A reziliencia, a vállalkozói énhatékonyság és a teljesítmény kapcsolatrendszere
Az állam sérülékenységének hatása fiatal vállalkozók esetében
Absztrakt
A vállalkozói énhatékonyság és reziliencia a vállalkozói siker lényeges meghatározói. E tanulmányban 37 ország adatainak felhasználásával vizsgáljuk, hogy az állam sérülékenységéből fakadó nehézségek miként befolyásolják a reziliencia és a vállalkozói énhatékonyság kapcsolatát, valamint a reziliencia vállalkozói teljesítményre gyakorolt hatásmechanizmusait a fiatal vállalkozók körében. Eredményeink azt mutatják, hogy a vállalkozói énhatékonyság és teljesítmény közötti kapcsolat szorosabb a stabil, mint a sérülékeny országokban, a reziliencia és a vállalkozói teljesítmény közötti kapcsolat pedig szorosabb a sérülékeny, mint a stabil országokban. A stabil országokban a reziliencia nagyobb fokú vállalkozói énhatékonysággal jár együtt, és a vállalkozói énhatékonyság közvetíti a reziliencia vállalkozói sikerre gyakorolt hatását. A törékeny országokban azonban a reziliencia és a vállalkozói énhatékonyság között nem áll fenn közvetítői kapcsolat. Ezek az eredmények arra utalnak, hogy sérülékeny környezetben a vállalkozók olyan akadályokba ütköznek, amelyek reziliens leküzdése kevésbé járul hozzá a tapasztalati tanuláshoz, a vállalkozói képességek növekedéséhez, mint a stabil állami keretrendszerek vállalkozói kihívásaira adott válaszlépések, például egy erős piaci versenyhelyzetben vagy a gyors technológiai fejlődés esetén adott vállalkozói válaszok.
Hivatkozások
ABDELWAHED, N. A. A.–SOOMRO, B. A.–SHAH, N.–SARAIH, U. N. [2023]: Effect of institutional support and entrepreneurial knowledge on women’s entrepreneurial self-efficacy and venture performance in a developing country. International Journal of Innovation Science, 15. évf. 5. sz. 776–798. o. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-12-2021-0218
ACS, Z. J.–ESTRIN, S.–MICKIEWICZ, T.–SZERB, L. [2018]: Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: an ecosystem perspective. Small Business Economics, 51. köt. 501–514. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0013-9
AGARWAL, V.–MATHIYAZHAGAN, K.–MALHOTRA, S.–PIMPUCHAT, B. [2023]: Building resilience for sustainability of MSMEs post COVID-19 outbreak: An Indian handicraft industry outlook. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 85. köt. 101443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101443
ALLEN, J.–STEVENSON, R. M.–O’BOYLE, E.–SEIBERT, S. [2021]: What matters more for entrepreneurship success? A meta-analysis comparing general mental ability and emotional intelligence in entrepreneurial settings. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 15. évf. 3. sz. 352–376. o. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1377
AUDRETSCH, D. B.–BELITSKI, M.–CHERKAS, N. [2021]: Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: The role of institutions. PloS One, 16. évf. 3. sz. e0247609. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247609
AULT, J. K.–SPICER, A. [2016]: Measuring the political context of entrepreneurship: lessons from the state fragility literature. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1. sz. 17750. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2016.221
AYALA, J. C.–MANZANO, G. [2014]: The resilience of the entrepreneur. Influence on the success of the business. A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 42. évf. 126–135. o. 10.1016/j.joep.2014.02.004
BANDURA, A. [1986]: Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
BARBOSA, S. D.–GERHARDT, M. W.–KICKUL, J. R. [2007]: The role of cognitive style and risk preference on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13. évf. 4. sz. 86–104. o. https://doi.org/10.1177/10717919070130041001
BARON, R. A.–MARKMAN, G. D. [2003]: Beyond social capital: The role of entrepreneurs’ social competence in their financial success. Journal of Business Venturing, 18. évf. 1. sz. 41–60. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00069-0
BEN-HAFAÏEDH, C.–XHENETI, M.–STENHOLM, P.–BLACKBURN, R.–WELTER, F.–URBANO, D. [2024]: The interplay of context and entrepreneurship: the new frontier for contextualisation research. Small Business Economics, 62. köt. 2. sz. 571–582. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00770-6
BRÄNDLE, L. –GOLLA, S. –KUCKERTZ, A. [2019]: How entrepreneurial orientation translates social identities into performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25. évf. 7. sz. 1433–1451. o. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2018-0804
BULLOUGH, A.–RENKO, M.–MYATT, T. [2014]: Danger zone entrepreneurs: The importance of resilience and self-efficacy for entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38. évf. 3. sz. 473–499. o. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12006
CANNON, M. D.–EDMONDSON, A. C. [2005]: Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently): How great organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve. Long Range Planning, 38. évf. 3. sz. 299–319. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2005.04.005
CHEN, C. C.–GREENE, P. G.–CRICK, A. [1998]: Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13. évf. 4. sz. 295–316. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00029-3
DE LA CRUZ, M. E.–VERDÚ JOVER, A. J.–GÓMEZ GRAS, J. M. [2018]: Influence of the entrepreneur’s social identity on business performance through effectuation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24. évf. 2. sz. 90–96. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.11.003
DESS, G. G.–ROBINSON JR., R. B. [1984]: Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5. évf. 3. sz. 265–273. o. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050306
DUONG, C. D.–VU, N. X. [2024]: Entrepreneurial education and intention: fear of failure, self-efficacy, and gender. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 31. évf. 4. sz. 629–654. o. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-02-2023-0057
EDDLESTON, K. A.–KELLERMANNS, F. W.–SARATHY, R. [2008]: Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45. évf. 1. sz. 26–50. o. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00717.x
ENVICK, B. R. [2005]: Beyond human and social capital: The importance of positive psychological capital for entrepreneurial success. The Entrepreneurial Executive, 10. évf. 1. sz. 41–52. o.
