Tomorrow’s parents? Exploring the fertility intentions of young adults in Hungary
Abstract
In Hungary, where current fertility is below replacement, it is important to explore the fertility intentions of potential future parents. In our paper, we use a novel representative database to explore the future childbearing intentions of young adult Hungarians (18–29) and to estimate the potential effect of a wide range of demographic, socioeconomic and value-related independent variables. According to our results, fertility intentions are shaped by the individual’s economic status, current domicile, parental education, religiosity, parental separation, relationship status and positivity towards Hungary. Additionally, interaction models show that fertility intentions vary by age and gender: a critical period of late young adulthood is highlighted when stronger intentions notably decline for women. Finally, using subsamples, we examine the effect of climate anxiety and green behaviour. Results suggest that those who plan to have more children are more likely to behave in an environmentally conscious way.
References
Ajzen, I. – Klobas, J. (2013): Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research, 29(8): 203–232. https://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.8
Ajzen, I. (1991): The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2): 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Albertini, M. – Brini, E. (2020): I’ve changed my mind. The intentions to be childless, their stability and realisation. European Societies, 23(1): 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1764997
Avison, M. – Furnham, A. (2015): Personality and voluntary childlessness. Journal of Population Research, 32(1): 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-014-9140-6
Bachrach, C. A. – Morgan, S. P. (2011): Is the Theory of Planned Behaviour an appropriate model for human fertility? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9: 11–18.
Bachrach, C.A. – Morgan, S. P. (2013): A cognitive–social model of fertility intentions. Population and Development Review, 39(3): 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00612.x
Bartus, T. – Kisfalusi, D. – Koltai, J. (2019): Logisztikus regressziós együtthatók összehasonlítása. Statisztikai Szemle, 97(3): 221–240. https://doi.org/10.20311/stat2019.3.hu0221
Beaujouan, E. – Berghammer, C. (2019): The gap between lifetime fertility intentions and completed fertility in Europe and the United States: A cohort approach. Population Research and Policy Review, 38(4): 507–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-019-09516-3
Becker, G. (1991): A Treatise on the Family (extended edition). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bein, C. – Gauthier, A.H. – Mynarska, M. (2021): Religiosity and fertility intentions: Can the gender regime explain cross-country differences? European Journal of Population, 37(2): 443–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-020-09574-w
Bein, C. – Mynarska, M. – Gauthier, A. (2021): Do costs and benefits of children matter for religious people? Perceived consequences of parenthood and fertility intentions in Poland. Journal of Biosocial Science, 53(3): 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932020000280
Bernardi, L. – Mynarska, M. – Rossier, C. (2015): Uncertain, changing and situated fertility intentions. In Philipov, D. – Liefbroer, A. C. – Klobas, J. (eds.): Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective. Dordrecht: Springer, 113–141.
Berninger, I. - Weiß, B. – Wagner, M. (2011): On the links between employment, partnership quality, and the desire to have a first child: The case of West Germany. Demographic Research, 24(24): 579–610. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.24
Billari, F. C. – Kohler, H.-P. (2004): Patterns of low and lowest-low fertility in Europe. Population Studies, 58(2): 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472042000213695
Blaskó Zs. (2006): Nők és férfiak - keresőmunka, házimunka. KSH Népességtudományi Kutatóintézet Kutatási Jelentések 82. Budapest: KSH Népességtudományi Kutatóintézet.
Blaskó, Zs. (2005): Dolgozzanak-e a nők? A magyar lakosság nemi szerepekkel kapcsolatos véleményének változásai, 1988, 1994, 2002. Demográfia, 48(2-3): 259-287.
Blossfeld, H.-P. – Huinink, J. (1991): Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(1): 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/229743
Bodin, M. – Björklund, J. (2022). “Can I take responsibility for bringing a person to this world who will be part of the apocalypse!?”: Ideological dilemmas and concerns for future well-being when bringing the climate crisis into reproductive decision-making. Social Science & Medicine, 302: 114985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114985
Bognár V. (2008): Gyermekvállalási tervek - munkaerő-piaci helyzet. Demográfia, 51(4): 356–375.
Boros, J. – Bucher, E. (2020): Szerepváltozások hátrányos helyzetű településeken élő családokban. Esély, 31(4), 3–31.
Brini, E. (2020): Childlessness and low fertility in context: Evidence from a multilevel analysis on 20 European countries. Genus, 76(6): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-020-00074-7
Buber-Ennser, I. – Berghammer, C. (2021): Religiosity and the realisation of fertility intentions: A comparative study of eight European countries. Population, Space and Place, 27(2): e2433. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2433
Cheng, Y. A. – Hsu, C. (2020): No more babies without help for whom? Education, division of labor, and fertility intentions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(4): 1270–1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12672
Csányi, G. (2019): Genderrezsim és „nőpolitika” Magyarországon 2008-2018. Történeti politikai gazdaságtani elemzés. Fordulat, 2019(26): 116–141.
