The role of solar PV systems in participatory energy transition
A systematic literature review based on the PRISMA method
Abstract
The energy transition is one of the most important economic and technological programmes of our time, and one that poses major challenges for society. The increasing use of modern renewable energy sources and the emergence of household-scale power plants are leading to the decentralisation of large energy systems. Previously passive consumers are becoming active energy citizens, realising a participatory energy transition. In my study, I examine this process from the perspective of energy democracy, energy justice and energy citizenship using the PRISMA method. I will conduct a systematic literature review, presenting the advantages and disadvantages of solar PV systems, the opportunities and threats of solar PV projects on household and industrial scale. It can be shown that there is a significant difference between the Global South and the Global North. Countries with democratic systems, where good governance is a priority and social inequalities are lower, are clearly more successful than authoritarian regimes in achieving participatory energy transition.
References
AGU, O.–TABIL, L.–MUPONDWA, E. [2023]: Actualization and Adoption of Renewable Energy Usage in Remote Communities in Canada by 2050: A Review. Energies, Vol. 16. No. 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083601.
BARNES, J. [2019]: Public participation in a West of England energy transition: Key patterns and trends. https://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-10/public-participation-in-a-West-of-England-energy-transition.pdf.
BAUWENS, T.–SCHRAVEN, D.–DREWING, E.–RADTKE, J.–HOLSTENKAMP, L.–GOTCHEV, B.–YILDIZ, Ö. [2022]: Conceptualizing community in energy systems. A systematic review of 183 definitions. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111999.
BERA, R.–MISHRA, P.–PATNAIK, P. [2024]: Renewable energy for women empowerment: Experiences from rural West Bengal. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 198. 114446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114446.
BLAZQUEZ, J.–FUENTES-BRACAMONTES, R.–MANZANO, B. [2019]: A road map to navigate the energy transition. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/A-road-map-to-navigate-the-energy-transition-Insight-59.pdf.
BOZÓKI ANDRÁS–SÜKÖSD MIKLÓS [1991a]: A zöld-mozgalom anarchista szellemisége. Megjelent: Bozóki András–Sükösd Miklós (szerk.): Anarchizmus. Modern ideológiák. Századvég Kiadó, Budapest, https://mek.oszk.hu/02000/02003/html/nter1887.htm.
BOZÓKI ANDRÁS–SÜKÖSD MIKLÓS [1991b]: Posztindusztrializmus és posztmaterializmus: Új társadalmi mozgalmak a posztmodern korszakban. Megjelent: Bozóki András–Sükösd Miklós (szerk.): Anarchizmus. Modern ideológiák. Századvég Kiadó, Budapest, https://mek.oszk.hu/02000/02003/html/nter1887.htm.
BRÁS, O. R.–FERREIRA, V.–CARVALHO, A. [2024]: People of the sun: Local resistance and solar energy (in)justice in southern Portugal. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 113. 103529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103529.
BRUNET, C.–SAVADOGO, O.–BAPTISTE, P.–BOUCHARD, M. A.–CHOLEZ, C.–GENDRON, C.–MERVEILLE, N. [2021]: The three paradoxes of the energy transition. Assessing sustainability of large-scale solar photovoltaic through multi-level and multi-scalar perspective in Rwanda. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 288. 125519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125519.
BURKE, M. J.–STEPHENS, J. C. [2017]: Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 33. 35–48. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.024.
BURKE, M. J.–STEPHENS, J. C. [2018]: Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 35. 78–93. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018.
BUSCH, H.–RADTKE, J.–ISLAR, M. [2023]: Safe havens for energy democracy? Analysing the low-carbon transitions of Danish energy islands. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, Vol. 33. No. 2. 227–251. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-023-00347-5.
CAMPOS, I.–BRITO, M.–LUZ, G. [2023]: Scales of solar energy: Exploring citizen satisfaction, interest, and values in a comparison of regions in Portugal and Spain. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.102952.
COMMUNITY ENERGY ENGLAND [2024]: Definition, impact and sector potential. Our How To section for all things community energy. Community Energy England, https://communityenergyengland.org/how-to-pages/definition-benefits-and-potential-of-community-energy.
CSÁK LÁSZLÓ [2015]: Energiapolitika: Minden területi szinten. Tér és Társadalom, 29. évf. 4. sz. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.29.4.2645.
