A hazai kis- és középvállalkozások növekedési konfigurációi
Absztrakt
A kis- és középvállalkozások a gazdasági fejlődés kulcsszereplői, ugyanakkor növekedési pályájuk összetett, mintázataik nehezen általánosíthatók. Jelen tanulmány egy komplex modellt javasol a kis- és középvállalkozások növekedésének magyarázatára, amely integrálja az erőforrás-alapú, valamint a dinamikus képességek és a vállalkozói képességek elméleteit. A vizsgálat 352 magyar kis- és középvállalkozásra terjed ki, amelyek létszáma az adatfelvétel időpontját megelőző három évben növekedett; az adatgyűjtésre 2018 és 2020 között került sor. A kvalitatív komparatív elemzés és a szükséges feltételek analízise módszereket alkalmazva a kutatás azonosítja a növekedést elősegítő kompetenciakonfigurációkat. Az eredmények azt mutatják, hogy nincs egyetlen univerzálisan és mindig szükséges kompetencia, ehelyett több, különböző kompetenciát kombináló út is vezethet magas növekedéshez. A vizsgált kompetenciák közül egyedül a nemzetköziesedés jelenik meg potenciális szűk keresztmetszetként. A kutatás alátámasztja, hogy a versenyelőny nem a statikus erőforrások birtoklásán, hanem azok rugalmas és kontextusfüggő kombinálásán alapul.
Hivatkozások
ABDULSALEH, A. M.–WORTHINGTON, A. C. [2013]: Small and medium-sized enterprises financing: A review of literature. International Journal of Business and Management, 8. köt. 14. sz. 36–54. o. http://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n14p36
ACS, Z. J.–AUDRETSCH, D. B. [1990]: Innovation and small firms. MIT Press, Cambridge.
ADOMAKO, S.–MOLE, K. F. [2018]: Small business growth and performance. Megjelent: Blackburn, R.–Clerq, D. D.–Heinonen, J. (szerk.): The Sage Handbook of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Sage Publications, London, 220–241. o.
AHMAD, N. H.–HALIM, H. A.–ZAINAL, S. R. M. [2010]: Is entrepreneurial competency the silver bullet for SME success in a developing nation. International Business Management, 4. köt. 2. sz. 67–75. o. https://doi.org/10.3923/ibm.2010.67.75
AL MAMUN, A.–FAZAL, S. A. [2018]: Effect of entrepreneurial orientation on competency and micro-enterprise performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12. köt. 3. sz. 379–398. o. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-05-2018-0033
ASIF, M. U.– BAKAR, L. J. A. [2025]: Green Strategic Orientation and Sustainable Performance of SMEs: Moderating Role of Environmental Turbulence. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–29. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-025-02606-y
AYYAGARI, M.–DEMIRGÜÇ-KUNT, A.–MAKSIMOVIC, V. [2011]: Small vs. young firms across the world: contribution to employment, job creation, and growth. World Bank, Policy Research Working Papers, No. WPS 5631. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5631
BAMIATZI, V. C.–KIRCHMAIER, T. [2014]: Strategies for superior performance under adverse conditions: A focus on small and medium-sized high-growth firms. International Small Business Journal, 32. köt. 3. sz. 259–284. o. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1332087
BARNEY, J. [1991]: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17. köt. 1. sz. 99–120. o. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
BERGER, A. N.–UDELL, G. F. [1998]: The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22. köt. 6–8. sz. 613–673. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00038-7
BLACKBURN, R.–HART, M.–WAINWRIGHT, T. [2013]: Small business performance: business, strategy and owner‐manager characteristics. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20. köt. 1. sz. 8–27. o. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001311298394
BLACKBURN, R.–HEINONEN, J.–DE CLERCQ, D. [2018]: The SAGE handbook of small business and entrepreneurship. SAGE Publications, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984080
BOYNTON, D. [2024]: Temporal attention, knowledge breadth, and firm growth. Strategic Organization, 22. köt. 1. sz. 91–117. o. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270231196213
BRUSH, C. G.– CERU, D. J.– BLACKBURN, R. [2009]: Pathways to entrepreneurial growth: The influence of management, marketing, and money. Business Horizons, 52. köt. 5. sz. 481–491. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.05.003
BURNS, P. [2022]: Entrepreneurship and small business. Bloomsbury Publishing, London.
