Hibrid design: Technológia–társadalom–nevelés
Abstract
At the threshold of the 21st century, the discipline of design is undergoing a profound transformation: at the intersections of art, science, design, technology, psychology, ecology, and the social sciences, hybrid design emerges as a new way of thinking and a potential scientific field one that adopts the perspective and vocabulary of network research as its primary tools. Hybrid design is capable of interpreting different systems, thinking within them, and eventually integrating them. The hybrid designer no longer designs mere objects, but relationships networks in which humans, art, machines, and nature learn from one another [I, II]. In this third article, I examine the collaboration between technology and society through joint research with APFM-Systems and MedHubAI, analyzing their latest pilot project and its potential for social education. This Hungarian-based collaboration serves as a living example of a technological ethical ecosystem in which building management algorithms and the artificial intelligence of medical empathy form a shared learning system [III, IV]. The aim of the joint research and project is to use technology not merely for efficiency, but for social education and moral development by reinterpreting maintenance, healthcare communication, and data flow as affective and educational spaces [V, VI]. I demonstrate how, in this context, a hybrid designer becomes an ethical curator rather than a traditional form-giver: an interdisciplinary creator capable of building bridges between human sensitivity and technological learning. The joint development by MedHubAI and APFM-Systems illustrates how technology can become a medium of empathy, care, and collective learning and how hybrid design may be understood as one of the potential new scientific disciplines of the 21st century [VII, VIII].
References
Oxman, N. (2016): Age of entanglement. Journal of Design and Science. https://doi org/10.21428/7e0583ad
Latour, B. (2005): Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University.
Hegedüs, V. (2021): Adaptive Systems and Ethical Design Paradigms.
Csernák, B.–Riskó, Á. (2023): Empatikus mesterséges intelligencia és hálózati etika.
Star, S. L. (1999): The Ethnography of Infrastructure.
DiSalvo, C. (2012): Adversarial Design.
APFM-Systems (2024): PropTech and Adaptive Facility Management.
MedHubAI (2024): Digital Empathy as Health Communication Infrastructure.
Oxman, N. (2016): Age of entanglement. Journal of Design and Science. https://doi.org/10.21428/7e0583ad
Latour, B. (2005): Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University.
Hegedüs, V. (2021): Adaptive Systems and Ethical Design Paradigms.
Csernák, B.–Riskó, Á. (2023): Empatikus mesterséges intelligencia és hálózati etika.
Star, S. L. (1999): The Ethnography of Infrastructure.
DiSalvo, C. (2012): Adversarial Design.
APFM-Systems (2024): PropTech and Adaptive Facility Management.
MedHubAI (2024): Digital Empathy as Health Communication Infrastructure.
Oxman, N. (2016): Age of entanglement. Journal of Design and Science. https://doi.org/10.21428/7e0583ad
Breque, M.–De Nul, L.–Petridis, A. (2021): Industry 5.0: Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. Brussels: European Commission.
Barabási, A.-L. (2016): Network science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ishii, H. (2008): Tangible bits: Beyond pixels. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, pp. 15–25.
Teicholz, E. (2013): Technology for facility managers: The impact of CAFM on productivity. London: Wiley.
Teicholz, E. (2013): Technology for facility managers: The impact of CAFM on productivity. London: Wiley.
Porter, M. E.–Heppelmann, J. E. (2014): How smart, connected products are transforming competition.
Harvard Business Review, 92., (11.), pp. 64–88.
Buckman, A. H.–Mayfield, M.–Beck, S. B. M. (2014): What is a smart building? Building and Environment, 70., pp. 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.036
Sanders, E. B.-N., –Stappers, P. J. (2008): Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4., (1.), pp. 5–18.
Bandura, A. (1997): Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Bainbridge, L. (1983): Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19., (6.), pp. 775–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(83)90046-8
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon.
Tarafdar, M.–Tu, Q.– Ragu-Nathan, B. S.–Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007): The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24., (1.), pp. 301–328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109
Koolhaas, R., & Mau, B. (1995): S, M, L, XL. New York: The Monacelli Press.
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999): Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286., (5439.), pp. 509–512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509
Kitchin, R. (2014): The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. London: Sage.
Breque, M.–De Nul, L.–Petridis, A. (2021): Industry 5.0: Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. Brussels: European Commission.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon.
Castells, M. (1996): The rise of the network society. London: Blackwell.
Mau, S. (2019): The metric society: On the quantification of the social. Polity Press.
Ananny, M.–Crawford, K. (2018): Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic
accountability. New Media & Society, 20., (3.), pp. 973–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645
DiSalvo, C. (2012): Adversarial design. Boston: MIT Press.
DiSalvo, C. (2012): Adversarial design. Boston: MIT Press.
Holland, J. C.– Breitbart, W. S.–Jacobsen, P. B.–Lederberg, M. S.–Loscalzo, M. J.–McCorkle, R. (Eds.) (2015): Psycho-oncology (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Topol, E. (Ed.) (2019): Deep medicine: How artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. New York: Basic Books.
Longoni, C.– Bonezzi, A.–Morewedge, C. K. (2019): Resistance to medical artificial intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research, 46., (4.), pp. 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz013
Barabási, A.-L. (2016): Network science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ananny, M.–Crawford, K. (2018): Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20., (3.), pp. 973–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645
Johnson, S. (2001): Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. New York: Scribner
Topol, E. (2019): Deep medicine: How artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. New York: Basic Books.
Floridi, L.–Cowls, J. (2019): A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1., (1.). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Topol, E. (2019): Deep medicine: How artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. New York: Basic Books.
Floridi, L.–Cowls, J. (2019): A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1., (1.). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Norman, D. A. (2013): The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Barabási, A.-L. (2016): Network science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Topol, E. (Ed.) (2019): Deep medicine: How artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. New York: Basic Books.
European Parliament and Council. (2016): Regulation (EU) 2016/679 … (General Data Protection Regulation).
Topol, E. (Ed.) (2019): Deep medicine: How artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. New York: Basic Books.
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. (2023): The NIS2 directive. Brussels.
Floridi, L.–Cowls, J. (2019): A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1., (1.). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Norman, D. A. (2013): The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Castells, M. (1996): The rise of the network society. New York: Blackwell.
Mau, S. (2019): The metric society: On the quantification of the social. New York: Polity Press.
Johnson, S. (2001): Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. New York: Scribner
Topol, E. (2019): Deep medicine: How artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. New York: Basic Books.
Floridi, L.–Cowls, J. (2019): A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1., (1.). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Kitchin, R. (2014): The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. London: Sage.
Star, S. L.–Strauss, A. (1999): Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, (1–2.), pp. 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008651105359
Floridi, L.–Cowls, J. (2019): A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1., (1.). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Norman, D. A. (2013): The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Barabási, A.-L. (2016): Network science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Star, S. L.–Strauss, A. (1999): Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ., (1–2.), pp. 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008651105359
Topol, E. (Ed.) (2019): Deep medicine: How artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. New York: Basic Books.
Floridi, L.–Cowls, J. (2019): A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1., (1.). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999): Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286., (5439.), pp. 509–512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509
Castells, M. (1996): The rise of the network society. New York: Blackwell.
Johnson, S. (2001): Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. New York: Scribner
Floridi, L.–Cowls, J. (2019): A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science
Review, 1., (1.). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Oxman, N. (2016): Age of entanglement. Journal of Design and Science. https://doi.org/10.21428/7e0583ad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