FISHBEIN, M.–AJZEN, I. [2011]: Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. Psychology Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838020
FORNELL, C.–LARCKER, D. F. [1981]: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18. évf. 1. sz. 39–50. o. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
FRESE, M.–GIELNIK, M. M. [2023]: The psychology of entrepreneurship: action and process. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10. évf. 1. sz. 137–164. o. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055646
FULLER, B.–LIU, Y.–BAJABA, S.–MARLER, L. E.–PRATT, J. [2018]: Examining how the personality, self-efficacy, and anticipatory cognitions of potential entrepreneurs shape their entrepreneurial intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 125. köt. 120–125. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.005
FUND FOR PEACE [2024]: Fragile States Index. https://fragilestatesindex.org/
GELDHOF, G. J.–PREACHER, K. J.–ZYPHUR, M. J. [2014]: Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19. évf. 1. sz. 72–91. o. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032138
GUBIK, S. A.–VÖRÖS, ZS. [2023]: Why narcissists may be successful entrepreneurs: The role of entrepreneurial social identity and overwork. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 19. köt. e00364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00364
HAKEN, N.–WOODBURN, D.–SAMPLE, E.–WILSON, W.–MADDEN, J.–TURNER, P.–BAXLEY, M.–AGWANDA, B.–ELLINGTON, M.–KIRIŞ, A.–GARCIA, C.–NSENGIYUMVA, I.–BASSEY, E.–BERGH, A.–MOHAN, N. [2023]: Fragile States Index 2023 – Annual Report. The Fund for Peace. Washington, DC. https://fragilestatesindex.org/2023/06/14/fragile-states-index-2023-annual-report/
HARTMANN, S.–BACKMANN, J.–NEWMAN, A.–BRYKMANN, K. M.–PIDDUCK, R. J. [2022]: Psychological resilience of entrepreneurs: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Small Business Management, 60. évf. 5. sz. 1041–1079. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.2024216
HAYWARD, M. L. A.– FORSTER, W. R.–SARASVATHY, S. D.– FREDRICKSON, B. L. [2010]: Beyond hubris: How highly confident entrepreneurs rebound to venture again. Journal of Business Venturing, 25. évf. 6. sz. 569–578. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.03.002
HOANG, G.–LUU, T. T.–LE, T. T. T.–TRAN, A. K. T. [2022]: Dark Triad traits affecting entrepreneurial intentions: The roles of opportunity recognition and locus of control. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 17. köt. e00310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00310
KERR, S. P.–KERR, W. R.–XU, T. [2018]: Personality traits of entrepreneurs: A review of recent literature. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 14. évf. 3. sz. 279–356. o. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000080
KOLK, A.–LENFANT, F. [2015]: Partnerships for peace and development in fragile states: Identifying missing links. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29. évf. 4. sz. 422–437. o. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0122
KORBER, S.–MCNAUGHTON, R. B. [2018]: Resilience and entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24. évf. 7. sz. 1129–1154. o. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-10-2016-0356
KORSGAARD, S.–WIGREN-KRISTOFERSON, C.–BRUNDIN, E.–HELLERSTEDT, K.–ALSOS, G. A.–GRANDE, J. [2022]: Entrepreneurship and embeddedness: Process, context and theoretical foundations. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 34. évf. 3-4. sz. 210–221. o. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2022.2055152
KRAMPE, H.–DANBOLT, L. J.–HAVER, A. – STÅLSETT, G.–SCHNELL, T. [2021]: Locus of control moderates the association of COVID-19 stress and general mental distress: results of a Norwegian and a German-speaking cross-sectional survey. BMC Psychiatry, 21. évf. 1–13. o. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03418-5
LIU, Q.–LIU, J.–CAI, J.–ZHANG, Z. [2020]: The relationship between domain- and task-specific self-efficacy and mathematical problem posing: a large-scale study of eighth-grade students in China. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105. köt. 407–431. o. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10649-020-09977-w
MARKMAN, G. D.–BARON, R.–BALKIN, D. B. [2005]: Are perseverance and self-efficacy costless? Assessing entrepreneurs’ regretful thinking. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26. évf. 1. sz. 1–19. o. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.305
