A határokon átnyúló információcserét akadályozó és segítő tényezők
Absztrakt
A jelen tanulmány célja, hogy részletes betekintést nyújtson a nemzetközi rendészeti információcsere elméleteibe, és ezzel segítse a stratégiai szintű döntéshozókat abban, hogy hogyan javíthatják munkájukat és hatékonyságukat. A szerző ezt a célt a szervezeti együttműködés területének lényeges tudományos elméleteinek bemutatásával, valamint ezen ‘civil’ vélemények speciális rendészeti kontextusba történő átvételével igyekszik elérni. Az elméleti kiértékelés három fő környezetet azonosít, a szervezetit, a jogit és a technológiait (Yang and Maxwell, 2011), a rendészeti, határokon átnyúló információcsere segítő és hátráltató tényezőinek megtalálásához. A szervezeti környezeten belül a szerző megvizsgálja, hogy a bürokratikus szervezeti felépítés, a különféle szervezeti kultúrák, a bizalom, a kölcsönösség és a vezetőség hogyan befolyásolják az információ megosztásának folyamatát. Bemutatja az adott politikai környezet mellett a nemzeti és az EU jogalkotás hatásait. Ebben a részben vázolja továbbá a különféle adatvédelmi és magánéleti előírásokat, a harmonizált nemzeti szabályozások hiányának, és az eltérő politikai értelmezések következményeit is. Végezetül részletezi az akadályozó és támogató technológiai környezet jellemzőit. Itt vitatjuk meg az együttműködési képesség, a homogenitás témáit, valamint az Információs és Kommunikációs Technológia (ICT) állapotát és hatását a cserefolyamatra. A megállapításokra alapozva levonja a szükséges következtetéseket, és olyan ajánlásokat alakít ki, amelyek segítik az akadályok megszűntetését, és ezzel támogató szervezeti környezetet hoznak létre. A legfontosabb ajánlások: kerüljük a kényszerítő bürokráciát, támogassuk a transzformációs vezetői stílust és a közös szervezeti kultúrát, hozzunk létre egy egységes és összehangolt jogi hátteret a határokon átnyúló információcseréhez, alakítsunk ki egy információcserét segítő környezetet, és biztosítsuk az együttműködési készséget és a homogenitást.
Hivatkozások
Adams, B. - Flear, C. - Taylor, T. - Hall, C. - Karthaus, C. (2010): Review of Interorganizational Trust Models. Ft. Belvoir: Defense Technical Information Center
Adler, P. - Borys, B. (1996): Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 61-89. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393986
Akbulut, A. - Kelle, P. - Pawlowski, S. - Schneider, H. - Looney, C. (2009): To share or not to share? Examining the factors influencing local agency electronic information sharing. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 2, 143-172. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2009.022821
Arches, J. (1991): Social Structure, Burnout, and Job Satisfaction. Social Work, 3, 202-206. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/36.3.202
Argote, L. - Ingram, P. - Levine, J. - Moreland, R. (2000): Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Learning from the Experience of Others. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 1, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2883
Atabakhsh, H. - Larson, C. - Petersen, T. - Violette, C. - Chen, H. (2004): Information sharing and collaboration policies within Government Information Quarterly agencies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3073, Springer: Berlin and Heidelberg, 467−475. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25952-7_37
Axelrod, R. (1990): The Evolution of Cooperation. New York, Basic Books, 241.
Bayley, D.H. (1990): Patterns of Policing: A Comparative International Analysis. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press
Bock, G.W. - Zmud, R.W. - Kim, Y.G. - Lee, J.N. (2005): Behavioural Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly, 1, 87. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669
Bozeman, B. - Scott, P. (1996): Bureaucratic Red Tape and Formalization: Untangling Conceptual Knots. The American Review of Public Administration, 1, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409602600101
Brazelton, J. - Gorry, G.A. (2003): Creating a knowledge-sharing community: If you build it, will they come? Communications of the ACM, 2, 23-25. https://doi.org/10.1145/606272.606290
Bstieler, L. (2006): Trust formation in collaborative new product development. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1, 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00181.x
Busuioc, E. (2015): Friend or foe? Inter-agency cooperation, organizational reputation, and turf. Public Administration, 1, 40-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12160
Čater, B. (2008): The importance of social bonds for communication and trust in marketing relationships in professional services. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 1, 1-10.
