The Types and Historical Development of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the Context of Early Ethical and Legal Reactions

Szerzők

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55019/plr.2026.1.145-161

Kulcsszavak:

assisted reproductive, technologies, ethical concerns of ART, historical background of ART, sperm donation, surrogacy

Absztrakt

The paper sets forth the explanation of the main types of assisted reproductive technologies and their medical, cultural and historical evolution. First, it deals with artificial insemination and sperm cryopresevation, after that the research explores the development of in vitro fertilisation in connection with egg and embryo donation. The study lays special emphasis on the early ethical and legal attempts to regulate the field of assisted reproduction, considering ethical documents and organizations, legal regulation and case law in the United States, England, Germany and Hungary.

The essay’s conclusion is in general, that for most states, there was an early period when assisted reproduction was actually prohibited. After that, in almost all countries, various regulatory bodies and legal regulations have classified assisted reproductive technologies as permissible procedures for the treatment of infertility. Consequently, limitations on the human embryo and the family, which had been established on long traditional development, were gradually dismantled.

Hivatkozások

Iván László Arnold: Az emberi lényeg, a mesterséges utódnemzés és a jog. [The human essence, artificial procreation, and the law]. Társadalmi Szemle 12, (1996).

Noa Ben-Asher: The curing law: On the evolution of baby-making markets. Cardozo Law Review 30, 5. (2009).

Béla Bodnár – Zoltán Bodnár: A személyállományra vonatkozó perek lehetőségei

az in vitro fertilisatio és embrió transfer eseteiben. [The possibilities of lawsuits concerning civil status in cases of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer]. Magyar Jog 4, (1986).

Béla Bodnár – Zoltán Bodnár: Lehet-e az anya személye kérdéses? [Can the identity of the mother be questionable?]. Magyar Jog 12, (1985).

Béla Bodnár – Zoltán Bodnár: Lombikbébi és társa.i [Test-tube baby and others]. Budapest, Kossuth Könyvkiadó, 1988.

Naomi Cahn: Accidental incest: Drawing the line – or the curtain? – for reproductive technology. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender 32, (2009).

Catherine A. Clements: What about the children? A call for regulation of assisted reproductive technology. Indiana Law Journal 84, 1. (2009).

Brian Clowes: The Facts of Life. An Authoritative Guide to Life & Family Issues. Front Royal, Human Life Intl., 1997.

Jean Cohen et. al.: The early days of IVF outside the UK. Human Reproduction Update 11, 5. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmi016

Gregory Dolin: A defence of embryonic stem cell research. Indiana Law Journal 84, 4. (2009).

W. J. Dondorp: Freezing the hands of time: Fertility insurance for healthy women? In: F. Shenfield – C. Sureau (ed.): Ethical dilemmas in reproduction. London, Parthenon, 2002.

Ulrich Eibach: Experimente mit menschlichen Embryonen? – Die Sicht der evangelischen Kirchen und Theologie. In: Uwe Opolka (ed.): Respekt vor dem werdenden Leben. München, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, 1989.

Theresa M. Erickson – Megan T. Erickson: What happens to embryos when a marriage dissolves? Embryo disposition and divorce. William Mitchell Law Review 35, 2. (2009).

Albin Eser – Marcus von Lutterotti – Paul Sporken: Lexikon Medizin, Ethik, Recht. Freiburg, Herder, 1989.

Sozos J. Fasouliotis – Joseph G. Schenker: Social aspects in assisted reproduction. Human Reproduction Update 5, 1. (1999). https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/5.1.26

W. Feichtinger – P. Kemeter: Über die In-vitro-Fertilisierung beim Menschen. In: Erwin Bernat (ed.): Lebensbeginn durch Menschenhand. Graz, Leykam, 1985.

W. Feichtinger et al.: Pregnancy after total ovariectomy achieved by ovum donation. The Lancet 326, (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92956-3

Jan M. R. Gerris: Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal. Human Reproduction Update 11, 2. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmh049

Joshua Greenfield: Dad was born a thousand years ago? An examination of post-mortem conception and inheritance, with a focus on the rule against perpetuities. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 8, 1. (2006). https://doi.org/10.24926/15529541.3616

Michéle Hansen et al.: The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. The New England Journal of Medicine 346, 10. (2002). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa010035

John Harris: On cloning. London, Routledge, 2004. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203440636

Holger Hassmann: Embryonenschutz im Spannungsfeld internationaler Menschenrechte, staatlicher Grundrechte und nationaler Regelungsmodelle zur Embryonenforschung. Berlin, Springer, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55491-9

Peter Hans Hofschneider: Embryonenforschung und Gentechnologie. In: Uwe Opolka (ed.): Respekt vor dem werdenden Leben. München, Max-. Planck-Gesellschaft, 1989.

Gábor Jobbágyi: A művi megtermékenyítés jogi és erkölcsi kérdőjelei. [Legal and moral dilemmas of artificial procreation]. Iustum, Aequum, Salutare 2, 1–2. (2006).

Gábor Jobbágyi: Az élet joga. [The right to life]. Budapest, Szent István Társulat, 2004.

Gábor Jobbágyi: Orvosi jog. Hippokratésztől a klónozásig. [Medical law: From Hippocrates to cloning]. Budapest, Szent István Társulat, 2008.

Thomas Katzorke: Entstehung und Entwicklung der Spendersamenbehandlung in Deutschland. In: Gisela Bockenheimer-Lucius – Petra Thorn – Christiane Wendehorst (ed.): Umwege zum eigenen Kind. Ethische und rechtliche Herausforderungen an die Reproduktionsmedizin 30 Jahre nach Louise Brown. Göttingen, Universitätsverlag, 2008.

