Adaptation of land use based on the assessment of inundation risk in the Kapos Valley, Southwest Hungary

  • Péter Gyenizse Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8175-9734
  • Dénes Lóczy Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
  • József Dezső Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
  • Ervin Pirkhoffer Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2917-3290
  • Marcin Słowik Institute of Physical Geography and Environmental Planning, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poznań, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8376-3414
Keywords: floodplain rehabilitation, hydromorphology, paleochannels, peat bogs, Histosols, land use change, Kapos River

Abstract

Complex river rehabilitation/restoration projects devote equal attention to the improvement of hydromorphological conditions and the neighbouring floodplain environment. Since land use exerts a heavy control on the hydrological cycle of floodplains, land use optimization is a central task in floodplain rehabilitation. In floodplains where large surfaces are temporarily inundated, the optimal allocation of land use classes involves the preservation of wetlands, maintenance of grasslands (meadows and pastures) and forests, and the restriction of arable land to higher ground with the lowest inundation hazard. The detailed mapping of land use against the distribution of soil types and fluvial landforms provides a solid basis for land use optimization. Rehabilitation design is presented in the paper on the example of the Kapos Valley, where inundations in the wet year of 2010 caused great damage to agricultural crops and efforts are directed to better water management (excess water reduction and floodwater retention) on the floodplain. Land use conversions, which are less expensive and easier to implement, are preferred to structural (engineering) solutions.

References

APFM-WMO 2017. Selecting measures and designing strategies for integrated flood management. Associated Programme on Flood Management. Geneva, World Meteorological Organization.

Ball, T. 2008. Management approaches to floodplain restoration and stakeholder engagement in the UK: A survey. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology 8. (2): 273-280. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10104-009-0021-0

Bencze, G. 2000. Vízimunkálatok a Sió-Kapos-Sárvíz vízrendszerén a XVIII-XIX. században (Water management measures in the Sió-Kapos-Sárvíz river system in the 18-19th centuries). Honismeret 28. (2): 99-101. Available at http://epa.oszk.hu/03000/03018/00153/pdf/EPA03018_honismeret_2000_02_099-101.pdf

Bernhardt, E.S., Palmer, M.A., Allan, J.D., Alexander, G., Barnas, K., Brooks, S., Carr, J., Clayton, S.,

Dahm, C., Follstad-Shah, J., Galat, D., Gloss, S., Goodwin, P., Hart, D., Hassett, B., Jenkinson, R., Katz, S., Kondolf, G.M., Lake, P.S., Lave, R., Meyer, J.L., O'Donnell, T.K., Pagano, L., Powell, B. and Sudduth, E. 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308. (5722): 636-637.

Beszédes, J. and Herman, J. 1829. Kapos mocsárainak Plánuma… (Plan of swamps along the Kapos River…). Manuscript map. Kaposvár, Hungary, Somogy County Archive.

Bogárdi, J. 1971. Vízfolyások hordalékszállítása (Sediment transport of watercourses). Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó. (in Hungarian)

Bogárdi, I. and Balogh, E. 2014. Floodway system operation along levee-protected rivers. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 140. (8) https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000391

Bognár, Gy. (ed.) 1989. Vízfolyások környezetbe illő szabályozása (Stream regulation by setting in the environment). Budapest, VITUKI.

Bratrich, C., Truffer, B. and Wehrli, B. 2002. River restoration projects - understanding success and failure. Report to the NCEAS National River Restoration Synthesis (NRRS) working group meeting in 14 September 2002. 1-13.

Brierley, G.J., Fryirs, K.A., Outhet, D. and Massey, C. 2002. Application of the River Styles framework as a basis for river management in New South Wales, Australia. Applied Geography 22. 91-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-6228(01)00016-9

Brierley, G.J. and Fryirs, K.A. 2008. River futures. an integrative scientific approach to river repair. The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration Series. Washington, D.C., Island Press.

Brookes, A. 1996. Floodplain restoration and rehabilitation. In Floodplain Processes. Eds.: Anderson, M.G., Walling, D.E. and Bates, P.D., Chichester, John Wiley and Sons, 553-576.

Brookes, A. and Shields, F.D. Jr. (eds.) 1996. River Channel Restoration: Guiding Principles for Sustainable Projects. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.

