Az ANFIS mesterséges neurális hálózat lehetséges bemeneti adatainak vizsgálata csapadék-lefolyás modellezés esetén

Keywords: Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System, ANFIS, rainfall-runoff modeling, artificial neural network, Arany-creek, Torna-creek

Abstract

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are gaining popularity across various scientific fields. Thus, studies to analyze the applicability of ANNs have also been appearing within the field of hydrology. In the case of rainfall-runoff modeling, one of the most promising networks is the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), which effectively combines the learning capability of neural networks and the flexible structure of fuzzy systems. ANFIS can model nonlinear phenomena and identify nonlinear components using, for example, the currently applied Takagi-Sugeno type system. In this study, nine-nine ANFIS-based rainfall-runoff models with different input datasets were compared for the catchments of Torna- and Arany-creek. The models were built using the MATLAB software and the "anfis" function. The input datasets included precipitation, antecedent discharge, antecedent precipitation index, temperature, and potential evaporation. The preprocessing of the data included the examinations of quality and standardization. The models can be divided into two groups: six-six models included antecedent discharge as an input, while three-three models did not use the antecedent discharge data. The sensitivity analysis of the models revealed that an optimal number of initial FIS was 2, and 500 training epochs were sufficient. Based on the results from the nine-nine models, ANFIS-based rainfall-runoff models demonstrated adequate model efficiency during calibration, but their performance decreased during validation. Whether the models used the discharge time-series as an input or not, the best-performing models were those that included all the examined input datasets. However, some models produced outlier values at certain time steps, which could be a result of the computational methods or the structure of the neural network.

Author Biographies

Klaudia Négyesi, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering

KLAUDIA NÉGYESI She received her Infrastructural Engineering degree at the Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Civil Engineering in 2022. Currently, she is in her first year of doctoral studies at the Department of Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering. The title of her research topic is Rainfall-runoff modeling of small watersheds in Hungary.

Eszter Dóra Nagy , Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering

ESZTER DÓRA NAGY She received her Infrastructural Engineering degree at the Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Civil Engineering in 2018. At the present time, she is an Assistant Lecturer at the Department of Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering. Her research topic is rainfall-runoff modeling of small watersheds. She has been a member of the Hungarian Hydrological Society since 2016.

References

AGROTOPO (2019). https://www.mta-taki.hu/hu/osztalyok/kornyezetinformatikai-osztaly/agrotopo (Letöltve: 2019.10.25.)

Ang, Y., Talei, A., Zahidi, I., Rashidi, A. (2023). Past, Present, and Future of Using Neuro-Fuzzy Systems for Hydrological Modeling and Forecasting. Hydrology. 10. 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10020036

Bartoletti, N., Casagli, F., Marsili-Libelli, S., Nardi, A., Palandri, L. (2017). Data-driven rainfall/runoff modelling based on a neuro-fuzzy inference system. Environmental Modelling & Software. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.11.026

Chang, T.K., Talei, A., Alaghmand, S., Ooi, M. (2016). Choice of Rainfall Inputs for Event-based Rainfall-Runoff Modeling in a Catchment with Multiple Rainfall Stations Using Data-driven Techniques. Journal of Hydrology. 545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.024

Chang, T.K., Talei, A., Chua, L., Alaghmand, S. (2018). The Impact of Training Data Sequence on the Performance of Neuro-Fuzzy Rainfall-Runoff Models with Online Learning. Water. 11. 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010052

C3S (2019). Copernicus Climate Change Service ERA5-Land reanalysis. Copernicus Climate Change Service, 15/09/2019. https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/home (Letöltve: 2019.09.18.)

CORINE (2019). Land Cover-Copernicus https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover (Letöltve: 2019.10.25.)

Fülöp, I., Józsa, J. (1998). A neurális hálózatok világa. Hidrológiai Közlöny, 78. évfolyam, 4. szám, p. 250.

Jackson, E., Roberts, W., Nelsen, B., Williams, G., Nelson, E., Ames, D. (2019). Introductory overview: Error metrics for hydrologic modelling – A review of common practices and an open source library to facilitate use and adoption. Environmental Modelling & Software. 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.05.001

Kohler, M.A., Linsley, R.K. (1951). Predicting the runoff from storm rainfall. Weather Bureu Research Papers. Washington.

Kontur, I., Koris, K., Winter, J. (2003). Hidrológiai számítások Lanograf Kft., Gödöllő.

Liptay, Z. (2022). Neurohydrological prediction of water temperature and runoff time series. Acta Hydrologica Slovaca. 23. pp. 190-196. https://doi.org/10.31577/ahs-2022-0023.02.0021.

MATLAB (2024). MATLAB Documentation – anfis. https://www.mathworks.com/help/fuzzy/anfis.html

ODP (2023). Meteorológiai Adattár https://odp.met.hu/ (Letöltve: 2023.09.25.)

Nash, J.E., Sutcliffe, J.V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I – A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10, 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6

Nayak, P.C., Sudheer, K.P., Rangan, D.M., Ramasastri, K.S., (2004). A neuro-fuzzy computing technique for modeling hydrological time series. J. Hydrol. 291 (1– 2), pp. 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.010

Pushpalatha, R., Perrin, C., le Moine, N. Andréassian, V. (2012). A review of efficiency criteria suitable for evaluating low-flow simulations. Journal of Hydrology. 420-421, 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.055

Rathnayake, N., Rathnayake, U., Chathuranika, I., Dang, L., Hoshino, Y. (2023). Cascaded-ANFIS to simulate nonlinear rainfall-runoff relationship. Applied Soft Computing. 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110722

Talei, A., Chua, L. (2012). Influence of lag time on event-based rainfall–runoff modeling using the data driven approach. Journal of Hydrology. s 438–439. pp. 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.027

Talei, A., Chua, L., Quek, C. (2010). A novel application of a neuro-fuzzy computational technique in event-based rainfall–runoff modeling. Expert Systems with Applications. 37. pp. 7456-7468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.015

Talei, A., Chua, L., Quek, C., Jansson, P. (2013). Runoff forecasting using a Takagi–Sugeno neuro-fuzzy model with online learning. Journal of Hydrology. 488. 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.022

Tayfur, G., Singh, V., Asce, F. (2006). ANN and Fuzzy Logic Models for Simulating Event-Based Rainfall-Runoff. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)132:12(1321)

Van Ooyen, A., Nienhuis, B. (1992). Improving the convergence of the backpropagation algorithm. Neural Networks 5 (3), pp. 465–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(92)90008-7

Wang, W., Chau, K., Cheng, C., Qiu, L. (2009). A Comparison of Performance of Several Artificial Intelligence Methods for Forecasting Monthly Discharge Time Series. Journal of Hydrology. 374. pp. 294-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.019

Published
2025-02-22
How to Cite
NégyesiK., & Nagy E. D. (2025). Az ANFIS mesterséges neurális hálózat lehetséges bemeneti adatainak vizsgálata csapadék-lefolyás modellezés esetén . Hungarian Journal of Hydrology, 105(1), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.59258/hk.18334
Section
Scientific Papers