Practice in conservation and conservation biology: the role of scientific research

  • Csaba Aradi Hortobágy National Park
  • Szilvia Gőri Hortobágy National Park
  • Szabolcs Lengyel Hortobágy National Park
Keywords: communication between managers and researchers, areas of common interest, models in conservation, mosaic structures, fragmentation, disturbance, nformation and monitoring system

Abstract

This paper overviews the relationship between practical nature conservation and academic research, and how research can benefit nature protection. Research can have various roles in the manifold tasks of national parks in Hungary (management, authoritative work, nature preservation, monitoring). In management, an understanding of the dynamic change of spatial patterns (e.g. habitat-mosaic structures) and of the natural systems, and of the factors influencing these changes is essential. Only with this knowledge is it possible to devise adequate management, to choose between preservation-type or conservation-type strategies, and to implement habitat rehabilitation or reconstruction. While the formulation of general action plans to protect individual species requires research and planning at the national level, national parks tend to be interested in local or regional research. However, national level planning and rapid actions are necessary in several distinguished areas. For instance, it is essential to establish and maintain an easy-to-use nature conservation information system, which can be used to address practical problems. As a first step, the uniformisation and widening of the accessibility of databases currently under development are necessary. Such an information system could provide help in developing management plans and in making decisions necessary for habitat conservation and authoritative activities by the parks. The information system can ultimately be a tool for measuring the productivity or efficiency of national parks in fulfilling their tasks of management and preservation by monitoring the changes in the status of natural values. Conservation biology, after clarifying its basic concepts, can be a „common denominator” as a unifying basic principle in the relations between managers and researchers.

References

Báldi, A. (1998): A konzervációbiológia meghatározása publikált cikkek elemzése alapján és javaslatok hazai kutatásokra. - Természetvédelmi Közlemények 7: 6-17.

Connell, J. H. (1978): Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. - Science 199: 1302-1310.

Czárán, T. (1998): Populáció- és társulásdinamika térben és időben: tömeg- és objektum-kölcsönhatási modellek. - In: Fekete, G. (szerk.): A közösségi ökológia frontvonalai. Scientia, Budapest, pp. 35-58.

Gardner, R. H. & O’Neill, R. V. (1991): Pattem, process, and predictability: the use of neutral models for landscape analysis. - In: Turner, M. G. and Gardner, R. H. (eds): Quantitave methods in landscape ecology. Springer, New York, pp. 289-307.

Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. E. (1991): Metapopulation dynamics: a brief history and conceptual domain. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 3-16.

Hobbs, R. J. & Huenneke, L. F. (1992): Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. - Conservation Biology 6: 324-337.

Juhász-Nagy, P. (1979): A környezetvédelem ökológiai alapjai.-AÍ7A Biol. Oszt. Közi. 22: 297-309.

Kovács-Láng, E., Fekete, G. & Molnár, Zs. (1998): Mintázat, folyamat, skála: hosszútávú ökológiai kutatások a Kiskunságban. - In: Fekete, G. (szerk.): A közösségi ökológia frontvonalai. Scientia, Budapest, pp. 209-224.

Lewin, R. (1984): Parks: how big is enough? - Science 225: 611-612.

MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. (1967): The theory of island biogeography. - Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.

Margóczi, K. (1998): Természetvédelmi biológia. -JATE Press, Szeged.

Nilsson, C. & Grelsson, G. (1995): The fragility of ecosystems: a review. - J. Appl. Ecol. 32: 677-692.

Petraitis, P. S., Latham, R. E. & Niesenbaum, R. A. (1989): The maintenance of species diversity by disturbance. - Quaterly Rev. Biol. 64: 393-418.

Pickett, S. T. A. & Thompson, J. N. (1978): Patch dynamics and the design of nature reserves. - Biological Conservation 13: 21-31.

Shrader-Frechette, K. S. & McCoy, E. D. (1993): Method in ecology. Strategies for Conservation. - Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Sousa, W. P. (1984): The role of disturbance in natural communities. - Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 353-391.

Standovár, T. & Primack, R. (2001): A természetvédelmi biológia alapjai. - Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest.

Turner, M. G. (1989): Landscape ecology: The effect of pattem on process. - Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 171-197.

Wiens, J. A., Stenseth, N. C., Van Home, B. & Ims, R. A. (1993): Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. - Oikos 66: 369-380.

Published
2004-12-31