A stratégiai autonómia újfajta közgazdaságtana: az európai válaszút
Absztrakt
A tanulmány a stratégiai autonómia fogalmát értelmezi újra a rendszerelmélet szemszögéből és az európai gazdaság perspektívájából. Érvelése szerint a jelenlegi, uralkodó megközelítés – miszerint az európai stratégiai autonómia a belső mennyiségi növekedés erősítését követeli meg – egyre törékenyebb feltételezéseken nyugszik a gazdasági reziliencia és függetlenség tekintetében. Ezzel szemben a dolgozat amellett foglal állást, hogy az európai stratégiai autonómia valódi megvalósítása a minőségi növekedés – sőt a nemnövekedés – irányába történő elmozdulást igényel, amely a fenntarthatóságot és a rendszerszintű alkalmazkodóképességet helyezi előtérbe az expanzióval szemben. A tanulmány a „zombijelenség” metaforáján keresztül illusztrálja a mennyiségi gazdasági növekedésen alapuló stratégiai autonómia tévútjellegét. A rendszerelméleti és posztnövekedési megközelítés összekapcsolása révén az elemzés a stratégiai autonómia átfogó újragondolására hív, mint olyan transzformatív folyamatra, amely egyszerre követel meg gazdasági és fogalmi megújulást a válaszúton álló Európától.
Hivatkozások
Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. The American Economic Review, 102(1), 131–166. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.131
Acharya, V. V., Eisert, T., Eufinger, C., & Hirsch, C. (2019). Whatever it takes: The real effects of unconventional monetary policy. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(9), 3366–3411. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz005
Acharya, V. V., Crosignani, M., Eisert, T., & Steffen, S. (2022). Zombie lending: Theoretical, international and historical perspectives. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 14(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-111620-114424
Acharya, V. V., Crosignani, M., Eisert, T., & Eufinger, C. (2024). Zombie credit and (dis-)inflation: Evidence from Europe. The Journal of Finance, 79(3), 1883–1929. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13342
Advisory Council on International Affairs (2025, June 17). AI: Technology, power, and democratic values in the foreign policy of the Netherlands (Advisory Letter). https://www.adviesraadinternationalevraagstukken.nl/site/binaries/site-content/collections/documents/2025/06/17/ai-technologie-macht-waarden/aiv-technology-power-and-democratic-values-in-the-foreign-policy-of-the-netherlands-17jun2025.pdf
Aktoudianakis, A. (2020). Fostering Europe’s strategic autonomy: Digital sovereignty for growth, rules and cooperation. European Policy Centre – Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. https://d1xp398qalq39s.cloudfront.net/content/PDF/2020/Digital_SA_paper_EPC_and_KAS.pdf
Albuquerque, B., & Iyer, R. (2024). The rise of the walking dead: Zombie firms around the world. Journal of International Economics, 152, 104019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2024.104019
Alcidi, C., Kiss-Gálfalvi, T., Postica, D., Righetti, E., Rizos, V., & Shamsfakh, F. (2023). What ways and means for a real strategic autonomy of the EU in the economic field? Final report. The European Economic and Social Committee. https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/files/qe-02-23-358-en-n_0.pdf
Alexander, S. (2012). Planned economic contraction: The emerging case for degrowth. Environmental Politics, 21(3), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.671569
Altman, E. I., Dai, R., & Wang, W. (2024). Global zombie companies: Measurements, de-terminants, and outcomes. Journal of International Business Studies, 55, 723–744. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-024-00689-4
Andersen, S. G., Kramp, P. L., & Kuchler, A. (2019). Low prevalence of zombie firms in Denmark. Danmarks Nationalbank. https://www.nationalbanken.dk/media/ojdkxorv/analysis-no-29-low-prevalence-of-zombie-firms-in-denmark.pdf
Andrews, D., & Petroulakis, F. (2017). Breaking the shackles: Zombie firms, weak banks and depressed restructuring in Europe (OECD Economics Department Working Paper, No. 1433). OECD Publishing.
Andrews, D., McGowan, M. A., & Millot, V. (2017). Confronting the zombies: Policies for productivity revival (OECD Economic Policy Paper, No. 21). OECD Publishing.
Arteaga, F., Jermalavicius, T., Marrone, A., Maulny, J.-P., & Terlikowski, M. (2016). Appro-priate level of European strategic autonomy. Armament Industry European Research Group (ARES). https://www.iris-france.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ARES-Group-Report-Strategic-autonomy-November-2016.pdf
Ascani, A., & Balachandran Nair, L. (2025). Innovation and zombie firms: Empirical evi-dence from Italy. Research Policy, 54(3), 105172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105172
Banerjee, S. B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24(1), 143–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024001341
Banerjee, S. B., & Hofmann, B. (2018). The rise of zombie firms: Causes and consequences. BIS Quarterly Review. Bank for International Settlements.