CHURCHILL, N. C.–LEWIS, V. [1983]: The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review, 61. köt. 3. sz. 30–50. o.
COAD, A. [2009]: The Growth of Firms: A Survey of Theories and Empirical Evidence. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
COPE, J.–KEMPSTER, S.–PARRY, K. [2011]: Exploring distributed leadership in the small business context. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13. köt. 3. sz. 270–285. o. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00307.x
COVIN, J. G. –SLEVIN, D. P. [1989]: Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10. köt. 1. sz. 75-87. o. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107
COVIN, J. G.–SLEVIN, D. P. [1991]: A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16. köt. 1. sz. 7–25. o. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101600102
DAUNFELDT, S. O.–ELERT, N. [2013]: When is Gibrat’s law a law? Small Business Economics, 41. köt. 133–147. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9404-x
DEPAOLI, P.–ZA, S.–SCORNAVACCA, E. [2020]: A model for digital development of SMEs: an interaction-based approach. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27. köt. 7. sz. 1049–1068. o. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-06-2020-0219
DI PAOLA, N.–CHARI, S.–IANNACCI, F.–KRAUS S. [2025]: Configurational theory in business and management research: Status quo and guidelines for the application of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 211. köt. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123907
DUL, J. [2016]: Identifying single necessary conditions with NCA and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 69. köt. 4. sz. 1516–1523. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.134
DUL, J. [2020]: Comparing NCA and QCA. Supplement to Dul, J. [2020]: Conducting necessary condition analysis, Sage Publications. http://erim.eur.nl/nca
DUL, J. [2021]: Advances in Necessary Condition Analysis. https://bookdown.org/ncabook/advanced_nca2/
DUL, J. [2024]: Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA). R Package Version 4.0.2. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/NCA/
DUL, J.–VAN DER LAAN, E.–KUIK, R. [2020]: A statistical significance test for necessary condition analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 23. köt. 2. sz. 385–395. o. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118795272
EISENHARDT, K. M.–MARTIN, J. A. [2000]: Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21. köt. 10–11. sz. 1105–1121. o. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405164054.ch21
ESTRADA-LAVILLA, R.–RUÍZ-NAVARRO, J. [2024]: Method for and Analysis of Early-Stage Firm Growth Patterns Using World Bank Data. Sustainability, 16. köt. 4. sz. 1–17. o. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041450
FINN, V. [2022]: A qualitative assessment of QCA: method stretching in large-N studies and temporality. Quality & Quantity, 56. köt. 3815–3830. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01278-5
FISS, P. C. [2011]: Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54. köt. 393–420. o. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
GEORGE, N.–PARIDA, V.–LAHTI, T.–WINCENT, J. [2016]: A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: insights on influencing factors. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12. köt. 309–350. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1891004
GIBB, A.–DAVIES, L. [1990]: In pursuit of frameworks for the development of growth models of the small business. International Small Business Journal, 9. köt. 1. sz. 15–31. o. https://doi.org/10.1177/026624269000900103
GIBRAT, R. [1931]: Les inégalits économiques. Recueil Sirey, Párizs.
