Hibrid design: A hálózatkutatás és a design szövetsége – Bauhaustól a kortárs ökológiai innovációig

Keywords: Hybrid design, network research, design, art, science, technology, interdisciplinarity, systems, structures

Abstract

This study examines the contemporary paradigm of hybrid design, a design approach that simultaneously draws on the knowledge of art, scien­ce, technology, and ecology, aiming at their sustainable integration. The essence of hybrid design is not merely the creation of objects, but the reorga­nization of complex ecosystems, social and natural relations, and the estab­lishment of new dynamics. Within this framework, the designer is not only making aesthetic decisions but acts as a mediator, a network bridge: capable of connecting engineers with biologists, social scientists with computer ex­perts, artists with industrial partners. In this process, network research is not only a theoretical background but a universal design toolkit, offering a sha­red conceptual language for the unified modeling and coordinated transfor­mation of diverse domains and heterogeneous systems (materials, processes, communities, technologies). The historical trajectory (Bauhaus–MIT) demonstrates how the network logic of interdisciplinarity became institutio­nalized, while contemporary case studies (Neri Oxman’s material ecology, To­más Saraceno’s spiderweb-based installations, Michael Strano’s biolumines­cent plants) illustrate the metaphorical, analytical, and operative applications of network thinking in design practice. We highlight that scale-free, small-world, and multiplex network models in hybrid design enable the iden­tification of key actors, the acceleration of knowledge flow, and the layering of collaborations. Our conclusion is that the potential expansion of hybrid design as a discipline lies in the alliance of network science and design, which enhances transparency, flexibility, innovation potential, and sustaina­bility in design, while simultaneously offering a renewed, structured role for the arts.

References

Adamatzky, A., & Saraceno, T. (2020). Spider/web communication in biohybrid networks. Leonardo, 53(2), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_01830

Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Behálózva: A hálózatok új tudománya (ford. Bognár Róbert). Budapest: Magyar Könyvklub.

Barabási, A.-L. (2013). Villanások: A jövő kiszámítható (ford. Török Gábor). Budapest: Libri.

Barabási, A.-L. (2016). A képlet: A siker egyetemes törvényei (ford. Török Gábor). Budapest: Libri.

Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Colani, L. (2019). Hybrid design: Interdisciplinary approaches in contemporary practice. London: Routledge.

Droste, M. (2002). Bauhaus 1919–1933. Köln: Taschen.

Erdős, P., & Rényi, A. (1959). On random graphs I. Publicationes Mathematicae, 6, 290–297.

Euler, L. (1736). Solutio problematis ad geometriam situs pertinentis. Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, 8, 128–140.

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469

Kennedy, S. (2018). Design as a form of brokerage: Mediating science and society through material innovation. Journal of Architectural Education, 72(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2018.1407956

Kepes, G. (1965). The new landscape in art and science. Chicago: Paul Theobald.

Kepes, G. (1979). A vizuális kommunikáció. Budapest: Gondolat.

Kivelä, M., Arenas, A., Barthelemy, M., Gleeson, J. P., Moreno, Y., & Porter, M. A. (2014). Multilayer networks. Journal of Complex Networks, 2(3), 203–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnu016

Kwak, S. Y., Giraldo, J. P., Lew, T. T. S., Wong, M. H., Liu, P., Yang, Y., ... & Strano, M. S. (2017). A nanobionic light-emitting plant. Nano Letters, 17(12), 7951–7961. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04369

Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Moholy-Nagy, L. (1947). Vision in motion. Chicago: Paul Theobald.

Moholy-Nagy, L. (2010). Látás mozgásban (válogatott írások; ford. Forgács Éva). Budapest: Typotex.

Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Negroponte, N. (1997). Digitális létezés (ford. Mátis Lívia). Budapest: Typotex.

Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Oxman, N. (2010). Material-based design computation. MIT Design Issues, 26(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2010.26.1.78

Oxman, N., & csapata. (2014). Silk Pavilion: A biologically inspired digital fabrication project. MIT Media Lab Research Report.

Saraceno, T. (2012). Cloud Cities. Berlin: Hamburger Bahnhof.

Watts, D. J. (2004). Six degrees: The science of a connected age. New York: W. W. Norton.

Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918

Published
2025-09-18
How to Cite
VattayF. V. (2025). Hibrid design: A hálózatkutatás és a design szövetsége – Bauhaustól a kortárs ökológiai innovációig. Dunakavics, 13(9), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.63684/dk.2025.09.02
Section
Cikkek