The first constitutional documents covering the principle of separation of powers in the historical process
Absztrakt
A jelen kutatás a hatalmi ágak szétválasztása elvének történelmi megjelenését és alkotmányosodását vizsgálja a legkorábbi olyan alkotmányos dokumentumok elemzésén keresztül, amelyekben ez az elv explicit vagy implicit módon megfogalmazódott. Az alkotmánytörténet kulcsfontosságú mérföldköveire összpontosítva a cikk először az angol tapasztalatokat értékelte az 1689-es Bill of Rights (Jogok Nyilatkozata) és az 1701-es Örökösödési Törvény értékelésével, amelyek korlátozták a monarchikus hatalmat, és lefektették a törvényhozási felsőbbrendűség valamint a bírói függetlenség alapjait. Ezt követően górcső alá került az amerikai alkotmányos hagyomány, kezdve az 1776-os Virginiai Jogok Nyilatkozatával és Virginia Alkotmányával, az Egyesült Államok 1787-es Alkotmányában csúcsosodva ki, ahol a törvényhozó, a végrehajtó és az igazságszolgáltatási hatalmi ágak szétválasztását szigorú fékek és ellensúlyok rendszerében intézményesítették. A tanulmány tovább vizsgálta a kérdés kontinentális európai dimenziót az 1789-es francia Emberi és Polgári Jogok Nyilatkozatának és az 1791-es francia Alkotmány elemzésével, amelyek explicit módon meghatározták a hatalmi ágak szétválasztását az alkotmányos létezés előfeltételeként. A Lengyel-Litván Köztársaság 1791-es Alkotmányát az egyik legkorábbi modern európai alkotmányként értékelte, amely megtestesíti ezt az elvet. Végül az 1814-es holland Alkotmány analízise során megállapította, hogy ez a korai alkotmányos monarchia maga is hozzájárult a hatalmi ágak szétválasztásának elterjedéséhez Európában. A kutatás bemutatta, hogy a hatalmi ágak szétválasztása különböző politikai kontextusokon keresztül a modern alkotmányosság alapelvévé fejlődött. A jelen tanulmány számos szerzői joggal védett mű felhasználásával készült, kvalitatív kutatási módszerrel, dokumentumelemzési technikával.
Hivatkozások
Falus O. (2014): Az iszlám alapítvány-a "waqf". Jogtörténeti Szemle, 16., (3.), pp. 1–7.
Falus O. (2011): Lepra: Stigma a XXI. században. Orvosi Hetilap, 152., (7.), pp. 246–251.
Falus O. (2015): Ispotályos keresztes lovagrendek az Árpádkori Magyarországon. Pécs: Publikon Kiadó.
Komlos J.–Falus O. (2023): Van-e jogunk stresszmentes élethez?: A stressz egyes gazdasági és jogelméleti aspektusairól. Civil Szemle, 20., (3.), pp. 145–156.
Jóźwiak, P.–Falus, O. (2022): Legal Regulations on Autonomous Vehicles in Poland and Hungary: The Issue of Criminal Liability In: Balázs L. –Rajcsányi-Molnár M. –András I. (Eds.): Elektromobilitás és társadalom. Dunaújváros: DUE Press, pp. 125–136.
Falus, O. (2020): The Legal Institutions of Charity in the Traditional Islamic Law. Sarajevo: Dobra knjiga.
Falus O.–Jóźwiak P.– Kővári A. (2022): “Gólyakalifa” a 21. században: Joghézag és analógia a virtuális valóság jogában. Jogelméleti Szemle, (2.), pp. 20–32.
Sosyal, M. (1979): The Meaning of the Constitution in 100 Questions. 5th Edition. Istanbul: Gerçek Publishing House Publications.
Parla, T. (1971): Constitutions in Türkiye. Istanbul: İletişim Publications.
Esen, B. N. (1979): Constitutional Law. Ankara: Resimli Posta Publications.
Tunç, B. (2020): The Place and Importance of the 1961 Constitution in The History of Turkish Constitution. Black Sea Studies, 17., (67.), pp. 657–692.
Çelik, İ. (2011): Separation of Powers: A Reduction and Transformation. Liberal Thought Journal, (64.), pp. 135–159.
Çelik, İ. (2011): Separation of Powers: A Reduction and Transformation. Liberal Thought Journal, (64.), pp. 135–159.