GILBERT, B. A.–MCDOUGALL, P. P.–AUDRETSCH, D. B. [2006]: New venture growth: A review and extension. Journal of Management, 32. köt. 6. sz. 926–950. o. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306293860
GRIMALDI, M.–QUINTO, I.–RIPPA, P. [2013]: Enabling open innovation in small and medium enterprises: A dynamic capabilities approach. Knowledge and Process Management, 20. köt. 4. sz. 199–210. o. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1423
HATTEN, T. S. [2023]: Small business management: Creating a sustainable competitive advantage. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
HENREKSON, M.–JOHANSSON, D. [2010]: Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 35. köt. 227–244. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9172-z
HERMAWATI, A.–GUNAWAN, E. [2020]: The implementation of dynamic capabilities for SMEs in creating innovation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 32. köt. 3. sz. 199–216. o. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2019-0121
HOANG, H.–ANTONCIC, B. [2003]: Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18. köt. 2. sz. 165–187. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00081-2
KARADAĞ, H. [2017]: The impact of industry, firm age and education level on financial management performance in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 9. köt. 3. sz. 300–314. o. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeee-09-2016-0037
KOMLÓSI ÉVA [2024]: A kvalitatív komparatív elemzés és alkalmazása a vállalkozáskutatás területén. Statisztikai Szemle, 102. köt. 6. sz. 549–577. o. https://doi.org/10.20311/stat2024.06.hu0549
KRAUS, S.–RIBEIRO-SORIANO, D.–SCHÜSSLER, M. [2018]: Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14. köt. 15–33. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0461-8
KUULUVAINEN, A. [2012]: How to concretize dynamic capabilities? Theory and examples. Journal of Strategy and Management, 5. köt. 4. sz. 381–392. o. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554251211276353
LAFUENTE, E.–LEIVA, J. C.–MORENO, J.–SZERB LÁSZLÓ [2020a]: A non-parametric analysis of competitiveness efficiency: The relevance of firm size and the configuration of competitive pillars. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 23. köt. 3. sz. 203–216. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2019.02.002
LAFUENTE, E.–SZERB LÁSZLÓ–RIDEG ANDRÁS [2020b]: A system dynamics approach for assessing SMEs’ competitiveness. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27. köt. 4. sz. 555–578. o. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-06-2019-0204
LAFUENTE, E.–VAILLANT, Y.–RABETINO, R. [2023]: Digital disruption of optimal co-innovation configurations. Technovation, 125. köt. 102772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102772
LEONIDOU, L. C.–CHRISTODOULIDES, P.–KYRGIDOU, L. P.–PALIHAWADANA, D. [2017]: Internal drivers and performance consequences of small firm green business strategy: The moderating role of external forces. Journal of Business Ethics, 140. köt. 585–606. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2670-9
LEVIE, J.–LICHTENSTEIN, B. B. [2010]: A terminal assessment of stages theory: Introducing a dynamic states approach to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34. köt. 2. sz. 317–350. o. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00377.x
LIU, H. M.–YANG, H. F. [2019]: Managing network resource and organizational capabilities to create competitive advantage for SMEs in a volatile environment. Journal of Small Business Management, 57. köt. 155–171. o. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12449
LUMPKIN, G. T.–DESS, G. G. [1996]: Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21. köt. 1. sz. 135–172. o. https://doi.org/10.2307/258632
MA, H.–LANG, C.–SUN, Q.–SINGH, D. [2021]: Capability development in startup and mature enterprises. Management Decision, 59. köt. 6. sz. 1442–1461. o. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2020-0313
MACPHERSON, I.–HOLT, R. [2007]: Knowledge, learning and small firm growth: A systematic review of the evidence. Research Policy, 36. köt. 2. sz. 172–192. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.10.001
MACPHERSON, A.–HERBANE, B.–JONES, O. [2015]: Developing dynamic capabilities through resource accretion: expanding the entrepreneurial solution space. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 27. köt. 5–6. sz. 259–291. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1038598
MANDVIWALLA, M.–FLANAGAN, R. [2021]: Small business digital transformation in the context of the pandemic. European Journal of Information Systems, 30. köt. 4. sz. 359–375. o. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1891004
MCKELVIE, A.–DAVIDSSON, P. [2009]: From resource base to dynamic capabilities: an investigation of new firms. British Journal of Management, 20. köt. 1. sz. 63–80. o. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00613.x
MEUER, J.–FISS, P. C. [2020]: Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Business and Management Research. Megjelent: Hitt, M. (szerk.): Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford University Press, New York, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.229
MILLER, D. [1983]: The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29. köt. 7. sz. 770–791. o. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
NASON, R. S.–WIKLUND, J. [2018]: An assessment of resource-based theorizing on firm growth and suggestions for the future. Journal of Management, 44. köt. 1. sz. 32–60. o. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315610635
OANA I.-E.–SCHNEIDER C. Q. [2021]: A Robustness Test Protocol for Applied QCA: Theory and R Software. Application Sociological Methods Research, 53. köt. 1. sz. 57–88. o. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241211036158
OANA I.-E.–SCHNEIDER C. Q.–THOMANN, E. [2021]: Qualitative comparative analysis using R: A Beginner’s guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
PALMER, C.–NIEMAND, T.–STÖCKMANN, C.–KRAUS, S.–KAILER, N. [2019]: The interplay of entrepreneurial orientation and psychological traits in explaining firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 94. köt. 183–194. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.005
PENROSE, E. [1959]: The theory of the growth of the firm. Blackwell, Oxford.