DALL-ORSOLETTA, A.–CUNHA, J.–ARAUJO, M.–FERREIRA, P. [2022]: A systematic review of social innovation and community energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102625.
DEUTSCH NIKOLETT [2011]: A technológiai rendszerek innovációja. Az elosztott villamosenergia-termelési technológiák fenntarthatósági értékelése és rendszerinnovációs potenciáljának vizsgálata az Európai Unióban. PTE Közgazdaságtudományi Kar Gazdálkodástani Doktori Iskola, Pécs, https://n9.cl/qukxop.
DEVAR, S. G. [2019]: Equitable Community Solar: California & Beyond. Ecology Law Quarterly, Vol. 46. No. 4. 1017–1047. o. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38057CS9H.
EC [2024]: Solar energy. European Commission, https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/renewable-energy/solar-energy_en.
EGERT, R.–DAUBERT, J.–MARSH, S.–MÜHLHÄUSER, M. [2021]: Exploring energy grid resilience: The impact of data, prosumer awareness, and action. Patterns, Vol. 2. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100258.
ÉLTETŐ ANDREA [2024]: Miért más? A magyar akkumulátorgyártás sajátos jellemzői: Jogi háttér, környezeti hatások. Külgazdaság, 68. évf. 7–8. sz. 88–120. o. https://kulgazdasag.eu/article/1723.
EVENSEN, D.–SOVACOOL, B. [2024]: Political economy of low-carbon electricity: Governance effects across 198 countries. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 189. 114016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114016.
FOUQUET, R. [2016]: Historical energy transitions: Speed, prices and system transformation. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 22. 7–12. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.014.
FÜZÉR KATALIN [2016]: A bizalom társadalomelmélete és a társadalmi tőke szociológiaelmélete. Századvég, Új Folyam, 78. évf. 4. sz. 5–18. o. http://www.szociologia.eu/sites/default/files/hir_csatolmanyok/szazadveg_folyoirat_78_tarsadalmi-toke.pdf.
GULYÁS EMESE [2013]: Az etikus fogyasztás mint szubpolitika. Szociológiai Szemle, 23. évf. 1. sz. 44–68. o.
HADDAD, C.–GÜNAY, C.–GHARIB, S.–KOMENDANTOVA, N. [2022]: Imagined inclusions into a ‘green modernisation’: Local politics and global visions of Morocco’s renewable energy transition. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 43. No. 2. 393–413. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.2014315.
HASSAN, Q.–NASSAR, A. K.–AL-JIBOORY, A. K.–VIKTOR, P.–TELBA, A. A.–AWWAD, E. M.–AMJAD, A.–FAKHRULDEEN, H. F.–ALGBURI, S.–MASHKOOR, S. C.–JASZCZUR, M.–SAMEEN, A. Z.–BARAKAT, M. [2024]: Mapping Europe renewable energy landscape: Insights into solar, wind, hydro, and green hydrogen production. Technology in Society, Vol. 77. 102535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102535.
IEA [2024]: Renewables 2023. Analysis and forecast to 2028. International Energy Agency, https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2023.
ITM [2020]: Nemzeti Energiastratégia, 2030. Innovációs és Technológiai Minisztérium, Budapest.
KŐSZEGHY LEA [2025]: Energiaátmenet, energiaválság és háztartási adaptáció: Társadalmi, térbeli egyenlőtlenségek és igazságtalanságok. Szociológiai Szemle, megjelenés alatt.
JANSMA, S. R.–LONG, L. A. N.–LEE, D. [2023]: Understanding Energy Citizenship: How Cultural Capital Shapes the Energy Transition. Energies, Vol. 16. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052106.
JENKINS, K.–MCCAULEY, D.–HEFFRON, R.–STEPHAN, H.–REHNER, R. [2016]: Energy justice: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 11. 174–182. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004.
KAMARÁSI VIKTÓRIA–MOGYORÓSY GÁBOR [2015]: Szisztematikus irodalmi áttekintések módszertana és jelentősége. Segítség a diagnosztikus és terápiás döntésekhez. Orvosi Hetilap, 156. évf. 38. sz. 1523–1531. o. https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2015.30255.