Brooks, A.P. and Brierley, G.J. 2004. Framing realistic river rehabilitation targets in light of altered sediment supply and transport relationships: lessons from East Gibbsland, Australia. Geomorphology 58. (1-4): 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(03)00227-7

Buijse, A.D., Coops, H., Staras, M., Jans, L.H., van Geest, G.J., Grift, R.E., Ibelings, B.W., Oosterberg, W. and Roozen, F.C.J.M. 2002. Restoration strategies for river floodplains along large lowland rivers in Europe. Freshwater Biology 47. 889-907. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00915.x

Bullock, A. and Acreman, M.C. 2003. The role of wetlands in the hydrological cycle. Hydrology and Earth System Science 7. (3): 358-389. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-7-358-2003

Clarke, S.J., Bruce-Burgess, L. and Wharton, G. 2003. Linking form and function: towards an eco-hydromorphic approach to sustainable river restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 13. 439-450. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.591

Dezső, J., Lóczy, D., Salem, A.M. and Nagy, G. 2019. Floodplain connectivity. In The Drava River: Environmnetal Problems and Solutions. Ed.: Lóczy, D., Cham, Switzerland, Springer, 215-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92816-6_14

Didovets, I., Krysanova, V., Bürger, G., Snizhko, S., Balabukh, V. and Bronstert, A. 2019. Climate change impact on regional floods in the Carpathian region. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 22. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.01.002

Dostal, T., Valentová, J., Weyskrabova, L., Koudelka, P., David, V. and Valenta, P. 2012. Retention and flood control effects of floodplains. Proceedings, 9th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Vienna, 17-21 September 2012.

Downs, P. and Thorne, C.R. 2000. Rehabilitation of a lowland river: Reconciling flood defence with habitat diversity and geomorphological sustainability. Journal of Environmental Management 58. (4): 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2000.0327

Dömsödi, J. 1980. A hazai tőzeglápok (tőzegek) osztályozása (Classification of peat bogs in Hungary). Földrajzi Értesítő / Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 29. (3-4): 485-494. (in Hungarian with English summary)

Dömsödi, J. 2011. Földminősítés és földértékelés (Land assessment and evaluation). Budapest, Szent Gellért Kiadó. (in Hungarian with English summary)

Dworak, T. 2008. Flood risk management and floodplain restoration in Europe: recent policy developments at EU level. In Restoring Floodplains in Europe. Eds.: Moss, T. and Mondstadt, J., London, IWA Publishing, 47-60.

ECRR 2001. River restoration in Europe. Conference on River Restoration, Proceedings. Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment (RIZA), Riza report 2001.023. Lelystad,The Netherlands, RIZA.

Fehér, Z.Zs. and Rakonczai, J. 2019. Analysing the sensitivity of Hungarian landscapes based on climate change induced shallow groundwater fluctuation. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 68. (4): 355-372. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.68.4.3

Fennessy, M.S. and Cronk, J.K. 1997. The effectiveness and restoration potential of riparian ecotones for the management of nonpoint source pollution, particularly nitrate. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 27. 285-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389709388502

Fischer, K.J. 1994. Fluvial geomorphology and flood control strategies: Sacramento River, California. In The variability of large alluvial rivers. Eds.: Schumm, S.A. and Winkley, B.R., New York, ASCE Press, 115-139.

FISRW 1998. Stream Corridor Restoration - Principles, Practices and Processes. Subdocument 57.6/2:EN3/PT.653. Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group, Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Fryirs, K.A. and Brierley, G.J. 2016. Assessing the geomorphic recovery potential of rivers: forecasting future trajectories of adjustment for use in management. Water 3. (5): 727-748. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1158

Gallant, J.C. and Dowling, T.I. 2003. A multiresolution index of valley bottom flatness for mapping depositional areas. Water Resources Research 39. 1347-1353. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001426

Gergely, E., Géczi, Cs., Horváth, J., Jakab, A., Jónás, Gy.-né, Károlyi, Z.-né, Mattányi, Zs., Szalai, Z., Szabó, I. and Ress, S. 2000. Kapos folyóvölgy - Lehetőségterv (Kapos river valley - Feasibility plan). Budapest, Öko Zrt.