De Rose, A. – Testa, M. R. (2015): Climate change and reproductive intentions in Europe. In Strangio, D. – Sancetta, G. (eds.): Italy in a European context. Research into business, economics and the environment. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 194–212.
De Wachter, D. – Neels, K. (2011): Educational differentials in fertility intentions and outcomes: family formation in Flanders in the early 1990s. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9: 227–258.
Demeny, P. (2003): Population policy dilemmas in Europe at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Population and Development Review, 29(1): 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2003.00001.x
Dupcsik, CS. – Tóth, O. (2008): Feminizmus helyett Familizmus. Demográfia, 51(4): 307–328.
Fahlén, S. – Oláh, L. (2015): The impact of economic uncertainty on childbearing intentions in Europe. Families and Societies Working Paper Series 36.
Füstös, L. - Szakolczai, Á. (1994): Értékek változásai Magyarországon, 1978-1993. Kontinuitás és diszkontinuitás a Kelet-Közép-Európai átmenetben. Szociológiai Szemle, 4(1): 57–90.
Füstös, L. - Szakolczai, Á. (1999): Kontinuitás és diszkontinuitás az értékpreferenciákban (1977-1998): Szociológiai Szemle. 9(3), 54–72.
Gobbi, P. E. (2012): A model of voluntary childlessness. Journal of Population Economics, 26(3): 963–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-012-0457-1
Goldstein, J. – Lutz, W. – Testa, M.R. (2003): The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideals in Europe. Population Research and Policy Review, 22(5) :479–496. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POPU.0000020962.80895.4a
Gregor, A. (2016): A nemi szerepekkel kapcsolatos attitűdök a 2000-es években Magyarországon. Socio.hu, 6(1): 89–111.
Gribaldo, A. – Judd, M. D. – Kertzer, D. I. (2009): An imperfect contraceptive society: Fertility and contraception in Italy. Population and Development Review, 35(3): 551–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00296.x
Hakim, C. (2003): A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: Preference theory. Population and Development Review, 29(3): 349–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2003.00349.x
Han, S. W. – Gowen, O. – Brinton, M. C. (2023): When mothers do it all: Gender-role norms, women’s employment, and fertility intentions in post-industrial societies. European Sociological Review, 2023: jcad036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcad036
Hanappi, D. – Ryser, V.-A. – Bernardi, L. – Le Goff, J.-M. (2017): Changes in employment uncertainty and the fertility intention–realization link: An analysis based on the Swiss household panel. European Journal of Population, 33(3): 381–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-016-9408-y
Hayford, S. R. – Morgan, S. P. (2008): Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions. Social Forces, 86(3): 1163–1188. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0000
Hiekel, N. – Castro-Martín, T. (2014): Grasping the diversity of cohabitation: Fertility intentions among cohabiters across Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(3): 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12112
Iacovou, M. – Tavares, L. P. (2011): Yearning, learning, and conceding: Reasons men and women change their childbearing intentions. Population and Development Review, 37(1): 89–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00391.x
Inglehart, R. (1970): The silent revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kapitány, B. – Spéder, Zs. (2021): Gyermekvállalás. In Monostori, J. – Őri, P. – Spéder, Zs. (eds.): Demográfiai Portré 2021. Budapest: KSH Népességtudományi Kutatóintézet, 45–65.
Karhunen, O. – Jokela, M. – Golovina, K. (2023): Associations between early family environment and ideal number of children. SocArXiv, 14 Apr. 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ea7rg
Keller, T. (2009): Magyarország helye a világ értéktérképén. Budapest: TÁRKI.
KINCS (2020): Gyorselemzés a “családok és a környezetvédelem” című kutatás eredményeiről.
Klobas, J. – Ajzen I. (2015): Making the decision to have a child. In Philipov, D. – Liefbroer, A. C. – Klobas, J. (eds.): Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective. Dordrecht: Springer, 41–78.
Korosteleva, O. (2019): Advanced regression models with SAS and R. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Kotte, M, – Ludwig, V. (2011): Intergenerational transmission of fertility intentions and behaviour in Germany: The role of contagion. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 207–226.
