Attitudes of local people towards Apuseni Nature Park, Romania

  • Zoltán Imecs Department of Geography in Hungarian Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • András Máthé Department of Geography in Hungarian, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • Balázs Kohán Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Science, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
Keywords: nature park, local people, questionnaire, karst, geotourism, protected areas

Abstract

Nature parks are protected natural areas whose purposes are the protection and conservation of landscapes in which the interaction of human activities with nature over time has created a distinct area, with significant landscape and/or cultural value, often with great biological diversity. This is the case of Apuseni Nature Park, which includes a significant karst terrain and is a very important tourist destination. In this article, we examine the attitude of local people towards the protected area with the help of a questionnaire composed of 32 questions. After the general questions, the economic situation was examined first. Then the respondents had to evaluate the values and the difficulties of their region and their relation to tourism. The answers reveal that they are aware of the importance of tourism, which may represent a serious complementary income for them. The most intriguing questions were some open-ended questions, which focused on the relationship of locals to Apuseni Nature Park. Based on the answers, we can conclude that the negative opinions slightly dominate. The dissatisfaction of the locals, the feeling of limitations due to the park are expressed in many different ways. But probably the most relevant problems can be linked to the rules and laws. As it is a nature park, people in fact, live inside the park, thus, the equilibrium between their lives and the purposes of the park should be approached. The administration of the nature park should involve local people more closely in decision-making, and maybe certain rules should be changed.

References

Badea, L. 1983. Geografia României, Vol. I. Geografia Fizică (Geography of Romania, Vol. I. Phisical Geography). București, Editura Academiei RSR.

Băltăreţu, A. and Busuioc, M. 2009. The management of the natural protected areas at a national level. Romanian Economic and Business Review 4. (2): 101-111.

Bleahu, M. 2019. Ariile Protejate și Protecția Naturii (Protected areas and conservation of nature). București, Paideia.

Beresford, M. and Phillips, A. 2000. Protected landscapes: A conservation model for the 21st century. George Wright Forum 17. (1): 15-26.

Božić, S. and Tomić, N. 2015. Canyons and gorges as potential geotourism destinations in Serbia: comparative analysis from two perspectives - general 'geotourists' and 'pure geotourists'. Open Geosciences 7. (1): 531-546. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2015-0040

Brankov, J., Micić, J., Ćalić, J., Kovačević-Majkić, J., Milanović, R. and Telbisz, T. 2022. Stakeholders' attitudes toward protected areas: The case of Tara National Park (Serbia). Land 11. (4): 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11040468

Cigna, A.A. and Forti, P. 2013. Caves: the most important geotouristic feature in the world. Tourism and Karst Areas 6. (1): 9-26.

CORINE Land Cover database, 2022. Available from https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover

Cucu, V. 1984. Geografia României, Vol. II. Geografia Umană și economică (Geography of Romania, Vol. II. Human and Economic Geography). București, Editura Academiei RSR.

Day, M. 2010. Human interaction with Caribbean karst landscapes: Past, present and future. Acta Carsologica 39. (1): 137-146. https://doi.org/10.3986/ac.v39i1.119

Dollma, M. 2018. Canyons of Albania and geotourism development. Acta Geoturistica 9. (2): 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1515/agta-2018-0008

Dowling, R.K. 2011. Geotourism's global growth. Geoheritage 3. (1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0024-7

Dudley, N., Parrish, J.D., Redford, K.H. and Stolton, S. 2010. The revised IUCN protected area management categories: the debate and ways forward. Oryx 44. (4): 485-490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605310000566

Gordon, J.E., Crofts, R., Díaz-Martínez, E. and Woo, K.S. 2018. Enhancing the role of geoconservation in protected area management and nature conservation. Geoheritage 10. (2): 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0240-5

GEO, 2007. Government Emergency Ordinance No. 57/2007 on the regime of protected natural areas, conservation of natural habitats, wild flora and fauna (20th June 2007, published in Official Monitor nr. 442 from 29th June 2007). Available at http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/83289 (in Romanian)

Hall, D. and Richards, G. 2000. Tourism and Sustainable Community Development. 1st Edition. London, Routledge.

Hayes, T.M. 2006. Parks, people, and forest protection: An institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Development 34. (12): 2064-2075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.03.002

Horváth, Gy. 2006. Északnyugat-Erdély. A Kárpátmedence Régiói 4. (Northwestern Transylvania. Regions of the Carpathian Basin 4.) Pécs-Budapest, Dialóg Campus Kiadó.

Hose, T.A. 2008. Towards a history of geotourism: definitions, antecedents and the future. Geological Society Special Publications 300. (1): 37-60. London. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP300.5

IUCN, 2022. Protected Areas. Category V. Protected Landscape. Gland, Switzerland, IUCN. Available at https://www.iucn.org/theme/protected-areas/about/protected-areas-categories/category-ii-national-park

Jakab, G., Pál, I., Silye, L., Sümegi, P., Tóth, A., Sümegi, B., Frink, J.P., Magyari, E.K., Kern, Z. and Benkő, E. 2021. Social context of late medieval and early modern deforestation periods in the Apuseni Mountains (Romania) based on an integrated evaluation of historical and paleobotanical records. Environmental Archaeology. Taylor and Francis online publications, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14614103.2021.1942744

Jamal, T. and Stronza, A. 2009. Collaboration theory and tourism practice in protected areas: stakeholders, structuring and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 17. (2): 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802495741

Krpina, V. 2015. Analysis of the relation between visitors and protected natural areas in the Zadar County. Šumarski list 139. (11-12): 535-551.