Banerjee, S. B., & Hofmann, B. (2022). Corporate zombies: Anatomy and life cycle. Economic Policy, 37(112), 757–803. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiac027
Bargués, P. (2021). From “resilience” to strategic autonomy: A shift in the implementation of the Global Strategy (EU-LISTCO Policy Papers Series, No. 9). https://d-nb.info/1233679198/34
Bärnthaler, R., Mang, S., & Hickel, J. (2025). Toward a post-growth industrial policy for Europe: Navigating emerging tensions and long-term goals. Globalizations, 22(6), 1124–1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2025.2501821
Beaucillon, C. (2023). Strategic autonomy: A new identity for the EU as a global actor. European Papers, 8(2), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/664
Beetsma, R., Busse, M., Larch, M., & Romp, W. E. (2025). Some intergenerational arithmetic to control public debt in the EU. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474747225100085
Benczes, I. (Ed.). (2024). Economic policies of populist leaders: A Central and Eastern European perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003378884
Bento, V. (2023). Strategic autonomy and economic power: The economy as a strategic theater. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003248392
Caballero, R. J., Hoshi, T., & Kashyap, A. K. (2008). Zombie lending and depressed restruc-turing in Japan. American Economic Review, 98(5), 1943–1977. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.5.1943
Cagnin, C., Münch, S., Scapolo, F., Störmer, E., & Vesnic Alujevic, L. (2021). Shaping and securing the EU’s open strategic autonomy by 2040 and beyond. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/727114
Capasso, M., Hansen, T., Heiberg, J., Klitkou, A., & Steen, M. (2019). Green growth – a synthesis of scientific findings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.013
Česnakas, G., & Juozaitis, J. (2024). European strategic autonomy and small states’ security: In the shadow of power. Routledge.
Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. MIT Press.
Chertkovskaya, E. (2023). From economic growth to socio-ecological transformation: Re-thinking visions of economy and work under SDG 8. In L. Partzsch (Ed.), The environment in global sustainability governance: Perceptions, actors, innovations (pp. 197–216). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781529228021.ch016
Criscuolo, C., Gonne, N., Kitazawa, K., & Lalanne, G. (2022). An industrial policy framework for OECD countries: Old debates, new perspectives (OECD Policy Paper, No. 127). OECD Publishing.
Csaba, L. (2023). The comparative economics of neo-illiberalism. Journal of Illiberalism Studies, 3(1), 103–106. https://doi.org/10.53483/XCLX3550
Csaba, L. (2025). Globalizáció és közgazdaságtan. Magyar Tudomány, 186(10), 1911–1919. https://doi.org/10.1556/2065.186.2025.10.5
De Jonghe, O., Mulier, K., & Samarin, I. (2025). Bank specialization and zombie lending. Management Science, 71(2), 1260–1286. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01437
Demertzis, M., Fiorito, A., & Panitsas, K. (2025). Strategic autonomy and European compet-itiveness: Security now comes first. EGOV, European Parliament, ECON Committee. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2025/764371/ECTI_STU(2025)764371_EN.pdf
Desmaele, L. (2025). European strategic autonomy as a double-edged sword? US perspec-tives in an era of Sino-American competition. Journal of European Integration, 47(6), 843–863. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2025.2537368
Draghi, M. (2024). The future of European competitiveness: Report to the European Com-mission. European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2024-09/draghi-report-2024.pdf
Eppinger, P., Fuchset, M., & Kukies, J. (2021). Decoupling global value chains: Economic costs of disintegration. Review of World Economics, 157(4), 905–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-021-00434-0
Európai Bizottság. (2019). European Green Deal. Striving to be the first climate-neutral con-tinent. Európai Bizottság. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
Európai Bizottság. (2025). Versenyképességi iránytű az EU számára. Európai Bizottság. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HU/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0030
Európai Központi Bank. (2025, July 9). Climate risks: no longer the tragedy of the horizon. ECB Blog. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/blog/date/2025/html/ecb.blog20250709~aed804c955.en.html?mod=djemclimate
Európai Külügyi Szolgálat. (2016). Közös jövőkép, közös fellépés: erősebb Európa. Az Európai Unió kül- és biztonságpolitikájára vonatkozó globális stratégia. Európai Külügyi Szolgálat. https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_hu_version.pdf
Farrand, B. (2024). The economy–security nexus: Risk, strategic autonomy and the regulation of the semiconductor supply chain. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 16(1), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2024.63
Favara, G., Minoiu, C., & Perez-Orive, A. (2024). Zombie lending to U.S. firms. (FRB Atlanta Working Paper, No. 2024-7). https://doi.org/10.29338/wp2024-07