Child, J. - Faulkner, D. - Tallman, S. (2005): Trust in cooperative strategies. In: Child, J. - Faulkner, D. - Tallman, S. (2005): Cooperative Strategy: Managing Alliances. Networks, and Joint Ventures, 2nd Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 50-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199266241.003.0004
Chau, M. - Zeng, D. – Atabakhsh, H. – Chen, H. (2001): Building an infrastructure for law enforcement information sharing and collaboration: Design issues and challenges. Proceedings of the National Conference on Digital Government Information Quarterly Research, Los Angeles CA
Chung-An, C. (2010): Teamwork and formal rules in public and private organizations: Evidence that formalization enhances teamwork. Public Management Research Conference: Research Directions for a Globalised Public Management, Hong Kong
Constant, D. - Kiesler, S. - Sproull, L. (1994): What’s Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing. Information Systems Research, 4, 400-421. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.5.4.400
Council of the European Union (2014): Draft SPOC Guidelines for international law enforcement information exchange 6721/3/14. Brussels
Creed, W. - Douglas, E. - Miles, R., (1996): Trust in organizations: A conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of, Controls. In: Kramer, R.M. - Tyler, T.R. (eds.): Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. California: Thousand Oaks, Sage Publication, 16-38. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243610.n2
Dawes, S. (1996): Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 3, 377-394. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199622)15:3<377::AID-PAM3>3.0.CO;2-F
De Hart-Davis, L. (2009): Green Tape and Public Employee Rule Abidance: Why Organizational Rule Attributes Matter. Public Administration Review, 5, 901-910. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02039.x
Deming, W. E. (1986): Out of the crisis. Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study
Denise, L. (2007): Collaboration vs. C-three (cooperation, coordination, and communication). The Rensselaerville Institute, 3.
Doherty, R. - Vandresse, B. - Kamarás É. - Siede, A. (2015): Deloitte Study on the implementation of the European Information Exchange Model (EIXM) for strengthening law enforcement cooperation, Final Report. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General Migration and Home Affairs
Duncan, W. - LaFrance, K. - Ginter, P. (2003): Leadership and Decision Making: A Retrospective Application and Assessment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 4, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190300900401
European Commission (2004): Enhancing police and customs co-operation in the European Union, COM (2004) 376 Final. Brussels
European Commission (2012): Strengthening Law Enforcement Cooperation in the EU: The European Information Exchange Model (EIXM), COM (2012)735 Final. Brussels
European Commission (2015): A European Agenda on Migration, Brussels, European Commission COM (2015) 240 Final. Brussels
Frontex (2018): European Border and Coast Guard Agency, Risk analysis for 2018. Warsaw, Frontex
Gil-Garcia, J. R. - Pardo, T. A. (2005): E-Government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 2, 187-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001
Gil-Garcia, J. R. - Schneider, C.A. - Pardo, T.A. - Cresswell, M.A. (2015): Interorganizational information integration in the criminal justice enterprise: Preliminary lessons from state and county initiatives. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-38), Hawaii. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.338
Goldenberg, I. – Dean, W. H. (2017): Enablers and Barriers to Information sharing in Military and Security Operations: Lessons Learned’ In: Goldenberg, I. - Soeters, J. - Dean, W. (eds.): Information sharing in military operations, Springer Cham, 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42819-2_16
Goldenberg, I. - Soeters, J. - Dean, W. (2017): Information sharing in military operations. Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42819-2
Gruszczak, A. (2016): Police and Customs Cooperation Centres and their Role in EU Internal Security. In: Bossong, R. - Carrapico, H. (eds.) (2016): EU Borders and Shifting Internal Security. Springer: Heidelberg, 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17560-7_9
Hartmut, A. (2001): Convergence of Policing Policies and Transnational Policing in Europe. European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 2, 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718170120519345
Hofstede, G. (1993): Coopération policière transfrontalière entre la Belgique, l’Allemagne et les Pays-Bas avec une attention particulière pour l’eurégion Meuse-Rhin. Maastricht: University Press Maastricht
Hufnagel, S. - McCartney, C. (2017): Trust in international police and justice cooperation. Hart Publishing Oxford. London: Portland
Hufnagel, S. (2016): Policing cooperation across borders. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315601069
Jarvenpaa. S.L. - Staples, D.S. (2001): Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1, 151−183. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045673
Jian, G. - Jeffres, L. W. (2006): Understanding employees’ willingness to contribute to shared electronic databases: A three-dimensional framework. Communication Research, 4, 242-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206289149
Kemeny, G. (2019): Fifteen minutes to decide. Master Thesis, Frontex
Kakabadse, A. (1986): Organizational Alienation and Job Climate: A Comparative Study of Structural Conditions and Psychological Adjustment. Small Group Behaviour, 4, 458-471. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649648601700406
Kim, S. - Lee, H. (2006): The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge-sharing capabilities. Public Administration Review, 3, 370−385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00595.x
Keohane, R.O. (1986): Reciprocity in International Relations. International Organization, 1, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300004458
Kolekofski, K.E. - Heminger, A.R., (2003): Beliefs and attitudes affecting intentions to share information in an organizational setting. Information Management, 6, 521-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00068-X
Koeszegi, S.T. (2004): Trust-building strategies in inter-organizational negotiations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 6, 640-660. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940410551534
Landsbergen, D. J. - Wolken, G. J. (2001): Realizing the promise: Government Information Quarterly information systems and the fourth generation of information technology. Public Administration Review, 2, 206-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00023
Lane, C. - Bachmann, R. (1996): The social constitution of trust: Supplier relations in Britain and Germany. Organization Studies, 3, 365-395. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069601700302
Lunenburg, F.C. (2012): Organizational structure: Mintzberg’s Framework. International Journal of Scholarly, Academic, Intellectual Diversity, 1, 1-8.