KOLNHOFER-DERECSKEI ANITA–SZÁSZVÁRI KARINA–TÓTH-TÉGLÁS TÜNDE–REICHER REGINA [2023]: Elméleti alapok és tapasztalatok a szisztematikus fókuszált szakirodalmi áttekintés során. Multidiszciplináris kihívások, sokszínű válaszok. Gazdálkodás- és Szervezéstudományi Folyóirat, 2. sz. https://doi.org/10.33565/MKSV.2023.02.01.
LABELLE, M. C. [2017]: In pursuit of energy justice. Energy Policy, Vol. 107. 615–620. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.054.
LEE, Y.–LIAO, C. [2024]: Upholding household agency in climate mitigation and socio-technical energy transition in Ethiopia. Energy Policy, Vol. 188. 114067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114067.
LIAO, C.–FEI, D.–HUANG, Q.–JIANG, L.–SHI, P. [2021]: Targeted poverty alleviation through photovoltaic-based intervention: Rhetoric and reality in Qinghai, China. World Development, Vol. 137. 105117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105117.
MARTINEZ, A.–KLUIVING, S.–MUÑOZ-ROJAS, J.–BORJA BARRERA, C.–FRAILE JURADO, P.–ROLDÁN MUÑOZ, M. E.–MEJÍAS-GARCÍA, J. C. [2023]: Energy regimes help tackle limitations with the prehistoric cultural-phases approach to learn about sustainable transitions: Archaeological evidence from northern Spain. Journal of Quaternary Science, Vol. 38. No. 6. 921–937. o. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.3522.
MELNYK, A.–COX, H.–GHORBANI, A.–HOPPE, T. [2023]: Value dynamics in energy democracy: An exploration of community energy initiatives. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 102. 103163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103163.
MININNI, G. M. [2022]: The Barefoot College ‘eco-village’ approach to women’s entrepreneurship in energy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Vol. 42. 112–123. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.12.002.
MOHER, D.–LIBERATI, A.–TETZLAFF, J.–ALTMAN, D. G.–PRISMA GROUP [2009]: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, Vol. 6. No. 7. e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
OSIČKA, J.–SZULECKI, K.–JENKINS, K. E. H. [2023]: Energy justice and energy democracy: Separated twins, rival concepts or just buzzwords? Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 104. 103266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103266.
ÖHRLUND, I.–STIKVOORT, B.–SCHULTZBERG, M.–BARTUSCH, C. [2020]: Rising with the sun? Encouraging solar electricity self-consumption among apartment owners in Sweden. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 64. 101424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101424.
PAGE, M. J.–MCKENZIE, J. E.–BOSSUYT, P. M.–BOUTRON, I.–HOFFMANN, T. C.–MULROW, C. D.–SHAMSEER, L.–TETZLAFF, J. M.–AKL, E. A.–BRENNAN, S. E.–CHOU, R.–GLANVILLE, J.–GRIMSHAW, J. M.–HRÓBJARTSSON, A.–LALU, M. M.–LI, T.–LODER, E. W.–MAYO-WILSON, E.–MCDONALD, S.–… MOHER, D. [2021]: The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, Vol. 372. No. 71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
PANDEY, P.–SHARMA, A. [2021]: Knowledge politics, vulnerability and recognition-based justice: Public participation in renewable energy transitions in India. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 71. 101824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101824.
PETRICHENKO, L.–SAUHATS, A.–DIAHOVCHENKO, I.–SEGEDA, I. [2022]: Economic Viability of Energy Communities versus Distributed Prosumers. Sustainability, Vol. 14. No. 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084634.
RADTKE, J.–BOHN, N. S. [2023]: Mind the gap: Community member perceptions of shortcomings in diversity and inclusivity of local energy projects in Germany. Utilities Policy, Vol. 85. 101686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101686.
RADTKE, J.–OHLHORST, D. [2021]: Community Energy in Germany. Bowling Alone in Elite Clubs? Utilities Policy, Vol. 72. 101269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2021.101269.
RIGHETTINI, M. S.–VICENTINI, G. [2023]: Assessing and Comparing Participatory Governance in Energy Transition: Evidence from the 27 European Union Member States. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, Vol. 25. No. 6. 565–584. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2023.2260994.
RIVERA MATOS, Y. [2023]: Grassroots Energy Emancipation through Solar Energy Projects: Narratives from Jayuya, Puerto Rico. Centro Journal, Vol. 35. No. 1. 81–99. o.