Lappegård, T. – Neyer, G. – Vignoli, D. (2021): Three dimensions of the relationship between gender role attitudes and fertility intentions. Genus, 77(15): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-021-00126-6
Lesthaeghe, R. (2010): The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2): 211–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17284457.2010.00328.x
Lesthaeghe, R. (2020): The second demographic transition, 1986–2020: Sub-replacement fertility and rising cohabitation – A global update. Genus, 76(10): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-020-00077-4
Liefbroer, A. C. – Billari, F. C. (2010): Bringing norms back in: A theoretical and empirical discussion of their importance for understanding demographic behaviour. Population, Space and Place, 16(4): 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.552
Liefbroer, A. C. – Dourleijn, E. (2006): Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography, 43(2): 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2006.0018
Liefbroer, A. C. – Merz, E-M. – Testa, M. R. (2015): Fertility-related norms across Europe: A multi-level analysis. In Philipov, D. – Liefbroer, A. C. – Klobas, J. (eds.): Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective. Dordrecht: Springer, 141–165.
Liefbroer, A. C. (2009). Changes in family size intentions across young adulthood: A life-course perspective. European Journal of Population, 25(4): 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-008-9173-7
Lois, D. – Becker, O. (2014): Is fertility contagious? Using panel data to disentangle mechanisms of social network influences on fertility decisions. Advances in Life Course Research, 21: 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2013.10.001
Luppi, F. – Arpino, B. – Rosina, A. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on fertility plans in Italy, Germany, France, Spain and the United Kingdom. Demographic Research, 43(47): 1399–1412. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2020.43.47
Makay, Zs. – Murinkó, L. (2021). Válás, élettársi kapcsolatok felbomlása. In Monostori, J. – Őri, P. – Spéder, Zs. (eds.): Demográfiai Portré 2021. Budapest: KSH Népességtudományi Kutatóintézet, 29–45.
Makay, Zs. – Spéder, Zs. (2018): Apaság, a férfiak gyermekvállalása és családi szerepei. In Monostori, J. – Őri, P. – Spéder, Zs. (Eds.): Demográfiai Portré 2018. Budapest: Központi Statisztikai Hivatal Népességtudományi Kutatóintézet, 65–83.
Merz, E.-M. – Liefbroer, A. C. (2012): The attitude toward voluntary childlessness in Europe: Cultural and institutional explanations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(3): 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00972.x
Merz, E.-M. (2012): Fertility intentions depend on intergenerational relations: A life course perspective. Family Science, 3(3-4): 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424620.2013.789976
Miettinen, A. – Gietel-Bastern, S. – Rotkirch, A. (2011): Gender equality and fertility intentions revisited: Evidence from Finland. Demographic Research, 24(20): 469–496. https://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.20
Miettinen, A. – Szalma, I. (2014): Childlessness intentions and ideals in Europe. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research, 49, 31–55. https://doi.org/10.23979/fypr.48419
Modena, F. – Rondinelli, C. – Sabatini, F. (2013): Economic insecurity and fertility intentions: The case of Italy. Review of Income and Wealth, 60 (S1): S233–S255. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12044
Mood, C. (2010): Logistic Regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1): 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp006
Morgan, S. P. – Rackin, H. (2010): The correspondence between fertility intentions and behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review, 36(1): 91–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00319.x
Murinkó, L. – Spéder, Zs. (2021). Párkapcsolatok, házasságkötés. . In Monostori, J. – Őri, P. – Spéder, Zs. (eds.): Demográfiai Portré 2021. Budapest: KSH Népességtudományi Kutatóintézet, 9–29.
Murinkó, L. (2014): A nemi szerepekkel és a családdal kapcsolatos attitűdök európai kitekintésben: Értékek és gyermekgondozás. Szociológiai Szemle, 24(1): 67–101.
Murinkó, L. (2019): A felnőtté válás életúttípusai, előzményei és kimenetei a 2000-es években Magyarországon. Demográfia¸ 62(2–3): 153–198. https://doi.org/10.21543/Dem.62.2–3.1
Nagy, E. – Pári, A. (2021): A tudatos gyermektelenség lehetséges okai egy kvalitatív felmérés alapján. Kapocs, 4(3-4): 98-105.
Novelli, M. – Cazzola, A. – Angeli, A. – Pasquini, L. (2021): Fertility intentions in times of rising economic uncertainty: Evidence from Italy from a gender perspective. Social Indicators Research, 154(1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02554-x
Okun, B. S. – Raz-Yurovich, L. (2018): Housework, gender role attitudes, and couples’ fertility intentions: Reconsidering men’s roles in gender theories of family change. Population and Development Review, 45(1): 169–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12207
Őri, P. – Spéder, Zs. (2020): Folytonos átmenet: Magyarország népesedése 1920 és 2020 között. Statisztikai Szemle, 98(6): 481–521. https://doi.org/10.20311/stat2020.6.hu0481
Pápay, N. – Rigó, A. – Nagybányai Nagy, O. – Soltész, A. (2014): A gyermekvállalási attitűdök alakulásának pszichoszociális meghatározói = Psychosocial factors influencing the motivation for parenthood. Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika, 15 (1): pp. 1-30.