Karst and National Parks 2022. Budapest, ELTE Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem. Online project content description. Available at https://karst.elte.hu/knp/

Mallarach, J.M., Morrison, J., Kothari, A., Sarmiento, F., Atauri, J.A. and Wishitemi, B. 2008. In defence of protected landscapes: a reply to some criticisms of category V protected areas and suggestions for improvement. In Defining Protected Areas: An International Conference in Almeria, Spain. Eds.: Dudley, N. and Stolton, S., Gland, Switzerland, IUCN, 31-37.

Mari, L., Tábori, Zs., Šulc, I., Radeljak Kaufmann, P., Milanović, R., Gessert, A., Imecs, Z., Baricz, A. and Telbisz, T. 2022. The system and spatial distribution of protected areas in Hungary, Slovakia, Romania, Serbia and Croatia. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 71. (2): 99-115.

Mika, M., Zawilińska, B. and Kubal-Czerwińska, M. 2019. Exploring the determinants of local people's attitude towards national parks in Poland. Folia Geographica 61. (1): 5-16.

Mose, I. 2007. Google-Books-ID: fl3dR_WiuKwC. Protected Areas and Regional Development in Europe: Towards a New Model for the 21st Century. Aldershot, Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

Nestorová Dická, J., Gessert, A., Bryndzová, L. and Telbisz, T. 2020. Behavioural survey of local inhabitants' views and attitudes about Slovak Karst National Park in Slovakia. Sustainability 12. (23): 10029. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310029

Nolte, B. 2004. Sustainable tourism in biosphere reserves of East Central European countries. Case studies from Slovakia, Hungary and the Czech Republic. Policies, Methods and Tools for Visitor Management.MMV2 Proceedings, 349-356.

Orășeanu, I. 2016. Hidrogeologia Carstului din Munții Apuseni (Hydrogeology of karsts in Apuseni Mountains). Oradea, Belvedere.

Papageorgiou, K. and Kassioumis, K. 2005. The national park policy context in Greece: Park users' perspectives of issues in park administration. Journal for Nature Conservation 13. (4): 231-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2004.11.001

Puhakka, R., Sarkki, S., Cottrell, S.P. and Siikamäki, P. 2009. Local discourses and international initiatives: sociocultural sustainability of tourism in Oulanka National Park, Finland. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 17. (5): 529-549. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802713457

Ruban, D. 2018. Karst as important resource for geopark-based tourism: Current state and biases. Resources 7. (4): 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7040082

Ravbar, N. 2004. Drinking water supply from karst water resources (The example of the Kras Plateau, SW Slovenia). Acta Carsologica 33. (1): 73-84. https://doi.org/10.3986/ac.v33i1.316

Šulc, I. and Valjak, V. 2012. Zaštićena područja u funkciji održivog razvoja hrvatskog otočja - primjer otoka Mljeta (Protected areas as a factor of sustainable development of the Croatian island - the example of Mljet island). Croatian Geographical Bulletin 74. (1): 161-185. https://doi.org/10.21861/HGG.2012.74.01.09

Telbisz, T., Imecs, Z., Mari, L. and Bottlik, Zs. 2016. Changing human-environment interactions in medium mountains: the Apuseni Mts (Romania) as a case study. Journal of Mountain Science 13. (9): 1675-1687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3653-0

Telbisz, T., Mari, L., Gruber, P., Kőszegi, M., Bottlik, Zs. and Standovár, T. 2018. Képes-e egy nemzeti park a regionális fejlődést előmozdítani? - Az Aggteleki Nemzeti Park speciális esete (Can a national park improve regional development? - The special case of Aggtelek National Park). In Földrajzi Tanulmányok 2018. Eds.: Fazekas, I., Kiss, E. and Lázár, I., Debrecen, Debreceni Egyetem, 251-254.

Telbisz, T., Gruber, P., Mari, L., Kőszegi, M., Bottlik, Zs. and Standovár, T. 2020. Geological heritage, geotourism and local development in Aggtelek National Park (NE Hungary). Geoheritage 12. (1): 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00438-7

Telbisz, T., Ćalić, J., Kovačević-Majkić, J., Milanović, R., Brankov, J. and Micić, J. 2021. Karst geoheritage of Tara National Park (Serbia) and its geotouristic potential. Geoheritage 13. (4): 88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00612-5

Telbisz, T. and Mari, L. 2020. The significance of karst areas in European national parks and geoparks. Open Geosciences 12. (1): 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2020-0008

Tempo online, 2022. INSSE tables, București, Institutul Naţional de Statistică. Available at http://statistici.insse.ro:8077/tempo-online/#/pages/tables/insse-table

Tosun, C. 2006. Expected nature of community participation in tourism development. Tourism Management 27. (3): 493-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.12.004

Trakolis, D. 2001. Perceptions, preferences and reactions of local inhabitants in Vikos-Aoos National Park, Greece. Environmental Management 28. (5): 665-676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010251

Williams, P.W. and Fennell, D.A. 2002. Creating a sustainable equilibrium between mountain communities and tourism development. Tourism Recreation Research 27. (3): 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2002.11081369

Zawilińska, B. 2020. Residents' attitudes towards a national park under conditions of suburbanisation and tourism pressure: A case study of Ojców National Park (Poland). European Countryside 12. (1): 119-137. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2020-0007

Zgłobicki, W. and Baran-Zgłobicka, B. 2013. Geomorphological heritage as a tourist attraction. A case study in Lubelskie Province, SE Poland. Geoheritage 5. (2): 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-013-0076-6

Zurc, J. and Udovč, A. 2009. Local inhabitants' opinion about the triglav national park management. Sociologija i proctor / Sociology & Space 47. 43-56.

Published
2022-06-30
How to Cite
ImecsZ., MáthéA., & KohánB. (2022). Attitudes of local people towards Apuseni Nature Park, Romania. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 71(2), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.71.2.3
Section
Benefits, challenges and opportunities of karst national parks