RUOSTETSAARI, I. [2020]: From consumers to energy citizens: Finns’ readiness for demand response and prosumerism in energy policy making. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, Vol. 14. No. 6. 1157–1175. o. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-11-2019-0001.
SHAKEEL, S. R.–YOUSAF, H.–IRFAN, M.–RAJALA, A. [2023]: Solar PV adoption at household level: Insights based on a systematic literature review. Energy Strategy Reviews, Vol. 50. 101178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101178.
SHELTON, R.–EAKIN, H. [2022]: Who’s fighting for justice? Advocacy in energy justice and just transition scholarship. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 17. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac7341.
SORMAN, A. H.–STOCK, R. [2024]: Solar masculinities from the south: Patriarchal and ethnoreligious authoritarianism through solar infrastructures in Turkey and India. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 114. 103583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103583.
STOCK, R. [2021]: Bright as night: Illuminating the antinomies of ‘gender positive’ solar development. World Development, Vol. 138. 105196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105196.
STOCK, R. [2023]: Abolition solarities: Theorizing antiracist and anticapitalist solar energy insurrections. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, Vol. 4. 100063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rset.2023.100063.
SZILAS ROLAND FERENC [2012]: Munkahelyi stressz és szervezeti igazságosság. Phd-értekezés, Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem, Budapest, https://phd.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/656/.
SZULECKI, K. [2018]: Conceptualizing energy democracy. Environmental Politics, Vol. 27. No. 1. 21–41. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1387294.
VAN VEELEN, B.–VAN DER HORST, D. [2018]: What is energy democracy? Connecting social science energy research and political theory. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 46. 19–28. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.010.
WAHLUND, M.–PALM, J. [2022]: The role of energy democracy and energy citizenship for participatory energy transitions: A comprehensive review. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 87. 102482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102482.
WEC [2024]: World Energy Trilemma Framework. World Energy Council. https://www.worldenergy.org/transition-toolkit/world-energy-trilemma-framework.
WUEBBEN, D.–PETERS, J. F. [2022]: Communicating the Values and Benefits of Home Solar Prosumerism. Energies, Vol. 15. No. 2. 596. o. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020596.
YADAV, P.–MALAKAR, Y.–DAVIES, P. J. [2019]: Multi-scalar energy transitions in rural households: Distributed photovoltaics as a circuit breaker to the energy poverty cycle in India. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 48. 1–12. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.013.
YADAV, P.–DAVIES, P. J.–ASUMADU-SARKODIE, S. [2021]: Fuel choice and tradition: Why fuel stacking and the energy ladder are out of step? Solar Energy, Vol. 214. 491–501. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.11.077.
BARNES, J. [2019]: Public participation in a West of England energy transition: Key patterns and trends. https://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-10/public-participation-in-a-West-of-England-energy-transition.pdf.
BAUWENS, T.–SCHRAVEN, D.–DREWING, E.–RADTKE, J.–HOLSTENKAMP, L.–GOTCHEV, B.–YILDIZ, Ö. [2022]: Conceptualizing community in energy systems. A systematic review of 183 definitions. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111999.
BERA, R.–MISHRA, P.–PATNAIK, P. [2024]: Renewable energy for women empowerment: Experiences from rural West Bengal. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 198. 114446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114446.
BLAZQUEZ, J.–FUENTES-BRACAMONTES, R.–MANZANO, B. [2019]: A road map to navigate the energy transition. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/A-road-map-to-navigate-the-energy-transition-Insight-59.pdf.
BOZÓKI ANDRÁS–SÜKÖSD MIKLÓS [1991a]: A zöld-mozgalom anarchista szellemisége. Megjelent: Bozóki András–Sükösd Miklós (szerk.): Anarchizmus. Modern ideológiák. Századvég Kiadó, Budapest, https://mek.oszk.hu/02000/02003/html/nter1887.htm.
BOZÓKI ANDRÁS–SÜKÖSD MIKLÓS [1991b]: Posztindusztrializmus és posztmaterializmus: Új társadalmi mozgalmak a posztmodern korszakban. Megjelent: Bozóki András–Sükösd Miklós (szerk.): Anarchizmus. Modern ideológiák. Századvég Kiadó, Budapest, https://mek.oszk.hu/02000/02003/html/nter1887.htm.
BRÁS, O. R.–FERREIRA, V.–CARVALHO, A. [2024]: People of the sun: Local resistance and solar energy (in)justice in southern Portugal. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 113. 103529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103529.