Feldmann, M., & Popa, M. (2022). Populism and economic policy: Lessons from Central and Eastern Europe. Post-Communist Economies, 34(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2022.2029253
Ferraro, F., Etzion, D., & Gehman, J. (2015). Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited. Organization Studies, 36(3), 363–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/
Fiksel, J. (2003). Designing resilient, sustainable systems. Environmental Science & Tech-nology, 37(23), 5330–5339. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0344819
Fukuda, S., & Nakamura, J. (2011). Why did ‘zombie’ firms recover in Japan? The World Economy, 34(7) (Special issue: Asia Regional Issue), 1124–1137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2011.01368.x
Gao, X. (2025). Zombie firms, state subsidies and aggregate productivity. Economica, 92(366), 507–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12569
Garcia-Merino, J. D., Urionabarrenetxea, S., & San-Jose, L. (2025). The economic and social dilemma of zombie companies worldwide: institutional context and poverty impact analysis. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal (ahead of print). http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2024-0461
Garicano, L. (2025, September 4). Strategic autonomy for Europe requires economic growth. VoxEU, CEPR. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/strategic-autonomy-europe-requires-economic-growth
Gehrke, T. (2022). EU open strategic autonomy and the trappings of geoeconomics. Euro-pean Foreign Affairs Review, 27 (Special issue), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2022012
Gensler, L., Baldwin, R., & Enderlein, H. (2025). Europe under pressure: Economic policy challenges in a fragmented world. Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR). https://cepr.org/publications/books/europe-under-pressure
Giannetti, M., & Simonov, A. (2013). On the real effects of bank bailouts: Micro evidence from Japan. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 5(1), 135–167. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.5.1.135
Guadagno, F., Riedo, M., & Gräbner, C. (2025). Foreign direct investments and European dependencies: Rethinking resilience in Central and Eastern Europe. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 49(1), 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bead037
Győrffy, D. (2024). Liberal and illiberal industrial policy in the EU: The political economy of building the EV battery value chain in Sweden and Hungary. Comparative European Pol-itics, 22, 574–593. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-023-00374-0
Hamano, M., & Zanetti, F. (2017). Endogenous product turnover and macroeconomic dynamics. Review of Economic Dynamics, 26, 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2017.06.003
Hamano, M., & Zanetti, F. (2022). Monetary policy, firm heterogeneity, and product variety. European Economic Review, 144, 104089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104089
Hamano, M., Schnattinger, P., Shintani, M., Uesugi, I., & Zanetti, F. (2025). Credit market tightness and zombie firms: Theory and evidence (CAMA Working Paper, No. 5/2025). Australian National University, Crawford School of Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5116382
Harari, Y. N. (2018). Sapiens: Az emberiség rövid története. Centrál Kiadói Csoport. (Az eredeti mű megjelenése: 2012.)
Haroche, P. (2024). Geoeconomic power Europe: When global power competition drives EU integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 62(4), 938–954. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13596
Hasselbalch, J. A., Kranke, M., & Chertkovskaya, E. (2023). Organizing for transformation: Post-growth in international political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 30(5), 1621–1638. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2023.2208871
Helwig, N., & Sinkkonen, V. (2022). Strategic autonomy and the EU as a global actor: The evolution, debate and theory of a contested term. European Foreign Affairs Review, 27 (Special Issue), 1–20. Kluwer Law International. https://doi.org/10.54648/EERR2022009
Hickel, J. (2020). What does degrowth mean? A few points of clarification. Globalizations, 18(7), 1105–1111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1812222
Higgs, R. (2013). Crisis and Leviathan: Critical episodes in the growth of American government (25th Anniversary ed.). Independent Institute.
Hill, C. (1993). The capability–expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe’s international role. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(3), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00466.x
Hirschman, A. O. (2018). National power and the structure of foreign trade. University of California Press. (Az eredeti mű megjelenése: 1945.)
Hoshi, T. (2006). Economics of the living dead. The Japanese Economic Review, 57(1), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5876.2006.00354.x
Jacobs, T., Gheyle, N., De Ville, F., & Orbie, J. (2023). The hegemonic politics of ‘strategic autonomy’ and ‘resilience’: COVID-19 and the dislocation of EU trade policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13348
Järvenpää, P., Major, C., & Sakkov, S. (2019). European strategic autonomy: Operationalising a buzzword. International Centre for Defence and Security.