Guerrin, J. 2014. A floodplain restoration project on the River Rhône (France): analyzing challenges to its implementation. Regional Environmental Change 15. (3): 559-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0650-8

GWP-WMO 2012. Conservation and Restoration of Rivers and Floodplains. Associated Programme on Flood Management, Global Water Partnership, Stockholm. Integrated Flood Management Tool Series. Geneva, World Meteorological Organization. Available at https://www.floodmanagement.info/publications/tools/APFM_Tool_13.pdf

Hein, T., Schwarz, U., Habersack, H., Nichersu, I., Preiner, S., Willby, N. and Weigelhofer, G. 2016. Current status and restoration options for floodplains along the Danube River. Science of the Total Environment 543. (A): 778-790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.073

Hey, D.L. and Philippi, N.S. 1995. Flood reduction through wetland restoration: The Upper Mississippi River Basin as a case history. Restoration Ecology 3. (1): 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1995.tb00070.x

Hohausova, E. and Jurajda, P. 2005. Restoration of a river backwater and its influence on fish assemblage. Czech Journal of Animal Science 50. (10): 473-482. https://doi.org/10.17221/4244-CJAS

Holmes, N.T.H. 1998. Floodplain Restoration. In United Kingdom Floodplains. Eds.: Bailey, R.G., Jose, P.V. and Sherwood, B.R., Otley, UK, Westbury Publishing, 29-41.

Hulse, D. and Gregory, S. 2004. Integrating resilience into floodplain restoration. Urban Ecosystems 7. (3): 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:UECO.0000044041.94705.52

Kauffman, J.B. and Beschta, R.L. 1997. An ecological perspective of riparian and stream restoration in the Western United States. Fisheries 22. (3): 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1997)022<0012:AEPORA>2.0.CO;2

Kertész, Á. and Křeček, J. 2019. Landscape degradation in the world and in Hungary. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 68. (3): 201-221. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.68.3.1

Kiedrzyńska, E., Kiedrzyński, M. and Zalewski, M. 2015. Sustainable floodplain management for flood prevention and water quality improvement. Natural Hazards 76. 955-977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1529-1

Kline, M. 2007. River Corridor Planning Guide to Identify and Develop River Corridor Protection and Restoration Projects. Draft. Vermont River Management Program. Waterbury, VT, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources.

Klug, H. 2016. Bodenfunktionen und Hochwasserentstehung. In Der Wert des Bodens in der Wasser-wirtschaft. Vorstellung des ÖWAVArbeitsbehelfs 47 "Bodenfunktionen in der Wasserwirtschaft". Wien, Österreichischer Wasserund Abfallwirtschaftsverband (ÖWAV).

Kondolf, G.M. and Micheli, E.R. 1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environmental Management 19. (1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471999

Kronvang, B., Larsen, S.E., Jensen, J.P., Andersen, H.E., Lázár, A. and Féher, J. 2004. Catchment report: Kapos, Hungary. Trend analysis, retention and source apportionment. EUROHARP report 7-2004, NIVA report SNO 4790-2004. Oslo, Norway, EUROHARP-NIVA.

Larsen, E.W., Girvetz, E.H. and Fremier, A. 2006. Assessing the effects of alternative setback levee scenarios employing a river meander migration model. Environmental Management 37. (6): 880-897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0220-9

Lóczy, D. 2013. Hydromorphological-geoecological foundations of floodplain management: Case study from Hungary. Saarbrücken, Lambert Academic Publishing.

Lóczy, D., Pirkhoffer, E. and Gyenizse, P. 2012. Geomorphometric floodplain classification in a hill region of Hungary. Geomorphology 147-148. 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.06.040

Macdonald, K.B. and Weinmann, F. (eds.) 1997. Wetland and riparian restoration: Taking a broader view. Report EPA910-R-97-007. Seattle, WA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

McHarg, I. 1969. Design with Nature. Graden City, NY, Natural History Press. New edition: 1995. New York, John Wiley and Sons.

