The contribution of EU b-solutions initiative to foster soft and hard territorial governance and how to assess its main cross-border impacts in the EU cross-border regions

Eduardo Medeiros

doi:10.66479/abcd.22924

Eduardo Medeiros Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Instituto Universitário de Lisbo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8877-5606

DOI: https://doi.org/10.66479/abcd.22924

Absztrakt

The article examines how the b-solutions initiative contributes to the reinforcement of territorial governance in European cross-border regions. Territorial governance is defined through two distinct processes: hard governance, which involves formal laws, regulations, and strategic planning, and soft governance, which focuses on decision-making, participation, and administrative capacity building. As of mid-2024, 169 b-solution cases have been identified, primarily targeting thematic areas such as employment and education, institutional cooperation, and public services. The research concludes that the initiative has a positive impact on both governance types. Hard governance facilitates the amendment of national and regional legislation to mitigate legal-administrative barriers. Soft governance solidifies cross-border co-creation, multi-level engagement, and institutional trust. The paper further proposes a methodology for performing an effective Cross-Border Impact Assessment. Using the TARGET_TIA matrix, it suggests, evaluating project impacts across four main analytical domains: social, institutional, accessibility, and environmental. This structured approach allows policymakers to assess how effectively legal and administrative obstacles are being reduced through public investment.

Hivatkozások

Association of European Border Regions (AEBR) & European Commission (EC). (2020a). b-solutions: Solving Border Obstacles. A Compendium of 43 Cases. Publications Office of the European Union.

Association of European Border Regions (AEBR) & European Commission (EC). (2020b). Annex b-solutions: Solving Border Obstacles. A Compendium of 43 Cases. Publications Office of the European Union.

Association of European Border Regions (AEBR) & European Commission (EC). (2021). b-solutions: Solving Border Obstacles. A Compendium 2020-2021. Publications Office of the European Union.

Association of European Border Regions (AEBR) & European Commission (EC). (2024). b-solutions: Solving Border Obstacles. A Compendium 2022-2023. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Commission. (2001). European governance: A White Paper. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/doc_01_10

European Commission. (2013). EVALSED - The resource for the Evaluation for Socio-Economic Development. European Commission.

European Commission. (2017). COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions (COM(2017) 534 final). European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52017DC0534

ESPON. (2018). COMPASS – Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe Applied Research 2016-2018. Final Report, ESPON.

Goodwin, M. (2009). Governance. In N. Thrift, & R. Kitchin (Ed.), International Encyclopaedia of Human Geography, Volume 4 (pp. 593–599). Elsevier.

Hufty, M. (2011). Governance: Exploring Four Approaches and Their Relevance to Research. In U. Wiesmann, & H.

Hurni, (Ed.), Research for Sustainable Development: Foundations, experiences and perspectives (pp. 165– 183). Geographica Bernensia.

Cheema, G. S., & Rondinelli, A. D. (ed.) (2007). Decentralizing Governance: Emerging Concepts and Practices. Brookings Institution Press.

Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2007). Governance Indicators: Where Are We, Where Should We Be Going? Policy Research Working Paper No. 4370. World Bank.

Lawn, M. (2006). Soft governance and the learning spaces of Europe. Comparative European Politics, 4(2), 272–288.

Mallin, C.(2013). Corporate Governance. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110081

Marginson, P., & Keune, M. (2015). European social dialogue as multi-level governance: Towards more autonomy and new dependencies. In J. Barbier, R. Rogowski, & F. Colomb (Ed.), The Sustainability of the European Social Model (pp. 79–102). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Medeiros, E. (2015). Territorial Impact Assessment and Cross-Border Cooperation. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2014.999108

Medeiros E. (ed.) (2020). Territorial Impact Assessment. Springer.

Medeiros. E., Guillermo-Ramirez, M., Brustia, G., Dellagiacoma, C. A, & Mullan, A. C. (2023). Reducing border barriers for cross-border commuters in Europe via the EU b-solutions initiative. European Planning Studies, 31(4), 822– 841. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2093606

Medeiros, E., Trillo-Santamaría, J-M., & Guillermo-Ramírez, M. (2024). Cross-Border Institutional Trust in Post-Pandemic Times. The Role of EU b-solutions Initiative. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2024.2352431

Oberthür, S. (2019). Hard or soft governance? The EU’s climate and energy policy framework for 2030. Politics and Governance, 7(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i1.1796

Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2004). The Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. A Quest for Control. Routledge.

Polverari, L., Domorenok, E., & Graziano, P. (2024). Empowerment via delegation? The administrative capacity-building potential of Cohesion Policy urban development strategies. Regional Studies, 58(4), 733–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2058698

Potluka, O., & Medeiros, E. (2024). Administrative and organizational capacities of civil society in EU Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 58(4), 745–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1986626

Rose, R., & Peiffer, C. (2019). Political Corruption and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan.

Schmitter, P. (1997). Defining, explaining, and using the concept of governance. Stanford University.

Surubaru, N. C. (2017). Administrative capacity or quality of political governance? EU Cohesion Policy in the new Europe, 2007–13.RegionalStudies, 51(6), 844–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1246798

Trubek, D., Cottrell, M., & Nance, M. (2005). ‘Soft Law,’ ‘Hard Law,’ and European Integration: Toward a Theory of Hybridity. University of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1002.

UN-ESCAP. What is Good Governance? https://www.gdrc.org/u-gov/escap-governance.htm

United Nations. (2007). Good governance practices for the protection of human rights. United Nations.

Unfried, M., Kortese, L., & Bollen- Vandenboorn, A. (2020). The Bottom- Up Approach: Experiences with the Impact Assessment of EU and National Legislation in the German, Dutch and Belgian Cross-Border Regions. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), Territorial Impact Assessment (pp. 103–121). Springer.