]: Amartya Sen és Az igazságosság eszméje. Közgazdasági Szemle, 68. évf. 3. sz. 300–342. o. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2021.3.300.
NAHMIAS-BIRAN, B.–SHIFTAN, Y. [2019]: Using activity-based models and the capability approach to evaluate equity considerations in transportation projects. Transportation, 47. évf. 5. sz. 2287–2305. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10015-9.
NUSSBAUM, M. [2000]: Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
NUSSBAUM, M. [2006]: Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
NUSSBAUM, M. C. [2011]: Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
OVIEDO, D.–GUZMAN, L. A. [2020]: Revisiting accessibility in a context of sustainable transport: Capabilities and inequalities in Bogotá. Sustainability, 12. évf. 11. sz. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114464.
PATAKI GYÖRGY [1999]: A fejlődés gazdaságtana és etikája: Tisztelgés Amartya Sen munkássága előtt. Kovász, 2. évf. 4. sz. 6–17. o.
QIAO, S.–YEH, A. G.-O. [2023]: Mobility-on-demand public transport toward spatial justice: Shared mobility or mobility as a service. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 123. köt. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103916.
RAWLS, J. [1971]: A theory of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA–London.
ROBEYNS, I. [2005]: The capability approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 6. évf. 1. sz. 93–117. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266.
ROBEYNS, I. [2006]: The capability approach in practice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14. évf. 3. sz. 351–376. o. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00263.x.
RYAN, J.–WRETSTRAND, A.–SCHMIDT, S. M. [2019]: Disparities in mobility among older people: Findings from a capability-based travel survey. Transport Policy, 79. köt. 177–192. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.04.016.
RYSECK, B.–BEHRENS, R. [2024]: A methodological application of the capability approach to investigate access to multimodal public transport information in a hybrid network. Transportation Research Procedia, 76. köt. 108–119. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.12.042.
SEN, A. K. [1979]: The welfare basis of real-income comparisons: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 17. évf. 1. sz. 1–45. o. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2723639.
SEN, A. K. [1982]: Choice, welfare and measurement. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
SEN, A. K. [1999a]: Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford–New York.
SEN, A. K. [1999b]: The possibility of social choice. American Economic Review, 89. évf. 3. sz. 349–378. o. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.349.
SEN, A. K. [2004]: Capabilities, lists, and public reason: continuing the conversation. Feminist Economics, 10. évf. 3. sz. 77–80. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570042000315163.
SEN, A. K. [2009]: The idea of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjnrv7n.
SMITH, N.–HIRSCH, D.–DAVIS, A. [2012]: Accessibility and capability: the minimum transport needs and costs of rural households. Journal of Transport Geography, 21. évf. 93–101. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.004.
STARK, A.–GALE, F.–MURPHY-GREGORY, H. [2023]: Just transitions’ meanings: A systematic review. Society & Natural Resources, 36. évf. 10. sz. 1–21. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2207166.
SZEMERE DOROTTYA–SURMAN VIVIEN [2025]: Az elektromos rollerek integrációjának vizsgálata Magyarországon. Közgazdasági Szemle, 72. évf. 3. sz. 312–327. o. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2025.3.312.
TERNES, V.–MARSDEN, G.–HARRISON, G. [2024]: A just transition or just a transition? The understanding and relevance of fairness in planning for a decarbonised transport system. Energy Research & Social Science, 113. köt. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103549.
TITSCHER, S.–MEYER, M.–WODAK, R.–VETTER, E. [2000]: Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. Sage Publications, London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857024480.
VAN BURGSTEDEN, M.–GRIGOLAN, A.–GEURS, K. [2024]: Improving community wellbeing through transport policy: A literature review and theoretical framework, based on the capability approach. Transport Reviews, 44. évf. 6. sz. 1161–1186. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2024.2374818.
VECCHIO, G. [2020]: Microstories of everyday mobilities and opportunities in Bogotá: A tool for bringing capabilities into urban mobility planning. Journal of Transport Geography, 83. köt. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102652.
VECCHIO, G.–MARTENS, K. [2021]: Accessibility and the capabilities approach: A review of the literature and proposal for conceptual advancements. Transport Reviews, 41. évf. 6. sz. 833–854. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1931551.
WANG, X.–LO, K. [2021]: Just transition: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science, 82. köt. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102291.
XU, Y.–CHAN, H.-Y.–CHEN, A.–CHIM, T.-Y.–LIU, X. [2024]: Aged and wheeled mobility in transit-oriented development: The capabilities approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 127. köt. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104058.
YOUNG, I. M. [1990]: Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
ZHANG, N.–YANG, Q. [2024]: Public transport inclusion and active aging: A systematic review on elderly mobility. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 11. évf. 2. sz. 312–347. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2024.04.001.
ZUTI BENCE–LUKOVICS MIKLÓS [2023]: Az önvezető járművek elfogadása viselkedés-gazdaságtani szemléletben: A nudge szerepe a fenntartható városi mobilitás kialakításában. Közgazdasági Szemle, 70. évf. 2. sz. 149–166. o. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2023.2.149.