BRUNET, C.–SAVADOGO, O.–BAPTISTE, P.–BOUCHARD, M. A.–CHOLEZ, C.–GENDRON, C.–MERVEILLE, N. [2021]: The three paradoxes of the energy transition. Assessing sustainability of large-scale solar photovoltaic through multi-level and multi-scalar perspective in Rwanda. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 288. 125519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125519.
BURKE, M. J.–STEPHENS, J. C. [2017]: Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 33. 35–48. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.024.
BURKE, M. J.–STEPHENS, J. C. [2018]: Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 35. 78–93. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018.
BUSCH, H.–RADTKE, J.–ISLAR, M. [2023]: Safe havens for energy democracy? Analysing the low-carbon transitions of Danish energy islands. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, Vol. 33. No. 2. 227–251. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-023-00347-5.
CAMPOS, I.–BRITO, M.–LUZ, G. [2023]: Scales of solar energy: Exploring citizen satisfaction, interest, and values in a comparison of regions in Portugal and Spain. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.102952.
COMMUNITY ENERGY ENGLAND [2024]: Definition, impact and sector potential. Our How To section for all things community energy. Community Energy England, https://communityenergyengland.org/how-to-pages/definition-benefits-and-potential-of-community-energy.
CSÁK LÁSZLÓ [2015]: Energiapolitika: Minden területi szinten. Tér és Társadalom, 29. évf. 4. sz. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.29.4.2645.
DALL-ORSOLETTA, A.–CUNHA, J.–ARAUJO, M.–FERREIRA, P. [2022]: A systematic review of social innovation and community energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102625.
DEUTSCH NIKOLETT [2011]: A technológiai rendszerek innovációja. Az elosztott villamosenergia-termelési technológiák fenntarthatósági értékelése és rendszerinnovációs potenciáljának vizsgálata az Európai Unióban. PTE Közgazdaságtudományi Kar Gazdálkodástani Doktori Iskola, Pécs, https://n9.cl/qukxop.
DEVAR, S. G. [2019]: Equitable Community Solar: California & Beyond. Ecology Law Quarterly, Vol. 46. No. 4. 1017–1047. o. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38057CS9H.
EC [2024]: Solar energy. European Commission, https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/renewable-energy/solar-energy_en.
EGERT, R.–DAUBERT, J.–MARSH, S.–MÜHLHÄUSER, M. [2021]: Exploring energy grid resilience: The impact of data, prosumer awareness, and action. Patterns, Vol. 2. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100258.
ÉLTETŐ ANDREA [2024]: Miért más? A magyar akkumulátorgyártás sajátos jellemzői: Jogi háttér, környezeti hatások. Külgazdaság, 68. évf. 7–8. sz. 88–120. o. https://kulgazdasag.eu/article/1723.
EVENSEN, D.–SOVACOOL, B. [2024]: Political economy of low-carbon electricity: Governance effects across 198 countries. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 189. 114016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114016.
FOUQUET, R. [2016]: Historical energy transitions: Speed, prices and system transformation. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 22. 7–12. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.014.
FÜZÉR KATALIN [2016]: A bizalom társadalomelmélete és a társadalmi tőke szociológiaelmélete. Századvég, Új Folyam, 78. évf. 4. sz. 5–18. o. http://www.szociologia.eu/sites/default/files/hir_csatolmanyok/szazadveg_folyoirat_78_tarsadalmi-toke.pdf.
GULYÁS EMESE [2013]: Az etikus fogyasztás mint szubpolitika. Szociológiai Szemle, 23. évf. 1. sz. 44–68. o.
HADDAD, C.–GÜNAY, C.–GHARIB, S.–KOMENDANTOVA, N. [2022]: Imagined inclusions into a ‘green modernisation’: Local politics and global visions of Morocco’s renewable energy transition. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 43. No. 2. 393–413. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.2014315.
HASSAN, Q.–NASSAR, A. K.–AL-JIBOORY, A. K.–VIKTOR, P.–TELBA, A. A.–AWWAD, E. M.–AMJAD, A.–FAKHRULDEEN, H. F.–ALGBURI, S.–MASHKOOR, S. C.–JASZCZUR, M.–SAMEEN, A. Z.–BARAKAT, M. [2024]: Mapping Europe renewable energy landscape: Insights into solar, wind, hydro, and green hydrogen production. Technology in Society, Vol. 77. 102535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102535.
