Integration Responsibility: The Relationship of National Constitutional Courts to the Court of Justice of the European Union
Hierarchy or Collegiality?
Abstract
As long as the peoples of Europe are unable to create a homogeneous, united society, the principle of ‘unity in diversity’ will be a natural limit to the development of the ‘ever closer union’ clause, and this is not a mere philosophical or theoretical argument; it is rather a fact-based inadequacy that must be reflected in the European legal order and the concrete competences and their limits, especially in the relationship between the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European national constitutional and higher courts. The undefined nature of the relationship between European Union (EU) law and national constitutions (resulting from the supranational nature of integration) forced European national constitutional courts to assume a role that could also be seen as a functional change in terms of the entirety of the European constitutional judiciary. The role of these bodies seems to be complemented by a kind of ‘integrational’ function; the European national constitutional courts must no longer only defend their national constitutions but must do so while considering the proper advancement of the integration process. They must act in a manner that upholds the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) right to an authentic interpretation of the Treaties; however, taking into account that the CJEU, as an institution of the EU, is not entitled to make decisions ultra vires against the framework set by the Treaties.
References
Belov, M. (2017) ‘The Functions of Constitutional Identity Performed in the Context of Constitutionalization of the EU Order and Europeanization of the Legal Orders of EU Member States’, Perspectives on Federalism, 9(2), pp. 72–97.
Blutman, L. (2022) ‘Az Alkotmánybíróság határozata arról, hogy egyes uniós jogi aktusok végrehajtása mellőzhető-e az Alaptörvényre tekintettel’, Jogesetek Magyarázata, 13(1), pp. 5–12.
Calliess, C. (2020) ‘Constitutional Identity in Germany. One for Three or Three in One?’ in Calliess, C., Van der Schyff, G. (eds.) Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–182; https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108616256.
Degenhart, C. (2022) Staatsrecht I. C.F. Müller GmbH.
Fabbrini, F. (2021) Saving the BVerfG from itself: the Commission infringement proceedings against Germany and its significance [Online]. Available at: https:// bridgenetwork .eu /2021 /06/10/sav ing-t he-bverfg-from-itselfthe-commission-infringement-proceedings-against-germany-and-itssignificance/ (Accessed: 25 June 2023).
Hamuľák, O., Sulyok, M., Kiss, L. N. (2019) ‘Measuring the ’EU’-Clidean Distance Between EU Law and the Hungarian Constitutional Court – Focusing on the Position of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’, Czech Yearbook of Public & Private International Law, 2019(10), pp. 130–150.
Kelemen, R D. et al. (2020) National Courts Cannot Override CJEU Judgments. A Joint Statement in Defense of the EU Legal Order [Online]. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/national-courts-cannot-override-cjeu-judgments/ (Accessed: 25 June 2023).
Martucci, F. (2021) ‘Primacy, identity and ultra vires: forging the Union through the law without foregoing the rule of law’, RED, 3(2), pp. 17–24.
Orbán, E. (2018) ‘Quo vadis, „alkotmányos identitás”?’, Közjogi Szemle, 11(3), pp. 1–13.
Piris, J C. (2022) ‘The European Union in Crisis: What Should the Member States Do?’, European Papers, 7(2), pp. 969–980.
Riedl, B. (2021) ‘Ultra Vires Control and European Democracy’, VerfBlog, 18 June [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17176/20210618-193307-0 (Accessed: 28 September 2023).
Tischendorf, M. (2016) ‘Theorie und Wirklichkeit der Integrationsverantwortung deutscher Verfassungsorgane’, Jus Internationale et Europaeum, 129, Universitat Augsburg.
Várnay, E. (2019) ‘Az Alkotmánybíróság és az Európai Bíróság. Együttműködő alkotmánybíráskodás?’, Állam- és Jogtudomány, 60(2), pp. 63–91.
Vincze, A., Chronowski, N. (2018) Magyar alkotmányosság az európai integrációban (Third, revised edition). Budapest: HVG Orac, pp. 493–515.
Infringements package (December 2021) of the European Commission [Online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/inf_21_6201?fbclid=IwAR1w6wbHhdcA5vxlqXTohUjxcgF7mJbpSBxTXjxaNWXpMJ0MIzb9Zyuwv7I (Accessed: 25 June 2023).