Maddock, I. 1999. The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluating river health. Freshwater Biology 41. 373-391. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00437.x

Manci, K.M. 1989. Riparian ecosystem creation and restoration: a literature summary. US Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 89. (20). Available at http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70122966

Moss, T. and Monstadt, J. (eds.) 2008. Restoring Floodplains in Europe. Policy Contexts and Project Experiences. London, IWA Publishing.

National Research Council 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog/1807.html

Newson, M.D. and Large, A.R.G. 2006. 'Natural' rivers, 'hydromorphological quality' and river restoration: a challenging new agenda for applied fluvial geomorphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 31. 1606-1624. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1430

Nunnally, N.R. 1978. Stream renovation: An alternative to channelization. Environmental Management 2. 403-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01872915

Opperman, J.J., Moyle, P.B., Larsen, E.W., Florsheim, J.L. and Manfree, A.D. 2017. Floodplains: Processes and Management for Ecosystem Services. Oakland, CA, University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520966321

ÖKO Rt., FÖMI and VÍZPART Kft. 2000. A magyarországi folyók töltésezett szakaszán kialakult hullámterek területhasználatának jellemzése (Description of land use in the active floodplains of channelized rivers in Hungary). Report. Budapest, Office for Nature Conservation, Ministry of Environment.

Pálfai, I. 2009. Inland flooding in Hungary. Riscuri şi catastrophe 8. (7): 193-201.

Petrasovits, I. and Balogh, J. 1975. Növénytermesztés és vízgazdálkodás (Crop cultivation and water management). Budapest, Mezőgazdasági Kiadó.

Petts, G.E., Möller, H. and Roux, A.L. (eds.) 1989. Historical Change of Large Alluvial Rivers: Western Europe. Chichester, John Wiley and Sons.

Piégay, H., Darby, S.E., Mosselman, E. and Surian, N. 2005. A review of techniques available for delimiting the erodible river corridor: a sustainable approach to managing bank erosion. River Research and Applications 21. (7): 773-789. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.881

Posthumus, H., Hewett, C.J.M., Morris, J. and Quinn, P.F. 2008. Agricultural land use and flood risk management: engaging with stakeholders in North Yorkshire. Agricultural Water Management 95. (7): 787-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.02.001

Rakonczai, J., Csató, Sz., Mucsi, L., Kovács, F. and Szatmári, J. 2003. Az 1999. és 2000. évi alföldi belvízelöntések kiértékelésének gyakorlati tapasztalatai (Experiences from the evaluation of the 1999 and 2000 excess water inundations in the Great Hungarian Plain). Vízügyi Közlemények, Special Issue 4. 317-336.

Rogger, M., Agnoletti, M., Alaoui, A., Bathurst, J.C., Bodner, G., Borga, M., Chaplot, V., Gallart, F., Glatzel, G., Hall, J., Holden, J., Holko, L., Horn, R., Kiss, A., Kohnová, S., Leitinger, G., Lennartz, B., Parajka, J., Perdigão, R., Peth, S., Plavcová, L., Quinton, J.N., Robinson, M., Salinas, J.L., Santoro, A., Szolgay, J., Tron, S., van den Akker, J.J.H., Viglione, A. and Blöschl, G. 2017. Land use change impacts on floods at the catchment scale: Challenges and opportunities for future research. Water Resources Research 53. WR020723. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020723

Rohde, S., Hostmann, M., Peter, A. and Ewald, K.C. 2006. Room for rivers: an integrative search strategy for floodplain restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning 78. 50-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.05.006

Roni, P. and Beechie, T. 2013. Stream and Watershed Restoration: A Guide to Restoring Riverine Processes and Habitats. New York, Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118406618

Roni, P., Hall, J.E., Drenner, S.M. and Arterburn, D. 2019. Monitoring the effectiveness of floodplain habitat restoration: A review of methods and recommendations for future monitoring. WIREsWater 6. (4): e1355. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1355

Schneider, E. 2010. Floodplain restoration of large European rivers, with examples from the Rhine and the Danube. In Restoration of Lakes, Streams, Floodplains, and Bogs in Europe. Wetlands: Ecology, Conservation and Management 3. Ed.: Eiseltová, M., Dordrecht, Springer, 185-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9265-6_11

Schwarz, U. 2013. Assessment of the Restoration Potential in the Transboundary UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Mura-Drava-Danube. Vienna, WWF Austria.