PRAHALAD, C. K.–HAMEL, G. [1990]: The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68. köt. 3. sz. 79–91. o.
PRIYONO, A.–HIDAYAT, A. [2022]: Dynamic capabilities for open innovation: A typology of pathways toward aligning resources, strategies and capabilities. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8. köt. 4. sz. 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040206
PULKA, B. M.–RAMLI, A.–MOHAMAD, A. [2021]: Entrepreneurial competencies, entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial network, government business support and SMEs performance. The moderating role of the external environment. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 28. köt. 4. sz. 586–618. o. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-12-2018-0390
RAGIN, C. C. [1987]: The Comparative Method. Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press. Berkeley, Los Angeles.
RAGIN, C. C. [2008]: Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
RAMPYAPEDI, K. P.–ADETUNJI, O. [2024]: Business size moderation and internal factors mediation impacts on SME business performance. The Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management, 16. köt. 1. sz. a958. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajesbm.v16i1.958
RIHOUX, B.–RAGIN, C. C. [2009]: Configurational Comparative Methods. Applied Social Research Method Series, 51. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
RUBINSON, C.–GERRITS, L.–RUTTEN, R.–GRECKHAMER, T. [2019]: Avoiding Common Errors in QCA: A Short Guide for New Practitioners. COMPASSS Working Papers, 1–6. o. https://compasss.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Common_Errors_in_QCA.pdf
RUNYAN, R. C.–HUDDLESTON, P.–SWINNEY, J. L. [2007]: A resource‐based view of the small firm: using a qualitative approach to uncover small firm resources. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 10. köt. 4. sz. 390–402. o. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750710819720
RUTTEN, R. [2020]: Applying and Assessing Large-N QCA: Causality and Robustness from a Critical Realist Perspective. Sociological Methods & Research, 51. köt. 3. sz. 1211-1243. o. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120914955
SADLER-SMITH, E.–HAMPSON, Y.–CHASTON, I.–BADGER, B. [2003]: Managerial behavior, entrepreneurial style, and small firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 41. köt. 1. sz. 47–67. o. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-627X.00066
SAHUT, J. M.–PERIS-ORTIZ, M. [2014]: Small business, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 42. köt. 663–668. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9521-9
SÁNCHEZ, J. [2012]: The influence of entrepreneurial competencies on small firm performance. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44. köt. 2. sz. 165–177. o.
SÁNTHA KÁLMÁN [2014]: Qualitative Comparative Analysis: módszertani lehetőség a pedagógiai vizsgálatok számára. Iskolakultúra, 24. köt. 6. sz. 3–16.
SÁNTHA KÁLMÁN [2020]: A kvalitatív összehasonlító elemzés történeti háttere. Polymatheia, 17. köt. 1–2. sz. 137–148. o.
SCARBOROUGH, N. M. [2012]: Effective Small Business Management: An Entrepreneurial Approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
SCHAPER, M.–VOLERY, T.–WEBER, P.–LEWIS, K. [2010]: Entrepreneurship and small business. John Wiley & Sons, Milton.