IEA [2024]: Renewables 2023. Analysis and forecast to 2028. International Energy Agency, https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2023.
ITM [2020]: Nemzeti Energiastratégia, 2030. Innovációs és Technológiai Minisztérium, Budapest.
KŐSZEGHY LEA [2025]: Energiaátmenet, energiaválság és háztartási adaptáció: Társadalmi, térbeli egyenlőtlenségek és igazságtalanságok. Szociológiai Szemle, megjelenés alatt.
JANSMA, S. R.–LONG, L. A. N.–LEE, D. [2023]: Understanding Energy Citizenship: How Cultural Capital Shapes the Energy Transition. Energies, Vol. 16. No. 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052106.
JENKINS, K.–MCCAULEY, D.–HEFFRON, R.–STEPHAN, H.–REHNER, R. [2016]: Energy justice: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 11. 174–182. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004.
KAMARÁSI VIKTÓRIA–MOGYORÓSY GÁBOR [2015]: Szisztematikus irodalmi áttekintések módszertana és jelentősége. Segítség a diagnosztikus és terápiás döntésekhez. Orvosi Hetilap, 156. évf. 38. sz. 1523–1531. o. https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2015.30255.
KOLNHOFER-DERECSKEI ANITA–SZÁSZVÁRI KARINA–TÓTH-TÉGLÁS TÜNDE–REICHER REGINA [2023]: Elméleti alapok és tapasztalatok a szisztematikus fókuszált szakirodalmi áttekintés során. Multidiszciplináris kihívások, sokszínű válaszok. Gazdálkodás- és Szervezéstudományi Folyóirat, 2. sz. https://doi.org/10.33565/MKSV.2023.02.01.
LABELLE, M. C. [2017]: In pursuit of energy justice. Energy Policy, Vol. 107. 615–620. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.054.
LEE, Y.–LIAO, C. [2024]: Upholding household agency in climate mitigation and socio-technical energy transition in Ethiopia. Energy Policy, Vol. 188. 114067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114067.
LIAO, C.–FEI, D.–HUANG, Q.–JIANG, L.–SHI, P. [2021]: Targeted poverty alleviation through photovoltaic-based intervention: Rhetoric and reality in Qinghai, China. World Development, Vol. 137. 105117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105117.
MARTINEZ, A.–KLUIVING, S.–MUÑOZ-ROJAS, J.–BORJA BARRERA, C.–FRAILE JURADO, P.–ROLDÁN MUÑOZ, M. E.–MEJÍAS-GARCÍA, J. C. [2023]: Energy regimes help tackle limitations with the prehistoric cultural-phases approach to learn about sustainable transitions: Archaeological evidence from northern Spain. Journal of Quaternary Science, Vol. 38. No. 6. 921–937. o. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.3522.
MELNYK, A.–COX, H.–GHORBANI, A.–HOPPE, T. [2023]: Value dynamics in energy democracy: An exploration of community energy initiatives. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 102. 103163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103163.
MININNI, G. M. [2022]: The Barefoot College ‘eco-village’ approach to women’s entrepreneurship in energy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Vol. 42. 112–123. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.12.002.
MOHER, D.–LIBERATI, A.–TETZLAFF, J.–ALTMAN, D. G.–PRISMA GROUP [2009]: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, Vol. 6. No. 7. e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
OSIČKA, J.–SZULECKI, K.–JENKINS, K. E. H. [2023]: Energy justice and energy democracy: Separated twins, rival concepts or just buzzwords? Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 104. 103266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103266.
ÖHRLUND, I.–STIKVOORT, B.–SCHULTZBERG, M.–BARTUSCH, C. [2020]: Rising with the sun? Encouraging solar electricity self-consumption among apartment owners in Sweden. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 64. 101424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101424.
PAGE, M. J.–MCKENZIE, J. E.–BOSSUYT, P. M.–BOUTRON, I.–HOFFMANN, T. C.–MULROW, C. D.–SHAMSEER, L.–TETZLAFF, J. M.–AKL, E. A.–BRENNAN, S. E.–CHOU, R.–GLANVILLE, J.–GRIMSHAW, J. M.–HRÓBJARTSSON, A.–LALU, M. M.–LI, T.–LODER, E. W.–MAYO-WILSON, E.–MCDONALD, S.–… MOHER, D. [2021]: The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, Vol. 372. No. 71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
PANDEY, P.–SHARMA, A. [2021]: Knowledge politics, vulnerability and recognition-based justice: Public participation in renewable energy transitions in India. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 71. 101824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101824.
