Vetőmageredet jelentősége a természet-helyreállítási gyakorlatban: érvek és ellenérvek a hazai szabályozás tükrében
Absztrakt
Az ENSZ „ökoszisztémák helyreállításának évtizede” világszerte új lendületet adott az élőhely-restaurációs projekteknek. Bár általános egyetértés van azzal kapcsolatban, hogy szabályozni kell a restaurációs célokra használt honos fajok magjainak transzferjét, sok esetben a magok származásával kapcsolatos vita nehézségeket okoz a gyakorlati megvalósításban. Vizsgálatunkban elemeztük a helyi és távoli forrásból származó magok használatának előnyeit, hátrányait, valamint felmértük a hazai restaurációval foglalkozó kutatók, gyakorlati szakemberek és más természetvédelmi területen dolgozó kutatók véleményét a kérdésről. A további kutatások és az azonnali beavatkozások prioritásával kapcsolatos attitűdök jelentősen eltértek a kutatók és a gyakorlati szakemberek körében. Eredményeink alapján javaslatot tettünk egy döntéstámogató keretrendszerre, amely segíthet a konszenzus kialakításában.
Hivatkozások
Abbandonato, H., Pedrini, S., Pritchard, H. W., De Vitis, M., Bonomi, C. (2018): Native seed trade of herbaceous species for restoration: a European policy perspective with global implications. Restoration Ecology 26(5): 820–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12641
Barak, R. S., Ma, Z., Brudvig, L. A., Havens, K. (2022): Factors influencing seed mix design for prairie restoration. Restoration Ecology 30(5): e13581. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13581
Bischoff, A., Steinger, T., Müller‐Schärer, H. (2010): The importance of plant provenance and genotypic diversity of seed material used for ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 18(3): 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00454.x
Bower, A. D., Clair, J. B. S., Erickson, V. (2014): Generalized provisional seed zones for native plants. Ecological Applications 24(5): 913–919. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0285.1
Broadhurst, L., Prober, S., Dickson, F., Bush, D. (2017): Using restoration as an experimental framework to test provenancing strategies and climate adaptability. Ecological Management & Restoration 18(3): 205–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/emr.12275
Brooks, T. M., Mittermeier, R. A., da Fonseca, G. A., Lamoreux, J. F., Mittermeier, C. G., Gerlach, J. (2010): Global biodiversity conservation priorities: an expanded review. In: Lovett, J. C., Ockwell, D. G. (eds.): A handbook of Environmental Management. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bucharova, A., Michalski, S., Hermann, J. M., Heveling, K., Durka, W., Hölzel, N., Kollmann, J., Bossdorf, O. (2017): Genetic differentiation and regional adaptation among seed origins used for grassland restoration: lessons from a multispecies transplant experiment. Journal of Applied Ecology 54(1): 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12645
Bucharova, A., Bossdorf, O., Hölzel, N., Kollmann, J., Prasse, R., Durka, W. (2019): Mix and match: regional admixture provenancing strikes a balance among different seed-sourcing strategies for ecological restoration. Conservation Genetics 20(1): 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-018-1067-6
Cevallos, D., Bede‐Fazekas, Á., Tanács, E., Szitár, K., Halassy, M., Kövendi‐Jakó, A., Török, K. (2020): Seed transfer zones based on environmental variables better reflect variability in vegetation than administrative units: evidence from Hungary. Restoration Ecology 28(4): 911–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13150
Cevallos, D., Szitar, K., Halassy, M., Kövendi-Jakó, A., Török, K. (2021): Does seed trait variability support preliminary seed transfer zones for Hungary? Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 19(5): 4129–4149. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1905_41294149
De Vitis, M., Abbandonato, H., Dixon, K. W., Laverack, G., Bonomi, C., Pedrini, S. (2017): The European native seed industry: characterization and perspectives in grassland restoration. Sustainability 9(10): 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101682
Durka, W., Michalski, S. G., Berendzen, K. W., Bossdorf, O., Bucharova, A., Hermann, J. M., Hölzel, N., Kollmann, J. (2017): Genetic differentiation within multiple common grassland plants supports seed transfer zones for ecological restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 54(1): 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12636
EC (2022): Proposal for a Regulation of the Eurpean Parliament and of the Council on nature restoration. COM(2022) 304 final. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/nature-restoration-law_en
FAO, IUCN CEM and SER. (2021): Principles for ecosystem restoration to guide the United Nations Decade 2021–2030. Rome, FAO. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/CB6591EN
Gann, G. D., McDonald, T., Walder, B., Aronson, J., Nelson, C. R., Jonson, J., Hallett, J.G., Eisenbenrg, C., Guariguata, M.R., Liu, J., Hua, F., Echeverría, C., Gonzales, E., Shaw, N., Decleer, K., Dixon, K. W. (2019): International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 27 (S1): S1–S46. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13035
Gibson‐Roy, P., Hancock, N., Broadhurst, L., Driver, M. (2021a): Australian native seed sector practice and behavior could limit ecological restoration success: further insights from the Australian Native Seed Report. Restoration Ecology 29(7): e13429. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13429
Gibson‐Roy, P., Hancock, N., Broadhurst, L., Driver, M. (2021b): Australian native seed sector characteristics and perceptions indicate low capacity for upscaled ecological restoration: insights from the Australian Native Seed Report. Restoration Ecology 29(7): e13428. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13428
Goldsmith, N. E., Flint, S. A., Shaw, R. G. (2022): Factors limiting the availability of native seed for reconstructing Minnesota's prairies: stakeholder perspectives. Restoration Ecology 30(3): e13554. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13554
Hancock, N., Hughes, L. (2012): How far is it to your local? A survey on local provenance use in New South Wales. Ecological Management & Restoration 13(3): 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2012.00660.x
Hancock, N., Gibson-Roy, P., Driver, M., Broadhurst, L. (2020): The Australian Native Seed Sector Survey Report. Australian Network for Plant Conservation, Canberra. https://www.anpc.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/ANPC_NativeSeedSurveyReport_WEB.pdf. Letöltve: 2023. 01. 05.
