Community afforestation against climate change?

The struggles and results of the Sixty Thousand Trees movement in Békéscsaba

  • Melinda Mihály

Abstract

In the fight against climate crisis, afforestation plays a prominent role at the global, national and local scales. Civil organizations, nation states, large companies and transnational organizations alike have put afforestation on their agenda. One of the best organized afforestation initiatives in Hungary (“60,000 trees in Békéscsaba”) is examined as a case study. This study aims to better understand the agency of local organizations in the context of the climate crisis, with particular attention to their communication, decisionmaking, resource mobilization strategy and ability to shape public affairs. In its communication (framing) and decision-making, the “60,000 trees in Békéscsaba” initiative is closer to the more moderate branch of the global climate movement. It emphasizes individual responsibility rather than urging systemic transformation. The movement applies participatory methods, but in order to achieve organizational efficiency the primary field of decision-making is the „democratic presidency”, in which renewal is not yet planned. In its resource mobilization strategy the movement primarily builds on its broad social base locally. Its local embeddedness and online presence enables it to widely mobilize volunteers, to acquire financial resources, tools and land needed for planting trees. While due to its broad social base locally it effectively influences public affairs on the local level, its capacity for shaping afforestation and climate policy on the national and global level is limited. Due to the movement’s local focus it does not aim at advocacy through networking with national and international civil society organizations. On the other hand, the initiative applies cooperative rather than confrontational strategies.

References

Ádám Zsófia–Lohász Cecília–Mihály Melinda–Molnár Zóra–Rosenfeld Annajuli–Sebály Bernadett–Vass Zsuzsanna–Zsámboki Miklós (2021): Válságból lehetőség - Lehetőségből válság: Szerveződések és önkormányzatok cselekvőképessége a koronavírus-járvány alatt. Budapest: Közélet Iskolája.

Benford, Robert D.–Snow, David A. (2000): Framing processes and social movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26., 1., 611–639. https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.

Bennett, W. Lance–Segerberg, Alexandra (2012): The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15., 5., 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661

Baptista, Ana Isabel; Jesudason, Sujatha; Greenberg, Molly; Perovich, Adrienne (2023): Landscape Assessment of the U.S. Environmental Justice Movement: Transformative Strategies for Climate Justice. Environmental Justice 16., 2., 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2021.0075.

Biró, Marianna–Révész, A.–Molnár, Zsolt–Horváth, Ferenc (2007): Regional habitat pattern of the Danube-Tisza interfluve in Hungary I. The landscape structure and habitat pattern; the fen and alkali vegetation. Acta Botanica Hungarica, 49., 3–4., 267–303.

Blanco, Ismael–Salazar, Yunailis–Bianchi, Iolanda (2020): Urban governance and political change under a radical left government: The case of Barcelona. Journal of Urban Affairs 42.,1., 1–21.

Bua, Adrian–Bussu, Sonia (2021): Between governance‐driven democratisation and democracy‐driven governance: Explaining changes in participatory governance in the case of Barcelona. In European Journal of Political Research 60., 3., 716–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12421.

Csepeli György (1993). A poszt-szocializmus gyermekei. Iskolakultúra, 3., 10., 44–46.

della Porta, Donatella (2013): Political opportunity/political opportunity structure. In: Snow, David A.–della Porta, Donatella–Klandermans, Bert–McAdam, Doug (Eds.): The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell (Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedias in social science). 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm159

della Porta, Donatella–Parks, Louisa (2014): Framing processes in the climate movement: from climate change to climate justice. In: Dietz, Matthias, Garrelts, Heiko (Eds.): Routledge Handbook of the Climate Change Movement. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis (Routledge International Handbooks), 19–30.

de Moor, Joost–De Vydt, Michiel–Uba, Katrin–Wahlström, Mattias (2021): New kids on the block: taking stock of the recent cycle of climate activism. Social Movement Studies, 20, 5, 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1836617.

Frankó Róbert (2022): A Garabonciás erdő. Erdészeti Lapok, 157., 1., 28.

Hawken, Paul (2021): Regeneration: ending the climate crisis in one generation. London: Penguin Books.

Hands, J. (2011): @ is for activism. Dissent, resistance and rebellion in a digital culture. London: Pluto Press.