Debora L . S par: The baby business: how money, science, and politics drive the commerce of conception. Boston, Harvard Business Review Press, 2006.

János László: Határkő a meddőség elleni küzdelem történetében. [A milestone in the history of the fight against infertility]. Magyar Tudomány 86, 1. (1979).

Crystal Liu: Restricting access to infertility services: What is a justified limitation on reproductive freedom? Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 10, 1. (2009). https://doi.org/10.24926/15529541.3556

Peter Lutjen et al.: The establishment and maintenance of pregnancy using in vitro fertilization and embryo donation in a patient with primary ovarian failure. Nature 307, (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/307174a0

Lyria Bennett Moses: Understanding legal responses to technological change of in vitro fertilization. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 6, 2. (2005).

Ferenc Oberfrank: A biomedicinális etika és az emberi jogok: európai helyzetkép. [Biomedical ethics and human rights: A European overview]. Acta Humana 7, 25. (1996).

Michael Pap: Extrakorporale Befruchtung und Embriotransfer aus Arztrechtlicher Sicht: insbesondere: der Schutz des werdenden Lebens “in vitro”. Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang Verlag, 1987.

Willibald Posch: Das Recht der künstlichen Humanreproduktion im Wandel. In: Erwin Bernat (ed.): Lebensbeginn durch Menschenhand. Graz, Leykam, 1985.

Gerhard Ranner: Aspekte der künstliche Insemination. In: Erwin Bernat (ed.): Lebensbeginn durch Menschenhand. Probleme künstlicher Befruchtungstechnologien aus medizinischer, ethischer und juristischer Sicht. Graz, Leykam, 1985.

J. Brad Reich – Dawn Swink: You can’t put the genie back in the bottle: Potential rights and obligations of egg donors in the cyberprocreation era. Albany Journal of Law, Science & Technology 20, 1. (2010).

Eva Maria K. Rütz: Heterologe Insemination – Die rechtliche Stellung des Samenspenders. Berlin, Springer, 2008.

Judit Sándor: A humán reprodukciós orvosi eljárások jogi szabályozásáról. [On the legal regulation of assisted medical procreation]. Acta Humana 7, 25. (1996).

Carol Sanger: Developing markets in baby-making: In the matter of Baby M. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender 30, 1. (2007).

Julia Schlüter: Schutzkonzepte für menschliche Keimbahnzellen in der Fortpflanzungsmedizin. Berlin, LIT Verlag, 2008.

Ingrid Schneider: Embryonen zwischen Virtualisierung und Materialisierung – Kontroll und Gestaltungswünsche an die technisierte Reproduktion. Technikfolgenabschätzung. Theorie und Praxis 11, 2. (2002). https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.11.2.45

Hinner Schütze: Embryonale Humanstammzellen. Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung der deutschen, französischen, britischen und US-amerikanischen Rechtslage. Berlin, Springer, 2007.

Béla Somfai: Emberi élet kémcsőben. [Human life in a test tube]. Vigília 49, 1. (1984).

Somfai, Béla: Religious traditions and stem cell research. In: Judit Sandor (ed.): Society and genetic information. Codes and laws in the genetic era. Budapest–New York, Central European University Press, 2003.

Armin Stolz: Grundrechtsaspekte künstlicher Befruchtungsmethoden. In: Erwin Bernat (ed.): Lebensbeginn durch Menschenhand. Graz, Leykam, 1985.

Alastair G. Sutcliff: IVF children: The first generation: Assisted reproduction and child development. London, CRC Press, 2002.

Kálmán Széll: Egészségügyi Etika. [Healthcare ethics]. Pécs, POTE EFK, 1995.

Gábor Szendi: A női funkcionális meddőség evolúciós értelmezése. [The evolutionary interpretation of female functional infertility]. Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika, 1. (2007).

Charis Thompson: Making parents. The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge, The MIT Press, 2005.

Petra Thorn: Familiengründung mit Samenspende. Stuttgart, Kohlhammer Verlag, 2008.

Hans-Rudolf Tinneberg: Zum aktuellen Leistungsstand der In-Vitro-Fertilisation. In: Christian Dierks – Albrecht Wienke – Wolfgang Eisenmenger (ed.): Rechtsfragen der Präimplantationsdiagnostik. Berlin, New York, Springer, 2007.

Urska Velikonja: The costs of multiple gestation pregnancies in assisted reproduction. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender 32, 2. (2009).

Juan de Dios Vial Correa – Elio Sgreccia (ed.): Identity and Status of the Human Embryo: Proceedings of the Third Assembly of the Pontifical Academy for Life. Vatican City, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1998.

Ellen Waldman: Cultural priorities revealed: The development and regulation of assisted reproduction in the United States and Israel. Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine 16, 1. (2006).

Kurt Weinke: Gedanken zu künstlichen Befruchtungstechniken aus philosophischethischer Sicht In: Erwin Bernat (ed.): Lebensbeginn durch Menschenhand. Graz, Leykam, 1985.

Fernando Zegers-Hochschild et al.: International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology. Fertility and Sterility 92, 5. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009

Letöltések

Megjelent

2026-11-13

Hogyan kell idézni

Navratyil, Z. (2026). The Types and Historical Development of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the Context of Early Ethical and Legal Reactions . Pázmány Law Review, 13(1), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.55019/plr.2026.1.145-161

Folyóirat szám

Rovat

Articles