SCHNEIDER, C. Q.–WAGEMANN, C. [2012]: Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences. A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
SCHREYER, P. [2000]: High-growth firms and employment. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2000/03. OECD Publishing, Párizs, https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/861275538813
SHEPHERD, D. A.–WILLIAMS, T. A.–PATZELT, H. [2015]: Thinking about entrepreneurial decision making: Review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41. köt. 1. sz. 11–46. o. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314541153
SIRMON, D. G.–HITT, M. A.–IRELAND, R. D.–GILBERT, B. A. [2011]: Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37. köt. 5. sz. 1390–1412. o. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385695
SOININEN, J.–MARTIKAINEN, M.–PUUMALAINEN, K.–KYLÄHEIKO, K. [2012]: Entrepreneurial orientation: Growth and profitability of Finnish small-and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 140. köt. 2. sz. 614–621. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.029
STREET, C. T.–CAMERON, A. F. [2007]: External relationships and the small business: A review of small business alliance and network research. Journal of Small Business Management, 45. köt. 2. sz. 239–266. o. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2007.00211.x
SZERB LÁSZLÓ–CSAPI VIVIEN–DEUTSCH NIKOLETT–HORNYÁK MIKLÓS–HORVÁTH ÁDÁM–KRUZSLICZ FERENC–LÁNYI BEATRIX–MÁRKUS GÁBOR–RÁCZ GÁBOR–ISSPPAI GÁBOR–RIDEG ANDRÁS–SZŰCS P. KRISZTIÁN–ULBERT JÓZSEF [2014]: Mennyire versenyképesek a magyar kisvállalatok? A magyar kisvállalatok (MKKV szektor) versenyképességének egyéni-vállalati szintű mérése és komplex vizsgálata. Marketing és Menedzsment, 48. köt. Különszám, 3–21. o.
SZERB LÁSZLÓ–RIDEG ANDRÁS–KRUZSLICZ FERENC–MÁRKUS GÁBOR–LUKOVSZKI LÍVIA–KRABANTNÉ FEHÉR ZSÓFIA–HORNYÁK MIKLÓS–HORVÁTH KRISZTINA [2019]: Kompetencia-alapú versenyképesség-mérés és -elemzés a magyar kisvállalati (mKKV) szektorban. Regionális Innováció- és Vállalkozáskutatási Központ, Kutatási beszámoló. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29806.77124
TAN, D.–MAHONEY, J. T. [2005]: Examining the Penrose effect in an international business context: The dynamics of Japanese firm growth in US industries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26. köt. 2. sz. 113–127. o. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1212
TEECE, D. J. [2007]: Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28. köt. 13. sz. 1319–1350. o. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
TEECE, D. J. [2014]: The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28. köt. 4. sz. 328–352. o. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0116
TEECE, D. J.–PISANO, G.–SHUEN, A. [1997]: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18. köt. 7. sz. 509–533. o. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
VERMOESEN, V.–DELOOF, M.–LAVEREN, E. [2012]: Long-term debt maturity and financing constraints of SMEs during the global financial crisis. Small Business Economics, 41. köt. 2. sz. 433–448. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9435-y
WAGEMANN, C.–BUCHE, J.–SIEWERT, M. B. [2016]: QCA and business research: Work in progress or a consolidated agenda? Journal of Business Research, 69. köt. 7. sz. 2531–2540. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.010
WELBOURNE, T. M.–PARDO-dEL-VAL, M. [2009]: Relational capital: strategic advantage for small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) through negotiation and collaboration. Group Decision and Negotiation, 18. köt. 483–497. o. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9138-6
WERNERFELT, B. [1984]: A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5. köt. 2. sz. 171–180. o.
WIKLUND, J.–SHEPHERD, D. [2005]: Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20. köt. 1. sz. 71–91. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.001
WÓJCIK, P. [2015]: Exploring links between dynamic capabilities perspective and resource-based view: A literature overview. International Journal of Management and Economics, 45. köt. 1. sz. 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijme-2015-0017
ZAHRA, S. A.–PETRICEVIC, O.–LUO, Y. [2022]: Toward an action-based view of dynamic capabilities for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 53. köt. 4. sz. 583–600. o. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00487-2
ZOLLO, M.–WINTER, S. G. [2002]: Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13. köt. 3. sz. 339–351. o. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