Marks, P. - Polak, P. - McCoy, S. - Galletta, D. (2008): Sharing knowledge. Communications of the ACM, 2, 60-65. https://doi.org/10.1145/1314215.1314226
Martin, M. (2017): Cooperation between Border Guards and customs. Master Thesis, Frontex
Mausolf, A. (2010): Keeping up appearances: Collaboration and coordination in the fight against Organized Crime and Terrorism. Master Thesis, University of Leiden.
Mintzberg, H. (1989): The Structuring of Organizations. In: Asch, D. - Bowman, C. (eds.) (1989): Readings in Strategic Management. London: Palgrave, 322-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_23
Rainey, H. G. (2009): Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.4050110432
Ranjay, G. - Wohlgezogen, F. - Zhelyazkov, P. (2012): The Two Facets of Collaboration: Cooperation and Coordination in Strategic Alliances. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 531–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2012.691646
Reagans, R. - McEvily, B. (2003): Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 240-267. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556658
Resteigne, D. - Van den Bogaert, S. (2017): Information sharing in Contemporary Operations: The Strength of SOF Ties. In: Goldenberg, I. - Soeters, J. - Dean, W.H. (eds.) (2017): Information Sharing in Military Operations. Springer Cham, 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42819-2_4
Rousseau, D.M. (1978): Characteristics of departments, positions and individuals: Context for attitudes and behaviour. Administrative Science Quarterly, 4, 521-540. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392578
Saloven, M. - Grant E. - Hanel, P. - Makai, V. - Brent, K. - Linas, H. - Pohnitzer, B.A. (2010): ICMPD Study on the status of information exchange amongst law enforcement authorities in the context of existing EU instruments. Vienna: ICMPD
Sardjoe, N. (2017): Understanding inter-organisational information sharing. Master thesis, Delft University of Technology
Sias, P. - Cahill, D. (1998): From co-workers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication, 3, 273-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319809374611
Soeters, J. (2017): Information Sharing in Military and Security Operations. In: Goldenberg I. - Soeters, J. - Dean, W.H. (eds.) (2017): Information Sharing in Military Operations. Springer Cham, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2018.1558055
Styczyńska, I. - Beaumont, K. (2017): Easing legal and administrative obstacles in EU border regions Case Study No. 8, Police cooperation Complexity of structures and rules on the border. Brussels: European Commission https://doi.org/10.2776/814404
Taylor, R. W. - Russell, A. L. (2011): The failure of police “Fusion’ Centers and the concept of a national intelligence sharing plan. Police Practice and Research, 2, 184-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2011.581448
Teboul, J. - Cole, T. (2005): Relationship Development and Workplace Integration: An Evolutionary Perspective. Communication Theory, 4, 389-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00341.x
Travica, B. (1998): Information aspects of new organizational designs: exploring the non-traditional organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 13, 1224-1244. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1998110)49:13<1224::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-V
Tsai, W. (2002): Social structure of ‘coopetition’ within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 2, 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536
Wheatley, M. J. (2006): Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers
Willem, A. - Buelens, M. (2007): Knowledge Sharing in Public Sector Organizations: The Effect of Organizational Characteristics on Interdepartmental Knowledge Sharing. Journal of Public Administration Research Theory, 4, 581-606. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul021
Wilson, D.T. (1995): An Integrated Model of Buyer–Seller Relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Greenvale, 4, 335-345. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300414
Wilson, J. (1989): Bureaucracy: What Government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Yang, T.M. - Maxwell, T.A. (2011): Information-sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors. Government Information Quarterly, 2, 164-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.008
Zhang, J. - Dawes, S.S. (2006): Expectations and perceptions of benefits, barriers, and success in public sector knowledge networks. Public Performance & Management Review, 4, 433−466.
Zhang, J. - Dawes, S.S. - Sarkis, J. (2005): Exploring stakeholders’ expectations of the benefits and barriers of e-Government knowledge sharing. The Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 5, 548−567. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390510624007
.png)