Philipov, D. – Spéder, Zs. – Billari, F. C. (2006): Soon, later, or ever? The impact of anomie and social capital on fertility intentions in Bulgaria (2002) and Hungary (2001). Population Studies, 60(3): 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324720600896080
Philipov, D. (2011): Theories on fertility intentions: A demographer's perspective. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9: 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1553/population yearbook2011s37.
Pongráczné, T. - S. Molnár, E. (2011): Nemi szerepek és a közvélemény változásának kölcsönhatása. In Nagy, I. - Pongráczné, T. (Eds.): Szerepváltozások: Jelentés a Nők és Férfiak Helyzetéről, 2011. Budapest: TÁRKI, 192–206.
Quesnel-Vallée, A. – Morgan, S. P. (2003). Missing the target? Correspondence of fertility intentions and behavior in the U.S. Population Research and Policy Review, 22(5–6): 497–525. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:popu.0000021074.33415.c1
Ragadics, T. (2018): Marriage and cohabitation in recent Hungarian Society. Nova prisutnost, 16(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.31192/np.16.1.6
Schneider-Mayerson, M. (2022): The environmental politics of reproductive choices in the age of climate change. Environmental Politics, 31(1): 152–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1902700
Schoen, R. – Astone, N. M. – Kim, Y. J. – Nathanson, C. A. – Fields, J. M. (1999): Do fertility intentions affect fertility behavior? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(3): 790–799. https://doi.org/10.2307/353578
Sobotka, T. (2009): Sub-replacement fertility intentions in Austria / Intentions de fécondité inférieures au seuil de remplacement en Autriche. European Journal of Population, 25(4): 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-009-9183-0
Spéder, Zs. – Kapitány, B. (2007): Gyermekek: Vágyak és tények. Dinamikus termékenységi elemzések. Életünk fordulópontjai Műhelytanulamányok 6.
Spéder, Zs. – Kapitány, B. (2009): How are time-dependent childbearing intentions realized? Realization, postponement, abandonment, bringing forward. European Journal of Population, 25(4): 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-009-9189-7
Spéder, Zs. – Kapitány, B. (2015): Influences on the link between fertility intentions and behavioural outcomes. Lessons from a European comparative study. In Philipov, D. – Liefbroer, A. C. – Klobas, J. (eds.): Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective. Dordrecht: Springer, 79–112.
Spéder, Zs. (2011): Ellentmondó elvárások között… Családi férfiszerepek, apaképek a mai Magyarországon. In Nagy, I. - Pongrácz, T. (Eds.): Szerepváltozások: Jelentés a Nők és Férfiak Helyzetéről, 2011. Budapest: TÁRKI, 207-228.
Spéder, Zs. (2021): Termékenységi mintaváltás – a családalapítás átalakulásának demográfiai nyomvonalai Magyarországon. Szociológiai Szemle, 31(2): 4–29. https://doi.org/10.51624/SzocSzemle.2021.2.1
Szalma, I. – Takács, J. (2012): A gyermektelenséget meghatározó tényezők Magyarországon. Demográfia, 55(1): 44-68.
Szalma, I. – Takács, J. (2016) Gyermektelenség Magyarországon. Mítoszok és kutatási eredmények. Magyar Tudomány, 177(2): 159–167.
Testa, M. R. – Stephany, F. (2017): The educational gradient of fertility intentions: A meta-analysis of European studies. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 15: 1–38.
Testa, M. R. – Toulemon, L. (2006): Family formation in France: Individual preferences and subsequent outcomes. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 4: 41–75.
Testa, M. R. (2014): On the positive correlation between education and fertility intentions in Europe: Individual- and country-level evidence. Advances in Life Course Research, 21: 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2014.01.005
Utasi, Á. (1996): Házasság és válás középosztályi identitással - praxisok és attitűdök. Szociológiai Szemle, 6(2): 57-70.
Veevers, J. E. (1980): Childless by choice. Toronto & Vancouver: Butterworth Co.
Veroszta Zs. – Györgyi Z. (2021): Képzési háttér és gyermekvállalási tervek. Educatio, 30(2): 184–205. https://doi.org/10.1556/2063.30.2021.2.2
Vignoli, D. – Minello, A. – Bazzani, G. – Matera, C. – Rapallini, C. (2022): Narratives of the future affect fertility: Evidence from a laboratory experiment. European Journal of Population, 38(1): 93–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-021-09602-3
Waren, W. – Pals, H. (2013): Comparing characteristics of voluntarily childless men and women. Journal of Population Research, 30(2): 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-012-9103-8