PETRICHENKO, L.–SAUHATS, A.–DIAHOVCHENKO, I.–SEGEDA, I. [2022]: Economic Viability of Energy Communities versus Distributed Prosumers. Sustainability, Vol. 14. No. 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084634.
RADTKE, J.–BOHN, N. S. [2023]: Mind the gap: Community member perceptions of shortcomings in diversity and inclusivity of local energy projects in Germany. Utilities Policy, Vol. 85. 101686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101686.
RADTKE, J.–OHLHORST, D. [2021]: Community Energy in Germany. Bowling Alone in Elite Clubs? Utilities Policy, Vol. 72. 101269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2021.101269.
RIGHETTINI, M. S.–VICENTINI, G. [2023]: Assessing and Comparing Participatory Governance in Energy Transition: Evidence from the 27 European Union Member States. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, Vol. 25. No. 6. 565–584. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2023.2260994.
RIVERA MATOS, Y. [2023]: Grassroots Energy Emancipation through Solar Energy Projects: Narratives from Jayuya, Puerto Rico. Centro Journal, Vol. 35. No. 1. 81–99. o.
RUOSTETSAARI, I. [2020]: From consumers to energy citizens: Finns’ readiness for demand response and prosumerism in energy policy making. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, Vol. 14. No. 6. 1157–1175. o. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-11-2019-0001.
SHAKEEL, S. R.–YOUSAF, H.–IRFAN, M.–RAJALA, A. [2023]: Solar PV adoption at household level: Insights based on a systematic literature review. Energy Strategy Reviews, Vol. 50. 101178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101178.
SHELTON, R.–EAKIN, H. [2022]: Who’s fighting for justice? Advocacy in energy justice and just transition scholarship. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 17. No. 6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac7341.
SORMAN, A. H.–STOCK, R. [2024]: Solar masculinities from the south: Patriarchal and ethnoreligious authoritarianism through solar infrastructures in Turkey and India. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 114. 103583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103583.
STOCK, R. [2021]: Bright as night: Illuminating the antinomies of ‘gender positive’ solar development. World Development, Vol. 138. 105196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105196.
STOCK, R. [2023]: Abolition solarities: Theorizing antiracist and anticapitalist solar energy insurrections. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, Vol. 4. 100063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rset.2023.100063.
SZILAS ROLAND FERENC [2012]: Munkahelyi stressz és szervezeti igazságosság. Phd-értekezés, Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem, Budapest, https://phd.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/656/.
SZULECKI, K. [2018]: Conceptualizing energy democracy. Environmental Politics, Vol. 27. No. 1. 21–41. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1387294.
VAN VEELEN, B.–VAN DER HORST, D. [2018]: What is energy democracy? Connecting social science energy research and political theory. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 46. 19–28. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.010.
WAHLUND, M.–PALM, J. [2022]: The role of energy democracy and energy citizenship for participatory energy transitions: A comprehensive review. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 87. 102482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102482.
WEC [2024]: World Energy Trilemma Framework. World Energy Council. https://www.worldenergy.org/transition-toolkit/world-energy-trilemma-framework.
WUEBBEN, D.–PETERS, J. F. [2022]: Communicating the Values and Benefits of Home Solar Prosumerism. Energies, Vol. 15. No. 2. 596. o. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020596.
YADAV, P.–MALAKAR, Y.–DAVIES, P. J. [2019]: Multi-scalar energy transitions in rural households: Distributed photovoltaics as a circuit breaker to the energy poverty cycle in India. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 48. 1–12. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.013.
YADAV, P.–DAVIES, P. J.–ASUMADU-SARKODIE, S. [2021]: Fuel choice and tradition: Why fuel stacking and the energy ladder are out of step? Solar Energy, Vol. 214. 491–501. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.11.077.
Published
2025-03-17
How to Cite
SzépT. (2025). The role of solar PV systems in participatory energy transition: A systematic literature review based on the PRISMA method. Hungarian Economic Review, 72(3), 259-284. Retrieved from https://ojs.mtak.hu/index.php/kszemle/article/view/18742
Issue
Section
Tanulmány