Değirmenci, R. (2023): Separation of Powers, Freedom And Judicial Power in Montesquieu's Thought. Akdeniz University Faculty of Law Journal, 13., (1.), pp. 239–257.
Karaağaç, Y. (2019): Socio-Economic Background of the Principles of Unity of Powers and Separation of Powers. Black Sea International Scientific Journal. (44.), pp. 76–83.
Urhan, V. (2016): Justice, Equality, Freedom in Political Philosophy. Anxiety. Bursa Uludağ University Faculty of Science and Literature Philosophy Journal, (26.), pp. 103–119.
Kalfa Ataay, C. (2016): Hayek and Friedman's Understanding of the State. Marmara University Journal of Political Sciences. 4., (1.), pp. 129–151.
Akgül, ME (2010): The Transformation of the Principle of Separation of Powers and its Meaning in Today's Democratic Regimes. Ankara Bar Association Journal, (4.), pp. 79–101.
Gözler, Kemal (2009): “How and Why Did Parliament Emerge in England? An Essay on the Antiquity of Financial Law over Constitutional Law”. A Gift Book for Prof. Dr. Mualla Öncel. Ankara University Faculty of Law Publications, (3.), pp. 365–374.
Doğan, K. C.– Şentürk, S. H. (2017): Budgetary Rights in the Era of Revolutions and The Development of Parliamentarism in the Seventeenth Century in England. Karadeniz Technical University Social Sciences Institute Social Sciences Journal, 7., (14.), pp. 353–373.
Erkul, İ. Ç. (2015): Analysis of the Process of Gaining Power of the British Parliament against Absolute Monarchy. Uludağ University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 34., (2.), pp. 131–151.
Sencer, M. (1987): "The American Revolution from a Human Rights Perspective”. Human Rights Yearbook, 35th Year. Ankara: T.O.A.I.E. Publication. (9.), pp. 3–21.
Şahingöz, A. (2022): Historical Development of Human Rights in Europe. EURO Politika, (17.), pp. 90–98.
Saçar, A. (2016): The Emergence of the Institution of Judicial Security. International Congress on the History of Turkish Law, May 13–14. Istanbul. pp. 535–557.
Dursun, H. (2009): Separation of Powers and Judicial Independence. TBB Journal, (80.), pp. 29–104.
Kama Işık, S. (2023): The British Constitutional System As a Sui Generis Example With Its Changing Aspects and the Future of the Unwritten Constitution. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University Faculty of Law Journal, 27., (2.), pp. 399–441.
Çoban Döşkaya, F. (2025): Background and Analysis of the American Declaration of Independence. Academic History and Thought Journal, 11., (6.), pp. 4727–4745.
Atçalı, A. (2022): Fundamental Rights and Freedoms in the United States Constitution. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). İzmir: Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Social Sciences.
Civelek, J. (2011): The 1789 French Declaration and the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Bulletin of International Law and Private International Law, 9., (1.), pp. 1–9.
Kaya, B. (2019): The Historical, Sociological, and Philosophical Background of the American Constitution as the First Constitution. Unpublished Master's Thesis. İstanbul: Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences.
Beyazıt, İ. H. (2013): On Defending Oneself in One's Native Language. Young Lawyers' Legal Readings and Accumulations -IV-. (Editor: Muharrem Balcı). Istanbul: Law Foundation Publications. pp. 137–148.
Kaya, E. (2022): On the Misconceptions of the Term "Separation of Powers". TYB Academy Journal of Language, Literature and Social Sciences. (35), pp.31- 57.
Vile, J. R. (2006): The Critical Role of Committees at the U.S. Constitutional Convention of 1787. American Journal of Legal History, 48., (2.), pp. 147–176. [33] Schlesinger Jr., A. M.(1987): The Constitution and Presidential Leadership. Maryland Law Review, 47., (1.), pp. 54–74.
Büke, A. (2016): The Effect of The Separation of Powers on the Activities Of Political Parties In The Parliamentary System. International Journal of Scientific Research (IBAD), 1., (2.), pp. 225–239.
Göksel, K., Tunç, A. (2022): Factors that Made the Presidential System Successful in the USA. Turkish Journal of Public Administration, 2., (2.), pp. 116–134.
