Planning Cultural Exchange Across Borders
First Steps Towards a Common Comprehension of Planning Paradigms in the Greater Region?
Abstract
Cross-border spatial development poses distinct challenges where differing planning cultures and paradigms meet at national borders, a reality that is particularly evident in the Greater Region. We present an innovative, intercultural planning game developed by the UniGR-CBS Spatial Planning Working Group, which serves as a science-policy interface with a dual purpose: it functions as a data collection methodology drawing on discourse analysis of stakeholder reasoning, and as a training format for spatial planners in cross-border contexts. The results highlight planning cultural differences and similarities as expressed by French, Walloon, German and Luxembourgish participants. These observations are followed by a reflection on the strengths and weaknesses of the planning game methodology, considering both its capacity to generate evidence on planning paradigms and its potential as a continuing professional development tool. Together, these two dimensions point toward the broader argument that sustained intercultural exchange and mutual understanding are not only academically valuable but politically necessary especially when the foundation of cross-border cooperation in spatial planning is being challenged.
References
Albrechts, L. (2006). Shifts in Strategic Spatial Planning? Some Evidence from Europe and Australia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(6), 1149–1170. https://doi.org/10.1068/a373
Babalk, E., Frank, A. I., & Sykes, O. (2026). International Comparative Planning: Key Findings and Future Agendas. In E. Babalık, A. I. Frank, & O. Sykes (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Comparative International Planning (pp. 487–501). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003299004-44
Barton, H., & Grant, M. (2006). A health map for the local human habitat. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 126(6), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466424006070466
Braunerhielm, L., Alfredsson Olsson, E., & Medeiros, E. (2019). The importance of Swedish–Norwegian border residents’ perspectives for bottom-up cross-border planning strategies. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 73(2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2019.1598485
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. UN-Document A/42/427. http://www.un-documents.net/ocf-ov.htm
Caesar, B., Funk, I., Lenz, J., Mangels, K., & Pallagst, K. (2025). Die Bedeutung der Daseinsvorsorge in der grenzüberschreitenden Raumentwicklung. In P. Ulrich, N. Cyrus, & J. Jańczak (Eds.), Grenzüberschreitende Daseinsvorsorge. Räume – Grenzen – Hybriditäten (pp. 69–103). Springer VS. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-46396-0_4
Caesar, B., & Evrard, E. (2020). Planungskulturelle Vielfalt in Grenzräumen - Theoretische und methodische Ansätze zur grenzüberschreitenden Raumplanung. In F. Weber, C. Wille, B. Caesar, & J. Hollstegge (Eds.), Geographien der Grenzen. Räume – Ordnungen – Verflechtungen. (Räume – Grenzen – Hybriditäten) (pp. 95–116). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30950-3_5
Cerić, D. (2023). Obstacles to cross-border tourism cooperation across the Baltic Sea as seen by Interreg stakeholders. Geografický časopis, 75(4), 317–339. https://doi.org/10.31577/geogrcas.2023.75.4.16
Chandy, J. (2023). A Speculative Exploration into the Current Planning Paradigm and Discourse on Planning Education. University of Waterloo. https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/items/81964593-87bb-4fe4-8d0e-23455019156c
European Commission (EC). (1997). The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L. J., Quinlan, A. E., Peterson, G. D., Wilkinson, C., Fünfgeld, H., McEvoy, D., & Porter, L. (2012). Resilience: a bridging concept or a dead end? “Reframing” resilience: challenges for planning theory and practice interacting traps: resilience assessment of a pasture management system in Northern Afghanistan urban resilience: what does it mean in planning practice? Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? The politics of resilience for planning: a cautionary note. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
Decoville, A., & Durand, F. (2017). Challenges and obstacles in the production of cross-border territorial strategies: the example of the greater region. Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning, 1(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.24306/TrAESOP.2017.01.005
Decoville, A., & Durand, F. (2021). An empirical approach to cross-border spatial planning initiatives in Europe. Regional Studies, 55(8), 1417–1428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1902492
Durand, F., & Decoville, A. (2018). Establishing Cross-Border Spatial Planning. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), European Territorial Cooperation - Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to the Process and Impacts of Cross-Border and Transnational Cooperation in Europe (pp. 229–244). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_12
Fainstein, S. (2010). The Just City. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801460487
Farinós Dasí, J., González, J. R., Milder, J., Payà, M., Davoudi, S., Evans, N., Cotella, G., Janin Rivolin, U., Servillo, L., Borrelli, N., Governa, F., Santangelo, M., Dematteis, G., Dispenza, R., Rossignolo, C., Toldo, A., Ache, P.,Peters, S., Hill A., Hoeweler, M., Heilmann, N., Zimmermann, F., Osebik, J., Osebik, D., Jørgensen, J., Damsgaard, O., Ikonen, R., Pettersson, Å., Ruotsalainen, A., Lähteenmäki-Smith, K., Sukeviciute, R., Valeviciene, N., Moxnes Steineke, J., Dahlström, M., Bjarnadóttir, H., Asprogerakas, E., Gianniris, E., Pagonis, A., Petropoulou, C., Wassenhoven, L., Sapountzaki, K., Lagendijk, A., Hendrikx, B., Biot, V., Bonerandi, E., & F. Santamaria (2007). Governance of territorial and urban policies from EU to local level. ESPON Project 2.3.2 Final Report - Part I. European Observation Network for Territorial Development and Cohesion. ESPON.