Sear, D. 1994. River restoration and geomorphology. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 4. 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3270040207

Słowik, M. 2013. Transformation of a lowland river from a meandering and multi-channel pattern into an artificial canal: retracing a path of river channel changes (the Middle Obra River, W-Poland). Regional Environmental Change 13. 1287-1299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0453-3

Słowik, M., Dezső, J., Kovác, J. and Gałka M. 2020. The formation of low-energy meanders in loess landscapes (Transdanubia, Central Europe). Global and Planetary Change 184. 103071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2019.103071

Smith, M.P., Schiff, R., Olivero, A. and MacBroom, J. 2008. The Active River Area: A Conservation Framework for Protecting Rivers and Streams. Boston, MA, The Nature Conservancy. Available at https://www.conservationgateway.org/Documents/ASFPM_TNC_Active_River_%20Area.pdf

Somlyódi, L. (ed.) 2011. Magyarország vízgazdálkodása: helyzetkép és stratégiai feladatok (Water management in Hungary: state of the art and strategic tasks). Budapest, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

Theiling, Ch. 1998. Floodplain geomorphology and river habitat. Chapter 4, River Restoration. Reston, VA, U.S. Geological Survey. Available at http://www.umesc.usgs.gov/documents/reports/1999/status_and_trends/99t001_ch04lr.pdf

Tockner, K., Schiemer, F., Baumgartner, C., Kum, G., Weigand, E., Zweimuller, I. and Ward, J.V. 1999. The Danube restoration project: species diversity patterns across connectivity gradients in the floodplain system. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 15. 245-258.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199901/06)15:1/3<245::AID-RRR540>3.0.CO;2-G

Tockner, K. and Stanford, J.A. 2002. Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends. Environmental Conservation 29. 308-330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689290200022X

U.S. Department of Commerce 1998. Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices. Springfield, VA, US Department of Commerce. Available at https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1044574.pdf

Verhoeven, J.T.A. and Setter, T.L. 2010. Agricultural use of wetlands: opportunities and limitations. Annals of Botany 105. 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp172

Wheaton, J.M., Fryirs, K.A., Brierley, G.J., Bangen, S.G., Bouwes, N. and O'Brien, G. 2015. Geomorphic mapping and taxonomy of fluvial landforms. Geomorphology 248. 273-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.07.010

Wheaton, J.M., Bennett, S.N., Bouwes, N., Camp, R., Maestas, J.D. and Shahverdian, S.M. 2019. Principles of low-tech process-based restoration. In Low-Tech Process-Based Restoration of Riverscapes: Design Manual. Eds.: Wheaton, J.M., Bennett, S.N., Bouwes, N., Maestas, J.D. and Shahverdian, S.M., Logan, UT, Utah State University Restoration Consortium, 1-31.

Wissmar, R.C. and Beschta, R.L. 1998. Restoration and management of riparian ecosystems a catchment perspective. Freshwater Biology 40. 571-585. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1998.00383.x

WWF 2004. Living with floods. Achieving ecologically sustainable flood management in Europe. Policy Briefing. Brussels, World-Wide Fund for Nature, European Policy Office. Available at https://wwf.panda.org/?13686/Living-with-floods-achieving-ecologically-sustainable-flood-management-in-Europe

WWF International 2010. Assessment of the restoration potential along the Danube and main tributaries. Working paper for the Danube River Basin. Final Draft. Vienna, World-Wide Fund for Nature. Available at http://assets.panda.org/downloads/wwf_restoration_potential_danube.pdf

Xie, H.L., Huang, Y.Q., Chen Q.R., Zhang, Y.W. and Wu, Q. 2019. Prospects for agricultural sustainable intensification: A review of research. Land 8. 157-184. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8110157

Zöckler, C. 2000. Wise Use of Floodplains - review of restoration projects in a number of European countries. WWF European Freshwater Programme. Cambridge, UK, WWF.

Published
2020-10-02
How to Cite
GyenizseP., LóczyD., DezsőJ., PirkhofferE., & SłowikM. (2020). Adaptation of land use based on the assessment of inundation risk in the Kapos Valley, Southwest Hungary. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 69(3), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.69.3.5
Section
Articles