Hensby, Alexander (2020): Open networks and secret Facebook groups: exploring cycle effects on activists’ social media use in the 2010/11 UK student protests. In: Flesher Fominaya, Cristina, Gillan, Kevin (Eds.): Technology, media and social movements. London: Routledge, 84–96.

Hunt, Scott A.–Benford, Robert D.–Snow, David A. (1994): Identity fields: framing processes and the social construction of movement identities. In: Laraña, Enrique–Johnston, Hank–Gusfield, Joseph R. (Eds.): New Social Movements: from ideology to identity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 185–208.

Kovácsné Tyirják K. (2022): Civilek a jövőért: a Hatvanezer Fa Egyesület tevékenysége. Záródolgozat, Műszaki mérnökasszisztens környezetvédelem-vízgazdálkodás specializáció. Budapest: Óbudai Egyetem, Rejtő Sándor Könnyűipari és Környezetmérnöki Kar.

Lakoff, George (2004): Don't Think of an Elephant! Know your Values and Frame the Debate: the Essential Guide for Progressives. White River Junction, Vt.: Chelsea Green

Massino, Jill–Penn, Shana (2009): Introduction: gender politics and everyday life in state socialist Eastern and Central Europe. In: Penn, Shana–Massino, Jill (Eds.): Gender politics and everyday life in state socialist Eastern and Central Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 1–10.

Meyer, D. S. (2004): Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30., 1., 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110545.

McCarthy, John D., Zald, Mayer N. (1977): Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82., 6., 1212–1241. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2777934

Mikecz Dániel (2019): A zöld, környezetvédő gondolat hallgatói megítélése In Szabó Andrea és Susánszky Pál–Oross, Dániel (Szerk.): Mások vagy ugyanolyanok? Belvedere könyvek. Belvedere Meridionale. 275-294.

Mikecz, Dániel (2023): A politikai ökológia megjelenése Magyarországon: elmélet és mozgalmi gyakorlat. In: Kádár-rendszerválság. Hungaria Aeterna. Századvég Kiadó, Budapest, 269-287. ISBN 978-615-6436-23-8

Sebály Bernadett (2020): Társadalmi mozgalmak és szakpolitikai változások. Esettanulmány az ápolási díjról Magyarországon. Budpest: CEU, researchgate.net, http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21426.43202

Simsek, Elif Tugba (2023): New Cooperatives Based on the Solidarity Economy insights from Hungary. Doktori disszertáció. Budapest: ELTE Társadalomtudományi Kar Szociológia Doktori Iskola

Szabo John (2022): Energy transition or transformation? Power and politics in the European natural gas industry’s trasformismo. Energy Research & Social Science, 84, 102391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102391.

Szilágyi Anna (2019): Miért gondolunk az elefántra? Goethe-Institut Budapest https://www.goethe.de/ins/hu/hu/kul/sup/klt/21483237.html (2023.12.19.)

Tormos‐Aponte, Fernando–García‐López, Gustavo A. (2018): Polycentric struggles: The experience of the global climate justice movement. In Environmental Policy and Governance 28., 4., 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1815.

Tölgyesi Csaba–Török Péter–Hábenczyus Alida Anna–Bátori Zoltán–Valkó Orsolya–Deák Balázs–Tóthmérész Béla–Erdős László–Kelemen András (2020): Underground deserts below fertility islands? Woody species desiccate lower soil layers in sandy drylands. Ecography, 43., 6., 848–859. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04906

Tramel, Salena (2016): The road through Paris: Climate change, carbon, and the political dynamics of convergence. Globalizations, 13., 6., 960–969. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1173376

Wahlström, Mattias–Wennerhag, Magnus–Rootes, Christopher (2013): Framing “the climate issue”: Patterns of participation and prognostic frames among climate summit protestors. Global Environmental Politics, 13, 4, 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00200

Warren, Mark E. (2014). Governance-driven democratization. In Steven Griggs, Aletta J. Norval & Hendrik Wagenaar (Eds), Practices of freedom: Decentered governance, conflict and democratic participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107296954

Published
2024-03-19
How to Cite
MihályM. (2024). Community afforestation against climate change? The struggles and results of the Sixty Thousand Trees movement in Békéscsaba. Civil Rewiev, 21(1), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.62560/csz.2024.01.04
Section
Cikkek