Jean, S., & Gomart, T. (2023). Impossible decoupling, improbable cooperation: Economic interdependencies in the face of power rivalries. Institut français des relations interna-tionales (Ifri).
Jones, C. I. (2016). Life and growth. Journal of Political Economy, 124(2), 539–578. https://doi.org/10.1086/684750
Kallis, G. (2011). In defence of degrowth. Ecological Economics, 70(5), 873–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007
Kassoti, E., & Wessel, R. A. (2023). Strategic autonomy: The legal contours of a security policy construct. European Foreign Affairs Review, 28(4), 305–309. https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2023023
Katzenstein, P. J. (1985). Small states in world markets: Industrial policy in Europe (Cornell Studies in Political Economy). Cornell University Press.
Kivimaa, P., & Rogge, K. (2024). Pursuing sustainability transitions and open strategic au-tonomy: A policy mix perspective on synergies and trade-offs (JRC Working Paper Series – For a Fair, Innovative and Sustainable Economy, 07/2024). European Commission.
Kovács, O. (2021). Encoded weakening of the European integration: The EU-specific vec-tors of disorientegration. Európai Tükör, 23(1), 43–76. https://doi.org/10.32559/et.2021.1.3
Kovács, O. (2023). Reversing the great suppression: Unleashing the catalytic public sector for innovation dynamism. Ludovika Publishing. https://doi.org/10.36250/01126
Kovács, O. (2024). A reziliencia metamorfózisa. Közgazdasági Szemle, 71(4), 408–443. https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2024.4.408
Kroll, H. (2024). Assessing open strategic autonomy. Joint Research Centre, Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/767279
Li, X., Wang, H., & Li, R. (2023). A hidden channel of “blood transfusion”: Internal capital market subsidies and zombie firms. The British Accounting Review, 55(6), 101267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2023.101267
Ma, H. R., & Dwyer, D. S. (2025). The effect of a firm’s zombie status on its innovation in research and development (R&D)-active small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Focusing on the moderating effect of zombie congestion. Journal of Policy Studies, 40(1), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.52372/jps.40101
Mariotti, S. (2025). “Open strategic autonomy” as an industrial policy compass for the EU competitiveness and growth: The good, the bad, or the ugly? Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-024-00327-y
McGowan, A. M., Andrews, D., & Millot, V. (2018). The walking dead? Zombie firms and productivity performance in OECD countries. Economic Policy, 33(96), 685–736. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiy012
Methmini, D., Dharmapriya, N., Gunawardena, V., Edirisinghe, S., Jayathilaka, R., & Wick-ramaarachchi, C. (2024). Impact of economic growth, energy consumption, and trade openness on carbon emissions: Evidence from the top 20 emitting nations. Climate and Development, 17(5), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2024.2375737
Millward-Hopkins, J., Hickel, J., & Nag, S. (2025). Is growth in consumption occurring where it is most needed? An empirical analysis of current energy and material trends. The Lancet Planetary Health, 9(6), 503–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00115-9
Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Prentice Hall.
Miró, J. (2023). Responding to the global disorder: The EU’s quest for open strategic au-tonomy. Global Society, 23, 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2022.2110042
Monastiriotis, V., & Gamtkitsulashvili, T. (2025). EU’s strategic autonomy and regional de-velopment objectives: Friends or foes? (London School of Economics, Europe In Ques-tion, Discussion Paper, No. 191). https://www.lse.ac.uk/asset-library/eiqpaper191.pdf
Monnet, J. (1982). Emlékiratok. Gondolat Könyvkiadó.
Moravcsik, A. (1998). The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht (Cornell Studies in Political Economy). Cornell University Press.
Mudde, C. (2004). The populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
Muraközy, L. (2012). Államok kora. Az európai modell. Akadémiai Kiadó.
Musto, S. A. (2010). World challenge to Western Europe: Integration as a response. World Futures: The Journal of New Paradigm Research, 26(1), 17–34. (Az eredeti mű megjelenése: 1989.) https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.1989.9972103
Myachin, V., & Vysotskyi, O. (2025). Strategic autonomy: Can the EU accelerate the at-tainment of defence and technological independence? European Journal of Economics and Management, 11(5), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.46340/eujem.2025.11.5.1
Nissen, C., & Larsen, J. (2021, February 8). European strategic autonomy: From misconceived to useful concept. What can we learn from the Northern outlook? DIIS Policy Brief. Danish Institute for International Studies.
