Mit kínálhat a kozmikus horror a jog számára – és mitől foszthatja meg azt?

A természetes rend összeomlása H. P. Lovecraft fikciójában

  • Molnár András Szegedi Tudományegyetem

Absztrakt

One of the most ancient and enduring issues in the history of legal philosophy is the relationship between law and morality. This can be explained with the fact that the birth of legal philosophy can be traced back to the emergence of philosophy in general. For this reason, for a large period in Western intellectual history, the philosophical analysis of law traditionally implied the assumption that fundamental moral principles and human-made legal rules are related, the former, with a validity beyond human volition, serving as a source of legitimacy for the latter, which are susceptible to change by temporary human will. Thus, one of the main pursuits of classic legal philosophy was to identify the eternal values supplying the foundations of positive law. My paper is an attempt at viewing the “law and morality” question through the lens of the “law and literature” approach. Interdisciplinary movements in legal scholarship like “law and literature” or “law and (popular) culture” offered insight into the various ways literature and other cultural products touch upon problems that are pertinent to how law works or how it is perceived in the popular imagination. From the principles of just distribution to retributive justice and the desire for vengeance to social inequalities, from the greatest literary classics to contemporary popular fiction, a plethora of interactions between fictitious stories and the world of law have been and are being explored to date. My paper focuses on weird fiction and cosmic horror, partly overlapping subgenres of horror fiction pioneered by H. P. Lovecraft (1890-1937). The central motif in cosmic horror is the insignificance of all kinds of human endeavour, and the meaningless world’s indifference towards humanity; an affront to our perception of ourselves as being inherently worthy or possessing some kind of inherent value. My claim is that cosmic horror, by annihilating the teleology attributed to the world by many, implicitly touches on the problem of the destabilization of universal values, a problem that led to the critique and marginalisation of natural law theory by the 19th century. While Lovecraft does not describe situations in which his protagonists face moral dilemmas, he repeatedly hints at an implicit belief in rules and limits inherent in the natural order of things—an assumption not unlike those found in classic natural law theories—and the realization that there is no “cosmic order” is an important writerly tool in his specific brand of horror. This way, cosmic horror offers an opportunity to reflect by the means of fiction upon the fragility of a universal (or any kind of) moral order.

Információk a szerzőről

Molnár András, Szegedi Tudományegyetem

Egyetemi adjunktus

Hivatkozások

Fiction
1. 2. Lovecraft, Howard Phillips: The Call of Cthulhu. In Lovecraft, Howard Phillips: The Call of
Cthulhu and Other Weird Stories. Penguin Books, London, 2002. pp. 139-169.
Lovecraft, Howard Phillips: The Case of Charles Dexter Ward. In Lovecraft, Howard Phillips:
The Thing on the Doorstep and Other Weird Stories. Penguin Books, London, 2001. pp. 90-
205.
3. Lovecraft, Howard Phillips: The Colour out of Space. In Lovecraft, Howard Phillips: The Call
of Cthulhu and Other Weird Stories. Penguin Books, London, 2002. pp. 170-199.
Scholarship
1. Birkhead, Edith: The Tale of Terror. A Study of the Gothic Romance. Russell & Russell Inc.,
New York, 1963.
2. Burke, Edmund: A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and
Beautiful. R. and J. Dodsley, London, 1757.
3. Cardin, Matt (ed.): Horror Literature through History. An Encyclopedia of the Stories That
Speak to Our Deepest Fears. Volume 1. Greenwood, Santa Barbara, 2017.
4. 5. Ellis, Markman: The History of Gothic Fiction. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2000.
Feldman, Stephen F.: American Legal Thought from Premodernism to Postmodernism. An
Intellectual Voyage. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
6. Finnis, John: Introduction. In Finnis, John (ed.): Natural Law. Volume I. Dartmouth,
Aldershot, 1991. pp. xi-xxiii.
7. 8. Harman, Graham: Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy. Zero Books, Winchester, 2012.
Houstoun, Alex: The Language of Lovecraft: Naming and Writing in “The Call of Cthulhu.”
In The Weird Fiction Review, Fall 2011, Issue 2. pp. 161-183.
9. Joshi, Sunand Tryambak: A Subtler Magick. The Writings and Philosophy of H. P. Lovecraft.
Wildside Press, Berkeley Heights, 1999.
10. Joshi, Sunand Tryambak: H. P. Lovecraft: A Life. Necronomicon Press, West Warwick, 1996.
11. Joshi, Sunand Tryambak: Time, Space, and Natural Law: Science and Pseudo-Science in
Lovecraft. In The Lovecraft Annual, 2010. pp. 171-201.
12. Leiber, Jr, Fritz: A Literary Copernicus. In Joshi, S. T. (ed.): H. P. Lovecraft: Four Decades of
Criticism. Ohio University Press, Athens, 1980. pp. 50-62.
13. Lovecraft, Howard Phillips: Selected Letters II. Arkham House, Sauk City, 1968.
14. Lovecraft, Howard Phillips: Selected Letters V. Arkham House, Sauk City, 1976.
15. Lovecraft, Howard Phillips: Supernatural Horror in Literature. In Lovecraft, Howard
Phillips: Collected Essays Volume 2: Literary Criticism. Hippocampus Press, New York,
2004. pp. 82-135.
16. Matolcsy Kálmán: Knowledge in the Void. Anomaly, Observation, and the Incomplete
Paradigm Shift in H. P. Lovecraft’s Fiction. In The Lovecraft Annual, 2008, pp. 165-191.
17. Nevins, Jess: Horror Fiction in the 20th Century. Exploring Literature’s Most Chilling Genre.
Praeger, Santa Barbara, 2020.
18. Oakes, David A.: Science and Destabilization in the Modern American Gothic. Lovecraft,
Matheson, and King. Greenwood Press, Westport, 2000.
19. Radbruch, Gustav: Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law. In Oxford Journal of
Legal Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2006. pp. 1-11. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqi041.
20. Weber, Max: Science as a Vocation. In Weber, Max: The Vocation Lectures. Hackett
Publishing Company, Indianapolis, 2004. pp. 1-31.
Judicial decisions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen, 244 U.S. 205 (1917)
Megjelent
2026-01-28
Rovat
Tanulmányok