MIAO, C.–QIAN, S.–MA, D. [2017]: The relationship between entrepreneurial self-efficacy and firm performance: a meta-analysis of main and moderator effects. Journal of Small Business Management, 55. évf. 1. sz. 87–107. o. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12240
MINNITI, M.–BYGRAVE, W. [2001]: A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25. évf. 3. sz. 5–16. o. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870102500301
NEWMAN, A.–OBSCHONKA, M.–SCHWARZ, S.–COHEN, M.–NIELSEN, I. [2019]: Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A systematic review of the literature on its theoretical foundations, measurement, antecedents, and outcomes, and an agenda for future research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110. köt. 403–419. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.05.012
PITUCH, K. A.–STEVENS, J. P. [2015]: Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 6th ed. Routledge, New York.
RENKO, M.–BULLOUGH, A.–SAEED, S. [2021]: How do resilience and self-efficacy relate to entrepreneurial intentions in countries with varying degrees of fragility? A six-country study. International Small Business Journal, 39. évf. 2. sz. 130–156. o. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266242620960456
ROUNDY, P. T.–LYONS, T. S. [2023]: Where are the entrepreneurs? A call to theorize the micro-foundations and strategic organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Organization, 21. évf. 2. sz. 447–459. o. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270211056240
SANTORO, G.–BERTOLDI, B.–GIACHINO, C.–CANDELO, E. [2020]: Exploring the relationship between entrepreneurial resilience and success: The moderating role of stakeholders’ engagement. Journal of Business Research, 119. köt. 142–150. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.052
SANTORO, G.–MESSENI-PETRUZZELLI, A.–DEL GIUDICE, M. [2021]: Searching for resilience: the impact of employee-level and entrepreneur-level resilience on firm performance in small family firms. Small Business Economics, 57. évf. 1. sz. 455–471. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00319-x
SHEPHERD, D. A.–SAADE, F. P.–WINCENT, J. [2020]: How to circumvent adversity? Refugee-entrepreneurs’ resilience in the face of substantial and persistent adversity. Journal of Business Venturing, 35. évf. 4. sz. 105940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.06.001
SINCLAIR, V. G.–WALLSTON, K. A. [2004]: The development and psychometric evaluation of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale. Assessment, 11. évf. 1. sz. 94–101. o. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191103258144
STRAUSER, D. R.–KETZ, K.–KEIM, J. [2002]: The relationship between self-efficacy, locus of control and work personality. Journal of Rehabilitation, 68. évf. 1. sz. 20–26. o.
TREVELYAN, R. [2011]: Self-efficacy and effort in new venture development. Journal of Management & Organization, 17. évf. 1. sz. 2–16. o. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2011.17.1.2
VIJ, S.–BEDI, H. S. [2016]: Are subjective business performance measures justified? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65. köt. 5. sz. 603–621. o. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2014-0196
WALL, T. D.–MICHIE, J.–PATTERSON, M.–WOODS, S. J.–SHEEHAN, M.–CLEGG, C. W.–WEST, M. A. [2004]: On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology, 57. évf. 1. sz. 95–118. o. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02485.x
WIKLUND, J.–SHEPHERD, D. A. [2005]: Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20. évf. 1. sz. 71–91. o. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.001
WILLIAMS, T. A.–GRUBER, D. A.–SUTCLIFFE, K. M.–SHEPHERD D. A.–ZHAO, E. Y. [2017]: Organizational response to adversity: Fusing crisis management and resilience research streams. Academy of Management Annals, 11. évf. 2. sz. 733–769. o. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0134
WU, W.–WANG, H.–WANG, X. [2022]: Entrepreneur narcissism and new venture performance: A learning perspective. Journal of Business Research, 149. köt. 901–915. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.001
ZHAO, H.–SEIBERT, S.–HILLS, G. [2005]: The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90. évf. 6. sz. 1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1265