Healey, P. (1997). Traditions of planning thought. Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Macmillan Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2
Hein, C. (ed.) (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Planning History. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315718996
Innes, J. E. (1995). Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of planning education and research, 14(3), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9501400307
Jacobs, J. (2016). Spatial planning in cross-border regions: A systems-theoretical perspective. Planning Theory, 15(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214547149
Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R., Sharifi, A., & Sadeghi, A. (2023). The 15-minute city: Urban planning and design efforts toward creating sustainable neighborhoods. Cities, 132, 104101, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104101
Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2009). Spatial Planning and Culture – Symbiosis for a better Understanding of Cultural Differences in Planning Systems, Traditions and Practices. In J. Knieling, & F. Othengrafen (Eds.), Planning Cultures in Europe. Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning (pp. 23–35). Ashgate.
Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2015). Planning Culture - A Concept to Explain the Evolution of Planning Policies and Processes in Europe? European Planning Studies, 23(11), 2133–2147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1018404
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The Science of "Muddling Through". Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677
Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the "15-Minute City": Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities. Smart Cities, 4(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010006
Newman, P., & Thornley, A. (2005). Urban Planning in Europe: International Competition, National Systems and Planning Projects. Routledge.
Nienaber, B. (2018). Grenzen als überwindbares Phänomen in der Raumplanung? In M. Heintel, R. Musil, & N. Weixlbaumer (Eds.), Grenzen, Theoretische, konzeptionelle und praxisbezogene Fragestellungen zu Grenzen und deren Überschneidungen (pp. 161–179). Springer.
Pallagst, K. (2018). Planungssysteme. In Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (Ed.), Handwörterbuch der Stadt‐ und Raumentwicklung (pp.1761–1770).
Pallagst, K. (2020). Cultures d’aménagement et villes en décroissance: Vers des recherches appliqués dans les régions transfrontalières. In G. Hamez, & J.-M. Defays (Eds.), Réalités, perceptions et représentations des frontières l’espace transfrontalier de la Grande Région Sare-Lor-Lux (pp. 183–198). EME Éditions.
Pallagst, K. (2024). Planungssysteme und Planungskulturen im Grenzraum. In C. Gohde, & C. Mayer (Eds.), Planung - Umwelt – Recht: Festschrift für Willy Spannowsky zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 71–84). C.H. Beck.
Pallagst, K., Fleschurz, R., Nothof, S., & Uemura, T. (2021). Shrinking cities - implications for planning cultures? Urban Studies, 58(1), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019885549
Ricq, C. (2006). Handbook on transfrontier co-operation for local and regional authorities in Europe. Council of Europe.
Rouchet, H. (2025). Formation des futurs aménageurs et relations praticiens – mandataires publics : conception et implémentation d’un module de formation. ORBi-University of Liège. https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/337567
Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. SAGE.
Stead, D. (2026). Planning Systems Compared: A reflection on the state of art. In E. Babalik, A. I. Frank, & O. Sykes (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Comparative International Planning (pp. 143–155). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003299004-15
Terlouw, K. (2012). Border Surfers and Euroregions: Unplanned Cross-Border Behaviour and Planned Territorial Structures of Cross-Border Governance. Planning Practice and Research, 27(3), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.670939
Turowski, G. (2005). Raumplanung. In Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (Ed.), Handbuch der Raumordnung und Landesplanung (pp. 893–898). Selbstverlag der ARL.
Copyright (c) 2026 Beate Caesar, Tom Becker, Leah Honecker, Karina Pallagst, Jonas Pauly, Hélène Rouchet
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