Büke, A. (2016): The Effect of The Separation of Powers on the Activities Of Political Parties In The Parliamentary System. International Journal of Scientific Research (IBAD), 1., (2.), pp. 225–239.
Ünal Açıkgöz M.–Fendoğlu H. T.–Güller A. S. (2020): Regulatory Actions of the Presidency in the United States. Turkish Bar Association Journal, (149.), pp. 225–252.
Grabenwarter, C. (2011): Separation of Powers and the Independence of Constitutional Courts and Equivalent Bodies. 2nd Congress of the World Conference on Constitutional Justice. Rio de Janeiro.16 January 2011. pp. 1–11.
Albert, R. (2010): Presidential Values İn Parliamentary Democracies. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 8., (2.), pp. 207–236.
Civelek, J. (2011): The 1789 French Declaration and the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Bulletin of International Law and Private International Law, 9., (1.), pp. 1–9.
Büke, A. (2016): The Effect of The Separation of Powers on the Activities Of Political Parties In The Parliamentary System. International Journal of Scientific Research (IBAD), 1., (2.), pp. 225–239.
Arslan, A. (2018): The French Revolution and the 1789 French Declaration of the Rights of the Citizen and of Man. Law Readings for Young Lawyers, 4., (1.), pp. 9–27.
Yıldırım, Y. (2019): An Evaluation of Citizenship and Its Effects in the French Revolution. Trakya University Journal of Social Sciences, (21.), pp. 251–271.
Birinci, G. (2017): A Brief History of the Universal Declaration Of Human Rights I: From the League of Nations to the United Nations. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Journal of Social Sciences, 7., (2.), pp. 50–81.
Özer, M. A.–Iskandarov, S. (2022): Government Systems in the Context of Separation of Powers: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Economics, Business, Politics and International Relations, 8., (2.), pp. 300–332.
Durmuş, T. (1997): (Translated into Turkish by. (Author: Prof. Dr. Jacques SOUBEYROL) The Birth and Death of a Revolution: The Constitutions of 1791 and 8th Century. (Naissance et mort d’une révolution: Les constitutions de 1791 et l’an VIII). A Gift Book to Prof. Şükrü Postacıoğlu. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları, pp. 391-397.
Gören, Z. (2019): The Principle of Separation of Powers and the Government System Adopted with the 2017 Constitutional Amendment. İzmir Bar Association Journal, pp. 469–489.
Bocianowska, J. (2024): The Emergence of Legal Rights in Modern Europe… – the Example of Achievements of the French Revolution. Prawo i Więź, 2., (49.), pp. 395–408.
Gürcan, E. C. (2011): A Comparative Evaluation of the 1791 and 1793 French Constitutions. Gazi University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 13., (3.), pp. 183–214.
Uğur, Ö.–Doğan, K. C. (2017): Polish Public Administration In The European Union Harmonization Process: The Impact of Europeanization. ASSAM International Peer-Reviewed Journal, 4., (8.), pp. 30–50.
Demirci, H. A. (2017): The Effects of the 1921 Polish Constitution on the 1924 Turkish Constitution. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, (26.), pp. 1–11.
Demirci, H. A. (2017): The Effects of the 1921 Polish Constitution on the 1924 Turkish Constitution. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, (26.), pp. 1–11.
Çetinel Çaylı, M. –Kuruloğlu, F. (2025): A Comparison of the Constitutional Development Processes of Turkey and Poland in the Interwar Period (1919-1939). Istranca History Research Journal, 3., (1.), pp. 89–111.
Gates, D. (2002): The Napoleonic Wars 1803–1815. Lancashire: Pimlico Publications.
Ustabulut, B. (2024): Two Communities and Federalism: The Example of the Constitution Of The Kingdom Of Belgium. Ankara Social Sciences University Faculty of Law Journal, 6., (1.), pp. 302–358.
Groot, A. H. D. (1998): Islamic Studies in the Netherlands. Turkish Religious Affairs Foundation Islamic Encyclopedia. (18). Istanbul: TDV Turkish Religious Affairs Foundation ISAM Publications, pp. 229–232.
İmga, O. (2015): Religion-State Relations and the Separation of Church and State in The Netherlands. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, (29.), pp. 1–5.
Yazici, S. (2012): ”Fundamental Concepts of Constitutional Law”. Constitution I. (Editor: Bülent Yücel). Eskişehir: Anadolu University Publications.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