Nurmi, S., Vanhala, J., & Viren, M. (2020). The life and death of zombies: Evidence from government subsidies to firms (Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper, No. 8/2020).
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource de-pendence perspective. Stanford Business Books. (Az eredeti mű megjelenése: 1978.)
Preston, A. (2025). Total defense: The New Deal and the invention of national security. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674300484
Rio, S. (2024). European strategic autonomy: How realism best explains why it remains a failure. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2024/12/03/european-strategic-autonomy-how-realism-best-explains-why-it-remains-a-failure/
Röpke, W. (1950). The social crisis of our time. University of Chicago Press. (Az eredeti mű megjelenése: 1942.)
Sajó, A., Uitz, R., & Holmes, S. (Eds.) (2022). Routledge handbook of illiberalism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367260569
Schivardi, F., Sette, E., & Tabellini, G. (2022). Credit misallocation during the European financial crisis. The Economic Journal, 132(641), 391–423. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueab039
Schulz, C., & Bailey, I. (2014). The green economy and post-growth regimes: Opportunities and challenges for economic geography. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 96(3), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12051
Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study of politics and organization. University of California Press.
Sempere, C. M. (2024). The European difficult goal of being strategically autonomous. Cuadernos Económicos de ICE, 107. https://doi.org/10.32796/cice.2024.107.7801
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G. M., Persson, L. M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., & Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
Tayyab, O., Goyal, M., Lemos, M. H., & Hickel, J. (2024). Degrowth: A new logic for the global economy. BMJ, 387, q2781. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2781
Tercovich, G., & Meijer, H. (2025). The EU’s strategic autonomy in foreign policy: Europe-an responses to American and Chinese influence over the arms embargo on China and Taiwan. Journal of European Integration, 47(6), 965–985. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2025.2537367
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill.
Tocci, N. (2021). European strategic autonomy: What it is, why we need it, how to achieve it. Istituto Affari Internazionali. https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/9788893681780.pdf
Tracey, B. (2025). The real effects of zombie lending in Europe. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 122–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12636
United Kingdom–France. (1998, December 4). Saint-Malo Declaration on European De-fence. https://www.cvce.eu/en/obj/Declaration_on_European_Defence_St_Malo_4_December_1998-en-0276baeb-94dc-4e36-b820-c83d53fdfb54.html
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393808
Vajda, M. (2009). Mi a válság? In Hosszú út az éjszakában (111–118. o.). Kalligram Kiadó. https://uni-eszterhazy.hu/api/media/file/1195e2be04b9344c35fc469ab930dc5a523196f0
Vivanco, D. F., McDowall, W., Freire-González, J., Kemp, R., & von der Voet, E. (2016). The foundations of the environmental rebound effect and its contribution towards a general framework. Ecological Economics, 125, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.006
Vogel, J., & Hickel, J. (2023). Is green growth happening? An empirical analysis of achieved versus Paris-compliant CO₂–GDP decoupling in high-income countries. The Lancet Plan-etary Health, 7(9), 759–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00174-2
Wallerstein, I. (2011). The modern world-system I: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. University of California Press. (Az eredeti mű megjelenése: 1974.) https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520948570
Weiss, M., & Cattaneo, C. (2017). Degrowth: Taking stock and reviewing an emerging ac-ademic paradigm. Ecological Economics, 137, 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.014
Wigell, M., & Helwig, N. (2022). The EU’s quest for geoeconomic power: Pursuing open strategic autonomy (FIIA Briefing Paper, No. 334, Geoeconomics Series). Finnish Insti-tute of International Affairs. https://fiia.fi/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/bp334_the-eus-quest-for-geoeconomic-power_niklas-helwig-mikael-wigell.pdf
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press.
World Meteorological Organization. (2024). State of the global climate 2023 (WMO, No. 1347). World Meteorological Organization. https://wmo.int/publication-series/state-of-global-climate-2023
Wood, H., & Liu, C. (Eds.) (2025). The green growth paradigm: Climate solution or envi-ronmental disaster? Bristol Institute for Learning and Teaching (BILT) Student Research Journal, 6, Article 0901. https://doi.org/10.70969/20250901
Zandee, D., Deen, B., Kruijver, K., & Stoetman, A. (2020, December). European strategic autonomy in security and defence: Now the going gets tough, it’s time to get going. Clingendael Report. Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
Zysman, J. (1983). Governments, markets, and growth: Financial systems and politics of industrial change (Cornell Studies in Political Economy). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501717413
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
