A jogi és a politikai alkotmányosság rövid összehasonlítása

A politizálódás fejlődése: intézményi és egyéni aspektusok

  • Szöllősi-Baráth Szabolcs Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem
Kulcsszavak: jurisztokrácia, demokratikus legitimáció, negatív jogalkotó, alkotmánybíráskodás

Absztrakt

The emerging constitutional court set an obstacle to the policy-making of democracy, and at the same time pushed the political system towards duplication, building the power mechanisms of juristocracy alongside democracy. The basic idea of the need to establish a constitutional court led to the recognition that the provision of cassation power also means interference in democratic processes. The study undertakes a short, sketchy presentation from the role of the ’Das Gericht als negativer Gesetzgeber’ to the intervention close to the positive situation (or from Kelsen to Rawls as preferred).

Információk a szerzőről

Szöllősi-Baráth Szabolcs, Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem

Tanársegéd, PhD hallgató

Hivatkozások

Bellamy, Richard: Political constitutionalism: a republican defence of the constitutionality of

democracy University Press Cambridge 2007. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490187

3. Bellamy, Richard: Politikai alkotmányosság, MCC Press Budapest, 2022.

Böttcher, Hans-Ernst: The Role of the Judiciary in Germany, German Law Journal, Vol.5. No. 10

http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200013237

Boulanger, Christian: Europeanization Through Judicial Activism? The Hungarian Constitutional

Court’s Legitimacy and the “Return to Europe” In book: Spreading Democracy and the Rule of

Law? The Impact of EU Enlargemente for the Rule of Law, Democracy and Constitutionalism in

Post-Communist Legal Orders (pp.263-280)Publisher: SpringerEditors: Sadurski W, Czarnota A,

Krygier

6. Feldman Noam: Imposed Constituttionalism. Connecticut Law Review (Vol. 37) 2005. 851-865. p

Goldstein, Leslie Friedman: From Democracy to Juristocracy, Law & Society Review, Sep., 2004,

Vol. 38, No. 3 (Sep., 2004), pp. 611-629 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00059.x

Hirschl, Ran Towards Juristocracy The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism

Harvard University Press 2004

Kelsen, Hans 1928. Die philosophischen Grundlage der Naturrechtslehre und des

Rechtspositivizmus. Kant Gesellschaft, 31. Charlottenburg: Pan-Verlag Rolf Heise

Moustafa, Tamir & Tom Ginsburg (2008): „Introduction: The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian

Politics.” In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, ed. Tom Ginsburg &

Tamir Moustafa, Cambridge University Press https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814822.001

Nuno Garupa and Tom Gingburg: Building Reputation in Constitutional Courts: Party and Judicial

Politics Arizona J. of International & Comparative Law 2011.

Pokol, Béla Kettős állam és jogduplázódás, Alapjogokért Központ Budapest 2020.

Pokol, Béla: A jurisztokratikus kormányforma és szerkezeti kérdései, Pázmány Law Working

Papers 2016/8

Pokol, Béla: Autentikus jogelmélet, Dialóg Campus Kiadó Pécs, 2010

Rawls, John Political Liberalism Columbia University New York 1993. p

Scheingold, Stuart (1998): The Struggle to Politicize Legal Practice: A Case Study of Left Activist

Lawyering in Seattle. In: Sarat, Austin/S. Scheingold (ed.): Cause Lawyering. Political

Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York.Oxford University Press. 1998 118-

p. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195113198.003.0004

Silverstein, Gordon (2003): „Globalization and the rule of law: ‘A machine that runs of

itself?’” International Journal of Constitutional Law 1(3): 427–445

https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/1.3.427

Varga Zs. András, Eszményből bálvány? A joguralom dogmatikája Századvég Kiadó 2015.

Budapest

Williams, Robert F. (2006): „Juristocracy in the American States?” Maryland Law Review 65(1):

–83

Megjelent
2026-01-28
Rovat
Tanulmányok