Höfner, J., Klein‐Raufhake, T., Lampei, C., Mudrak, O., Bucharova, A., Durka, W. (2022): Populations restored using regional seed are genetically diverse and similar to natural populations in the region. Journal of Applied Ecology 59(9): 2234–2244. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14067
IPBES (2018): Summary for policymakers of the assessment report on land degradation and restoration of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. R. Scholes, L. Montanarella, A. Brainich, N. Barger, B. ten Brink, M. Cantele, B. Erasmus, J. Fisher, T. Gardner, T. G. Holland, F. Kohler, J. S. Kotiaho, G. Von Maltitz, G. Nangendo, R. Pandit, J. Parrotta, M. D. Potts, S. Prince, M. Sankaran, L. Willemen (eds.). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany, 44 p.
Jalonen, R., Valette, M., Boshier, D., Duminil, J., Thomas, E. (2018): Forest and landscape restoration severely constrained by a lack of attention to the quantity and quality of tree seed: Insights from a global survey. Conservation Letters 11(4): e12424. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12424
Kettenring, K. M., Tarsa, E. E. (2020): Need to seed? Ecological, genetic, and evolutionary keys to seed-based wetland restoration. Frontiers in Environmental Science 8: 109. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00109
Ladouceur, E., Jiménez‐Alfaro, B., Marin, M., De Vitis, M., Abbandonato, H., Iannetta, P. P., Bonomi, C., Pritchard, H. W. (2018): Native seed supply and the restoration species pool. Conservation Letters 11(2): e12381. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12381
León‐Lobos, P., Bustamante‐Sánchez, M. A., Nelson, C. R., Alarcón, D., Hasbún, R., Way, M., Pritchard, H. W., Armesto, J. J. (2020): Lack of adequate seed supply is a major bottleneck for effective ecosystem restoration in Chile: friendly amendment to Bannister et al. (2018). Restoration Ecology 28(2): 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13113
Lhoest, S., Kelman, C. C., Barton, C. J., Beaudette, J. A., Gerber, L. R. (2024): The impact factor of engaged research: Metrics for conservation outcomes. Biological Conservation 292,: 110534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110534
Nolan, M. P., Luong, J. C., Valliere, J. M., Mazer, S. J., D'Antonio, C. M. (2023): Rethinking local seed sourcing for the restoration of a foundational grass species in California. Restoration Ecology 31(8): e13992. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13992
Nunes, A., Oliveira, G., Mexia, T., Valdecantos, A., Zucca, C., Costantini, E. A., Abraham, E. M., Kyriazopoulos, A. P., Salah, A., Prasse, R., Correia O., Milliken, S., Kotzen, B., Branquinho, C. (2016): Ecological restoration across the Mediterranean Basin as viewed by practitioners. Science of the Total Environment 566: 722–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.136
Pandit, R., Parrotta, J. A., Chaudhary, A. K., Karlen, D. L., Vieira, D. L. M., Anker, Y., Chen, R., Morris, J., Harris, J., Ntshotsho, P. (2020): A framework to evaluate land degradation and restoration responses for improved planning and decision-making. Ecosystems and People 16(1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1697756
Pedrini, S., Gibson‐Roy, P., Trivedi, C., Gálvez‐Ramírez, C., Hardwick, K., Shaw, N., Frischie, S., Laverack, G., Dixon, K. (2020): Collection and production of native seeds for ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 28: S228–S238. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13190
Pedrini, S., Urzedo, D., Shaw, N., Zinnen, J., Laverack, G., Gibson-Roy, P. (2023): Strengthening the Global Native Seed Supply Chain for Ecological Restoration. In: Florentine, S., Broadhurst, L., Gibson-Roy, P., Dixon, K. (eds.): Ecological Restoration: Moving Forward Using Lessons Learned. Springer International Publishing, pp. 437–472.
Prober, S. M., Byrne, M., McLean, E. H., Steane, D. A., Potts, B. M., Vaillancourt, R. E., Stock, W. D. (2015): Climate-adjusted provenancing: a strategy for climate-resilient ecological restoration. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 3: 65. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2015.00065
Schmidt, I. B., De Urzedo, D. I., Piña‐Rodrigues, F. C. M., Vieira, D. L. M., De Rezende, G. M., Sampaio, A. B., Junqueira, R. G. P. (2019): Community‐based native seed production for restoration in Brazil – the role of science and policy. Plant Biology 21(3): 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12842
ter Braak, C. J., Šmilauer, P. (2012): Canoco reference manual and user's guide: software for ordination, version 5.0. Biometrics: Wageningen, The Netherlands; České Budějowice, Czech Republic.
Török, P., Janišová, M., Kuzemko, A., Rūsiņa, S., Stevanović, Z. D. (2018): Grasslands, their threats and management in Eastern Europe. In: Squires, V. R., Dengler, J., Hua, L., Feng, H. (eds.): Grasslands of the World: Diversity, Management and Conservation. CRC Press, pp. 78–102.
VM (2012) 86/2012. (VIII. 15.) VM rendelet a természetes környezet megőrzésére szánt takarmánynövény-vetőmagkeverékek kereskedelmi célú begyűjtéséről és forgalmazásáról. Magyar Közlöny 108: 18490–19498.
http1: https://native-seed.eu
